m ake a m erica g reat lo ng r un im p a cts o f s h o rt
play

M ake A m erica G reat: Lo ng-R un Im p a cts o f S h o rt-R u n P - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M ake A m erica G reat: Lo ng-R un Im p a cts o f S h o rt-R u n P u b lic Investm e nt A le x a n d r K o p y to v and H a o tia n X ia n g The Wharton School M a y 9, 2018 A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G


  1. M ake A m erica G reat: Lo ng-R un Im p a cts o f S h o rt-R u n P u b lic Investm e nt A le x a n d r K o p y to v and H a o tia n X ia n g The Wharton School M a y 9, 2018 A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s t m e n t 1 / 2 9

  2. D o n a ld J . T ru m p O £ + F o llo w @realDonaldTrump T h e ro a d s a n d s id e w a lk s , a irp o rts a n d b rid g e s , a re p e rfe c t in D u b a i. E v e ry th in g lo o k s c le a n & s tro n g . In U .S ., e v e ry th in g is fa llin g a p a rt! RETWEETS LIKES 71 ־ g£Q-. - ,.* n [־=־, r־» V I * i i B £. X ¥ \\ 3 257 258 A 1 7:33 AM -1 9 May 2014 134 257 V 258 H illa ry C lin to n O E 3 ±* F o llo w v @HillaryClinton In v e s tin g in o u r in fra s tru c tu re is a b o u t m o re th a n c re a tin g g o o d jo b s : it's a b o u t m a in ta in in g o u r s ta tu s a s th e w o r ld ’s e c o n o m ic s u p e rp o w e r. RETWEETS LIKES r 4 ־ k. t v ~ ■OB ■ ■ i 598 1,335 7:06 PM -3 0 Nov 2015 ♦ » 184 598 V 1.3K < □ ► 4 i f ► 4 0 ^ 0־ =51■ ► 5 » ► ן A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c ts o f S h o r t - R u n P u b lic I n v e s tm e n t 2 / 2 9

  3. ► L a rry S u m m e rs: “T h e issue n o w is n o t w h e th e r th e US sh o u ld in ve st [in in fra s tru c tu re ] m ore b u t w h a t th e p o lic y fra m e w o rk sh o u ld be .” ► Ben B e rn a n ke : “ I w o u ld th in k ... th a t in fra s tru c tu re s p e n d in g th a t im p ro ve s o u r roads, o u r bridges, o u r schools, and ... w o u ld p ro b a b ly be th e h ig h e s t-re tu rn fisca l a c tio n s in te rm s o f g e ttin g h ig h e r g ro w th .” ► P aul K ru g m a n : “ In fra s tru c tu re please.” ► Joseph S tig litz : “ In fra s tru c tu re alo n e c o u ld a b sorb trillio n s o f d o lla rs in in v e s tm e n t, n o t o n ly tru e in th e d e v e lo p in g w o rld , b u t also in th e US, w h ic h has u n d e rin ve ste d in its core in fra s tru c tu re fo r decades.” -s | = 0י a o־< □ = ► A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s t m e n t 3 / 2 9

  4. M o tiv a tio n ► O n e o f th e fe w consensuses: A large-scale s h o rt-ru n g o v e rn m e n t in v e s tm e n t (G I) p ro g ra m ► C ru cia l t o u n d e rsta n d e c o n o m ic consequences p ro d u ce d by a large tra n s ito ry G I sh o ck ► C u rre n t m a c ro fra m e w o rk s : C o n sid e r sm a ll G I sh o cks in (a lm o s t) lin e a r R B C m o d e ls (B a x te r and K in g , 1993; Leepe r e t al., 2 0 1 0 ) ► Is th e re n o n -lin e a rity ? = ► a oי =| ־0 4 □ - s A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s t m e n t 4 / 2 9

  5. M o tiv a tio n F acts: In te rs ta te H ig h w a y C o n s tru c tio n a ro u n d 1960s N o n -d e fe n se Gl to o u tp u t O u tp u t p e r c a p ita , lo g d e v ia tio n 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 C o n s u m p tio n p e r c a p ita , lo g d e v ia tio n In v e s tm e n t p e r c a p ita , lo g d e v ia tio n 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 ־׳ = . 5 = ^ ( 0, 0 n d H a o t ia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n I m p a c ts o f S h o r t - R u n P u b li<

  6. O v ervie w ► W e c o n s tru c t a R B C m o d e l w ith tw o s ta b le ste a d y s ta te s (s.s.) ► M u ltip lic ity arises because public capital com plem ents private choice ► Small shocks have tem porary outcomes, while large ones can lead to steady state transitions ► Rare switches across steady states can generate medium term cycles as in the data ► A p p ly o u r m o d e l t o tw o case stu d ie s: ► Can the large GI in the 1960s explain S-shaped dynam ics o f the US economy? ► Can a large GI expansion trigger a recovery from the Great Recession? >ג0י 4 □ = ► - e I = 0 , A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s t m e n t 6 / 2 9

  7. L ite ra tu re Review ► R B C m o d e ls w ith tra n s ito ry s h o c k to GI ► Baxter and King (1993), Leeper, Walker and Yang (2010) ► E n d o g e n o u s g ro w th m o d e ls w ith p e rm a n e n t ch a n g e in GI ► Barro (1990), Futagami, Morita and Shibata (1993), Eicher and Turnovsky (2000) ► E m p iric a l an a lysis o f GI ► Public capital elasticity: Aschauer (1989), Bom and Ligthart (2013) ► Nonlinear impact of GI: Fernald (1999), Candelon, Colletaz and Hurlin (2013) ► Multiplier papers: Perotti (2004), Auerbach and Gorodnichenko (2012), Ilzetzki, Mendoza and Vegh (2013) ► R B C m o d e ls w ith m u ltip le ste a d y s ta te s ► Schaal and Taschereau-Dumouchel (2015), Cai (2016) ► M e d iu m te rm flu c tu a tio n s ► Comin and Gertler (2006), Anzoategui, Comin, Gertler, Martinez (2017) < □ ► 4 & ► 4 = ► 4 ^ ► -I I = • 0 0 , 0־ A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s t m e n t 7 / 2 9

  8. I. M o d e l I ■ s ► -sl = ■ 0 0.0 A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s tm e n t

  9. H ous eholds ► H o u se h o ld w ith G H H prefe rence s u b je c t t o d is to rtio n a ry in c o m e ta x and lu m p sum ta x (tra n s fe rs ): 1+V 1 ץ— Y C t - k 1 + v ) !3* m a x E ^ 1 - Y t s.t. C t = (1 - T ) ( W tLt + R tK t + n t ) - It - Tt K t+ 1 = (1 - 5k)K t + It < □ = ► - s >ג,0י =| 0 A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c t s o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s t m e n t 9 / 2 9

  10. ✓ F irm s ► A c o n tin u u m o f s h o rt-liv e d firm s p ro d u ce u n d e r C -D te c h n o lo g y s u b je c t to n o n -c o n v e x te c h n o lo g y ch o ice u £ { H , L}: n = m a x {n H , k l } w h e re n H = m a x A ld/ k°k( K G ) a w - W l - R k- f k,/ s ---------------------- v ---------------------- ׳ high (H) utilization n L = m a x A ld/k°k( K G ) a - W l - Rk k,/ s ^ low (L) utilization ► A is a g g re g a te sh o ck: lo g A t + 1 = pA lo g A t + c t a c ^ , eA ~ N ( 0 ,1 ) D e fin e A n = ! h - n\_. F irm chooses H w h e n A n > 0 ► 4 □ ► 4 = ► < g ► < 1 ► - l | = •0 0,0־ A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c ts o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s tm e n t 1 0 / 2 9

  11. Fiscal Rule ► L a w o f m o tio n o f p u b lic c a p ita l: K t+ 1 = (1 - £g )K tG + C t w h e re G l/o u tp u t ra tio g t = C t/Y t fo llo w s A R (1 ): N ( 0 , 1) g t+ 1 = (1 - pg )־ l + pggt + ag eg+ 1 , £g ► G ov co n su m e s a given fra c tio n o f o u tp u t: ► F in a n cin g : C l + C f = T Yt + Tt 4 □ ■ s ► -s i = OHO A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c ts o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s tm e n t 11 / 2 9

  12. M echanism s ► F ro m p u b lic c a p ita l to p riv a te c a p ita l K G t ^ K , L, Y t ^ K G t ► (1) C om plem entarity between private factors, ( K , L), and public capital, K G, in Cobb-Douglas production function ► (2) GI proportional to o u tp u t F ro m c a p ita l a c c u m u la tio n K , K G ► t to te c h n o lo g y a d o p tio n ► (3) A non-convex adoption cost 4 □ = ► - 3 1 = 0י a o A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c ts o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic I n v e s tm e n t 1 2 / 2 9

  13. C h a ra cte riza tio n M u ltip le S te a d y S ta te s ► D enote fra c tio n o f H firm s as m e [0 ,1 ] D efine A l־ l(m ss) as A 7 r(m ss) evaluated a t steady state w ith m = mss ► P ro p o s itio n The model has two stable deterministic steady states mss e { 0 , 1 } if i) A l־ l(m ss) is increasing in mss and ii) A f l ( l ) > 0 > A fl(O ). ► i) requires m oderate social IRS: 1 — 9k — > e t> ן0ך^ ► ii) non-convex cost creates no deviatio n in centive and su pp o rts tw o stable steady states

  14. C h a ra cte riza tio n M u ltip le S te a d y S ta te s high te ch n o lo g y, Public capital, K Mass of firms operating A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n I m p a c t s o f S h o r t - R u n P u b lic In v e s t m e n t 1 4 / 2 9

  15. II. C a lib ra tio n and A ssessm ents A le x a n d r K o p y t o v a n d H a o tia n X ia n g M A G : L o n g - R u n Im p a c ts o f S h o r t- R u n P u b lic In v e s t m e n t

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend