lung cancer in the elderly d schrijvers md phd
play

Lung cancer in the elderly D. Schrijvers, MD, PhD Ziekenhuisnetwerk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lung cancer in the elderly D. Schrijvers, MD, PhD Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen(ZNA)-Middelheim Antwerp Belgium I ncidence and m ortality of all cancers and lung cancer in relation to age and gender ( US) 120,000 50,000 Number of patients


  1. Lung cancer in the elderly D. Schrijvers, MD, PhD Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen(ZNA)-Middelheim Antwerp Belgium

  2. I ncidence and m ortality of all cancers and lung cancer in relation to age and gender ( US) 120,000 50,000 Number of patients Number of patients 100,000 40,000 80,000 30,000 60,000 20,000 40,000 10,000 20,000 0 0 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- 75- 80- 85+ 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- 75- 80- 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84 Age category (years) Age category (years) All-male Lung cancer-male All-women Lung cancer-women All-male Lung cancer-male All-women Lung cancer-women Mortality Incidence National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) 2004 1 30

  3. Early-stage non-sm all cell lung cancer 2 30

  4. Surgery N ° pts Author ( year) Stage Positive prognostic factors Outcom e ~ Age Chang (07) 10.761 IA Tumor size (< 2.0 cm) 5-year survival Gender (women) 52 vs. 65% Age (< 67 years) Resection (anatomical) Ou (07) 19.702 IA-IB Age Gender (women) Socio-economic class Surgical treatment Histological differentation Tumor size (< 4 cm) (IB) Anatomical location (IB) Schneider (08) 2.021 NA ECOG PS Operative mortality 3.0% < 65 years 7.9% 65-75 years 10.5% > 75 years 5-year survival = 3 30

  5. Radiotherapy Treatm ent Overall survival ( % ) No 6–14 (5-year) Conventional RT 34 (3-year) Stereotactic RT 70 (5-year) Haasbeek CJ et al. Oncologist 2008 4 30

  6. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chem otherapy Trial ALPI ANI TA BLT I ALT JBR.1 0 N ° patients 1.101* 840 307 1.867 482 Eligibility Stage I-IIIA IB-IIIA I-III I-III IB-II Upper age limit None 75 None 75 None Total cisplatin dose (mg/ m² ) 300 400 240/ 150 300-400 400 + vinorelbine No Yes Yes Yes Yes + other agents Yes No Yes Yes No Hazard ratio 0.95 0.8 1.02 0.86 0.69 p .59 .02 .9 < .03 .04 Difference at 5 years (% ) No 8.6 No 4.1 15 * 1,209, minus 108 excluded from one center Fruh M et al. J Clin Oncol 2008 5 30

  7. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chem otherapy: overall survival by treatm ent and age All Elderly > 7 0 years HR death 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-94 HR death 0.90; 95% CI 0.70-1.16 Fruh M et al. J Clin Oncol 2008 6 30

  8. Early-stage NSCLC in elderly patients › Surgery › = standard of care › Feasible › Higher operative mortality in case of co-morbidity › Radiotherapy › Valuable option in selected patients › Adjuvant chem otherapy › No survival benefit > 70 years 7 30

  9. Advanced non-sm all cell lung cancer 8 30

  10. First-line treatm ent: com parison young- elderly Author ( year) Treatm ent RR( % ) MOS ( m onths) Qol/ Tox Y E Y E Kelly (2001) Pacli-carbo NR NR 8.6 6.9 = Vino-cis Langer (2002) Pacli-carbo + G-CSF 22 23 9.1 8.5 > hemato Eto+ cis Schiller (2002) Pacli + cis 22.1 24.5 8.15 8.24 > grade 4 tox Gem + cis Doc + cis Pacli + carbo Lilenbaum (2005) Pacli 15 21 6.8 5.8 Pacli + carbo 28 36 9 8 Sandler (2005) Pacli + carbo 15 28.7 10.3 12.1 > tox with bev Pacli + carbo + bev 35 17.3 12.3 11.3 RR: response rate; MOS: median overall survival; Qol: quality of life; Tox: toxicity; Carbo: carboplatin; Pacli: paclitaxel; Cis: cisplatin; Bev: bevacizumab; Eto: etoposide; G-CSF: granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Eto: etoposide; Gem: gemcitabine, Doc: docetaxel, Y: younger: E: elderly; NR: not reported Avery et al. Cancer Treat Rev 2009 9 30

  11. First-line treatm ent in elderly patients: single agent Author ( year) Treatm ent N pts RR( % ) MOS ( w ks) Qol/ Toxicity  Vino Elvis (99) BSC 78 21 Vino 76 20 28  D Kudoh (06) Vino 91 10 57 Doc 91 23 39 Lilenbaum (07) Doc q 1w x3 q28 56 14 3 wks > w Doc q 3 wks 55 25 Leong (07) Gem 43 16 = Vino 45 20 Doc 46 22 RR: response rate; MOS: median overall survival; wks: weeks; Qol: quality of life: BSC: best supportive care; Vino: vinorelbine; Doc: docetaxel; Gem: gemcitabine;  : better than; = : equal to; > more toxic than 10 30

  12. First-line treatm ent in elderly patients: com binations Author ( year) Treatm ent N pts RR( % ) MOS ( w ks) Qol/ Toxicity  Vino + Gem Frasci (00) Vino 60 15 18 Vino+ Gem 60 22 29 Gridelli (03) Vino 223 18 36 = Gem 223 16 28 Vino+ Gem 232 21 30 Comella (04) Gem + Pacli 65 32 9.2 mo = Gem + Vino 68 23 9.7 mo Pacli 63 13 6.4 mo Gem 68 18 5.1 mo Hainsworth (07) Doc 345 20 = Doc + Gem 22 Gridelli (07) Pem 44 4.5 18 = Pem + Gem 43 11.6 23 RR: response rate; MOS: median overall survival; wks: weeks; Qol: quality of life: Vino: vinorelbine; Gem: gemcitabine; Doc: docetaxel; Pem: pemetrexed;  : better with; = : equal to: > more toxic; mo: months 11 30

  13. First-line treatm ent in elderly patients: platinum com pounds/ targeted agents Author ( year) Treatm ent N pts RR( % ) MOS ( w ks) QolToxicity Chen (06) Carbo + Pacli 40 40 41 Cis > Carbo Cis + Pacli 41 39 42  B Ramalingam (08) Carbo + Pacli 113 17 49 Carbo + Pacli + B 111 29 45  B Reck (09) Cis + Gem 112 20 NA Cis + Gem + B 192 30-34* NA RR: response rate; MOS: median overall survival; wks: weeks; Qol: quality of life: Carbo: carboplatin; Pacli: paclitaxel; Cis: cisplatin; Gem: Gemcitabine; B: bevacizumab;  : worse with: > more toxic 12 30

  14. Second-line treatm ent in elderly patients Author ( year) Treatm ent N pts RR( % ) MOS ( w ks) Qol/ Toxicity  E Wheatley (08) Erlotinib 112 7.6 31 Placebo 51 NA 20 RR: response rate; MOS: median overall survival; wks: weeks; Qol: quality of life: E: erlotinib: paclitaxel; Cis: cisplatin;  : higher than 13 30

  15. Advanced NSCLC in elderly patients › First-line chem otherapy › Single-agent vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) are first-line treatment options › Non-platinum combinations vs single agent › Higher response rates and/ or disease-free survival › Sim ilar m edian overall survival or 1 -year survival rates › Slightly m ore toxic › Platinum combinations › Cisplatin m ore toxic than carboplatin › Targeted agents › Bevacizum ab m ore toxic › Second-line chem otherapy › Targeted agents are treatment option 14 30

  16. Sm all cell lung cancer: lim ited disease 15 30

  17. First-line treatm ent N ° pts Author ( year) Age Treatm ent MST 5 YS p ( years) ( m onths) ( % ) Siu (96) < 70 580 CAV/ PE + RT 8 NS > 70 88 11 Jara (99) < 70 20 PE + RT 12.3 NS > 70 12 14.9 Yuen (00) < 70 271 PE + either BID/ QD RT 19 NS > 70 50 16 Ludbrook (03) < 65 55 CT + RT 37* .003 > 65–74 76 22* > 75 43 19* Schild (04) < 70 209 PE + either BID/ QD RT 22 NS > 70 54 17 BID: twice-daily; CAV: cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine; CT: chemotherapy; HDEP: high- dose epirubicin + cisplatin; MST: median survival time; NS: not significant; PE: cisplatin + etoposide; QD: once-daily; RT = radiotherapy; * : 2-year survival, 5YS: 5-year survival Rossi A et al. Oncologist 2005 16 30

  18. First-line treatm ent: chem oradiation N ° pts Author ( year) Age Treatm ent RR MST ( years) ( % ) ( m onths) Murray (98) > 70 55 CAV (1 cycle) + PE (1 cycle) 89 12.6 20–30 Gy Jeremic (98) 72 72 cPE (2 cycles) 75 15 45 ACC HFX ACC HFX = accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy; CAV = cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine; cPE = carboplatin + oral etoposide; RR: response rate; MST = medial survival time; PE = cisplatin + etoposide Rossi A et al. Oncologist 2005 17 30

  19. First-line treatm ent: chem oradiation › Role of thoracic irradiation › 13 randomized trials › 2140 patients › 3 -year survival › 8.9 % CT alone › 14.3% CT+ RT › Relative risk of death › < 55 years: 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.93) › > 70 years: 1.07 (95% CI 0.70-1.64) Pignon et al. N Engl J Med 1992 18 30

  20. First-line treatm ent: single agent N ° pts Author ( year) Age Treatm ent RR MST ( years) ( % ) ( m onths) Smit (89) > 70 13 Oral etoposide 84 16 Bork (97) > 70 32 Oral etoposide 7 30 Oral etoposide 7.5 Quoix (92) > 70 18 Epirubicin 50 Cerny (88) > 70 16 Teniposide 37.5 7.5 Tummarello (92) > 70 13 Teniposide 61 10 Cascinu (97) > 65 12 Teniposide 30 8 MST = median survival time; NR = not reported; RR = response rate Rossi A et al. Oncologist 2005 19 30

  21. First-line treatm ent: carboplatin com binations N ° pts Author ( year) Age Treatm ent RR MST ( years) ( % ) ( m onths) Evans (95) > 65 11 carbo + eto a 88 12.2 Matsui (98) > 70 16 carbo + eto a 93 15.1 Okamoto (99) > 70 16 carbo + eto 63 11.6 Goss (91) > 60 17 carbo + teni 72 a: oral etoposide; carbo: carboplatin; eto: etoposide; RR: response rate; MST = median survival time; teni: teniposide Rossi A et al. Oncologist 2005 20 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend