1 New York, NY LUKE ARRON GRAY SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | 2010-2011
2 AFTER BEFORE Overview Structural Bracing Electrical connection to CHP Matrix Scheduling BIM and Facility Management Integration Conclusion and Recommendations
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing Structural Loads Computer Model Location : New York City, NY Conclusion and Recommendations Function : Office building and theatre Electrical Connection to CHP Size : 54,640 Square Feet Electrical Loads Stories : 6 levels Electrical Equipment Construction Schedule : August 2008- July 2010 Conclusion and Recommendations Project Delivery : Fast track with CM At Risk Matrix Schedule Create Zones PROJECT TEAM : Create Matrix Schedule Contractor : SKANSKA Conclusion and Recommendations Architect : MA Architects BIM and Facility Integration Structural : Robert Silman Assoc. Conclusion and Recommendations MEP : FMC Associates
4 Project Overview STRUCTURAL SYSTEM: Structural Lateral Bracing 10” DEEP TWO -WAY FLAT PLATE FLOOR SLAB Structural Loads COLUMNS 24’ x 24’ Computer Model Conclusion and Recommendations BUILDING ENCLOSURE: Electrical Connection to CHP GRANITE BASE Electrical Loads MASONRY BRICK WITH CMU BACKUP Electrical Equipment GLASS CURTAIN WALL Conclusion and Recommendations TERACCOTA CROWN Matrix Schedule Create Zones ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: Create Matrix Schedule 208Y/120V, 3-PHASE Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration MECHANICAL SYSTEM: Conclusion and Recommendations HW/CW SUPPLIED BY CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing Structural Loads Computer Model Conclusion and Recommendations Electrical Connection to CHP Electrical Loads Electrical Equipment Conclusion and Recommendations Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations
4 Project Overview BACKGROUND : GOALS Structural Lateral Bracing Original building 33,000 SF since1918 Increase productivity on site by reducing site congestion Structural Loads Volume of the theater to remain Use the light wt. bracing for temporary shoring of the concrete Computer Model slab Conclusion and Recommendations PROBLEM : Electrical Connection to CHP The original two story k-bracing increased site congestion Electrical Loads The original two story k-bracing was only used temporary Electrical Equipment bracing Conclusion and Recommendations Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing WIND LOADS: Structural Loads F=q z GC f A f (lb)(N)=0.0171ksf Computer Model Conclusion and Recommendations SELF WEIGHT: Electrical Connection to CHP Type M mortar three coarses thick brick=2klf Electrical Loads Electrical Equipment CONTROLLING LOAD COMBINATION: Conclusion and Recommendations D 3 =1.2DL+1.6W Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Structural Computer Results Conclusion and Recommendations Loads Model BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations
4 Project Overview MOMENT CAPACITY OF MASONRY WALL: Structural Lateral Bracing 0.88 kip*ft/ft Structural Loads Computer Model MOMENT WITHOUT BRACING: Conclusion and Recommendations 3.91 kip*ft/ft REVIT STRUCTURES Electrical Connection to CHP • Architecture • Structural Modeling Electrical Loads MOMENT OF MASONRY WITH BRACING: Electrical Equipment 0.8kip*ft/ft Conclusion and Recommendations DEFLECTION: Matrix Schedule L/240=0.85in RAM Structural RAM ELEMENTS Create Zones System • Design masonry, wood, CFMF/LGMS Analysis and • Structural Analysis and Create Matrix Schedule Design Toolkit Design MODEL’S MAXIMUM DEFLECTION: Conclusion and Recommendations 0.33in BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations Structural Computer Results Loads Model
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing MATERIAL TAKEOFF WITH RAM ELEMENTS Structural Loads L 3x3x3/16 Computer Model L 5x5x5/16 MC 6x12 Conclusion and Recommendations W6x9 Electrical Connection to CHP Electrical Loads COST Electrical Equipment $32,000 Conclusion and Recommendations Matrix Schedule SCHEDULE Create Zones Original 18.9 days Create Matrix Schedule Alternative 25.1 days Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Structural Computer Results Conclusion and Recommendations Loads Model
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing Structural Loads ADVANTAGES: Computer Model Decreased site congestion Conclusion and Recommendations Decreased required shoring Electrical Connection to CHP Electrical Loads DISADVANTAGE: Electrical Equipment Increased steel installation time Conclusion and Recommendations Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations Structural Computer Results Loads Model
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing Structural Loads Computer Model Conclusion and Recommendations Electrical Connection to CHP Electrical Loads Electrical Equipment Conclusion and Recommendations Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations
4 Project Overview BACKGROUND : Structural Lateral Bracing Three steam turbines producing a total of 13.4 MW Structural Loads Emergency electrical power to 18 University’s buildings Computer Model Connected to 40 cw/hw Universit’s buildings Conclusion and Recommendations Currently Project X is connected to CHP’s Plant cw/hw piping Electrical Connection to CHP Electrical Loads PROBLEM : Electrical Equipment Project X is not connected to CHP electrical supply Conclusion and Recommendations Rising electricity costs Matrix Schedule Create Zones GOALS Create Matrix Schedule Reduce peak demand electrical loads Conclusion and Recommendations Identify financial incentives in New York BIM and Facility Integration Conclusion and Recommendations
4 Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing Structural Loads Computer Model Conclusion and Recommendations ELECTRICAL LOADS: Electrical Connection to CHP Electrical Loads Equest Electrical Equipment Takes into account cw/hw chp plant Conclusion and Recommendations Summer peak electrical load 330 kW Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Results Conclusion and Recommendations Electrical Equipment Loads
4 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT: Project Overview Structural Lateral Bracing Woodward SPM-D21 Structural Loads Woodward 2301D Load sharing and speed control for Computer Model generator Conclusion and Recommendations GE 100kVA transformer Electrical Connection to CHP ∆ 13.8kVA to 208Y/120 Electrical Loads Circuit breakers, conductors, conduit Electrical Equipment Conclusion and Recommendations Matrix Schedule Create Zones Create Matrix Schedule Conclusion and Recommendations BIM and Facility Integration Results Conclusion and Recommendations Electrical Equipment Loads
4 Project Overview Demand & System Structural Lateral Bracing SYSTEM COST Structural Loads Year Incentives Cost Payback $25,000 Computer Model 1 $8,167.05 24617 -$16,449.95 Conclusion and Recommendations INCENTIVES: 2 $14,684.10 24617 -$9,932.90 Electrical Connection to CHP Con Edison’s Commercial System Relief Program 3 $21,201.15 24617 -$3,415.85 Electrical Loads Program activated by Con Edison during: PAYBACK: 4 $27,718.21 24617 $3,101.21 Electrical Equipment 4 YEARS Summer peak days 5 $34,235.26 24617 $9,618.26 Conclusion System critical situation 6 $40,752.31 24617 $16,135.31 Matrix Schedule Annual Savings 7 $47,269.36 24617 $22,652.36 Create Zones Peak Demand $6,517.05 Create Matrix Schedule 8 $53,786.41 24617 $29,169.41 Conclusion and Recommendations Con Edison Commercial System Relief Program $1,650.00 9 $60,303.46 24617 $35,686.46 BIM and Facility Integration Total $8,167.05 10 $66,820.52 24617 $42,203.52 Conclusion and Recommendations 11 $73,337.57 24617 $48,720.57 12 $79,854.62 24617 $55,237.62 Results Electrical Equipment Loads
Recommend
More recommend
