loop of formal diffeomorphisms
play

Loop of formal diffeomorphisms A. Frabetti (Lyon, France) based on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loop of formal diffeomorphisms A. Frabetti (Lyon, France) based on a work in progress with Ivan P. Shestakov (Sao Paulo, Brasil) Potsdam, 812 February, 2016 Motivation: from renormalization Hopf algebras to series Diffeomorphism groups


  1. Loop of formal diffeomorphisms A. Frabetti (Lyon, France) based on a work in progress with Ivan P. Shestakov (Sao Paulo, Brasil) Potsdam, 8–12 February, 2016

  2. Motivation: from renormalization Hopf algebras to series ‚ Diffeomorphism groups fix structure in geometry and physics.

  3. Motivation: from renormalization Hopf algebras to series ‚ Diffeomorphism groups fix structure in geometry and physics. ‚ Taylor expansion gives formal diffeomorphisms , ok for perturbations. They form proalgebraic groups , represented by commutative Hopf algebras on infinitely many generators.

  4. Motivation: from renormalization Hopf algebras to series ‚ Diffeomorphism groups fix structure in geometry and physics. ‚ Taylor expansion gives formal diffeomorphisms , ok for perturbations. They form proalgebraic groups , represented by commutative Hopf algebras on infinitely many generators. ‚ In pQFT, ren. Hopf algebras do represent groups of formal series on the coupling constants [Connes-Kreimer 1998, Pinter 2001, Keller 2010]

  5. Motivation: from renormalization Hopf algebras to series ‚ Diffeomorphism groups fix structure in geometry and physics. ‚ Taylor expansion gives formal diffeomorphisms , ok for perturbations. They form proalgebraic groups , represented by commutative Hopf algebras on infinitely many generators. ‚ In pQFT, ren. Hopf algebras do represent groups of formal series on the coupling constants [Connes-Kreimer 1998, Pinter 2001, Keller 2010] ‚ Renormalization Hopf algebras: - are right-sided combinatorial Hopf alg [Loday-Ronco 2008, Brouder-AF-Menous 2011] - are all related to operads and produce P -expanded series [Chapoton 2003, van der Laan 2003, AF 2008] - admit non-commutative lifts [Brouder-AF 2000, 2006, Foissy 2001]

  6. Motivation: from renormalization Hopf algebras to series ‚ Diffeomorphism groups fix structure in geometry and physics. ‚ Taylor expansion gives formal diffeomorphisms , ok for perturbations. They form proalgebraic groups , represented by commutative Hopf algebras on infinitely many generators. ‚ In pQFT, ren. Hopf algebras do represent groups of formal series on the coupling constants [Connes-Kreimer 1998, Pinter 2001, Keller 2010] ‚ Renormalization Hopf algebras: - are right-sided combinatorial Hopf alg [Loday-Ronco 2008, Brouder-AF-Menous 2011] - are all related to operads and produce P -expanded series [Chapoton 2003, van der Laan 2003, AF 2008] - admit non-commutative lifts [Brouder-AF 2000, 2006, Foissy 2001] ‚ Puzzling situation: - Series with coefficients in a non-comm. algebra A do appear in physics, but their commutative representative Hopf algebra is not functorial in A cf. [Van Suijlekom 2007] for QED . - These series are related to some non-commutative Hopf algebras which are functorial in A .

  7. Aim of the talk How are series related to non-commutative Hopf algebras?

  8. Aim of the talk How are series related to non-commutative Hopf algebras? ‚ Toy model: the set of formal diffeomorphisms in one variable ! a n λ n ` 1 | a n P A ) ÿ Diff p A q “ a p λ q “ λ ` n ě 1 ` ˘ with composition law p a ˝ b qp λ q “ a b p λ q and unit e p λ q “ λ , when A is a unital associative algebra, but not commutative .

  9. Aim of the talk How are series related to non-commutative Hopf algebras? ‚ Toy model: the set of formal diffeomorphisms in one variable ! a n λ n ` 1 | a n P A ) ÿ Diff p A q “ a p λ q “ λ ` n ě 1 ` ˘ with composition law p a ˝ b qp λ q “ a b p λ q and unit e p λ q “ λ , when A is a unital associative algebra, but not commutative . Examples of non-commutative coefficients A : M 4 p C q matrix algebra cf. QED renormalization [Brouder-AF-Krattenthaler 2001, 2006] T p E q tensor algebra cf. renormalization functor [Brouder-Schmitt 2002] and work in progress on bundles with Brouder and Dang L p H q linear operators on a Hilbert space

  10. Aim of the talk How are series related to non-commutative Hopf algebras? ‚ Toy model: the set of formal diffeomorphisms in one variable ! a n λ n ` 1 | a n P A ) ÿ Diff p A q “ a p λ q “ λ ` n ě 1 ` ˘ with composition law p a ˝ b qp λ q “ a b p λ q and unit e p λ q “ λ , when A is a unital associative algebra, but not commutative . Examples of non-commutative coefficients A : M 4 p C q matrix algebra cf. QED renormalization [Brouder-AF-Krattenthaler 2001, 2006] T p E q tensor algebra cf. renormalization functor [Brouder-Schmitt 2002] and work in progress on bundles with Brouder and Dang L p H q linear operators on a Hilbert space ‚ Two problems: 1) define (pro)algebraic groups on non-commutative algebras 2) modify because Diff p A q is not a group !

  11. Lie and (pro)algebraic groups on commutative algebras Group Function algebra G Lie group R r G s “ O p G q representations or (pro)algebraic Hopf com G p A q – Hom uCom p R r G s , A q dense in C 8 p G q algebraic group convolution group

  12. Lie and (pro)algebraic groups on commutative algebras Group Function algebra G Lie group R r G s “ O p G q representations or (pro)algebraic Hopf com G p A q – Hom uCom p R r G s , A q dense in C 8 p G q algebraic group convolution group group-like infinitesimal elements Hopf algebra structure distributions duality supported at e Lie algebra Enveloping algebra algebra ext. U g – R r G s ˚ g “ T e G – Prim U g Hopf cocom (not com) g A “ g b A primitives U g A – U g b A uAs Ñ Lie : A ÞÑ A L Hom Lie p g , A L q – Hom uAs p U g , A q r a , b s “ ab ´ ba adjoint functors

  13. Details on convolution groups and functorial Lie algebras Let A be a commutative algebra and H be a commutative Hopf algebra. Denote: multiplication m , unit u , coproduct ∆, counit ε and antipode S .

  14. Details on convolution groups and functorial Lie algebras Let A be a commutative algebra and H be a commutative Hopf algebra. Denote: multiplication m , unit u , coproduct ∆, counit ε and antipode S . ‚ The set uCom p H , A q forms a group with Hom convolution α ˚ β “ m A p α b β q ∆ H unit e “ u A ε H α ´ 1 “ α S H inverse

  15. Details on convolution groups and functorial Lie algebras Let A be a commutative algebra and H be a commutative Hopf algebra. Denote: multiplication m , unit u , coproduct ∆, counit ε and antipode S . ‚ The set uCom p H , A q forms a group with Hom convolution α ˚ β “ m A p α b β q ∆ H unit e “ u A ε H α ´ 1 “ α S H inverse ‚ Let G be a (pro)algebraic group represented by the Hopf algebra R r G s , and let x 1 , x 2 , ... be generators of R r G s (coordinate functions on G ). Then the isomorphism G p A q – Hom uCom p R r G s , A q is given by g ÞÝ Ñ α g : R r G s Ñ A x n ÞÑ α g p x n q “ x n p g q .

  16. Details on convolution groups and functorial Lie algebras Let A be a commutative algebra and H be a commutative Hopf algebra. Denote: multiplication m , unit u , coproduct ∆, counit ε and antipode S . ‚ The set uCom p H , A q forms a group with Hom convolution α ˚ β “ m A p α b β q ∆ H unit e “ u A ε H α ´ 1 “ α S H inverse ‚ Let G be a (pro)algebraic group represented by the Hopf algebra R r G s , and let x 1 , x 2 , ... be generators of R r G s (coordinate functions on G ). Then the isomorphism G p A q – Hom uCom p R r G s , A q is given by g ÞÝ Ñ α g : R r G s Ñ A x n ÞÑ α g p x n q “ x n p g q . ‚ Let g be a Lie algebra with bracket r , s . Then g A “ g b A is also a Lie algebra with bracket r x b a , y b b s “ r x , y s b ab , and U g A – U g b A .

  17. Convolution groups on non-commutative algebras Let A and H be unital associative algebras (not nec. commutative).

  18. Convolution groups on non-commutative algebras Let A and H be unital associative algebras (not nec. commutative). ‚ Even if H is a Hopf algebra, the convolution α ˚ β “ m A p α b β q ∆ H is not well defined on Hom uAs p H , A q , because it is not an algebra morphism.

  19. Convolution groups on non-commutative algebras Let A and H be unital associative algebras (not nec. commutative). ‚ Even if H is a Hopf algebra, the convolution α ˚ β “ m A p α b β q ∆ H is not well defined on Hom uAs p H , A q , because it is not an algebra morphism. ∆ f : H Ñ H f H , ‚ Solve requiring a modified coproduct where A f B is the free product algebra with concatenation a b b b a 1 b b 1 b ¨ ¨ ¨ instead of p aa 1 ¨ ¨ ¨ q b p bb 1 ¨ ¨ ¨ q as in A b B . Then m A : A b A Ñ A induces an algebra morphism m f A : A f A Ñ A , can define the convolution α ˚ β “ m f A p α f β q ∆ f H and get a group [Zhang 1991, Bergman-Hausknecht 1996] .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend