long range behavior of the van der waals forces between a
play

Long range behavior of the van der Waals forces between a molecule - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Long range behavior of the van der Waals forces between a molecule and a perfectly conducting metallic plate based on joint work with Mariam Badalyan and Dirk Hundertmark Ioannis Anapolitanos special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco


  1. Long range behavior of the van der Waals forces between a molecule and a perfectly conducting metallic plate based on joint work with Mariam Badalyan and Dirk Hundertmark Ioannis Anapolitanos special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon Wugalter 21.10.2019, CIRM Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  2. Van der Waals forces and heuristics Water-Water Water-Atom Atom-Atom dipole-dipole dipole-induced dipole induced dipole- interaction interaction induced dipole interaction Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  3. Van der Waals forces in life and science ◮ Stabilize DNA, Influence boiling points ◮ Material sciences, Chemistry ◮ Molecule-Wall Interactions (i) Geckos climb vertical surfaces (ii) Can change the direction of atomic beams Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  4. Modeling of the problem (for a hydrogen atom) ◮ nucleus at (0 , 0 , 0) ◮ position of the electron x = ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) ◮ infinite plate at the plane x 1 = r Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  5. Modeling of the problem (with perfectly conducting plate) ◮ ”anti-nucleus” at 2 re 1 ◮ ”anti-electron” with distance x ∗ = ( − x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) from anti-nucleus. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  6. Hamiltonian of the system H ( r ) = H h + I ◮ Hamiltonian 2 H h = − ∆ x − 1 | x | 1 1 1 1 I = − − + + | − x + 2 re 1 + x ∗ | | 2 re 1 + x ∗ | 2 r | 2 re 1 − x | ���� � �� � � �� � � �� � Attraction Attraction Repulsion Repulsion K + / K − e − / e + e + / K + e − / K − � �� � 2 = | 2 re 1 − x | Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  7. Hamiltonian of the system H ( r ) = H h + I ◮ Hamiltonian 2 H h = − ∆ x − 1 | x | 1 1 1 1 I = − − + + | − x + 2 re 1 + x ∗ | | 2 re 1 + x ∗ | 2 r | 2 re 1 − x | ���� � �� � � �� � � �� � Attraction Attraction Repulsion Repulsion K + / K − e − / e + e + / K + e − / K − � �� � 2 = | 2 re 1 − x | ◮ Always attractive : I < 0. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  8. Form core of the Hamiltonian ◮ Electron ’lives’ in halfspace A = { ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) | x 1 < r } . ◮ In H 1 ( A ) (no boundary conditions): Hamiltonian not bounded from below, attraction of electron from the mirror charge is too singular . ◮ Form core C ∞ c ( A ): Electron can not touch the plane, or pass through it (Dirichlet b.c. rides to the rescue). Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  9. Form domain and boundedness from below ◮ We use the ”Hardy inequality” � ∞ � ∞ | u ( x ) | 2 | u ′ ( x ) | 2 dx , in C ∞ dx ≤ c ( R + ) . 4 x 2 0 0 � ∞ � ∞ � ∞ � ′ � 1 | u ( x ) | 2 u ( x ) u ( x ) u ( x ) 2 x u ′ ( x ) dx dx = − dx = Re 4 x 2 4 x 0 0 0 � � ∞ � 1 2 � � ∞ � 1 � � 2 u ( x ) CS 2 � � | u ′ ( x ) | 2 dx ≤ dx � � � 4 x � 0 0 Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  10. Form domain and boundedness from below ◮ We use the ”Hardy inequality” � ∞ � ∞ | u ( x ) | 2 | u ′ ( x ) | 2 dx , in C ∞ dx ≤ c ( R + ) . 4 x 2 0 0 � ∞ � ∞ � ∞ � ′ � 1 | u ( x ) | 2 u ( x ) u ( x ) u ( x ) 2 x u ′ ( x ) dx dx = − dx = Re 4 x 2 4 x 0 0 0 � � ∞ � 1 2 � � ∞ � 1 � � 2 u ( x ) CS 2 � � | u ′ ( x ) | 2 dx ≤ dx � � � 4 x � 0 0 ◮ Extension of the form on H 1 0 ( A ): Form closed and bounded from below. ◮ Thus H ( r ) can be realized as a self-adjoint operator. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  11. Plate and Electron ◮ z position of the electron with respect to a point on the plate. 1 1 ◮ H e − = − ∆ z − 2 | z − z ∗ | = − ∆ z − 4 z 1 rescaling E e − = 0 ( A ) , � ψ � L 2( A ) =1 ψ | H e − ψ inf < 0 ψ ∈ H 1 Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  12. Plate and Electron ◮ z position of the electron with respect to a point on the plate. 1 1 ◮ H e − = − ∆ z − 2 | z − z ∗ | = − ∆ z − 4 z 1 rescaling E e − = 0 ( A ) , � ψ � L 2( A ) =1 ψ | H e − ψ inf < 0 ψ ∈ H 1 ◮ Lower bound: Because 2 ab ≤ a 2 + b 2 : 16 − ∂ 2 1 4(2 z 1 ) ≤ 1 1 1 ”Hardy” 1 = 2 16 + ≤ 4 z 2 ∂ z 2 4 z 1 1 1 4 z 1 ≥ − 1 1 16 = E h Thus − ∆ z − 4 > E h (hydrogen gs energy) ◮ Thus E e − > E h . The electron prefers to be close to the nucleus and not close to the plate. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  13. Existence of a ground state of the system ◮ HVZ type Theorem: − 1 inf σ ess ( H ( r )) = E e − 4 r ���� � �� � minimum energy of nucleus-plate electron at ’infinity’ attraction ◮ I < 0 r not too small = ⇒ inf σ ( H ( r )) ≤ E h . ◮ Recall E e − ≥ E h 4 > E h . ◮ Thus inf σ ( H ( r )) in discrete spectrum. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  14. Interaction energy and main result ◮ Ground state energy E ( r ) = inf ψ ∈ H 1 0 ( A ) , � ψ � L 2( A ) =1 ψ | H ( r ) ψ . ◮ Interaction energy W ( r ) = E ( r ) − lim s →∞ E ( s ) = E ( r ) − E h . Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  15. Interaction energy and main result ◮ Ground state energy E ( r ) = inf ψ ∈ H 1 0 ( A ) , � ψ � L 2( A ) =1 ψ | H ( r ) ψ . ◮ Interaction energy W ( r ) = E ( r ) − lim s →∞ E ( s ) = E ( r ) − E h . Theorem (A., Badalyan, 51,32 e ) There exist a r 0 > 0 and D > 0 , so that for all r > r 0 : � � � W ( r ) + 1 � ≤ D � � � � r 3 r 5 holds. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  16. Main idea of the proof Write H = H ( r ) and E the ground state energy of H . ◮ P orthogonal projection P ⊥ = 1 − P , H ⊥ = P ⊥ HP ⊥ . Feshbach map F P ( λ ) = ( PHP − PHP ⊥ ( H ⊥ − λ ) − 1 P ⊥ HP ) | RanP . ◮ Thm: ( H ⊥ − E ) ≥ γ > 0 = ⇒ E is eigenvalue of F P ( E ). Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  17. Main idea of the proof Write H = H ( r ) and E the ground state energy of H . ◮ P orthogonal projection P ⊥ = 1 − P , H ⊥ = P ⊥ HP ⊥ . Feshbach map F P ( λ ) = ( PHP − PHP ⊥ ( H ⊥ − λ ) − 1 P ⊥ HP ) | RanP . ◮ Thm: ( H ⊥ − E ) ≥ γ > 0 = ⇒ E is eigenvalue of F P ( E ). ◮ Choose P = | ψ �� ψ | cut off ground state of hydrogen atom. ◮ Step 1: ( H ⊥ − E ) ≥ γ , we need E e − > E h . 2 ψ � = E h − 1 r 3 + O ( 1 ◮ Step 2: PHP | RanP ≃ E h + � ψ, I r 5 ). � 1 I = − ( x · e 1 ) 2 − | x | 2 � + f odd ( x ) + O 8 r 3 8 r 4 r 5 ◮ Step 3: − PHP ⊥ ( H ⊥ − E ) − 1 P ⊥ HP = O ( 1 r 6 ). Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  18. Feshbach condition H ⊥ − E ≥ c > 0 ◮ IMS Localization: H = J 1 HJ 1 + J 2 HJ 2 − |∇ J 1 | 2 − |∇ J 2 | 2 for J 1 , J 2 : R 3 → R zwei C ∞ -Functions so that J 2 1 + J 2 2 = 1 ◮ For the term J 1 HJ 1 we need E e − > E h Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

  19. The case of a general molecule ◮ Hamiltonian H N = H N ( r , v ), N number of electrons, r distance of molecule and plate, v relative orientation. Ioannis Anapolitanos van der Waals force between a molecule and a metallic plate special thanks to: Kurt Busch, Francesco Intravaia, Semjon

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend