localization capabilities of ground based interferometers
play

Localization capabilities of ground based interferometers Lee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Localization capabilities of ground based interferometers Lee Samuel Finn Penn State University Goal, assumptions, outline Goal: How well can ground-based detectors localize gravitational wave sources. Assumptions Simultaneous


  1. Localization capabilities of ground based interferometers Lee Samuel Finn Penn State University

  2. Goal, assumptions, outline • Goal: How well can ground-based detectors localize gravitational wave sources. • Assumptions – Simultaneous observation by at least four geographically distinct interferometric detectors • Next 5y: LIGO (2) plus at least three of GEO, TAMA, Virgo • > 5 yr horizon: LIGO (2) plus at least three of ACIGA, GEO, LCGT, Virgo/Ego • Outline – Basic concepts – Methodology – Results

  3. Basic concepts – Three detectors: • A single ground-based intersection of two circles interferometer has no – Four (or more) detectors: directional sensitivity to a single point (patch) inspiraling binaries • Arrival time? – NS/NS signal passes through band in ~ 20s – Define in terms of canonical feature of • Directional information signal: e.g., when is determined by time-of- instantaneous frequency arrival information at 100Hz. different detectors • Arrival time accuracy? – Two detectors: a circle in sky normal to axis between – No better than 0.1ms detectors (8/SNR)

  4. Methodology • Wave incident direction n yields (relative) arrival times T. – T = A n • N detectors? A is Nx3 matrix whose rows are detector location vectors • Pick point in sky & determine exact arrival times T • Introduce timing errors dT – Assume normally distributed, zero mean, σ ~ 1 ms • Invert, in least squares sense, (T+dT) = A n’ to find best-fit angle of incidence • Find angle between n’, n • Repeat to determine error distribution

  5. Results • GEO, LIGO, Virgo • Median localization error – I.e., half time error is greater, half time less • Error ranges by factor 2 – Maximum error when source direction normal to axis between detectors

  6. Results: GEO, LCGT, LIGO, Virgo • Maximum error significantly reduced – Minimum error slightly improved • Mean error on sky significantly reduced

  7. Results: Add an Australian Detector • ACIGA, GEO, LCGT, LIGO, Virgo • Maximum error reduced again • Mean sky error reduced further • Minimum error never gets better than ~2 degrees

  8. With, without Australian Detector

  9. Caveats and Conclusions • Assumption that all errors are the same – GEO much less sensitive than LIGO, Virgo to binary inspiral and will have greater timing errors. • Gravitational wave astronomy needs at least four, large, well separated detectors – Southern Hemisphere detector would be especially helpful

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend