Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

local water groups building influence in watershed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making CBWN Member Meeting Natasha Overduin, Rosie Simms November 17 th , 2018 BC Water Law Reform 200 200 200 2014 2016 2017 2018 2 8 9 What were here to do today Part


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making

CBWN Member Meeting Natasha Overduin, Rosie Simms November 17th, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

200 8 200 9 2014 200 2 2016 2018 2017

BC Water Law Reform

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What we’re here to do today

Part 1: ✓Who’s who in the water ecosystem? ✓Role & strengths of community-based groups Part I1: ✓ How do we increase our punch?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Governance: How decisions about water are made, and who influences and plays a role?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Val Napoleon UVic Indigenous Laws program

slide-6
SLIDE 6

85% (water professionals)

agree local watershed entities will be needed to

ensure B.C’s new WSA is

implemented to its fullest potential.

87% (public) believe the

province will face a serious

problem if nothing is done to

improve the management of water resources

slide-7
SLIDE 7

“Reconciliation in action”

Nutsamaat kws yaay’us—we come together as a whole to work together to be stronger as partners

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Watershed

Governance Pilot -

Nicola Valley

○ Nicola Watershed Project – Co-governed with Province + “5 Nicola” Chiefs ○ MoU now signed ○ Opportunity to test and implement new key Water Sustainability Act provisions: ✓ Water Objectives ✓ Water Sustainability Plans ✓ Environmental Flows

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

First Nations at the forefront of water stewardship

COLLABORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS LITIGATION & G2G AGREEMENTS PLAN or POLICY Revitalizing LAWS DECLARATIONS MANAGEMENT PROJECTS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Considerations for cross-cultural collaboration and partnerships

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Province

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Land-use planning Climate adaptation Drinking Drinking/ source protection Salmon Reconciliation

Water

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Some key considerations

  • Province is not homogenous!

– Know the different Ministries, their organizational cultures – Engaging staff vs. politicians (different strategies needed)

  • Develop relationships with regional staff +

enforcement officers

  • Take note of Ministry/political priorities
  • Government capacity is limited: know

what they need; demonstrate your value

  • Government are just people
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Water Management is Shared in the Natural Resource Sector model

Environment and Climate Change Strategy Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development

  • Provincial water strategies
  • Water policy, legislation, regulations
  • Watershed and aquifer science
  • Water objectives, standards and

guidelines

  • Advice, guidance and support to

statutory decisions

  • Support enforcement
  • Monitoring networks
  • Transboundary and inter-

governmental agreements (e.g. Mackenzie River Basin)

  • Administer the Water Sustainability

Act including all statutory decisions pertaining to surface and groundwater licensing

  • Other programs and related statutes:
  • Dam and dike safety
  • Flood management
  • Drought management
  • Utility regulation
  • Issue enforcement orders

POLICY, LEGISLATION, SCIENCE, MONITORING DELIVERY, STATUTORY DECISION-MAKING

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Local Government

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Close to the issues and community concerns

  • Not just “creatures of the province”
  • Significant roles/responsibilities, e.g.
  • Land use and development
  • Local infrastructure
  • Drinking water and sewage services
  • Education
  • Funding
  • Conservation
slide-18
SLIDE 18

9 UBCM water & waterway

resolutions endorsed (2018)

Province to recognize and support local watershed collaborative governance entities and adequately resource these entities.

B67 – Watershed Governance Model

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Some observed concerns/constraints

“Passing the buck” – downloading Resistance to taking on work that has real or perceived costs

Wary of politically risky moves

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sockeye fry

Watershed groups

slide-21
SLIDE 21

As watershed stewardship groups, what is your role in the ecosystem? What are your strengths and your

  • pportunities for influence?

Where do you face resistance?

PLENARY DISCUSSION

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Our observations: role of local groups

✓ESSENTIAL! Often the only boots on the ground ✓Most effective as SUPPORTING vs. ACTING as convener ✓Data collector ✓Education and watershed IQ ✓Getting issues on the radar of decision-makers; creating demand for solutions ✓Telling the water story in a compelling way

slide-23
SLIDE 23

NOT ENOUGH TOO MUCH

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PART 2: STEPPING STONES OF WATERSHED GOVERNANCE

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Build Champions (on the outside & inside)

What: Articulating issues; building demand for solutions; finding people on the ‘inner track’ who will advocate. Why: Someone needs get water “on the agenda” and in the mandate of leadership! Examples of How:

  • Surveys/open-houses to determine constituency water values
  • Convening board or band council and educating colleagues
  • Lots of 1:1 discussions – “politicking”
  • Use other venues/places to talk about the water issues
  • Get your message out there & in front of different audiences
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Example & Questions

What are the main water issues

community members

are concerned about? Who do you need to work with on these issues? How can you resonate with people who might not agree?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Collaborative Watershed Projects & Relationship Building

What: Collaborative “boots on the ground” initiatives

.

How: e.g. projects such as restoration, monitoring, or mapping

Why: “Doing things together” as an entry point for:

  • Developing relationships & trust
  • Strengthening info base
  • Securing funding
  • Discovering common appreciation

for the watershed

  • + … Critical ecological wins!

Habitats for species, etc.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Example & a Question

As a result of projects, are governments and organizations connecting in new ways (e.g., MOUs, jointly produced terms

  • f reference, etc.)?
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Shared Visioning & Priority Setting

  • What: Establishing the big picture goals for where you

want the watershed to be in the future; and what your initial priorities are to get there.

  • Why: offers an opportunity to develop a “whole of

watershed” approach, and figure out what the priorities are (a vision and plan is key for funding too!)

  • How:
  • Host a visioning session – and solicit community input
  • Who convenes matters + value of neutral facilitation
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Example & Question

Are local political leaders at all necessary levels (e.g., local government, First Nations) supportive

  • f the process and driving

it within their

  • rganizations?

A healthy watershed supported and enjoyed by the community in a manner that respects our common values through:

  • Partnerships and collaboration;
  • Education, stewardship, and monitoring;
  • Conservation and green economics; and,
  • Responsible decision making

….In perpetuity.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

PART II: INCREASING YOUR INFLUENCE – TWO EXERCISES TO WORKSHOP

slide-32
SLIDE 32

EXERCISE 1: ELEVATOR PITCH

WHAT IS THE WATER PROBLEM YOUR GROUP IS WORKING ON, WHY DOES IT MATTER, AND HOW ARE YOU HELPING SOLVE IT?

  • Individually (3 min)
  • With a partner (3 min)
  • Go around your table (5 min)
slide-33
SLIDE 33

EXERCISE 2: KNOWING YOUR AUDIENCE

Audience Onside/neutral/opposed/unsure? Actions to build support and relationship 1. 2. 3.