Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making
CBWN Member Meeting Natasha Overduin, Rosie Simms November 17th, 2018
Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Local water groups: building influence in watershed decision-making CBWN Member Meeting Natasha Overduin, Rosie Simms November 17 th , 2018 BC Water Law Reform 200 200 200 2014 2016 2017 2018 2 8 9 What were here to do today Part
CBWN Member Meeting Natasha Overduin, Rosie Simms November 17th, 2018
200 8 200 9 2014 200 2 2016 2018 2017
BC Water Law Reform
Part 1: ✓Who’s who in the water ecosystem? ✓Role & strengths of community-based groups Part I1: ✓ How do we increase our punch?
Governance: How decisions about water are made, and who influences and plays a role?
Val Napoleon UVic Indigenous Laws program
implemented to its fullest potential.
province will face a serious
improve the management of water resources
○ Nicola Watershed Project – Co-governed with Province + “5 Nicola” Chiefs ○ MoU now signed ○ Opportunity to test and implement new key Water Sustainability Act provisions: ✓ Water Objectives ✓ Water Sustainability Plans ✓ Environmental Flows
COLLABORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS LITIGATION & G2G AGREEMENTS PLAN or POLICY Revitalizing LAWS DECLARATIONS MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
Land-use planning Climate adaptation Drinking Drinking/ source protection Salmon Reconciliation
– Know the different Ministries, their organizational cultures – Engaging staff vs. politicians (different strategies needed)
Environment and Climate Change Strategy Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development
guidelines
statutory decisions
governmental agreements (e.g. Mackenzie River Basin)
Act including all statutory decisions pertaining to surface and groundwater licensing
POLICY, LEGISLATION, SCIENCE, MONITORING DELIVERY, STATUTORY DECISION-MAKING
“Passing the buck” – downloading Resistance to taking on work that has real or perceived costs
Sockeye fry
✓ESSENTIAL! Often the only boots on the ground ✓Most effective as SUPPORTING vs. ACTING as convener ✓Data collector ✓Education and watershed IQ ✓Getting issues on the radar of decision-makers; creating demand for solutions ✓Telling the water story in a compelling way
NOT ENOUGH TOO MUCH
What: Articulating issues; building demand for solutions; finding people on the ‘inner track’ who will advocate. Why: Someone needs get water “on the agenda” and in the mandate of leadership! Examples of How:
What are the main water issues
community members
are concerned about? Who do you need to work with on these issues? How can you resonate with people who might not agree?
What: Collaborative “boots on the ground” initiatives
.
How: e.g. projects such as restoration, monitoring, or mapping
Why: “Doing things together” as an entry point for:
for the watershed
Habitats for species, etc.
As a result of projects, are governments and organizations connecting in new ways (e.g., MOUs, jointly produced terms
want the watershed to be in the future; and what your initial priorities are to get there.
watershed” approach, and figure out what the priorities are (a vision and plan is key for funding too!)
Are local political leaders at all necessary levels (e.g., local government, First Nations) supportive
it within their
A healthy watershed supported and enjoyed by the community in a manner that respects our common values through:
….In perpetuity.
Audience Onside/neutral/opposed/unsure? Actions to build support and relationship 1. 2. 3.