Local Energy Devolution in in Practice Dan Nicholls Cornwall - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

local energy devolution in in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Local Energy Devolution in in Practice Dan Nicholls Cornwall - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Local Energy Devolution in in Practice Dan Nicholls Cornwall Council Cornwalls journey - local energy economy Cornwalls energy spend Cornwall Devolution Deal Devolution focus Supporting communities Supporting the growth of community


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Local Energy Devolution in in Practice

Dan Nicholls Cornwall Council

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cornwall’s journey - local energy economy

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cornwall’s energy spend

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cornwall Devolution Deal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Devolution focus

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Supporting communities Supporting the growth of community energy in Cornwall and

beyond

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Supporting communities - Funding

Cornwall Revolving Loan Fund

  • £800k loaned
  • £1m committed
  • 1.5MW enabled
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Supporting communities - Planning

http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/renewableenergy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Supporting communities - Innovation

Cornwall Devolution Deal

  • Community heat (off gas)
  • Community supply
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Green transport

Developing the largest rural electric vehicle charging network

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Electric car charging network

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Affordable homes

Opening up ECO to local people that need it

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Energy efficiency

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Green economy

Fostering green innovation, new technologies and opportunity

slide-15
SLIDE 15

New capacity and local ownership

slide-16
SLIDE 16

New technologies

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Smart & local energy market

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cornwall’s local energy economy

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LED installation in Street Lighting and other Energy projects in Gloucestershire

Peter Wiggins Outcome Manager, Community Infrastructure Commissioning ‘Place’

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

How we got here……..

  • 60,000 street lights – costing £2m per year to keep lit
  • Electricity costs expected to rise, 57% of service spend

and requiring annual growth bids

  • Energy efficiency projects – dimming, part night lighting

(gone about as far as we could go)

  • 53% of CO2 footprint (excl schools)
  • Carbon reduction target, 60% by 2020/21 – not

achievable without significant change in street lighting

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LED Technology

  • Mainstream solution
  • Up to 50% energy saving, can then be dimmed
  • 70% reduction in maintenance cost, fewer faults
  • Better light quality – whiter so easier to see
  • Less light pollution – better focussed
  • Lighting for residential areas relatively mature
  • Traffic routes need brighter lighting – more expensive but

also more energy efficient, cost still likely to fall as matures

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Before After

Example of LED Scheme

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Market Engagement Event

  • Test our assumptions
  • Whether right to time to enter market
  • Scale – county-wide, market towns, Glos & Chelt
  • Whether CMS advanced enough, eg common TALQ

platform

  • Financial modelling, PWLB rates
slide-25
SLIDE 25

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 £ Millions

Street Lighting Budget Requirements including Energy from Waste

Street Lighting Budget (energy, maintenance, CRC) Business as Usual, no LED @ market energy rate

Cost avoidance Cashable savings (after investment repaid)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 £ Millions

Street Lighting Budget Requirements including Energy from Waste

Street Lighting Budget (energy, maintenance, CRC) Business as Usual, no LED @ market energy rate Business as Usual, no LED @ Energy from Waste facility energy rate

Cost avoidance Cashable savings (after investment repaid)

£1.1m budget shortfall to 2016/17

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • 2

4 6 8 10 12 14 £ Millions

Street Lighting Budget Requirements including Energy from Waste

  • traffic routes last, 60% GCC Funded, 70% dimming with CMS
Street Lighting Budget (energy, maintenance, CRC) Business as Usual, no LED @ market energy rate Business as Usual, no LED @ Energy from Waste facility energy rate LED with CMS - Glos-wide 60% GCC funding and 75% CMS coverage

MTC2 £1.7m cost avoidance, MTC2 Cashable saving Initial investment repaid

Driver replacement

Cost avoidance Cashable savings (after investment repaid)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Funding

£m DfT Challenge Fund 5 Salix Energy Efficiency Loans (SEELS) 4.7 GCC Salix Recycling Fund 1.5 GCC Capital Receipts 2.5 Total £13.7m

slide-29
SLIDE 29

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Energy Cost (£Millions) CO2 (thousand tonnes) Financial Year Start

Street Lighting, LED with CMS Implications

Street Lighting CO2 Street Lighting CO2 Forecast Street Lighting £ Street Lighting £ Forecast

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 Financial Year Start Actual Emissions Predicted Business as Usual Emissions Rebaselined Predicted Business as Usual Emissions Target Emissions Emissions in CO2 reduction plan CO2 (thousand tonnes)

Carbon progress against 60% reduction target on 2006/07 baseline

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Further Energy Work

Done almost all we can energy efficiency-wise

  • Insulation – loft, wall, pipes
  • Heating & lighting upgrades and controls, remote BEMS
  • Office rationalisation
  • Shire Hall refurbishment, inc cladding, new windows,
  • pen plan, thin client
  • ICT – server virtualisation, moved off-site, upgrades
  • LED street lighting with CMS, bollard de-illumination, LED

signs & bollards Saving over £1m a year

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Further Energy Work

Now set to become a net electricity producer

  • Residual Waste Project, Energy from Waste plant 2019
  • 116,000 MWh generation
  • Renewable energy generation
  • £12.7m for ground-mounted solar (GMS), approved by Cabinet on

the day DECC published subsidy consultation

  • Now putting in grid connections for battery storage, some with GMS

to follow, plus solar car ports inc private wire

  • Working with APSE Energy
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Local Advisory Adaptation Partnership (LAAP)

  • Established 2011 - forum for Local Government, Central

Government and arm’s length delivery bodies

  • Key role in shaping the Local Government Chapter of the National

Adaptation Programme report (NAP), published in July 2013

  • Now chaired by Gloucestershire County Council
  • Inc reps of Climate UK; Local Authorities; DEFRA; the Environment

Agency and the Local Government Association (LGA)

  • Series of meeting to better understand the risks to areas

that are being impacted by climate change

  • ADEPT will help to input technical advice, with political

input via the LGA

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

LAAP

  • Meetings around the CCRA receptors
  • July 2016 Infrastructure
  • Sep 2016 Heat & Built Environment
  • Nov 2016 Natural Capital
  • Jan 2017 Public Health
  • Outputs will help to identify any gaps in existing

Government policy and suggest modifications to policy to improve the country’s resilience to climate change

  • Submit for inclusion within the next iteration of the

National Adaption Programme (NAP) due to be published in 2018

slide-39
SLIDE 39

LAAP

If anyone is interested in becoming more involved or have colleagues who might assist, please contact Nigel Riglar, LAAP Chair at nigel.riglar@gloucestershire.gov.uk

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Thank you

Peter Wiggins Outcome Manager Commissioning Gloucestershire County Council 01452 328538 peter.wiggins@gloucestershire.gov.uk

slide-41
SLIDE 41

A Guide to Delivering a Standalone Battery Project

This guide has been created to provide Local Authorities with all the necessary information and reasons to instigate a strategy to deliver a standalone battery programme.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Electricity purchased at low costs in early morning

What Is Standalone Battery Storage?

Answer : It is a battery on a small parcel of ground that has no requirement for renewable energy generation Electricity is purchased from the grid when prices are at their lowest and then resold between 4-7pm during the Red Zone when the highest prices can be obtained. This transaction is controlled by an ‘energy trader’ whose responsibility it is to manage the battery and maximise the financial income achievable. The battery must be carefully ‘specified’ to be able to charge and discharge quickly in order to for the process to be repeated at peak times. The quicker the process, the greater the revenue earning potential. Procurement of energy trader and battery must be managed as a package.

Electricity sold at higher prices 4pm-7pm

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Reasons To Consider Standalone Battery Storage?

Reason 1 : Financial Returns

  • Attractive income for 10+ years
  • Capital repayment within 7 years

Reason 2 : Urgency is Required

  • Limited connection capacity in the grid
  • Private developers are ‘capacity bagging’ in the same way as they did with ground mounted solar
  • National Grid’s storage contracts have been allocated to energy traders who are allocating them to

battery owners on a first come basis LOCAL AUTHORITIES SHOULD MAKE FORMAL GRID APPLICATIONS BY DECEMBER 2016 TO SECURE THEIR POSITION WITH THE GRID Reason 3 : Small Parcels of Land Required

  • 1 MW of Battery Storage = 40ft container = 90 sq m of land required

Reason 4 : Local Authority Can Choose Level of Financial Risk and Financial Reward

  • Three possible options available

Reason 5 : De Risked Delivery Process

  • Asset Utilities can de-risk the delivery process and provide the local authorities with investment options

to match a risk and reward profile

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Example of Financial Returns : Option 1 – Local Authority Owns the Battery

Year 1 2 3 4 5 Date 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Cost of battery
  • £1,144,000
Battery installation
  • £115,000
Grid connection
  • £734,000
TRIAD £93,080 £98,040 £112,180 £120,840 £149,080 Capacity market £40,000 £40,800 £41,616 £42,448 £43,298 CM charge £4,958 £5,058 £5,158 £5,262 £5,366 GDUoS £4,508 £4,598 £4,690 £4,784 £4,880 FFR £235,875 £235,875 £235,875 £235,875 £235,875 Running cost
  • £37,000
  • £37,740
  • £38,495
  • £39,265
  • £40,050
Net income
  • £1,993,000
£341,421 £346,631 £361,024 £369,944 £398,449 Cumulative income
  • £1,993,000
  • £1,651,579
  • £1,304,948
  • £943,924
  • £573,979
  • £175,530

This example is for a 2 MW (import of 2 MW and export of 1 MW) battery with no renewable energy generation. Land required 180 sq m. A 5 year model has been shown as the industry is only able to provide with present contracts for this period Battery has a 10 year warranty which can extended to year 15. The grid connection is an assumed maximum. A lower connection cost will enhance the financial model and reduce the capital repayment period. Capital repayment is achieved in year 6. Further energy trading assumptions to support the model are available.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Battery Technology + Energy Trader = Required as a Package

Energy traders have the contracts with National Grid, which battery owners require to access Energy traders will only accept projects that have a proven viability :

  • Site Survey
  • Full Financial Feasibility

Energy Trader

FFR Firm Frequency Response CM Capacity Market Triads GDUoS

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Ownership and Investment Options

There are principally three options with different levels of risk and reward that can be considered.

Option 1

Local Authority Owns the Battery HIGHER RISK : HIGHER REWARD

Option 2

Shared Income / Profit Model MEDIUM RISK : MEDIUM REWARD

Option 3

Local Authority Receives Rental income for 15 years LOWER RISK : LOWER REWARD Reward Potential Capital repayment within 7 years By negotiation ** £7,000-£10,000 pa rental for a 1 MW battery Grid Application * Local Authority Local Authority Local Authority Procures and Pays for Battery Local Authority Investor Investor Planning Application Local Authority Local Authority / Investor Investor Pays for Grid Connection Local Authority Local Authority / Investor ** Investor Appoints and Manages the Energy Trader Local Authority Investor Investor

Notes * Grid Application – securing connection capacity increases the land’s capital value. The capital value will be further enhanced if no further capacity is available to other battery developers ** Share of Income or Profit – this is by negotiation on a site by site basis. The local authority is able to define what they wish to commit to the project e.g. the land, capital, the cost of the grid connection etc. which defines the financial reward received.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Key Strategic Actions and Considerations

Securing The Grid Connection The starting point to secure the grid connection. There is limited capacity in the grid and if the Local Authority fails to secure a grid connection, a private developer will. Enhanced Land Value The grid connection demonstrates the site can be developed for battery storage. This site therefore has a value to battery investors, which enhances the land value. Ownership and Investment Options Available The Local Authority has the ability to choose the level of risk and reward required. Option 1 : Local Authority Owns and Operates the Battery HIGHER RISK :HIGHER REWARD

Option 2 : Shared Income / Profit Model MEDIUM RISK : MEDIUM REWARD Option 3: Local Authority Receives Rental income for 15 years LOWER RISK : LOWER REWARD

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Questions You Should Be Asking

Grid Connection

How do I know if there is capacity in the grid for a battery? How much import and export capacity is required? How do I make a formal application to the DNO? How can this application process be managed effectively? How can my application be ahead of the competition? How can I reduce my connection costs?

Battery Choice and Location

What size and type of battery is required? What size of land is required? What distance do the battery sites need to be located to the DNO’s connection point into the network? What effect does that distance have on the connection cost and the financial returns?

Financial

How is money made from the battery? Who will managed the energy trading element? How do I know this is being managed effectively? What level of financial return can be achieved? How can I use battery storage to enhance the capital value of my land? How can I limit risk by working with a battery investor?

Delivery Process

What is the process from project commencement, to grid connection, to procurement to operation? How can consultancy fees be limited to de-risk the project? How can ‘gateways’ be built into the project to protect the local authority? How can procurement procedures be managed effectively? How do you procure a battery and an energy trading contract? How quickly can an income be generated?

Which other local authorities can I work with to knowledge share?

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Delivery Process

1 month 3 months

Gateway 1 : Viability Assessment Asset Utilities Site Identification : Local Authority Gateway 2 : Grid Delivery Asset Utilities Project Delivery : Local Authority

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Delivery Process Gateway 1 : Viability Assessment Timescale : 1 month

Report demonstrating the viability of battery storage, the extent of delivery and financial benefits to the local authority. This assessment ensures that the local authority only commits funding into viable projects Grid Assessment : Assess the import and export capacity at all DNO primary substations in the local authority area OUTPUT : This defines the size and number of batteries that can be connected to each substation Site Location Assessment : Identify the distance sites can be located from each primary substation, OUTPUT : Location report recommending where land should be identified Energy Trading and Financial Modelling : Produce financial models (high level) for different battery sizes at EACH primary substation SEE NEXT SLIDE : Understand importance of working with an ‘energy trader’ to access CM (Capacity Market) and FFR (Firm Frequency Response) OUTPUT : Accurate financial modelling specific to the local authority’s project : Access to key players with National Grid contracts Battery Storage Ownership and Investment Options : Options provided that illustrate levels of risk and reward and the key players in the market OUTPUT : Local authority able to evaluate financial returns Key Battery Storage Information : Key information regarding battery container and land sizes, recycling, planning, visual impact etc OUTPUT : Local authority able to strategically plan more effectively

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Delivery Process Gateway 1 : Viability Assessment

GRID WORK : required because each primary substation produces different results : Local Authority can assess the financial models (high level) for each primary substations

Primary Substation Location and mpan number Available import capacity FFR rate

Energy Trading and Financial Modelling : Financial models (high level) are different at EACH primary substation

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Delivery Process : Site Identification – Local Authority

Local Authority locates sites within agreed distances to each primary substation. Local authority can also consider purchasing suitable land.

Gateway 1 : Viability Assessment Asset Utilities Site Identification : Local Authority Gateway 2 : Grid Delivery Asset Utilities Project Delivery : Local Authority

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Produces an ENQ number which guarantees a priority position in grid queue

Delivery Process Gateway 2 : Grid Delivery Timescale : 3 months

Delivering the project is completely subject to securing a grid connection. Local Authorities can during the 3 month grid process complete all necessary due diligence Timescale Day 1 2 Weeks Month 1 Month 2 Month 3

Formal grid application made for each site Budget grid application made for each site Unsatisfactory quotations result in formal applications being withdrawn. Local Authority benefits from abortive fees for formal applications. Local Authority considers battery

  • wnership and

investment options Energy trader requires site survey and financial feasibility report completed Completed on 1 site to provide comfort in process (after budget) quote received Reports produced

  • n all sites

Triggers pre development offer from energy trader Further discussions

  • n planning and

local authority requirements

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Delivery Process : Project Delivery - Local Authority

Project Delivery is driven by the Local Authority and includes the stages and timescales to achieve cabinet approval. Within this Gateway are the following considerations :

  • Procurement of choice of battery and energy trader or negotiations with

battery investor

  • Timescale for battery ordering (typically 4 months)
  • Commencement of planning application
  • Acceptance of DNO formal offer (will have 90 day validity period)
  • Instruction of DNO works and connection
  • Instruction of onsite grid connection works
  • Cabinet report and approval

Gateway 1 : Viability Assessment Asset Utilities Site Identification : Local Authority Gateway 2 : Grid Delivery Asset Utilities Project Delivery : Local Authority

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Turning an Unviable GMS site into a Viable Project

Ground Mounted Solar 1 MW

  • Connection cost £125,000

Answer Develop the site as Battery Storage 1 MW (import) and 500 kva (export) GMS 500 kva The battery generic financial model shows a payback before the end year 7. However, model includes an assumed grid connection cost of £604,000 but actual cost is £125,000. The saving of £479,000 reduces the payback before the end of year 5. The GMS site can then be developed at an agreed date with no connection charge

Year 1 2 3 4 5 Date 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Cost of battery
  • £572,000
Battery installation
  • £60,000
Grid connection
  • £604,000
TRIAD £46,540 £49,020 £56,090 £60,420 £74,540 Capacity market £20,000 £20,400 £20,808 £21,224 £21,649 CM charge £2,479 £2,529 £2,579 £2,631 £2,683 GDUoS £2,254 £2,299 £2,345 £2,392 £2,440 FFR £117,938 £117,938 £117,938 £117,938 £117,938 Running cost
  • £18,500
  • £18,870
  • £19,247
  • £19,632
  • £20,025
Net income
  • £1,236,000
£170,711 £173,316 £180,512 £184,972 £199,225 Cumulative income
  • £1,236,000
  • £1,065,290
  • £891,974
  • £711,462
  • £526,490
  • £327,265
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Next Stages

Initial meeting with the Local Authority to explore

  • pportunities

Fully costed proposal submitted Local Authority either approves feasibility or decides not to proceed

Gateway 1 :

Viability Assessment

  • defines the
  • pportunity

Gateway 2 :

Grid Delivery

  • makes the

project viable Contact Information Marc Wynn Director 07798 646 936 marc@assetutilities.com

42 Westdale Drive Moodiesburn Glasgow G69 0NR 01236 872 925 www.assetutilities.com

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Bristol City Council What’s next for community energy? A local authority perspective

Lorna Edwards

Community Energy Project Manager

slide-58
SLIDE 58

£1 million spent

  • n energy every

day in Bristol

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Bristol’s Energy Service

Our Investment team leads on renewable energy installations and community energy projects which help local people to invest in clean energy like solar power. Our Warm Up Bristol scheme is an initiative designed to make the private housing stock in Bristol more energy efficient to create cosier, healthier homes and reduce carbon emissions. This scheme focuses on projects which will improve Bristol’s energy

  • security. We're working on installing heat and energy networks to

supply more efficient and lower carbon heat and power to the city.

slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61

www.presentationgo.com

9 7 5 3

2012 Jan 2014 May 2015 2016 Going forwards Nov 2014 2015 2016

DECC Community Energy Strategy Competition launched to find local community group providers Construction

  • f a 4.2MW Solar

Farm completed at Lawrence Weston Future projects? Easton Community Centre 18kW installation Cabinet Report Community Investment in Renewables DECC community Energy funding received Bristol Energy Cooperative have a pipeline

  • f 20 projects

Community Renewables installed so far: 4.299MW

Bristol City Council & Community Energy

2011

Catalyst Fund launched

1

slide-62
SLIDE 62

www.presentationgo.com

www.bristolcommunityenergy.co.uk

slide-63
SLIDE 63

www.presentationgo.com

What’s next?

Funded Projects

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Governance…

slide-65
SLIDE 65

www.presentationgo.com

What’s next?

What’s next?

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Keep in touch

Mareike Schmidt: mareike.schmidt@bristol.gov.uk

@Energy4Bristol

Bristol Community Energy

www.bristolcommunityenergy.co.uk

Thank you!

Lorna Edwards

Lorna.edwards@bristol.gov.uk www.bristolcommunityenergy.co.uk @energy4Bristol