local coderivatives and approximation of hodge laplace
play

Local coderivatives and approximation of Hodge Laplace problems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Local coderivatives and approximation of Hodge Laplace problems Ragnar Winther Department of Mathematics University of Oslo Norway based on joint work with Jeonghun J. Lee, UT, Austin 1 The mixed finite element method Elliptic problem:


  1. Local coderivatives and approximation of Hodge Laplace problems Ragnar Winther Department of Mathematics University of Oslo Norway based on joint work with Jeonghun J. Lee, UT, Austin 1

  2. The mixed finite element method Elliptic problem: − div( K grad u ) = f in Ω , u | ∂ Ω = 0 The mixed method: � � K − 1 σ h , τ − � u h , div τ � = 0 , τ ∈ Σ h ⊂ H (div) , (1) v ∈ V h ⊂ L 2 , � div σ h , v � = � f , v � , where σ h approximates − K grad u . 2

  3. The mixed finite element method Elliptic problem: − div( K grad u ) = f in Ω , u | ∂ Ω = 0 The mixed method: � � K − 1 σ h , τ − � u h , div τ � = 0 , τ ∈ Σ h ⊂ H (div) , (1) v ∈ V h ⊂ L 2 , � div σ h , v � = � f , v � , where σ h approximates − K grad u . In contrast to the standard finite element method the mixed method is a conservative discretization. 2

  4. The mixed finite element method Elliptic problem: − div( K grad u ) = f in Ω , u | ∂ Ω = 0 The mixed method: � � K − 1 σ h , τ − � u h , div τ � = 0 , τ ∈ Σ h ⊂ H (div) , (1) v ∈ V h ⊂ L 2 , � div σ h , v � = � f , v � , where σ h approximates − K grad u . In contrast to the standard finite element method the mixed method is a conservative discretization. However, the method is nonlocal. 2

  5. Properties Conservative: � � f dx = σ h · ν ds . T ∂ T 3

  6. Properties Conservative: � � f dx = σ h · ν ds . T ∂ T Nonlocal: The map u h �→ σ h , which approximates u �→ − K grad u , defined by � � K − 1 σ h , τ = � u h , div τ � = 0 , τ ∈ Σ h is nonlocal. 3

  7. Construction of local methods ◮ two point flux methods based on lumping of the Raviart-Thomas method, Baranger, Maitre, Oudin (1993), ◮ multipoint flux approximations, Aavatsmark et al., (1998, . . . ) ◮ various other finite volume schemes, mimetic methods ◮ discrete exterior calculus, Desbrun, Hirani, Leok, Marsden (2005) ◮ lumping of the P 1 − P 0 method, Brezzi, Fortin, Marini (2006) 4

  8. Multipoint flux approximations The methods are constructed and described as finite volume/finite difference methods, but for convergence proofs one relies on relations to the mixed method. 5

  9. Multipoint flux approximations The methods are constructed and described as finite volume/finite difference methods, but for convergence proofs one relies on relations to the mixed method. ◮ Wheeler and Yotov, A multipoint flux mixed finite element... , SIAM J. Num. Anal. (2006) ◮ Droniou and Eymard, A mixed finite volume scheme.... on any grid, Numer. Math. (2006) ◮ Klausen and W, Numer. Math. and Num. Meth. for PDE (2006) ◮ Bause, Hoffman, Knabner, Multipoint flux approximations on triangular grids, Numer. Math. (2010) ◮ Ingram, Wheeler, Yotov, A multipoint flux mixed finite element method on hexahedra, SIAM J. Num. Anal. (2010) ◮ Wheeler and Yotov, A multipoint flux mixed finite element method on distorted quadrilaterals hexahedra, Numer. Math. (2012) 5

  10. Multipoint flux approximations The methods are constructed and described as finite volume/finite difference methods, but for convergence proofs one relies on relations to the mixed method. ◮ Wheeler and Yotov, A multipoint flux mixed finite element... , SIAM J. Num. Anal. (2006) ◮ Droniou and Eymard, A mixed finite volume scheme.... on any grid, Numer. Math. (2006) ◮ Klausen and W, Numer. Math. and Num. Meth. for PDE (2006) ◮ Bause, Hoffman, Knabner, Multipoint flux approximations on triangular grids, Numer. Math. (2010) ◮ Ingram, Wheeler, Yotov, A multipoint flux mixed finite element method on hexahedra, SIAM J. Num. Anal. (2010) ◮ Wheeler and Yotov, A multipoint flux mixed finite element method on distorted quadrilaterals hexahedra, Numer. Math. (2012) in addition to the paper by Brezzi et al. from 2006. 5

  11. Hodge Laplace problems and their discretizations The de Rham complex: d d d H Λ 0 (Ω) → H Λ 1 (Ω) → H Λ n (Ω) − − → · · · −       � π n � π 0 � π 1 h h h d d d V 0 V 1 V n − → − → · · · − → h h h where H Λ k (Ω) = { v ∈ L 2 Λ k +1 (Ω) | dv ∈ L 2 Λ k (Ω) } , and V k h is a subspace. 6

  12. Hodge Laplace problems and their discretizations The de Rham complex: d d d H Λ 0 (Ω) → H Λ 1 (Ω) → H Λ n (Ω) − − → · · · −       � π n � π 0 � π 1 h h h d d d V 0 V 1 V n − → − → · · · − → h h h where H Λ k (Ω) = { v ∈ L 2 Λ k +1 (Ω) | dv ∈ L 2 Λ k (Ω) } , and V k h is a subspace. We have a stable mixed methods for the Hodge Laplace problems iff there exists bounded cochain projections π h . 6

  13. Mixed formulation of Hodge Laplace problems The non-mixed formulation: Lu = ( d ∗ d + dd ∗ ) u = f , where the unknown u is a k -form. The operator d ∗ mapping k -forms to ( k − 1)-forms can be represented in two ways, either as the L 2 adjoint of d , or as ⋆ d ⋆ , where ⋆ is Hodge star operator mapping k -forms to n − k -forms. 7

  14. Mixed formulation of Hodge Laplace problems The non-mixed formulation: Lu = ( d ∗ d + dd ∗ ) u = f , where the unknown u is a k -form. The operator d ∗ mapping k -forms to ( k − 1)-forms can be represented in two ways, either as the L 2 adjoint of d , or as ⋆ d ⋆ , where ⋆ is Hodge star operator mapping k -forms to n − k -forms. The mixed formulation: Find ( σ, u ) ∈ H Λ k − 1 (Ω) × H Λ k (Ω) such that τ ∈ H Λ k − 1 (Ω) , � σ, τ � − � u , d τ � = 0 , v ∈ H Λ k (Ω) , � d σ, v � + � du , dv � = � f , v � , where σ = d ∗ u , and �· , ·� denotes L 2 -inner products. 7

  15. The corresponding mixed method Find ( σ h , u h ) ∈ V k − 1 × V k h such that h τ ∈ V k − 1 � σ h , τ � − � u h , d τ � = 0 , , h v ∈ V k � d σ h , v � + � du h , dv � = � f , v � , h , h → V k − 1 where the operator d ∗ h : V k defined by h � d ∗ τ ∈ V k − 1 h u , τ � = � u , d τ � = 0 , h is nonlocal. 8

  16. The corresponding mixed method Find ( σ h , u h ) ∈ V k − 1 × V k h such that h τ ∈ V k − 1 � σ h , τ � − � u h , d τ � = 0 , , h v ∈ V k � d σ h , v � + � du h , dv � = � f , v � , h , h → V k − 1 where the operator d ∗ h : V k defined by h � d ∗ τ ∈ V k − 1 h u , τ � = � u , d τ � = 0 , h is nonlocal. In particular, there is no natural ”discrete Hodge star operator,” ⋆ h , mapping V k h to V n − k , cf. Hiptmair, Discrete Hodge operators, h (2001). 8

  17. Examples of Hodge Laplace problems The case k = n corresponds to mixed formulation of the scalar Laplace problem with H Λ n − 1 × H Λ n replaced by H (div) × L 2 , while the case k = 0 corresponds to the standard H 1 formulation. 9

  18. Examples of Hodge Laplace problems The case k = n corresponds to mixed formulation of the scalar Laplace problem with H Λ n − 1 × H Λ n replaced by H (div) × L 2 , while the case k = 0 corresponds to the standard H 1 formulation. For n = 3 and k = 1: Find ( σ, u ) ∈ H 1 × H (curl) such that τ ∈ H 1 , � σ, τ � − � u , grad τ � = 0 , � grad σ, v � + � curl u , curl v � = � f , v � , v ∈ H (curl) . For n = 3 and k = 2: Find ( σ, u ) ∈ H (curl) × H (div) such that � σ, τ � − � u , curl τ � = 0 , τ ∈ H (curl) , � curl σ, v � + � div u , div v � = � f , v � , v ∈ H (div) . Both correponds to vector Laplace. 9

  19. Abstract framework, Hilbert complexes cf. Arnold, Falk, W, Bulletin of AMS, 2010. 10

  20. Abstract framework, Hilbert complexes cf. Arnold, Falk, W, Bulletin of AMS, 2010. We are given a structure of the form d d d V 0 → V 1 → V n − − → · · · −       � π 0 � π 1 � π n h h h d d d V 0 → V 1 → V n − − → · · · − h h h where V k = { v ∈ W k | dv ∈ W k +1 } , and V k h ⊂ V k . 10

  21. Abstract framework, Hilbert complexes cf. Arnold, Falk, W, Bulletin of AMS, 2010. We are given a structure of the form d d d V 0 → V 1 → V n − − → · · · −       � π 0 � π 1 � π n h h h d d d V 0 → V 1 → V n − − → · · · − h h h where V k = { v ∈ W k | dv ∈ W k +1 } , and V k h ⊂ V k . The standard mixed method for the Hodge Laplace problems: Find u h ) ∈ V k − 1 × V k (˜ σ h , ˜ h such that h τ ∈ V k − 1 � ˜ σ h , τ � − � d τ, ˜ u h � = 0 , , h v ∈ V k � d ˜ σ h , v � + � d ˜ u h , dv � = � f , v � , h . where �· , ·� are inner products of the W spaces. 10

  22. Abstract framework, Hilbert complexes cf. Arnold, Falk, W, Bulletin of AMS, 2010. We are given a structure of the form d d d V 0 → V 1 → V n − − → · · · −       � π 0 � π 1 � π n h h h d d d V 0 → V 1 → V n − − → · · · − h h h where V k = { v ∈ W k | dv ∈ W k +1 } , and V k h ⊂ V k . The standard mixed method for the Hodge Laplace problems: Find u h ) ∈ V k − 1 × V k (˜ σ h , ˜ h such that h τ ∈ V k − 1 � ˜ σ h , τ � − � d τ, ˜ u h � = 0 , , h v ∈ V k � d ˜ σ h , v � + � d ˜ u h , dv � = � f , v � , h . where �· , ·� are inner products of the W spaces. The standard theory gives optimal convergence in the V -norms for stable methods. 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend