Little Elm ISD Long-Range Facilities Planning Committee Meeting 5: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Little Elm ISD Long-Range Facilities Planning Committee

Meeting 5: Monday, May 22, 2017

Zellars Center for Learning & Leadership 300 Lobo Lane Little Elm, TX 75068

AGENDA

• Welcome, Meeting 4 Recap & Agenda Review
• Community Survey Results
• Bonding Capacity Review
• Potential Project Updates & Cost Analysis
• Prioritization Review & Potential Bond Package Scenarios
• Small Group Exercise – Build Your Ideal Bond Package Scenario
• Large Group Share Out – Building Consensus on Recommendation
• Closing

COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS

LITTLE ELM ISD VOTER SURVEY

May 16 - 18, 2017 N = 200 respondents margin of error: + 6.9%

OBJECTIVES

To assess general attitudes about Little Elm ISD. 1 To measure the correlation of informative statements on support / opposition to a bond proposal. 3 To assess current levels of support and

• pposition to a $150 million bond proposal.

2

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

QUESTIONNAIRE FORMAT

1

Introduction and Screeners

2

General & Specific Issues

3

Initial Ballot (Q7)

6

Demographics

5

Informed Ballot (Q28)

4

Impact of Specific Information

Multiple regression is used to measure persuasiveness of specific information between initial and informed ballots

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

COMPARISON of SAMPLE FILE to RESPONDENTS

18-44 yrs 45-54 yrs 55-64 yrs 65+ yrs

Registration

47% 19% 15% 19%

November 2012

33% 22% 18% 27%

November 2014

25% 19% 20% 37%

November 2015

11% 13% 19% 56%

Survey N=200

38% 28% 14% 18%

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Little Elm ISD Superintendent Lowell Strike

7.5:1 38% 5%17% 39%

Little Elm ISD Board of Trustees

4.8:1 43% 9% 25% 24%

NAME AWARENESS LEVELS

(Ranked by Positive % plus Negative %)

Know / Positive Know / Negative Never heard of Know / No opinion

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Positive / Negative Ratio

Little Elm Independent School District

82% 12%7% 6.8:1

47% / 11% 36% / 6% Par Non 49% / 6% 21% / 5% Par Non 87% / 9% 73% / 16% Par Non

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

27% 39% 14% 20% MANAGING MONEY

• Q5. Which of the following best describes your opinion of how Little

Elm ISD manages the money it has to operate the school district?

Unsure / refused Wastefully and ineffectively As well as can be expected Wisely and effectively

Wisely As expected Wastefully Unsure Parents

34% 43% 11% 12%

Non-parents

16% 32% 19% 33%

Under 55

34% 42% 9% 15%

55 and over

15% 34% 24% 27%

10% 18% 72%

Has enough

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

ENOUGH SCHOOLS vs. NEED MORE

• Q6. Do you think Little Elm ISD has enough schools and classrooms

to meet the needs of the district over the next (Ver X: five / Ver Y: ten) years, or do you think more schools and classrooms are needed?

Needs more Unsure / refused

Enough Unsure More Parents

8% 7% 85%

Non-parents

13% 35% 52%

Under 55

7% 9% 84%

55 and over

16% 33% 51%

35%

19% 23% 7%

58% 16% 26% INITIAL BALLOT

• Q7. Little Elm ISD is considering recommending calling a bond election for

this coming November. If an election were held today would you vote for or against the issuance of $150 million in bonds for constructing, renovating and equipping schools with the levying of a property tax thereof?

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Strongly Somewhat

For

Strongly Somewhat

Against Depends / Unsure

Strong For Strong Against

30% 24%

Adjusted for low turnout

INITIAL BALLOT

Strong For Strong Against Total For Total Against

35% 19%

Total

58% 26% 42% 11%

Parents

68% 16% 23% 31%

Non-parents

42% 42% 41% 11%

18-54 years

68% 18% 23% 32%

55 years & over

40% 41%

39% 32% 9% 14% WHY VOTE AGAINST / HESITANT

(n=79 respondents who are not in favor)

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Not needed Taxes Need more information / details District criticisms

• Q8. And in your own words, please tell me why you (would

vote against / might be hesitant to support) a bond proposal.

Net Impact

For Against Depends / Unsure

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

VARIOUS BOND AMOUNTS

Q9. Would you vote for or against the issuance of $125 million in school bonds, which would increase property taxes by approximately $15 per month for the average home value of $250,000.

56% 36% 8% +19%

• Q10. Would you vote for or against the

issuance of $150 million in school bonds, which would increase property taxes by approximately $18.75 cents per month for the average home value of $250,000.

51% 40%10% +11%

• Q11. Would you vote for or against the

issuance of $175 million in school bonds, which would increase property taxes by approximately $24.37 per month for the average home value of $250,000.

34% 55%10%

• 21%

25% Strongly 27% Strongly 32% Strongly 23% Strongly 14% Strongly 34% Strongly

Par +32% Non -22% Par -8% Non -41% Par +43% Non -18%

Favor Oppose Depends / Unsure Net Impact Several of the district’s elementary schools are over functional capacity and more growth is expected. Please tell me if you favor or oppose each of the following two options… Q12 Constructing (Ver X: a new elementary school / Ver Y: classroom additions to existing elementary schools) to accommodate growth.

78% 15% 7% +63%

Q13 Re-purposing Powell Sixth Grade Center and Prestwick K-8 STEM Academy to become elementary schools to save the district from having to build new schools and have the district’s sixth through eighth grade students all at the middle school level.

50% 39% 11% +11%

Q14 Lakeside Middle School could enroll more than 1,400 students by 2018, putting it well over its functional capacity. This bond could allow for the construction of a new middle school to serve the district’s growing middle school population.

82% 11% 6% +71%

Lakeside Middle School is 37 years old, was last renovated 22 years ago and is in need of repair. Please tell me if you favor or oppose each of the following two options… Q15 Making significant renovations to Lakeside Middle School to bring it up to today’s standards and make it equitable to the new middle school that is part of this bond.

79% 18% 2% +61%

Q16 Completely rebuilding Lakeside Middle School (Ver Y: which

• nly costs a little more than it would to renovate it) to bring it

up to today’s standards and make it equitable to the new middle school that is part of this bond.

68% 27% 4% +41%

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

MESSAGE STATEMENTS

+40% +42% X: Y: +65% +60% X: Y:

38% Fav / 52% Opp 69% Fav / 18% Opp Parents: Non-Par:

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

29% 60% 2% 8% RENOVATING vs. REBUILDING

• Q29. Renovating Lakeside Middle School would extend the life of the school

twenty years and would cost less than completely rebuilding the school, but not much less. Rebuilding the school would extend the life of the school by at least fifty years and would cost more than renovations, but not much more. Hearing this, which one of the following do you prefer for Lakeside Middle School...

Unsure / refused Neither Rebuilding it Renovating it

Renovate Rebuild Parents

26% 68%

Non-parents

34% 47%

Favor Oppose Depends / Unsure Net Impact Q17 Little Elm ISD is expected to add approximately 900 students during the next 5 years and

• ver 1,500 students in the next 10 years. This bond will allow the district to accommodate

this growth.

77% 17% 6% +60%

Q18 This bond would allow for upgrades and repairs to aging school buildings such as new air conditioning and roofing (Ver X: to extend the life of the school buildings / Ver Y: to make school buildings operate more efficiently and at lower costs).

87% 11% 2% +75%

Q19 The district is looking to expand STEM programming and incorporate more hands-on learning at all campuses. This bond could include minor renovations to elementary schools to create multi-purpose areas for students to collaborate in small groups and conduct experiments.

76% 20% 4% +56%

Q20 This bond could include construction of a multi-purpose facility to be used by a variety of several extracurricular activities including all athletic programs, band, dance and cheer. These growing student programs have outgrown current spaces and need additional room for training, practices and activities, as well as a safe space during inclement weather.

76% 21% 3% +55%

Q21 Career and Technical Education programs allow students to prepare for college and the

• workforce. This bond could enhance these programs, including health science, agriculture

sciences, and engineering, by improving and expanding existing program spaces.

83% 13% 4% +71%

Q22 This bond could provide improvements to current technology infrastructure and devices on all campuses that will provide better instructional tools and learning opportunities for students.

80% 16% 4% +64%

Q23 This bond could include improvements to aging athletic facilities in need of repair and upgrades including track re-surfacing, bleacher replacement, and locker room renovations.

68% 27% 4% +41%

Q24 This bond could include enhancements to campus safety and security with additional security cameras and access control systems.

82% 16% 2% +67%

Q25 Existing state law freezes the tax rate of homeowners sixty five years of age or older. Senior citizens who file their exemption will not have to pay any additional property taxes associated with this bond proposal.

86% 12% 2% +75%

Q26 A diverse advisory committee of citizens, parents and teachers has been working to evaluate the school district’s needs and this bond proposal will include recommendations from this citizen’s group.

79% 14% 8% +65%

Q27 Opponents say this bond will increase taxes and local debt and includes many things that are not essential.

39% 48% 12%

• 9%

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

MESSAGE STATEMENTS

+83% +67% X: Y:

41%

19% 29% 7%

71% 3% 26% INFORMED BALLOT

• Q28. Having heard more about it...if an election were held today would you

vote for or against the issuance of $150 million in bonds for constructing, renovating and equipping schools with the levying of a property tax thereof?

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Strongly Somewhat

For

Strongly Somewhat

Against Depends / Unsure

Strong For Strong Against Total For Total Against

48% 15%

Parents

77% 21% 31% 26%

Non-parents

61% 35% 49% 12%

18-54 years

79% 17% 28% 32%

55 years & over

56% 42% 35% 23%

Adjusted for low turnout

54% 17% 19% 71% 3%26%

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

COMPARISON OF INITIAL & INFORMED BALLOTS

Solidifiers & Switchers Informed ballot (Q28) Initial ballot (Q7)

For Against

Unsure

58% 16% 26%

For Against

Unsure

3% 7%

Stayed For Switched For Depends / Unsure Switched Against Stayed Against

54% 17% 3% 7%19%

Solidifiers and Switchers

Switched For Stayed For Depends / Unsure Switched Against Stayed Against

54% 17% 3% 7%19%

Solidifiers and Switchers

Switched For Stayed For Depends / Unsure Switched Against Stayed Against

REGRESSION (CORRELATION) ANALYSIS

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

51% 26% 6% 7% 11%

• Q17. Little Elm ISD is expected to add

approximately 900 students during the next 5 years and over 1,500 students in the next 10

• years. This bond will allow the

district to accommodate this growth.

+60%

Somewhat Favor Strongly Favor Depends / Unsure Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose

61% 26% 2% 5% 7%

• Q18. This bond would allow for

upgrades and repairs to aging school buildings such as new air conditioning and roofing (Ver X: to extend the life of the school buildings / Ver Y: to make school buildings operate more efficiently and at lower costs).

+75%

Net Favor

Somewhat Favor Strongly Favor Depends / Unsure Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Solidifier Correlation Factor 0.0464 Average Correlation Score

4.1

=

Switcher Correlation Factor 0.0619

+ ÷ 2

Net Favor +75%

X

CALCULATING CORRELATION SCORES

Solidifier Correlation Factor 0.3097 Average Correlation Score

16.8

=

Switcher Correlation Factor 0.2493

+ ÷ 2

Net Favor +60%

X Q17 is 4 times more persuasive than Q18.

51% 26% 6% 7% 11%

• Q17. Little Elm ISD is expected to add

approximately 900 students during the next 5 years and over 1,500 students in the next 10

• years. This bond will allow the

district to accommodate this growth.

+60%

Somewhat Favor Strongly Favor Depends / Unsure Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose

61% 26% 2% 5% 7%

• Q18. This bond would allow for

upgrades and repairs to aging school buildings such as new air conditioning and roofing (Ver X: to extend the life of the school buildings / Ver Y: to make school buildings operate more efficiently and at lower costs).

+75%

Net Favor

Somewhat Favor Strongly Favor Depends / Unsure Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose

Total Sample (N=200) Parent (n=123) Non- Parent (n=77) Vote All / Most (n=100) Vote Some / None (n=100) 18 - 54 yrs (n=133) 54+ yrs (n=65)

Correlation Correlation Correlation Correlation Correlation Correlation Correlation Score Score Score Score Score Score Score

Q12 [ASKED AFTER INTRO INFO] Constructing (Ver X: a new elementary school / Ver Y: classroom additions to existing elementary schools) to accommodate growth.

7.9 6.6 10.4 4.7 3.7 6.4 2.5

Q13 [ASKED AFTER INTRO INFO] Re-purposing Powell Sixth Grade Center and Prestwick K-8 STEM Academy to become elementary schools to save the district from having to build new schools and have the district’s sixth through eighth grade students all at the middle school level.

• 0.4
• 0.8

11.5 0.0 0.0

• 0.1

4.2

Q14 Lakeside Middle School could enroll more than 1,400 students by 2018, putting it well over its functional

• capacity. This bond could allow for the construction of a new middle school to serve the district’s

growing middle school population.

13.8 16.3 1.4 13.5 4.0 16.2 2.8

Q15 [ASKED AFTER INTRO INFO] Making significant renovations to Lakeside Middle School to bring it up to today’s standards and make it equitable to the new middle school that is part of this bond.

5.4 9.5 6.0 2.5 20.9 11.9 5.2

Q16 [ASKED AFTER INTRO INFO] Completely rebuilding Lakeside Middle School (Ver Y: which only costs a little more than it would to renovate it) to bring it up to today’s standards and make it equitable to the new middle school that is part of this bond.

3.5 4.6 2.7 10.9 4.6 6.7 1.9

Q17 Little Elm ISD is expected to add approximately 900 students during the next 5 years and over 1,500 students in the next 10 years. This bond will allow the district to accommodate this growth.

16.8 14.1 2.6 8.0 24.4 20.0 13.2

Q18 This bond would allow for upgrades and repairs to aging school buildings such as new air conditioning and roofing (Ver X: to extend the life of the school buildings / Ver Y: to make school buildings operate more efficiently and at lower costs).

4.1 5.7 4.0 3.1 5.7 5.5 3.6

Q19 The district is looking to expand STEM programming and incorporate more hands-on learning at all

• campuses. This bond could include minor renovations to elementary schools to create multi-purpose

areas for students to collaborate in small groups and conduct experiments.

2.9 2.1 10.5 2.1 4.4 4.4 2.7

Q20 This bond could include construction of a multi-purpose facility to be used by a variety of several extracurricular activities including all athletic programs, band, dance and cheer. These growing student programs have outgrown current spaces and need additional room for training, practices and activities, as well as a safe space during inclement weather.

5.4 5.2 1.6 4.2 25.6 19.0 1.8

Q21 Career and Technical Education programs allow students to prepare for college and the workforce. This bond could enhance these programs, including health science, agriculture sciences, and engineering, by improving and expanding existing program spaces.

6.2 3.6 14.1 12.7 5.8 4.8 6.3

Q22 This bond could provide improvements to current technology infrastructure and devices on all campuses that will provide better instructional tools and learning opportunities for students.

8.3 13.5 3.3 5.2 33.8 15.5 3.9

Q23 This bond could include improvements to aging athletic facilities in need of repair and upgrades including track re-surfacing, bleacher replacement, and locker room renovations.

5.0 3.8 5.0 2.7 9.2 5.3 4.6

Q24 This bond could include enhancements to campus safety and security with additional security cameras and access control systems.

4.1 2.6 8.6 6.6 4.4 12.2 7.3

Q25 Existing state law freezes the tax rate of homeowners sixty five years of age or older. Senior citizens who file their exemption will not have to pay any additional property taxes associated with this bond proposal.

3.6 9.1 6.0 3.3 3.6 3.2 5.4

Q26 A diverse advisory committee of citizens, parents and teachers has been working to evaluate the school district’s needs and this bond proposal will include recommendations from this citizen’s group.

1.4 1.7 4.6 5.1 6.2 3.0 5.4

Q27 Opponents say this bond will increase taxes and local debt and includes many things that are not essential.

0.3 3.0 0.7

• 0.1
• 0.1

2.0 0.3

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Correlation Scores

The top three scores are highlighted in light blue. The scores are relative measures that should be compared within a subgroup, not compared between different subgroups.

MESSAGE MATRIX

This bond could provide improvements to current technology infrastructure and devices on all campuses that will provide better instructional tools and learning

• pportunities for students (Q22).

Little Elm ISD is expected to add approximately 900 students during the next 5 years and over 1,500 students in the next 10 years. This bond will allow the district to accommodate this growth (Q17). Lakeside Middle School could enroll more than 1,400 students by 2018, putting it well over its functional

• capacity. This bond could allow for

the construction of a new middle school to serve the district’s growing middle school population (Q14).

Total

The district is looking to expand STEM programming and incorporate more hands-on learning at all

• campuses. This bond could include

minor renovations to elementary schools to create multi-purpose areas for students to collaborate in small groups and conduct experiments (Q19). Career and Technical Education programs allow students to prepare for college and the workforce. This bond could enhance these programs, including health science, agriculture sciences, and engineering, by improving and expanding existing program spaces (Q21).

Non-Parent

This bond could provide improvements to current technology infrastructure and devices on all campuses that will provide better instructional tools and learning

• pportunities for students (Q22).

Lakeside Middle School could enroll more than 1,400 students by 2018, putting it well over its functional

• capacity. This bond could allow for

the construction of a new middle school to serve the district’s growing middle school population (Q14). Little Elm ISD is expected to add approximately 900 students during the next 5 years and over 1,500 students in the next 10 years. This bond will allow the district to accommodate this growth (Q17).

Parent

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

Several of the district’s elementary schools are over functional capacity and more growth is expected….Re- purposing Powell Sixth Grade Center and Prestwick K-8 STEM Academy to become elementary schools to save the district from having to build new schools and have the district’s sixth through eighth grade students all at the middle school level (Q13).

CONCLUSIONS

5

After hearing more about the possible bond elements, 71% would vote for and 26% would vote against it. A majority of both parents and non- parents are in favor at the end of the survey. Regression analysis identifies the most important messages to communicate.

2

On the initial ballot, 58% would vote for a bond of $150 million and 26% would vote against and 16% are undecided. Intensity percentages among older voters and non-parents indicate a close

• utcome (if held today) in a low turnout election.

Little Elm ISD has a 82% positive / 12% negative image rating. Voters under 55 are more likely to say the district manages its money wisely while voters 55 and older are more likely to say the district manages its money wastefully.

1

Baselice & Associates, Inc. Project# 17461

3

A majority of voters (both parent and non-parents) are opposed to a bond of $175 million with a tax impact of $24.37 on the average home.

4

Parents are opposed to re-purposing Powell. There is no statistical difference between new elementary schools and expanding them. While there is more initial support for renovating Lakeside Middle School, voters prefer rebuilding it when they hear more about it.

BONDING CAPACITY REVIEW

OVERVIEW OF BOND PROCESS

• The sale of bonds begins with an election to authorize a specific amount – the maximum

the district is allowed to sell without another election.

• The school district sells the bonds when funds are needed for capital projects.
• LEISD does not incur bond debt until the bonds are sold. Even though the voters approved

the bond issue, there are no costs incurred until the bonds are sold.

• Bonds being authorized does not obligate the district to sell bonds. The district sells bonds when

the funds are needed for the approved projects.

BONDING CAPACITY

• Bonding capacity is estimated based on the following variables:

ü Beginning Assessed Valuation of Taxable Property ü Projected growth rate of Assessed Property Valuation ü Projected Interest Rates on Bonds ü Timing and amount of Individual Bond Sales ü The product of these variables determines the tax rate required to fund the projects.

SCENARIO

• Authorize $195,000,000
• Sell $105 million of bonds in 2018
• Sell $80 million of bonds in 2020
• Sell $10 million of bonds in 2022
• Debt Service Tax Rate will increase $.1015 from $.37 to .4715
• Overall Tax Rate will increase from $1.54 to $1.6415
• Assumes 18% Property Value Growth for 1 year; 7.5% for 2 years; 5%

for 3 years.

POTENTIAL PROJECT UPDATES & COST ANALYSIS

BUILDING TOTAL PROJECT BUDGETS

BUILDING TOTAL PROJECT BUDGETS

Cost Trends

SUMMARY

$240 $230 $220 $210 $200 $190 $180 $170 $160 $150 $140

$161 $193 $184 $238 $227 $155 $166 $164 $174 $169 $184 $179 $204 $218 $218 $138 $151 $159 $171 $166 $193

High School Middle School Elem School Pent Up Demand Recovery 11% AVERAGE 4-5% AVERAGE

2010 201 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

• New Middle School

$66,757,000

• 945 functional student capacity with 1,200 core capacity
• Designed to be expanded
• Tornado shelter
• Land Purchase
• Projected opening of August 2020

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

• Lakeside Middle School Options
• Lakeside Middle School Renovation

$53,998,000

• 800 student capacity
• New additions to replace metal buildings and improve circulation
• Renovations to the existing school
• Tornado Shelter
• Athletic facility improvements
• Lakeside Middle School Renovation and Additions

$73,043,000

• Everything above plus classroom addition to bring to 945 functional capacity

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

• Lakeside Middle School Options
• Lakeside Middle School Replacement

$75,412,000

• New construction on existing site
• 945 student functional capacity with 1,200 core capacity
• Tornado Shelter
• Demolition of existing school and partial parking
• Projected opening of August 2022

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

Lakeside Middle School Options

RENOVATE BUILD NEW

Renovate only: $53,998,000 800 capacity 66% of cost to build new Renovate and add onto: $73,043,000 945 capacity 89% of cost to build new 10-20 year life extension of 30 year old building $75,412,000 945 capacity, 1,200 core with ability to expand Brand new building with 50 to 75 year life expectancy

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

• Two Middle Schools with 945 functional capacity provides

1,890 functional capacity, and up to 2,000 total capacity, satisfying ten year growth projections.

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

Project Timeline

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

Elementary Growth

• Convert Powell to K-5 Elementary School

$4,011,000

• New classroom furniture
• Includes capital improvement projects
• Convert Prestwick to K-5 Elementary School

$704,000

• New age-appropriate furniture allotment

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

Capital Improvement Projects $23,735,000

• Site improvements at Brent ES, Cesar Chavez ES, Hackberry ES and Oak Point ES
• Masonry cleaning, pointing, and reseal of all joints and penetrations at all campuses
• Controlled entry vestibule at Brent ES and Cesar Chavez ES
• HVAC replacements at Brent ES, Cesar Chavez ES, Hackberry ES, Little Elm HS and Athletic

Complex

• Fire Alarm replacements at Brent ES, Cesar Chavez ES, Hackberry ES, Lakeview ES, Little Elm HS

and Athletic Complex

• Roof replacements or improvements at all campuses

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

Multipurpose Facility Options

• 100-yard Multipurpose Facility across Waterside Dr.

$32,605,000

• 100yd indoor field, 2 end zones, 20’ clear around field, Full program for Fine Arts, Football, Soccer, and Wrestling
• 100-yard Multipurpose Facility - Minimal Option A across Waterside Dr.

$20,138,000

• 100yd indoor field, 1 end zone, 14’ clear around field, support rooms (restrooms, storage, etc.) NO LOCKER ROOMS
• 100-yard Multipurpose Facility - Minimal Option B across Waterside Dr.

$21,652,000

• 100yd indoor field, 1 end zone, 14’ clear around field, weight room, AD office suite, support rooms, NO LOCKER ROOMS
• 100-yard Multipurpose Facility - Minimal Option C across Waterside Dr.

$28,283,000

• 100yd indoor field, 1 end zone, 14’ clear around field, weight room, AD office suite, football locker rooms, mat room, support

rooms

• New Baseball and Softball facilities at High School (Across Waterside Dr.)

$9,571,000

• Needed to keep the Indoor on the HS side of their property

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

• Existing Little Elm High School Athletic Renovations

$11,100,000

• Renovate existing athletics area in HS
• Weight room addition
• Replace turf and resurface track
• Tennis Court Renovations
• 400-bench seats – BB & SB
• Pre-engineered Press box at BB & SB
• 2 practice fields (one soccer size) with 100-bench seats
• BB/SB Concessions & RR Bldg.
• Flood plain study / Corp of Engineers
• Little Elm Athletic Complex Renovations

$3,394,000

• Resurface track, upgraded shot put areas, scoreboard components, concession A/C

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

LEHS CTE Additions & Renovations $15,016,000

New Addition for an Auto Tech Shop $3,943,000 New Addition for a Welding Shop Expansion $3,114,000 New Addition for a Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing (MEP) Lab & Shop $2,781,000 New Addition for a Horticulture Lab $607,000 New Addition for a CNC Lab $2,781,000 Renovation for a School Store $196,000 Renovation for an Engineering Lab $583,000 Renovation for a Health Science Lab $1,011,000

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

• Elementary STEM Renovations

$3,413,000

• Convert existing library/classroom spaces at 5 elementary campuses

POTENTIAL PROJECTS & COST ANALYSIS

Security & Technology

• Safety & Security

$1,043,000

• Security camera additions/upgrades, access control devices, two-way radios and fencing
• 10 G Fiber-Backbone Upgrades at each facility

$173,000

• HVAC to MDF Rooms

$59,000

• New location for NOC

$2,391,000

• Neighborhood WiFi Network

$291,000

PRIORITIZATION REVIEW & POTENTIAL BOND PACKAGE SCENARIOS

PRIORITIZATION FROM MEETING 4

PROJECTS CAMPUS BENEFIT TO STUDENTS URGENCY OF NEED EQUITY VALUE PROJECT RANKING TOTAL 40% 30% 20% 10% Weighted Value Multipurpose Facility & Existing Athletic Renovations Little Elm High School 4.7 4.9 4.3 4.6 4.66 Convert Prestwick to K-5 Prestwick STEM Academy 4.7 4.7 4.3 4.0 4.56 Convert Powell to K-5 Colin Powell Sixth Grade Center 4.7 4.7 4.1 3.7 4.50 Existing CTE Renovations/Expansions Little Elm High School 4.7 3.6 4.4 4.0 4.24 Renovations to Athletic Complex Little Elm High School 4.1 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.90 Elementary STEM Renovations All Elementary Campuses 4.6 3.1 4.0 2.7 3.84 Security and 10G Fiber-Backbone Upgrades All Facilities 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.69 HVAC to MDF Rooms All Facilities 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.93 Neighborhood WiFi Network Technology 2.9 2.1 3.0 2.4 2.63 Horticulture - Green house, lab and storage Little Elm High School 2.6 1.9 2.6 2.6 2.36 New Location for Network Operations Center Technology 2.6 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.07

PROJECTS CAMPUS BUDGET PROJECT RANKING TOTAL New Middle School #2 (945 capacity) + Land New $66,757,000 Lakeside Middle School Replacement (945 capacity) New $75,412,000 Capital Improvement Projects All Campuses $23,735,000 Multipurpose Facility & Existing Athletic Renovations Little Elm High School 4.66 100-yard Multipurpose Indoor Facility across Waterside Dr. $32,605,000 100-yard Multipurpose Indoor Facility - Minimal Option A across Waterside Dr. $20,138,000 100-yard Multipurpose Indoor Facility - Minimal Option B across Waterside Dr. $21,652,000 100-yard Multipurpose Indoor Facility - Minimal Option C across Waterside Dr. $28,283,000 New Baseball and Softball facilities at High School (Across Waterside Dr.) $9,571,000 Athletics renovations to existing High School facilities $10,434,000 Convert Prestwick to K-5 Prestwick STEM Academy $704,000 4.56 Convert Powell to K-5 Colin Powell Sixth Grade Center $4,011,000 4.50 Existing CTE Renovations/Expansions Little Elm High School $15,016,000 4.24 LEHS CTE - New Addition for an Auto Tech Shop $3,943,000 LEHS CTE - New Addition for a Welding Shop Expansion $3,114,000 LEHS CTE - New Addition for a Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing (MEP) Lab & Shop $2,781,000 LEHS CTE - New Addition for a Horticulture Lab $607,000 2.36 LEHS CTE - New Addition for a CNC Lab $2,781,000 LEHS CTE - Renovation for a School Store $196,000 LEHS CTE - Renovation for an Engineering Lab $583,000 LEHS CTE - Renovation for a Health Science Lab $1,011,000 Renovations to Athletic Complex LEISD Athletics $3,394,000 3.90 Elementary STEM Renovations All Elementary Campuses $3,413,000 3.84 Safety & Security All Facilities $1,043,000 3.69 Fiber-Backbone Upgrades $173,000 3.69 HVAC to MDF Rooms All Facilities $59,000 2.93 Neighborhood WiFi Network Technology $291,000 2.63 Horticulture - Green house, lab and storage Little Elm High School 2.36 New Location for Network Operations Center Technology $2,391,000 2.07

POTENTIAL SCENARIOS

Scenario 1 $171,662,000

• New Middle School

$66,757,000

• Lakeside Middle School Replacement

$75,412,000

• Capital Improvement Projects

$23,735,000

• Convert Powell to K-5 Elementary School

$4,011,00

• Convert Prestwick to K-5 Elementary School

$704,000

• Security & Security

$1,043,000

POTENTIAL SCENARIOS

Scenario 2 $188,903,000

• New Middle School

$66,757,000

• Lakeside Middle School Replacement

$75,412,000

• Capital Improvement Projects

$23,735,000

• Convert Powell to K-5 Elementary School

$4,011,00

• Convert Prestwick to K-5 Elementary School

$704,000

• Existing Little Elm High School Athletic Renovations

$10,434,000

• Little Elm Athletic Complex Renovations

$3,394,000

• Elementary STEM Renovations

$3,413,000

• Security & Security

$1,043,000

POTENTIAL SCENARIOS

Scenario 3 $180,586,000

• New Middle School

$66,757,000

• Lakeside Middle School Replacement

$75,412,000

• Capital Improvement Projects

$23,735,000

• Convert Powell to K-5 Elementary School

$4,011,00

• Convert Prestwick to K-5 Elementary School

$704,000

• New Addition for a Welding Shop Expansion

$3,114,000

• New Addition for a Horticulture Lab

$607,000

• Renovation for a School Store

$196,000

• Renovation for a new Engineering Lab

$583,000

• Renovation for a Health Science Lab

$1,011,000

• Elementary STEM Renovations

$3,413,000

• Security & Security

$1,043,000

SMALL GROUP EXERCISE: BUILD YOUR IDEAL BOND PACKAGE

LARGE GROUP SHARE OUT

CLOSING Questions?

NEXT MEETING

MONDAY, JUNE 5, 2017

Zellars Center for Learning & Leadership 300 Lobo Lane Little Elm, TX 75068 5:30 p.m. Dinner; 6:00 p.m. Meeting Start