Lipid lowering therapies - past, present and future Professor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lipid lowering therapies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lipid lowering therapies - past, present and future Professor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lipid lowering therapies - past, present and future Professor Mogens Lytken Larsen Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark It began with the population studies! Relationship between total serum cholesterol concentration and stroke risk by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lipid lowering therapies

  • past, present and future

Professor Mogens Lytken Larsen

Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

It began with the population studies!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Relationship between total serum cholesterol concentration and stroke risk by subtype from MRFIT. From Ansell in Curr Atheroscler Rep 2000.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Before statins

  • Bile acid sequestering resins *
  • Neomycin
  • Beta-sitosterol
  • Nicotinic acid *
  • Clofibrate *
  • Probucol
  • D-thyroxine

* tested in clinical trials

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LRC-CPPT - resins

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Coronary Drug Project - Niacin

slide-8
SLIDE 8

POSCH study – ilial bypass

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LDL lowering today

  • Statins (1987)
  • Ezetimibe (2002)
  • Combinations
  • Statin + resins
  • Statin + Nicotinic acid
  • Statin + ezetimibe
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

4S To IDEAL 11 Years Of Landmark Statin Trials

Second Wave Of Trials

  • Focus on other high-risk groups

– ACS, elderly, DM, HTN

  • Comparisons beyond placebo

– vs usual care (ALLIANCE, ALL-HAT) – active comparator (PROVE IT, A to Z) First 5 Trials Proved RRR In Morbidity And Mortality Vs Placebo 1994 4S 1995 WOSCOPS 1996 CARE 1998 AFCAPS/TexCAPS LIPID 2001 MIRACL 2002 HPS PROSPER ALL-HAT LLT 2003 ASCOT-LLA 2004 PROVE IT ALLIANCE CARDS A to Z 2005 TNT IDEAL Intensity Of Statin Treatment In Stable CHD Patients Receiving Contemporary Therapy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Slide 11

Relationship Between LDL-C and CV Incidence

Mean Treatment LDL-C at Follow-up, mg/dL (mmol/L) Event, %

30 80 (2.1) 140 (3.6) 200 (5.2) 25 20 15 10 5 100 (2.6) 40 (1.0) 120 (3.1) 180 (4.7)

4S 4S CARE HPS

60 (1.6)

LIPID

Statin Placebo

HPS CARE LIPID

160 (4.1)

PROVE-IT (Atv) PROVE-IT (Pra)

ASCOT

AFCAPS

ASCOT

AFCAPS WOSCOPS WOSCOPS

Secondary Prevention Primary Prevention

IDEAL (Atv) IDEAL (Sim) TNT (Atv 80 mg) TNT (Atv 10 mg)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AIM-HIGH (N Eng J Med nov. 2011)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Slide 13

Ezetimibe: LDL-C Lowering Efficacy Regardless of Statin

*Lovastatin, pravastatin, cerivastatin, and fluvastatin Adapted from Gagné C et al Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1084–1091.

–30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5

Mean % change in calculated LDL-C from on-statin baseline at 8 weeks Simvastatin Atorvastatin Other statins* Statin + placebo Statin + ezetimibe

–26.8 –23.5 –3.1 –3.8 –4 –25

(n=117) (n=123) (n=162) (n=146) (n=111) (n=110)

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

1.8 vs. 1.4

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Bempodoic acid
  • CETP inhibitors
  • PCSK9 inhibitors
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Three CETP inhibitors failed - # 4 succesfull ???

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

NEJM march 17, 2017

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Small interferingRNA – a new PCSK9 approach

slide-26
SLIDE 26

NEJM 2017,376;41-51

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CONCLUSION

  • Statins and ezetimibe will reduce cardiovascular events
  • The first PCSK9 inhibitor have been shown to reduce

cardiovascular events - more to come ?

  • After three failures with CETP inhibitors one succesful

will be presented next week (??)

  • What will the future bring ?
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Nostradamus

It’s all in the stars

Jules Verne

Let your imagination run free – science will make everything possible

Karl Popper

We cannot know what we do not yet know