LIGO Mirror Diagnosis and Requirement SEN HAN University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
LIGO Mirror Diagnosis and Requirement SEN HAN University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The 3rd KAGRA International Workshop (KIW3) LIGO Mirror Diagnosis and Requirement SEN HAN University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Suzhou H&L Instruments LLC Academia Sinica (NTU campus), Taipei May 21-22, 2017 Outline KIW3
Introduction to USST GW Detection Activities at USST LIGO Mirror Requirements Absolute Measurement for High Accuracy Testing Super Large ROC Mirror
- Interferometer design
- Measurement results
Summary Outline
KIW3 · Taipei
3
USST - University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
KIW3 · Taipei
4
Suzhou H&L Instruments LLC
KIW3 · Taipei
Chairs
- Professor Songlin Zhuang, Academician
- Professor Jun Luo, Academician
- Professor Nenghong Zhu, Academician
Meeting at Caltech
- LIGO Director: Prof. David Reitze
- LIGO Deputy Director: Prof. Albert Lazzarini
- Chief Scientist: Dr. Stanley Whitcomb
- With the help of Dr. Garrett Cole
Support by both EFST and USST Background of 247th EFST in 2014
A-C Roundtable 247th EFST KIW3 · Taipei
随着科学技术的飞速发展,中国应积极参与到引力波这项基础科学的研究领域中,在已有的研究基础上,集中国内的科 研力量,制定完整的路线图和具体的探测方案,同时也应使更多的学者和科学家参与到国际探测引力波的合作中,从而 培养自己的科研队伍,为世界科学发展贡献自己的一份力量。
Agreement at 247th EFST
KIW3 · Taipei
Visited Advanced LIGO, 2015.2
KIW3 · Taipei
美国加州理工学院 LIGO执行副主任 Albert Lazzarini博士 日本东京大学 KAGRA执行主任 Takaaki Kajita教授 英国格拉斯哥大学 GEO600发言人 Sheila Rowan教授 美国佛罗里达大学 LIGO 主要成员 David Tanner教授 美国加州理工学院 LIGO首席科学家 Stan Whitcomb博士 美国加州理工学院 LIGO执行主任 David Reitze博士 澳大利亚西亚大学 ACIGA执行主任 David Blair教授 台湾清华大学 Wei-Tou Ni教授
All Experts Related with USST
KIW3 · Taipei
Sample: R =6.0 m D =50 mm
δ = Δ
- =
[1 2 − 2 8ℎ2 Δℎ]2 + ( 4ℎ Δ)2 (4ℎ2 + 2) 8ℎ ⁄
Transmission Flat vs LIGO Mirror
TF LIGO Mirror
Flat A:PV = l/20.3 Flat B: PV = l/9.6 Flat C: PV = l/35.5 KIW3 · Taipei
Three Ideal Flats Generated by Zernike
Flat TF
Fizeau Laser Interferometer
KIW3 · Taipei
Testing Principle
Step 2:BxA-90 Step 1:BxA Step 4:CxB Step 3:CxA
KIW3 · Taipei
Testing Procedure
Flat A’:PV = l/20.3 Flat B’: PV = l/9.6 Flat C’: PV = l/35.5 KIW3 · Taipei
Result of Three-Flat Testing
Flat A – A’:PV =0 nm Flat B – B’: PV = 0 nm Flat C – C’: PV = 0 nm KIW3 · Taipei
Difference bwt Ideal & Testing Surface
PV = 6.13nm,H=30.0mm,Flat PV = 6.64nm,H=27.5mm,TF
KIW3 · Taipei
Extension Analysis — Deadweight (DW)
KIW3 · Taipei
Figure Error Caused by Deadweight PV=6.46mm
A - A’ 表面:PV = 0 nm B - B’ 表面: PV = 0 nm C - C’ 表面: PV = 0 nm
Further simulation shows: Assumed that SW figure error is changed from 6.46nm to15.17nm, Testing error from SW is still PV = 0. KIW3 · Taipei
Difference bwt Ideal & Testing with DW
Model:HOOL L9600A Company: Suzhou H&L Instruments Aperture 6inch (150mm) Wavelength 632.8nm TF PV λ/20 Precision λ/600 Repeatability (PV) λ/500 Repeatability (RMS) λ/1000 Alignment Two spots Feature Non-stress Size 798×598×1078mm Power 220V 50Hz KIW3 · Taipei
Real Measurement
PV: 26.76 nm RMS: 5.70 nm
KIW3 · Taipei
Testing Result of TF A
PV: 19.28 nm RMS: 4.32 nm
KIW3 · Taipei
Testing Result of TF B
PV: 29.36 nm RMS: 6.88 nm
KIW3 · Taipei
Testing Result of TF C
A:National Standard Flat C2 Ab=BA-B Ac=CA-C B:H&L Instruments TF Ba=BA-A Bc=CB-C Ca=CA-A Cb=CB-B PV: 0.090 l RMS: 0.0169 l PV: 0.083 l RMS: 0.0154 l PV: 0.085 l RMS: 0.0153 l PV: 0.052 l RMS: 0.0073 l PV: 0.044 l RMS: 0.0048 l PV: 0.058 l RMS: 0.0073 l PV: 0.053 l RMS: 0.0059 l PV: 0.057 l RMS: 0.0073 l PV: 0.051 l RMS: 0.0046 l C: National Standard Flat C1
H&L solved the hard problem of closed-loop for absolute testing
PV = 12.64 nm, RMS = 1.43 nm KIW3 · Taipei
High Accurate Flat — l/50PV
After one day, absolute testing was repeated. RMS Difference = 2nm
Flat A'
KIW3 · Taipei
Reproducibility
30℃ 25℃ Temperature Change
PV:345.94nm RMS:103.99nm PV:111.63m RMS:29.95nm PV:72.34m RMS:17.85nm PV:49.15nm RMS:10.18nm
KIW3 · Taipei
Absolute shape changed with temperature
Special Interferometer for LIGO Mirror
A-C Roundtable 247th EFST KIW3 · Taipei
27
The ROC was independently established to be 6 km. Three measurement results: 5.84 km, 5.85 km, and 5.87 km.
Measurement Results - Final ROC
Simulated Retrace Error Using Ray Tracing Software 2.11 nm PV with tilt term for 4 fringes, 0.56 nm PV after removal of tilt term. Retrace Error of Real System 1.84 nm PV and 0.26 nm RMS at 4-fringe tilt and average
- f 60 sets after the accurate alignment
A-C Roundtable
3-FLAT TEST
- PV=10nm for difference
bwt 2 independent measurements RMS=1nm after removing both focus and astigmatism
247th EFST KIW3 · Taipei
Digital phase shifting interferometer
Absolute measurement
Solution of closed-loop for absolute testing
High accuracy PV l/100
Temperature effect
Deadweight issue
ROC error 2.5% Summary / Future
GWO - Gravitational-Wave Observatory
- 1. Keeping talking at this workshop
- 2. Cooperating with all of you on testing super