Licensure and Preparation Subcommittee STATE BO ARD O F EDUC ATIO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Licensure and Preparation Subcommittee STATE BO ARD O F EDUC ATIO N DEC . 17, 2019 Agenda Pro po se d c ha ng e s to the E duc a to r Pre pa ra tio n Re po rt Ca rd Po te ntia l upda te to middle g ra de s ma th lic e nsure a sse
STATE BO ARD O F EDUC ATIO N DEC . 17, 2019
duc a to r Pre pa ra tio n Re po rt Ca rd
AMY O WEN AND ERIKA LEIC HT
Annual Educator Preparation Reporting
A shared data set that is cleaned and coded by a joint SBE/TDOE team and verified by EPPs underlies both reports
State Board of Education Report Cards High-level report designed for external stakeholders Highlights EPP performance on key state priority areas Public accountability mechanism TDOE Annual Reports Detailed report designed for program approval process and EPP continuous improvement efforts Sets a minimum bar for programs to continue
Failure to meet expectations for two consecutive years triggers TDOE interim review
nc re a se a c c e ssib ility & use fulne ss fo r ne w sta ke ho lde r g ro ups
E d uc a tio n Pre pa ra tio n Pro vid e rs Pro spe c tive T e a c he r Ca nd id a te s L e g isla to rs & Sta te -L e ve l L e a d e rs Sc ho o l-L e ve l L e a d e rs Othe r Co mmunity Gro ups Distric t-L e ve l L e a d e rs
Ne w T e ac he r Hir ing E duc ator Pr e par ation Pr
am Se le c tion Par tne r ships with ar e a E PPs
e a c he r Ca ndida te s – a b o ut 40 stude nts a t 4 E PPs
e ve l L e a de rs – Go ve rno r’ s Ac a de my fo r Sc ho o l L e a de rs (GASL )
e ve l L e a de rs
OSS Bo a rd
ASPA (distric t HR pro fe ssio na ls) Bo a rd a nd pre se nta tio n a t No v. 2019 c o nfe re nc e
duc a to r Pre pa ra tio n Pro vide rs
ACT E c o nfe re nc e
syste m sc ho o ls
e e db a c k fo rms se nt to T I CUA institutio ns
N Ge ne ra l Asse mb ly
b y – SBE Vic e Cha ir
PPS:
isa Ba rro n/ Dr. Pre ntic e Cha nd le r, Austin Pe a y
ipsc o mb
no xville
ric Cumming s, Cumb e rla nd
im Ha wkins, Ca rso n-Ne wma n
a ha nn, Na shville T e a c he r Re sid e nc y
iz Se lf, Va nd e rb ilt
ync h – T OSS
re e la nd – SCORE
no xville Co unty Sc ho o ls
PP; c o mplia nc e with this po lic y is mo nito re d b y T DOE
DOE , stude nts o f c o lo r ma ke up 37 pe rc e nt o f T e nne sse e ’ s K
e nne sse e te a c he rs a re pe o ple o f c o lo r.
va rie ty o f po sitive impa c t o n stude nts, inc luding in the a re a s o f a c a de mic a c hie ve me nt, disc ipline , a nd so c ia l/ e mo tio na l de ve lo pme nt.
his me tric re c o g nize s a nd re wa rds E PPs tha t a re pre pa ring te a c he rs in the a re a s o f g re a te st ne e d.
will wo rk with T DOE to upda te the list o f hig h-de ma nd e ndo rse me nts a s ne e ds c ha ng e .
e nne sse e pub lic sc ho o ls va rie s g re a tly de pe nding o n the lo c a tio n a nd missio n o f e a c h E PP.
he re is no fe a sib le wa y fo r us to tra c k o ut-o f-sta te o r priva te sc ho o l e mplo yme nt.
DOE ’ s a nnua l re po rts o n E PPs (whic h a re use d to de te rmine pro g ra m a ppro va l) inc lude first-ye a r e mplo yme nt a s a n unsc o re d me tric .
SE COND YE AR Curre nt va lue : 9 po ints Pro po se d va lue : 9 po ints Ra tio na le :
the impo rta nc e o f this me tric
T HI RD YE AR Curre nt va lue : 0 po ints Pro po se d va lue : 6 po ints Ra tio na le :
nc e ntivize E PPs to pre pa re te a c he rs with “sta ying po we r”
SCORE OF 3+ Curre nt va lue : 6 po ints Pro po se d va lue : 9 po ints Ra tio na le :
c o nside re d to b e “me e ting e xpe c ta tio ns.”
SCORE OF 4+ Curre nt va lue : 9 po ints Pro po se d va lue : 6 po ints Ra tio na le :
his is a hig h b a r fo r e a rly c a re e r te a c he rs to me e t.
PPs to a im fo r this hig h b a r with the ir c o mple te rs a nd re c o g nize the m whe n the y suc c e e d.
SCORE OF 3+ Curre nt va lue : 10 po ints Pro po se d va lue : 15 po ints Ra tio na le :
c o nside re d to b e “me e ting e xpe c ta tio ns.”
SCORE OF 4+ Curre nt va lue : 15 po ints Pro po se d va lue : 10 po ints Ra tio na le :
his is a hig h b a r fo r e a rly c a re e r te a c he rs to me e t.
PPs to a im fo r this hig h b a r with the ir c o mple te rs a nd re c o g nize the m whe n the y suc c e e d.
e nne sse e E duc ator Sur ve y
N E duc a to r Surve y inc lude s a n “E a rly Ca re e r” mo dule fo r te a c he rs in the ir first thre e ye a rs o f te a c hing
his ma y e ve ntua lly b e c o me a sc o re d me tric , b ut will b e unsc o re d this ye a r sinc e we a re re po rting it fo r the first time
ate s on e dT PA and Pr axis Subje c t Asse ssme nts
his ma y b e c o me a sc o re d me tric o nc e a ll re le va nt c o ho rts ha ve e dT PA re sults
PRE VI OUS VE RSI ON: 4 CAT E GORI E S NE W VE RSI ON: 3 CAT E GORI E S
Category Percent of Points Exceeds Expectations 80%-100% Meets Expectations 40%-79.9% Does Not Meet Expectations 0%-39.9% Category Percent of Points 4 80.1%-100% 3 60.1%-80% 2 40.1%-60% 1 0%-40%
PPs
spe c ia lly fo r sma ll E PPs, ma king fine distinc tio ns a mo ng pro g ra ms tha t a re pe rfo rming in the middle o f the pa c k is diffic ult
numb e r o f pe rfo rma nc e c a te g o rie s he lps a vo id fa lse e q uiva le nc ie s with pre vio us ye a rs’ re sults
ge t.
PPs a t o r b e lo w the flo o r fo r a pa rtic ula r me tric will re c e ive 0 po ints fo r tha t me tric .
PPs a t o r a b o ve the ta rg e t fo r a pa rtic ula r me tric will re c e ive full po ints fo r tha t me tric .
PPs b e twe e n the flo o r a nd the ta rg e t will re c e ive a pro po rtio na l a mo unt o f po ints.
PP must re c e ive a t le a st 40% o f po ssib le po ints.
PP must re c e ive a t le a st 80% o f po ssib le po ints.
n pre vio us ye a rs, the flo o r a nd ta rg e t fo r e a c h me tric we re b a se d o n pe rc e ntile s. T he pe rc e ntile s we re se t in 2016 a nd ha ve no t b e e n re se t sinc e the n, so a ll E PPs c o uld sho w impro ve me nt.
ave r age s (no t inc luding the c urre nt
ye a r) to se t pe rfo rma nc e b e nc hma rks. T he se a ve ra g e s we re ro unde d to pro duc e the fina l b e nc hma rks sho wn o n the ne xt slide .
Metric Floor (minimum to receive points) Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Target (maximum points) Percent of racially & ethnically diverse completers 0% 12% 24% 30% Percent of high-demand endorsements 5% 17% 29% 35% Second-year retention 80% 86% 92% 95% Third-year retention 60% 68% 76% 80% Observation 3+ 80% 86% 92% 95% Observation 4+ 35% 47% 59% 65% Student Growth 3+ 45% 55% 65% 70% Student Growth 4+ 10% 20% 30% 35%
DOE E duc a to r Upda te
PP Org a niza tio ns (e .g ., T ACT E , T I CUA)
t Car d L aunc h: F e b. 15, 2020
AMY O WEN
n 2017, the Sta te Bo a rd c o nve ne d a g ro up o f K
fa c ulty to re vie w a va ila b le lic e nsure a sse ssme nts in the a re a o f ma th.
he e duc a to rs re c o mme nde d tra nsitio ning fro m the Pr
axis Middle Gr ade s Math
a sse ssme nt to the Pe ar
son NE S Middle Gr ade s and E ar ly Se c ondar y Math
a sse ssme nt due to tig hte r a lig nme nt to T N ma th sta nda rds.
he y a lso re c o mme nde d tha t the NE S a sse ssme nt a llo w e duc a to rs to te a c h up thro ug h Alg e b ra 1/ I nte g ra te d Ma th 1, in a dditio n to middle g ra de s ma th.
his c ha ng e wa s pha se d in a nd wa s a c c e pte d in Oc t. 2018.
PPs, inc luding tho se a c hie ving the to p c a te g o rie s o n the SBE E duc a to r Pre pa ra tio n Re po rt Ca rd, ha ve indic a te d lo w pa ss ra te s o n the Pe a rso n NE S e xa m fo r the ir c a ndida te s.
PPs fo c us the ir pro g ra mming fo r this e ndo rse me nt a re a o n middle g ra de s-le ve l ma th a nd no t ne c e ssa rily e a rly se c o nda ry-le ve l, whic h is a lso c o ve re d o n the Pe a rso n NE S a sse ssme nt.
g ra de s ma th te a c he rs.
lic e nsure rule s ha ve no t ye t b e e n upda te d to a llo w pa ssing the Pe a rso n NE S e xa m to a llo w c a ndida te s to te a c h Alg e b ra 1/ I nte g ra te d Ma th 1.
a ppro ve d b o th the Pra xis a nd Pe a rso n NE S a sse ssme nts b a se d o n the 2017 re vie w.
ha t de c isio n wa s b a se d o n the hig h rig o r o f b o th te sts, tho ug h the Pe a rso n NE S te st wa s a g a in b e tte r-a lig ne d to T N ma th sta nda rds.
his dua l-o ptio n pa thwa y ma y e a se so me te a c he r sho rta g e s in hig h sc ho o l ma th a nd a ssist e duc a to rs fro m o the r sta te s tha t re q uire the Pe a rso n NE S se rie s in mo re e a sily
N lic e nse s.
he re fo re , SBE sta ff pro po se a dding the Pra xis Middle Gra de s Ma th a sse ssme nt b a c k into the Pro fe ssio na l Asse ssme nts Po lic y 5.105 a s a n o ptio n fo r c a ndida te s pursuing middle g ra de s ma th lic e nsure , in a dditio n to le a ving the Pe a rso n NE S
– Out of State applicants – Professional License – Teaching Reading Assessment – Early Childhood endorsements – Licensure policy alignment to rule
– Continued engagement with HR directors and directors of schools – TASPA Kitchen Cabinet
32
– Use of TNCR rubric – Training – Next steps for fall reviews
33