LEGEND: The Large Enriched Germanium Experiment for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
Julieta Gruszko on behalf of the LEGEND Collaboration Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 7, 2019
LEGEND: The Large Enriched Germanium Experiment for Neutrinoless - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
LEGEND: The Large Enriched Germanium Experiment for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Julieta Gruszko on behalf of the LEGEND Collaboration Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 7, 2019 Why Use 76 Ge? High-Purity Ge (HPGe) detectors:
Julieta Gruszko on behalf of the LEGEND Collaboration Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 7, 2019
intrinsically low background, high efficiency
FWHM @ 2039 keV (Qββ )
commercial market for HPGe detectors
– Multiplicity-based rejection in arrays – Multi-site event rejection – Surface event rejection
2
3
– Optimize noise performance w/ ~1kg masses – Pulse shape highly dependent on position
➞ multi-site pulse shape discrimination (PSD)
– Reduces Compton BG by 60% with 90% signal efficiency
Normal SSE MSE
Time (µs)
Current (ADC/ns) Voltage (ADC)
Lower Limit MJD, arXiv:1901.05388 GERDA, Eur. Phys.
4
CC near Qββ CC near Qββ, Mean
Detector ID (MJD)
Acceptance (%)
Near-p+ SSE
Time (µs)
Normal SSE
Current (ADC/ns) Voltage (ADC)
GERDA Phase II, J. Janicsko MEDEX’17
Signal band
6
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
t [ns]
500 1000 1500 2000
ADC
MAJORANA-1803.01b
Voltage (ADC)
Signal region High DCR: surface α Low A vs. E: multi-site
See Gruszko, J., & Detwiler, Jason A. (2017). Surface alpha interactions in P-Type point-contact HPGe detectors : Maximizing sensitivity of ⁷⁶Ge neutrinoless double-beta decay searches. Seattle, University of Washington.
7
!. #$!.%
&!.'×)!$* cnts/keV/kg/yr
~ ). +$!.#
&).% cnts/FWHM/t/yr
From combined exposure:
8
4.7 ± 0.8 ×10)* cnts/keV/kg/yr ~ 11.9 ± 2.0 cnts/FWHM/t/yr
1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350
Energy [keV]
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Counts/(keV kg yr)
All Cuts 90% C.L. Limit
MAJORANA-1806.07b
9
47 Institutions, 250 Scientists, worldwide Mission statement The collaboration aims to develop a phased, 76Ge based double-beta decay experimental program with discovery potential at a half-life beyond 1028 years, using existing resources as appropriate to expedite physics results.
1
17 meV for worst-case matrix element of 3.5 and unquenched gA
cover inverted
element uncertainty
11
17 meV for worst-case matrix element of 3.5 and unquenched gA
cover inverted
element uncertainty
See Matteo Agostini, Giovanni Benato, and Jason A. Detwiler, Phys. Rev. D 96, 053001 for more discussion
12
Combine the best of MAJORANA:
…with the best of GERDA:
and techniques developed in both experiments:
13
near term physics results
MAJORANA GERDA
LEGEND-200
LEGEND-1000
Assuming ROI = 3σ ≈ 1.3 FWHM Figure taken from PRD 96, 053001 (2017)
IO m""
#$%
14
infrastructure
experiment, allows for early world-leading results
15
strings with 40 detectors total
accommodate 200 kg of detectors: 14 - 19 detector strings
already exist: PPCs from MJD and GERDA
new detectors
16
yet determined
cosmogenic backgrounds underway
17
0.14 0.18 0.39 <0.24 0.38 <0.04 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.02 <0.01
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Electroformed Cu OFHC Cu Shielding Pb shielding Cables / Connectors Front Ends Ge (U/Th) Plastics + other Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) Co-60 (Cu) External γ, (α,n) Rn, surface α Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) Ge(n,n') Ge(n,γ) direct μ + other ν backgrounds
Background Rate (c/FWHM-t-y)
Electroformed Cu Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) External γ, (α,n) Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) ν backgrounds
Natural Radioactivity Cosmogenic Activation External, Environmental μ-induced neutrinos Total: <2.2 c/FWHM-t-y
MAJORANA-1810.03
MJD Background Budget (c/FWHM-t-yr)
42K
210Po
18
0.14 0.18 0.39 <0.24 0.38 <0.04 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.02 <0.01
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Electroformed Cu OFHC Cu Shielding Pb shielding Cables / Connectors Front Ends Ge (U/Th) Plastics + other Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) Co-60 (Cu) External γ, (α,n) Rn, surface α Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) Ge(n,n') Ge(n,γ) direct μ + other ν backgrounds
Background Rate (c/FWHM-t-y)
Electroformed Cu Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) External γ, (α,n) Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) ν backgrounds
Natural Radioactivity Cosmogenic Activation External, Environmental μ-induced neutrinos Total: <2.2 c/FWHM-t-y
MAJORANA-1810.03
MJD Background Budget (c/FWHM-t-yr)
42K
210Po
Reduced by lab depth and low-Z shielding
Controlled surface exposure; analysis Upper limit, will continue to learn Upper limit, will continue to learn; analysis
19
0.14 0.18 0.39 <0.24 0.38 <0.04 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.02 <0.01
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Electroformed Cu OFHC Cu Shielding Pb shielding Cables / Connectors Front Ends Ge (U/Th) Plastics + other Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) Co-60 (Cu) External γ, (α,n) Rn, surface α Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) Ge(n,n') Ge(n,γ) direct μ + other ν backgrounds
Background Rate (c/FWHM-t-y)
Electroformed Cu Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) External γ, (α,n) Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) ν backgrounds
Natural Radioactivity Cosmogenic Activation External, Environmental μ-induced neutrinos Total: <2.2 c/FWHM-t-y
MAJORANA-1810.03
MJD Background Budget (c/FWHM-t-yr)
42K
210Po
20
Benefits of larger detectors
and β BG reduction
New design: Inverted Coaxial Point-Contact
PPC
21
0.14 0.18 0.39 <0.24 0.38 <0.04 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.02 <0.01
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Electroformed Cu OFHC Cu Shielding Pb shielding Cables / Connectors Front Ends Ge (U/Th) Plastics + other Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) Co-60 (Cu) External γ, (α,n) Rn, surface α Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) Ge(n,n') Ge(n,γ) direct μ + other ν backgrounds
Background Rate (c/FWHM-t-y)
Electroformed Cu Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) External γ, (α,n) Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) ν backgrounds
Natural Radioactivity Cosmogenic Activation External, Environmental μ-induced neutrinos Total: <2.2 c/FWHM-t-y
MAJORANA-1810.03
MJD Background Budget (c/FWHM-t-yr)
42K
210Po
22
– ≤ 0.1 µBq/kg Th & U decay chains, very low in 60Co – New electroformed materials under study
front end electronics can be placed next to detectors: – Improves resolution and PSD – Lower-background cable and connector options being tested
23
mini-shrouds to limit β backgrounds
GERDA, arXiv:1711.01452
24
0.14 0.18 0.39 <0.24 0.38 <0.04 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.02 <0.01
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Electroformed Cu OFHC Cu Shielding Pb shielding Cables / Connectors Front Ends Ge (U/Th) Plastics + other Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) Co-60 (Cu) External γ, (α,n) Rn, surface α Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) Ge(n,n') Ge(n,γ) direct μ + other ν backgrounds
Background Rate (c/FWHM-t-y)
Electroformed Cu Ge-68, Co-60 (enrGe) External γ, (α,n) Ge, Cu, Pb (n, n'γ) ν backgrounds
Natural Radioactivity Cosmogenic Activation External, Environmental μ-induced neutrinos Total: <2.2 c/FWHM-t-y
MAJORANA-1810.03
MJD Background Budget (c/FWHM-t-yr)
42K
210Po
25
reduce/eliminate β backgrounds
for light collection efficiency
plant under construction
process ~1 ton/day
26
27
secured
running in GERDA
being delivered
detectors ordered
detector unit design being finalized
campaign is underway
Cryostat/Lock Upgrades Integration/ Commissioning
GERDA (100 kg yr) MAJORANA (75 kg yr)
Ton-Scale Down-Select L-1k Design and Build, 2021-2029
L-1k Data- Taking Start, 2025/6
28
– GERDA has the lowest ROI background experiment in the field – MJD has the best energy resolution of any experiment in the field
– Uses existing infrastructure – Data-taking planned to start in 2021 – Factor of 5 reduction from current best background index
– Another factor of 6 reduction in background index – Conceptual design and R&D are underway
29
– German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) – German Research Foundation (DFG), Excellence Cluster Universe – German Max Planck Society (MPG) – U.S. National Science Foundation, Nuclear Physics (NSF) – U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics (DOE-NP) – U.S. Department of Energy, Through the LANL & LBNL LDRD programs (LDRD) – Italian Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) – Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) – Polish National Science Centre (NCN) – Foundation for Polish Science – Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) – Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering – Canada Foundation for Innovation, John R. Evans Leaders Fund
30