lecture 2 embodiment concept and models
play

Lecture 2. Embodiment: Concept and Models Fabio Bonsignorio The - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lecture 2. Embodiment: Concept and Models Fabio Bonsignorio The BioRobotics Institute, SSSA, Pisa, Italy and Heron Robots Intelligence : Hard to agree on definitions, arguments necessary and sufficient conditions? are robots, ants, humans


  1. Lecture 2. Embodiment: Concept and Models Fabio Bonsignorio The BioRobotics Institute, SSSA, Pisa, Italy and Heron Robots

  2. Intelligence : Hard to agree on definitions, arguments necessary and sufficient conditions? • are robots, ants, humans intelligent? • more productive question: “Given a behavior of interest, how to implement it?” 2

  3. Successes and failures of the classical approach successes failures applications (e.g. foundations of Google) behavior chess natural forms of intelligence manufacturing interaction with real (“controlled”artificial world worlds) 3

  4. The “symbol grounding” problem real world: 
 doesn’t come 
 with labels … How to put the labels?? Gary Larson 4

  5. Two views of intelligence classical: 
 cognition as computation embodiment: 
 cognition emergent from sensory- motor and interaction processes 5

  6. The need for an embodied perspective “failures” of classical AI • fundamental problems of classical approach • Wolpert’s quote: Why do plants not …? • (but…check…Barbara Mazzolai’s lecture…) Interaction with environment: always • mediated by body 6

  7. “Frame-of-reference” Simon’s ant on the beach simple behavioral rules • complexity in interaction, 
 • not — necessarily — in brain thought experiment: 
 • increase body by factor of 1000 
 7

  8. Industrial robots vs. natural systems principles: humans - low precision - compliant - reactive - coping with uncertainty robots no direct transfer of methods 8

  9. Communication through interaction with exploitation of interaction with environment • simpler neural circuits angle sensors in joints “parallel, loosely coupled processes” 9

  10. Emergence of behavior: the actuated: 
 quadruped “Puppy” oscillation 
 simple control (oscillations of 
 • springs 
 “hip” joints) spring-like material properties 
 • (“under-actuated” system) passive 
 self-stabilization, no sensors • “outsourcing” of functionality • morphological computation 10

  11. Implications of embodiment “Puppy”, But Also Cruse Pfeifer et al.,Science, 16 Nov. 2007 11

  12. Implications of embodiment “Puppy” which part of diagram is relevant? 
 —> 
 Pfeifer et al.,Science, 16 Nov. 2007 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend