lay up mobile offshore units
play

LAY-UP MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS Liv Sand, Gard / Georg Nygaard, NHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LAY-UP MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS Liv Sand, Gard / Georg Nygaard, NHC 12 December 2016 LAY-UP OF MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS Background WHAT WHY HOW Cefor Guidelines for Lay-up of MOUs related to the Insurance Contract Checklist


  1. LAY-UP – MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS Liv Sand, Gard / Georg Nygaard, NHC 12 December 2016

  2. LAY-UP OF MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS • Background • WHAT • WHY • HOW • Cefor Guidelines for Lay-up of MOUs related to the Insurance Contract • Checklist for evaluation of lay-up

  3. BACKGROUND

  4. WHAT? The Nordic Marine Insurance Plan of 2013 Clause 3-26 (Ships laid up): For ships which are to be laid up, a lay-up plan shall be drawn up which shall be submitted to the insurer for his approval. If this has not been done, or the lay-up plan has not been followed while the ship is laid up, Cl. 3-25, sub-clause 1, shall apply correspondingly. Clause 3-25 (Breach of safety regulation), sub-clause 1: If a safety regulation has been breached, the insurer shall only be liable to the extent that the loss is not a consequence of the breach, or that the assured has not breached the safety regulation through negligence. However, the insurer may not invoke this rule where the assured is the master of the ship or a member of the crew and the breach is committed in connection with his service as a seaman.

  5. WHAT? NMIP Part 1 – Common Rules Chapter 3, DUTIES OF THE ASSURED • Section 1, DUTY OF DISCLOSURE - Full and correct information before contract is concluded • Section 2, ALTERATION OF RISK - Disclose changes during the insurance period; Change of flag, manager, loss of class, special operations, rebuilding of the MOU . Triggers new evaluation and agreement. • Section 3, SAFETY REGULATIONS - Adhere to and follow rules and regulations set by authorities, class, flag, etc - Prepare a lay-up plan - Cl. 18-1 (e) 1 – well being equipped with BOP or other well pressure control equipment - Cl. 18-1 (e) 2 – Prepare a move plan for MOUs not moving by own propulsion

  6. WHAT? • Breach of a safety regulation – insurers only liable for a loss if the loss is not a consequence of the breach, or if the assured has not acted negligent. • Focus: Safety being kept at an acceptable and manageable level – not a premium discussion • Prudent un-insured

  7. WHY? Why special focus on safety during lay-up? • «Just parking of the MOU» • «Risk is less than during operation» When in operation there are many interested parties making sure that safety is in focus; - Operator (license holders) - Petroleum Safety Authorities (sokkelstat) - Maritime Authorities - Flag state - Classification Societies - Own organization - Reputation Operations manuals/procedures approved by various parties

  8. WHY? When in lay-up most of these parties are no longer involved - Class and flag does not really have any requirements Flag - minimum manning, not all flags does provide a guide for this whilst in lay up. Norway (NMA) being one; “The company and the master are responsible for the safe operation of the ship. The NMA will therefore not stipulate a minimum safe manning for the lay-up period. The size of the crew will depend on several factors, e.g. lay-up location, level of security, hot or cold lay- up and local requirements.” Class – amends the status to «Laid up» if requested by the owner, no initial survey at time of lay-up, some request annual lay-up surveys, some do not. Referring to insurance. - Port authorities have limited requirements. - Consultancy services, but this comes at a cost.

  9. WHY? • Reduced costs naturally in focus • Cost vs safety • Park and leave • Minimal or no rules and regulations from authorities  Already seen damages – could easily been avoided?

  10. OCCURRENCE 1, 22.11.15

  11. OCCURRENCE 2, 02.06.16 • Semi-sub cold stacked and laid down on seabed • 2 x drillships broke moorings, drifted and 1 collided with the semi-sub • Minor damage, no breach of hull or impact on water integrity Damage of U- Light (Aft – Stbd) Damage of Vertical frame and its bracings. Steering room (Aft – Stbd)

  12. OCCURRENCE 3, 09.07.16 • Semi-sub cold stacked and laid down on seabed • Monthy inspection revealed that a pump room had flooded • Leaking sea chest valve caused water ingress

  13. OCCURRENCE 4, 29.01.16 • NB 830 – today «Normand Maximus» • Heavy weather, broke loose from quayside during outfitting at Yard in Brattvaag, just north of Ålesund. • The video demonstrates the power in strong wind

  14. HOW? • Planning of the lay-up • Prepare a lay-up plan • Duty of the assured • No guide provided by insurers on how to lay-up a vessel, we are not the experts • Many consultants, including class companies, are offering to assist in the planning and execution of a lay-up, if required. Cefor guideline focus on the provisions laid down in an insurance contract based on the Nordic Plan, and furthermore provides a guide of what is important to include in the lay-up plan in relation to clause 3-26, being safety and security. Result of the Nordic insurers ’ wish to be pro-active in order to avoid possible conflicts in case of an incident leading to a physical damage.

  15. CEFOR GUIDELINES Introduction • Underlines that this is not a guide on how to lay up or preserve the MOU. • Stacking / lay-up = same meaning. • Idle units vs operational units. Insurance Implications • Description of clause 3-26 and the corresponding commentaries. • Approval only in respect of the four issues listed. • Recommend that a lay-up plan also should include maintenance and preservation (ref cl 18-19 Inadequate maintenance, etc). • Must remain in class (but ok to amend to laid up status). • Alteration of risk (cl 3-8), e.g. if different management during lay-up.

  16. CEFOR GUIDELINES When and how should insurers be advised and involved • Notify insurers early in the planning of an upcoming idle period • Laid up in the context of clause 3-26? • Third party review? • One insurer (Claims Lead/Leading Insurer) on behalf of all insurers • Notify insurers if there are any changes to the lay-up plan and/or arrangements during the lay-up period. • Notify insurers when a decision is made to reactivate the MOU. Lay-up return • Clause 6-6. Separate evaluation from the requirements of a lay-up plan. Checklist for evaluation of lay-up

  17. CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATION OF LAY-UP 1) General; where the MOU is to be laid up  MOU lay-up position:  Latitude and longitude  Port/ city/ country  Geographical characteristics (including surrounding vessels, harbours, shallow banks etc.)  Geopolitical conditions (such as potential strikes, unstable political climate etc.)  Type of lay-up (describe condition; idle/ hot/ cold etc.):  Planned duration of the lay-up  Planned activities during lay-up (i.e. bunkering, moves, other logistics)  Involvement and follow-up including planned visits to undertake surveys by:  Classification Society, including class status  Flag state  Local port authorities  Any other third parties  Name of the person/entity responsible for implementing and follow-up of the lay-up plan 2) Mooring and stability  Evaluation of lay-up location (sheltered from heavy wind, currents and swells):  Weather forecasts, monitoring/statistics  Natural hazards  Third party approval of location and mooring arrangements:  Seabed analysis if applicable (jack-up rigs)  Considerations with respect to minimum distance to separately laid up units, anchored vessels or shore  Mooring watch/ mooring integrity  Emergency operations of mooring winches  Ballasting considerations 3) Supervision of the MOU  Security:  ISPS port status  Theft/ vandalism/ piracy  Power supply:  Dependent on type of lay-up (hot/cold), generator or shore supply  Emergency power arrangements  Emergency contingency plan:  Fire management  Water integrity  Navigation lights, fire and bilge alarms  Support from port authorities  Readily available supply of spares equipment 4) Minimum crew  Manning  Crew number and positions and functions / responsibility during lay-up  Own crew, regular crew or external service provider

  18. MAINTENANCE / PRESERVATION

  19. MAINTENANCE/PRESERVATION In order to prevent damage occurring as a result of the MOU not being in normal use… ..it is the duty of the owner to maintain, preserve and operate machinery and other equipment in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations.

  20. MAINTENANCE/PRESERVATION Clause 18-19. Inadequate maintenance, etc. The insurer is not liable for costs incurred in renewing or repairing a part or parts of the hull, machinery, plant or equipment which were in a defective condition as a result of wear and tear, corrosion, rot, inadequate maintenance and the like.

  21. MAINTENANCE/PRESERVATION In order to avoid any discussion about insurance cover.. ..we recommend to inform insurers about the plan for preservation and maintenance of the MOU and its equipment during in lay-up. And furthermore maintain a log of such activities. Maintenance / preservation is not subject to approval per NMIP 3-26.

  22. QUESTIONS?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend