Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation to compute - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lake eutrophication using resilience evaluation to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation to compute - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation to compute sustainable policies Laetitia Chapel Sophie Martin Guillaume Deffuant Laboratory of Engineering for Complex Systems (LISC) Cemagref 10th International Conference on Environmental


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation to compute sustainable policies

Laetitia Chapel Sophie Martin Guillaume Deffuant

Laboratory of Engineering for Complex Systems (LISC) Cemagref

10th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology - September 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

1

Lake eutrophication

2

Viability kernel

3

Resilience value computation

4

Summary

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 2 / 19

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lake eutrophication

Definition

Oligotrophic lake clear water low input nutrient high economic value

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 3 / 19

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Lake eutrophication

Definition

Eutrophic lake turbid water high input nutrient low economic value

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 4 / 19

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lake eutrophication

Definition

Phosphorus P in the lake is the most critical nutrient used by the farmers in form of fertilizer or animal feed supplements excess P accumulates in the soil and is transported to the lakes

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 5 / 19

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lake eutrophication

Simplified model in 3 dimensions (L, P, M)

x′(t) =    L′(t) = u, u ∈ [−VL; +VL] P′(t) = −(s + h)P(t) + L(t) + rM(t)f (P(t)) M′(t) = −kM(t) + sP(t) − rM(t)f (P(t)) (1)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 6 / 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lake eutrophication

Property of interest

Property of interest the lake must remain in an oligotrophic state (population point of view) P ∈ [0; Pmax] the profitability of the farmers activities must be ensured L ∈ [Lmin; Lmax] We evaluate the resilience of this property of interest

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 7 / 19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Outline

1

Lake eutrophication

2

Viability kernel

3

Resilience value computation

4

Summary

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 8 / 19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Viability kernel

Aim: define levels of P, M and L that are compatible with the

  • bjective to maintain the property of interest

Concentration of phosphorus (P)

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

Viab(K)

K

Eutrophic lake No rentability for the farmers

M=0

Input of phosphorus in the lake (L)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 9 / 19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Viability kernel

Viable state: there exists at least one evolution which allows staying in the viability constraint set

Concentration of phosphorus (P)

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

Viab(K)

K

No rentability for the farmers Eutrophic lake

u=-VL u=0 u=+VL

M=0

Input of phosphorus in the lake (L)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 10 / 19

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Viability kernel

Viability kernel: set of all viable states = states for which the property of interest can be maintained

Concentration of phosphorus (P)

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

Viab(K)

K

Eutrophic lake No rentability for the farmers

M=0

Input of phosphorus in the lake (L)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 11 / 19

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Outline

1

Lake eutrophication

2

Viability kernel

3

Resilience value computation

4

Summary

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 12 / 19

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Resilience value computation

Definition

Resilience: capacity of the system to maintain its property of interest in spite of disturbance Martin proposed a mathematical interpretation of resilience

  • S. Martin

The cost of restoration as a way of defining resilience: a viability approach applied to a model of lake eutrophication. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 2004.

  • Resilience: inverse of the cost of restoration of the property of

interest

  • Based on the viability theory framework

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 13 / 19

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Resilience value computation

Cost function

Viability kernel is the 0-level of the cost function

Concentration of phosphorus (P)

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

Viab(K) : Null Cost

K

Eutrophic lake: Ecological cost No rentability: Economic cost Outside Viab(K): Management cost

M=0

Input of phosphorus in the lake (L)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 14 / 19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Resilience value computation

Methods

Algorithm to compute resilience values Approximating viability kernel algorithm can be used to compute resilience values Use a classification method: Support Vector Machines We propose a new algorithm that

  • deals with more realistic systems
  • allow to introduce uncertainties on the parameters

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 15 / 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Resilience value computation

Restoration costs

Starting from a non-viable state, the system is doomed to leave K and we look for policies that bring back the system inside Viab(K)

Concentration of (P) 4

M=1

1 Input of phosphorus in the lake (L)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 16 / 19

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Resilience value computation

Resilience

Inverse of the cost to restore the property of interest, lost due to exogenous disturbances Maximal disturbance: jump of magnitude P = 0.5

Concentration of (P) 4

M=1

1 Input of phosphorus in the lake (L)

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 17 / 19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Outline

1

Lake eutrophication

2

Viability kernel

3

Resilience value computation

4

Summary

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 18 / 19

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

Resilience can be defined thanks to viability theory We propose a new algorithm that enhances the potential of the approach Resilience values allow to define sustainable policies, with the minimal cost

Chapel, Martin & Deffuant Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation 19 / 19