Labour market segmentation vs. EPL reform Jrg PESCHNER European - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

labour market segmentation vs epl reform
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Labour market segmentation vs. EPL reform Jrg PESCHNER European - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Labour market segmentation vs. EPL reform Jrg PESCHNER European Commission, DG EMPL, Employment Analysis Warsaw 8 October 2014 Climbing unemployment rates in most places, Strong divergence DG EMPLs regional projection software


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Labour market segmentation vs. EPL reform

Jörg PESCHNER European Commission, DG EMPL, Employment Analysis Warsaw – 8 October 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Climbing unemployment rates in most places, Strong divergence

Source: LFS data, displayed using DG EMPL‘s regional projection software

EU: 7.2%

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Source: LFS data, displayed using DG EMPL‘s regional projection software

Climbing unemployment rates in most places, Strong divergence

EU: 10.8%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Build-up of temporary employment… … stopped over the crisis

Source: Eurostat EU LFS Temporary employment, % change in selected Member States

  • 60%
  • 40%
  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2003-2007 2007-2013

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Strong evidence for increasing structural component since crisis started

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EU28 Poland 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EU28 Poland

Unemployment rate in % Share of long-term in all unemployed (%)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Structural Labour Market reforms become urgent necessity Fight mismatches Fight against LM segmentation Prepare for workforce shrinkage

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Segmentation and Labour Market situation: Is there a typology of Member States in the EU ? Factor&Cluster analysis based on 27 labour-market related indicators

slide-8
SLIDE 8

BE BG CZ DK DE EE IE EL ES FR HR IT CY LV LT LU HU MT NL AT

PL

PT RO SI SK FI SE UK

  • 2.50
  • 2.00
  • 1.50
  • 1.00
  • 0.50

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

  • 2.00
  • 1.50
  • 1.00
  • 0.50

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

Segmentation Strong performance

Factor Score and Cluster Analysis

High share in (involuntary) temporary employment, high share of low-skilled, … High (youth) employment, low unemployment, strong employment growth, strong LLL, long working life,…

slide-9
SLIDE 9

BE BG CZ DK DE EE IE EL ES FR HR IT CY LV LT LU HU MT NL AT

PL

PT RO SI SK FI SE UK

  • 2.50
  • 2.00
  • 1.50
  • 1.00
  • 0.50

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

  • 2.50
  • 2.00
  • 1.50
  • 1.00
  • 0.50

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Segmentation Adequacy problem, high inequality

Factor Score and Cluster Analysis

High inequality, low ULC dynamics, high (in-work) poverty, … High share in (involuntary) temporary employment, high share of low-skilled, …

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Duality and Wages: Results of a contrast regression (2011) Considerable wage penalty on temporary contracts !

Source: DG EMPL calculations, based on EU-SILC 2010, SES 2006, see also EiE2010

  • 15.0
  • 10.0
  • 5.0

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 BG SK UK LU BE CZ AT HU GR IT EU27 DE FI SI NL PT ES PL Share of temporary workers Wage-penalty adjusted - regression contrast

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The role of EPL

Source: Eurostat EU-LFS

Continue effort: structural labour market reforms

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BE CZ DK DE EE IE GR ES FR IT LV LU HU NL AT PL PT SI FI SE UK IC NO CH TR 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 10 15 20 25 30 EPL on temporary contracts Share of temporary in all employees

EPL and Temporary Contracts

Source: OECD (EPL), Eurostat EU LFS

Correlation: -0.04

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Source: Eurostat EU-LFS

Simulation exercise for Poland With DG EMPL's Labour Market Model Reduce Poland's EPL down to the level

  • f Denmark
  • Administrative Cost of Firing
  • Severance Payment
  • 23%
slide-14
SLIDE 14

OECD Index III Modified Index Share of Severance Pay Austria 2.41 2.37 30.8% Belgium 2.61 2.36 36.3% Czech Republic 2.32 2.76 30.1% Germany 2.63 2.90 35.5% Denmark 1.91 1.82 23.4% Spain 3.11 2.88 38.6% Finland 2.29 2.35 40.5% France 3.00 2.66 49.3% Italy 2.58 2.31 38.5% Netherlands 2.23 2.59 44.8% Poland 2.41 2.35 23.2% Sweden 2.06 2.62 34.1% Slovak Republic 2.13 2.61 42.6% United Kingdom 1.09 1.41 30.7% Source: Berger, Gstrein, Keuschnigg, Miess, Müllbacher, Strohner, Winter-Ebmer: Development/Maintenance of the Labour Market Model (Final Report), Institut für Höhere Studien, Universität St. Gallen, p. 25.

Overall EPL .. weighted

  • 23%

Labour-Market Model: Calibrated parameters on EPL

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Reduction of firing costs Job surplus of an employment relationship Wage bargaining Higher wages Higher firms' rent Higher LM participation Higher labour demand More job separations Higher frictional Unemployment Elasticity(EPL)=0.17 Higher Employment Lower Employment

Lowering EPL: Transmission Path in the Labour Market Model

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Unemployment rate: +0.11 %-pts Labour market participation +0.04%-pts

  • 0.1%

0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4%

Wages Employment Hours Worked per worker Output GDP Lowering EPL in Poland: Long-term impact on …

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lowering EPL in Poland: Long-term impact on wages…

0.00% 0.10% 0.20% 0.30% 0.40% 0.50% 0.60% All Low-Skilled Medium-Skilled High-Skilled

slide-18
SLIDE 18

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

Lowering EPL in Poland: Long-term impact on unemployment… %-pts.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusion: Lowering EPL in Poland: Long-term impact

  • Strong positive overall employment gains questionable
  • But: Higher frictional unemployment reflects

more hiring, more firing -> higher job turnover Thank you.