keep the bone preservation is the key resurfacing is the
play

Keep the Bone: Preservation is the Key Resurfacing is the way to go! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OS ET 2017 Bellagio Las Vegas Keep the Bone: Preservation is the Key Resurfacing is the way to go! Avoid the Nay S ayers Thomas Gross 10:19 AM 30 Undeniably MM HRA Preserves the Bone Advantages of MM HRA Advantages of MM HRA Reasons not


  1. OS ET 2017 Bellagio Las Vegas Keep the Bone: Preservation is the Key Resurfacing is the way to go! Avoid the Nay S ayers Thomas Gross 10:19 AM 30

  2. Undeniably MM HRA Preserves the Bone

  3. Advantages of MM HRA

  4. Advantages of MM HRA

  5. Reasons not to do resurfacing  A mini stem anterior THR is quicker for the same reimbursement  HRA is technically difficult and I difficult to master  The XLPE Hip S ociety has convinced us that cobalt is evil: cancer allergy toxicity metalosis “ pseudotumor”

  6. Members of the XLPE Hip S ociety proclaim: “ THA is the operation of the century” “ Never again metal”

  7.  THA are not really that good Residual pain Instability Difficulty with athletics Poor survivorship in young patients  Problems with Metal Bearings The DePuy AS R The Zimmer Durom Oxford Resurfacing technique Trunionosis (large heads with small trunions)

  8. Cobalt is scary: Cancer?  Cobalt in t issue cult ure leads t o DNA changes.  Visuri 30 year st udy shows no difference in cancer rat es  Oswest ry regist ry  Brit ish j oint regist ry

  9. Cobalt is scary Allergy?  Willert and Campbell described lymphocyte response around failed metal bearings.  Oxford had a 4% rate of HRA failure at 8 years due to “ Pseudotumors” which they claimed were allergic reactions.  Anecdotal reports of skin rashes with implants

  10. Cobalt is scary Allergy?  In 5000 HRA I have never seen a case of “ allergy”  Neit her skin pat ch t est ing nor LTT has been shown t o predict a higher failure rat e  Over 500,000 cobalt chrome TKR are done annually in t he US wit hout any fear of allergy  How many CC head THR are st ill done annually and how many CC st ems were implant ed in t he past wit hout “ allergy” arising?  Bot h TKR and CC head THR have been shown t o release cobalt and chromium ions

  11. Cobalt is scary: toxicity?  Beer drinkers in Canada got t oxic from cobalt supplement s t o maint ain frot h Their blood cobalt levels were not report ed  Case report s of cobalt ism wit h THR 2/ 4 involve fract ured ceramic heads 2/ 4 Depuy AS R THR

  12. Cobalt is scary: toxicity?  Mild sympt oms of cobalt t oxicit y were seen at a higher rat e t han baseline aft er Co level exceeded 20ug/ L Van der S t raet en & DeS met  S ympt oms of cobalt t oxicit y are vague and are seen in nat ural aging: neuropat hy, t innit us, hearing loss, heart failure

  13. Cobalt is scary: metalosis?  This is the real deal!  Oxford reported 4% pseudotumors at 8 years in 1400 cases with disastrous outcomes on revision  30-50% failure rate of DePuy AS R HRA and THA largely due to metalosis and failure of cup ingrowth

  14. Cobalt is scary: metalosis? We reported :  1% AWRF at 10 years in 2600 cases Hip Intl 2013  Excellent outcomes on revision JOA 2014  RAIL guidelines for cup positioning to prevent metalosis JOA 2013  Validation of RAIL with 1800 consecutive HRA since 2012 meeting RAIL guidelines and no metalosis IS TA 2017

  15. Disadvantage of Resurfacing malposition  metalosis 64 0

  16. Problem solved with correct cup position 31 0

  17. Advantages of MM HRA

  18. THR is not adequate for young people  NICE crit eria 2014 95% 10-year implant survivorship  S wedish regist ry implant survivorship 83% @ 10 years in pat ient s under 50 We need to set a benchmark for young patients

  19. International Resurfacing S tudy Group

  20. International Resurfacing S tudy Group 28 surgeons

  21. International Resurfacing S tudy Group  11,386 METAL ON METAL Resurfacing  All pat ient s UNDER 50  28 surgeons  12 different implant s  3-22 year follow-up

  22. International Resurfacing S tudy Group  11,386 METAL ON METAL Resurfacing  All patients UNDER 50  28 surgeons  12 different implants  3-22 year follow-up Establish a benchmark for the young patient

  23. International Resurfacing S tudy Group 20 year implant survivorship: 93% men, 82% women

  24. Implant S urvivorship in Y oung patients ( <50 years ) THR Resurfacing 10 year 83% 95% 20 year 50% 89% S wedish Register IHRS G 15,454 cases 11,386 cases

  25. Implant S urvivorship in Y oung patients ( <50 years ) THR Resurfacing 83% 10 year 95% 89% 20 year 50% S wedish Register IHRS G 15,454 cases 11,386 cases

  26. A new benchmark has been set age<50 Implant survivorship: 95% 10-year 89% 20-year

  27. Metal on Metal Resurfacing is the Gold S tandard for young patients The XLPE Hip S ociety is wrong. Our “ thought leaders” are misleading us. Give patients a more durable and functional hip Allow them to reap the proven benefits of exercise 27

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend