KANSA KANSA People of the South Wind People of the South Wind - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kansa kansa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

KANSA KANSA People of the South Wind People of the South Wind - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

KANSA KANSA People of the South Wind People of the South Wind Thomas Wright Thomas Wright Chairman , Kansas Corporation Commission Chairman , Kansas Corporation Commission p Presentation for Presentation for Revolution: Oklahoma Wind


slide-1
SLIDE 1

KANSA KANSA

People of the South Wind People of the South Wind

Thomas Wright Thomas Wright

Chairman , Kansas Corporation Commission Chairman , Kansas Corporation Commission p Presentation for Presentation for Revolution: Oklahoma Wind Energy Conference Revolution: Oklahoma Wind Energy Conference December 3, 2008 December 3, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Capacity & Cost Trends Capacity & Cost Trends

12000

100 Cost of Energy and Cumulative Domestic Capacity

12000

100 Cost of Energy and Cumulative Domestic Capacity

8000 10000

70 80 90 W) /kWh*)

8000 10000

70 80 90 W) /kWh*)

6000 8000

40 50 60 70 pacity (MW rgy (cents/

6000 8000

40 50 60 70 pacity (MW rgy (cents/

2000 4000

20 30 40 Cap

  • st of Ener

2000 4000

20 30 40 Cap

  • st of Ener

2000 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

10 Co

2000 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

10 Co Increased Turbine Size - R&D Advances - Manufacturing Improvements

*Year 2000 dollars

Increased Turbine Size - R&D Advances - Manufacturing Improvements

*Year 2000 dollars

slide-4
SLIDE 4

U.S Lagging Other Countries for U.S Lagging Other Countries for Wind As a Percentage of Electricity Consumption Wind As a Percentage of Electricity Consumption Wind As a Percentage of Electricity Consumption Wind As a Percentage of Electricity Consumption

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Installed Wind Capacities Installed Wind Capacities (1999 (1999 – 2007) 2007) (1999 (1999 2007) 2007)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Meridian Way Wind Farm 201 MW 2008 Westar 1.5 MW 1999 Smoky Hills Wind Farm 250 MW 2008 Central Plains Wind Farm 99 MW 2008 Spearville Wind Farm Facility 100 MW 2006 Elk River Wind Farm Flat Ridge Wind Farm 100 MW 2008 150 MW 2005 Gray County Wind Farm 112 MW 2001

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Kansas Commercial Wind Farms

Gray County Wind Farm 2001 – 112 MegaWatts Elk River Wind Farm 2005 – 150 MegaWatts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Kansas Commercial Wind Farms

Spearville Wind Farm 2006 – 100 MegaWatts Smoky Hills Wind Farm Smoky Hills Wind Farm 2008 – 250 MegaWatts

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Kansas Commercial Wind Farms

WIND PROJECT (County) DEVELOPER UTILITY SIZE YEAR WIND PROJECT (County) DEVELOPER UTILITY SIZE YEAR____ Jeffery Energy Center (Pottawatomie Co.) Westar Westar 1.5 MW 1999 Gray County Wind Farm (Gray Co.) FPL Energy Aquila 112.2 MW 2001 Elk River Wind Facility (Butler Co.) PPM Energy Empire 150 MW 2005 y ( ) gy p Spearville Wind Energy Facility (Ford Co.) enXco KCP&L 100.4 MW 2006

TOTAL INSTALLED AT END OF 2007 364.1 MW

Smoky Hills Wind Farm Phase I Tradewind Sunflower 50.4 MW 2008 (1st Qtr) (Lincoln & Ellsworth Counties) KC BPU 25.2 MW 2008 (1st Qtr) Midwest 25 2 MW 2008 (1st Qtr) Midwest 25.2 MW 2008 (1 Qtr) Smoky Hills Wind Farm Phase II Tradewind Sunflower 24 MW 2008 (4th Qtr) Lincoln & Ellsworth Counties) Midwest 24 MW 2008 (4th Qtr) TBD 100.5 MW 2008 (4th Qtr) TBD 100.5 MW 2008 (4 Qtr) Meridian Wind Farm (Cloud Co.) Horizon Empire 105 MW 2008 (4th Qtr) Westar 96 MW 2008 (4th Qtr) Flat Ridge Wind Farm (Barber Co.) BP Alt Energy Westar 100 MW 2008 (4th Qtr) g ( ) gy ( Q ) Central Plains Wind Farm (Wichita Co.) RES America, Inc Westar 99 MW 2008 (4th Qtr)

TOTAL TO BE INSTALLED BY END OF 2008 1013.4 MW

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Kansas School Wind Kansas School Wind

50 kw Turbines 50 kw Turbines Moscow USD Moscow USD Pratt Community Pratt Community College College Quinter USD Quinter USD

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Kansas Wind for Schools Project Kansas Wind for Schools Project

1 8 S 1.8 kW Skystream Turbines A pilot project by the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) in K C l d N b k M t S th D k t & Id h Fairfield High School, USD 310, Langdon, Reno County Fairfield High School, USD 310, Langdon, Reno County Kansas, Colorado, Nebraska, Montana, South Dakota & Idaho Concordia School District, USD 333, Concordia, Cloud County Concordia School District, USD 333, Concordia, Cloud County Ell Ell-

  • Saline School District, USD 307, Brookville, Saline County

Saline School District, USD 307, Brookville, Saline County Sterling School District, USD 376, Sterling, Rice County Sterling School District, USD 376, Sterling, Rice County Walton Rural Life Charter Elementary, Newton School District, Walton Rural Life Charter Elementary, Newton School District, USD 373, Walton, Harvey County USD 373, Walton, Harvey County Five schools will be selected for the project in each of the next 3 years Five schools will be selected for the project in each of the next 3 years

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Kansas Wind for Schools Project Kansas Wind for Schools Project

1 8 S 1.8 kW Skystream Turbines Fairfield High School R C t Reno County Walton Elementary Harvey County

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Reported Impacts from the Reported Impacts from the Reported Impacts from the Reported Impacts from the Smokey Hills Wind Farm: Phase I Smokey Hills Wind Farm: Phase I

  • 145 local workers employed during

construction construction

  • 4-6 permanent positions

L d l Mi i t f

  • Landowner lease: Minimum payment of

$3,000/turbine (1.8 MW turbines)

  • Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT):

$3,000/MW

Data furnished by NREL

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NREL Forecasts for 100 MW of New Wind NREL Forecasts for 100 MW of New Wind Power Power

  • 140-160 Direct Jobs during construction*

– 135-155 construction-sector jobs

  • 15-25 Direct Jobs during operations*

– 4-6 plant workers 4 6 plant workers

  • 50-100 acres of land removed from agriculture or range

service – Total acreage of a 100-MW wind farm is estimated at – Total acreage of a 100-MW wind farm is estimated at 5,000 acres (50 acres/MW)

  • 1%-2% is removed from existing applications

Developers often arrange turbine layouts in – Developers often arrange turbine layouts in accordance with existing land use to minimize land impacts

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Kansas Economic Impacts Kansas Economic Impacts

from from 1000 MW 1000 MW of New Wind Development (NREL)

  • f New Wind Development (NREL)

p ( ) p ( ) Wind Energy’s Economic “Ripple Effect”

Payments to Landowners:

Direct Impacts Indirect & Induced Impacts Totals (construction + 20 years)

y

  • $2.7 million/year

Local PILOT Revenue:

  • $2.9 million/year

Construction Phase:

1 600 j b

Construction Phase:

  • 1,550 new jobs
  • $138 million to local

economies

Total economic benefit =

$1.08 billion

New local jobs during t ti

3 150

Induced Impacts years)

  • 1,600 new jobs
  • 1,500-1,550 construction jobs
  • $189 million to local economies

Operational Phase:

  • 200 new long-term jobs

economies

Operational Phase:

  • 180 local jobs
  • $17 million/year to local

economies

construction = 3,150 New local long-term jobs = 430

200 new long term jobs

  • 40-60 plant-only jobs
  • $21 million/year to local economies
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Kansas Economic Impacts Kansas Economic Impacts

From the DOE 20% Scenario From the DOE 20% Scenario Wind Energy’s Economic “Ripple Effect”

Indirect & Induced Impacts Totals (construction + 20 years) Direct Impacts

Payments to Landowners: Construction Phase:

  • 11,200 new jobs
  • $985 million to local

economies

Total economic benefit =

$7.8 billion

New local jobs during construction = 22 700

p

y

  • $20 million/year

Local PILOT Revenue:

  • $20 million/year

Construction Phase:

11 500 j b economies

Operational Phase:

  • 1,300 local jobs
  • $120 million/year to local

economies

construction

22,700

New local long-term jobs = 2,800

  • 11,500 new jobs
  • 11,150 construction jobs
  • $1.4 billion to local economies

Operational Phase:

  • 1,500 new long-term jobs

1,500 new long term jobs

  • 300-450 plant only jobs
  • $150 M/yr to local economies

*See slides 6, 7, and 8 for notes regarding this analysis

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Drivers for Wind Power Drivers for Wind Power

C titi Wi d C t

  • Competitive Wind Costs
  • Fuel Price Uncertainty
  • Federal and State
  • Federal and State

Policies

  • Economic Development
  • Public Support
  • Green Power
  • Energy Security
  • Carbon Risk
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Energy Issues were prominently featured in State of the State Address by Governor Sebelius…

“Our goal is to produce 10 percent of our state’s electricity from wind power by 2010, and 20 percent by 2020. ”

….State of the State Address, Jan. 10, 2007

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Estimates from the Kansas Wi d W ki G Wind Working Group Installed MW of wind 1200 1400 800 1000 1200 400 600 800 MW 200

Existing By End 2008 Existing, Under Construction and Announced by 2010 Existing, Under Construction, Announced by 2010 and Announced by 2012 (Kansas or Missouri)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

According to Kansas Lt. Governor Mark Parkinson, chair of the Kansas Wind Working Group:

HOW WE CAN MAKE

t e a sas d

  • g G oup

HOW WE CAN MAKE THIS HAPPEN? WE BRING EVERYONE TOGETHER…

ENVIRONMENTALISTS, UTILITIES, AND CONSUMER ADVOCATES MUST COME TOGETHER IN AN UNPRECEDENTED WAY

slide-21
SLIDE 21

A favorite quote by our friend, Larry Flowers

Carpe Ventum Carpe Ventum

Seize the Wind! Seize the Wind! Thank you!