Kane County Energy Plan Update Presentation to the Energy and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kane county energy plan update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kane County Energy Plan Update Presentation to the Energy and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kane County Energy Plan Update Presentation to the Energy and Environmental Technology Committee Jessica Spanier CNT Energy May 19, 2010 Agenda 1) Kane County Energy Consumption 2) Methodology 3) Metrics 4) Whats next? Slide 2 Boone


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kane County Energy Plan Update

Presentation to the Energy and Environmental Technology Committee

Jessica Spanier CNT Energy May 19, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Slide 2

Agenda

1) Kane County Energy Consumption 2) Methodology 3) Metrics 4) What’s next?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Slide 3

Kane County DeKalb County DuPage County McHenry County Cook County Will County Kendall County Lake County Boone County La Salle County

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Slide 4

Kane County Electricity Use (in kWh)

2007 Residential 1,664,588,247 C&I 3,271,827,251 Total 4,936,415,497 2008 Residential 1,617,248,849 C&I 3,253,629,099 Total 4,870,877,948 Percent change Residential

  • 2.93%

C&I

  • 0.56%

Total

  • 1.35%

C&I 66% Residential 34%

% split of usage between Residential and C&I – consistent for 2007 and 2008

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Slide 5

Potential reasons for changes in consumption from 2007 to 2008

Electricity: Decreased consumption

1) Weather: 2007 summer was hotter than 2008, based on number

  • f cooling degree days (CDD)
  • 2007: 1111 CDD
  • 2008: 828 CDD
  • 30 year average: 830 CDD.1

2) Economy

1 For the Chicago O’Hare weather station http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/climatenormals/climatenormals.pl

Example: How to calculate cooling degree days June 1, 2007: average temperature of 74°F Base temperature of a building: 65°F Number of cooling degree days: 74 – 65 = 9

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Slide 6

Kane County Natural Gas Use (in therms)

2007 Residential 164,810,974 C&I 150,546,211 Total 315,357,185 2008 Residential 181,639,334 C&I 158,437,043 Total 340,076,377

Residential 52% C&I 48%

Percent change Residential 9.26% C&I 4.98% Total 7.27%

% split of usage between Residential and C&I – consistent for 2007 and 2008

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Slide 7

Potential reasons for changes in consumption from 2007 to 2008

1 For the Chicago O’Hare weather station http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/climatenormals/climatenormals.pl

Natural gas: Increased consumption

1) Weather: 2007 winter was warmer than 2008, based on number of heating degree days (HDD)

  • 2007: 6,022 HDD
  • 2008: 6,678 HDD
  • 30 year average: 6,498 HDD.1

2) Economy

Example: How to calculate heating degree days January 1, 2008: average temperature of 16°F Base temperature of a building: 65°F Number of heating degree days: 65 – 16 = 49

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Slide 8

4 step aggregation method

1) Single county zip codes 2) Geocoding and mapping 3) Townships 4) Fraction of municipal land area in the county

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Slide 9

60175

Step 1: Single county zip codes (one example)

Kane County

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Slide 10 60151 Kane County DeKalb County

Step 2: Geocoding and mapping (one example)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Slide 11 60151 DeKalb County Kane County

Step 2: Geocoding and mapping (one example)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Slide 12 60151

DeKalb County

Kane County Kane County

DeKalb County

Step 2: Geocoding and mapping (one example)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Slide 13

Virgil Plato Elgin Aurora Dundee Rutland Big Rock Kaneville Campton Hampshire

  • St. Charles

Blackberry Burlington Sugar Grove Batavia Geneva

Step 3: Townships

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Slide 14 Kane County Cook County Elgin

Step 4: Fraction by municipal land area (one example)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Slide 15

% of gas use appropriated by method Residential C&I 1) Single county zips 60% 50% 2) Geocoding and mapping 38% 37% 3) Townships* 0% 0% 4) Fraction of municipal area 2% 13% *Nicor does not identify townships in Kane County in data % of electricity use appropriated by method Residential C&I 1) Single county zips 64% 53% 2) Geocoding and mapping 34% 43% 3) Townships 2% 3% 4) Fraction of municipal area <1% <1%

Usage aggregated by method

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Slide 16

Geneva Batavia Saint Charles

Municipal Utilities – Thank you for giving us data!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Slide 17

Average account consumption

2007 Average Consumption/Cost* (residential only) Natural gas (in therms) Electricity (in kWh) Residential 1,089 ($966) 9,689 ($1042) C&I 10,509 89,944 2008 Average Consumption/Cost* (residential only) Natural gas (in therms) Electricity (in kWh) Residential 1,200 ($1218) 9,345 ($1081) C&I 10,941 87,266

*Illinois Commerce Commission Electricity and Natural Gas Sales Statistics, 2007 and 2008 (increase in rates for both utilities)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Slide 18

Individual Municipality Consumption

2007 Average Consumption Gas (in therms) Electricity (in kWh) Residential 1,089 9,689 C&I 10,509 89,944 2008 Average Consumption Gas (in therms) Electricity (in kWh) Residential 1,200 9,345 C&I 10,941 87,266

1) Total electricity/natural gas consumption 2) Average Consumption 3) Useful to compare to county average & similar municipalities

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Slide 19

Forecast to 2040 – Business as usual

Residential C&I Electricity (kWh) Gas (therms) Electricity (kWh) Gas (therms) 2008 consumption 1,617,248,849 181,639,334 3,253,629,099 158,437,043 Growth factor 1 0.49%

  • 0.57%

0.44% 0.24% Projected 2040 consumption 1,889,025,035 151,285,016 3,747,267,064 170,904,954

1 From the 2010 EIA Annual Energy Outlook - http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Slide 20

What’s Next

1) Strategies to reduce energy consumption

  • Provide details on energy conservation measures; how they work;

financial/political feasibility

  • Categorized by building sector; County corridor (Urban

Renaissance; Critical Growth; or Rural)

  • Examine potential for energy savings countywide at varying

implementation levels; and at individual household/business level

2) Recommendations

  • For implementation and moving forward
  • Categorized by municipalities; county; utilities; joint action
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Slide 21

What’s Next

3) Set of 2040 Energy Forecasts

  • Business As Usual
  • Aggressive

(aggressive action towards increasing energy efficiency)

  • Moderate

(moderate action towards increasing energy efficiency)

  • Limited

(limited action towards increasing energy efficiency)

Will be based

  • n a mix of

strategies defined in the plan

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Slide 22

Thank you!

Jessica Spanier, LEED AP

Research Associate jspanier@cntenergy.org (773) 269-4038

Lindy Wordlaw, AICP

Senior Planner lindy@cntenergy.org (773) 269-4012