july 23 2016 stm 2016 outline
play

July 23, 2016 STM 2016 Outline Background Additively homomorphic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

July 23, 2016 STM 2016 Outline Background Additively homomorphic encryption Beacon search by Oblivious transfer Genome sequence search Overview of the proposed method Recursive oblivious transfer Burrows Wheeler


  1. July 23, 2016 @ STM 2016

  2. Outline • Background • Additively homomorphic encryption • Beacon search by Oblivious transfer • Genome sequence search • Overview of the proposed method • Recursive oblivious transfer • Burrows Wheeler Transform • Results • Conclusion

  3. DNA sequence • DNA is a molecule that carries genetic information. • It consists of four nucleotides (Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, Thymine), thus it is represented as a sequence of four letters. • Analyzing DNA sequences is one of the most important approaches in current biology. GGCATGAAAGTCAGGGCAGAGCCATCTATTGC TTACATTTGCTTCTGACACAACTGTGTTCACT AGCAACCTCAAACAGACACCATGGTGCACCTG ACTCCTGAGGAGAAGTCTGCCGTTACTGCCCT GTGGGGCAAGGTGAACGTGGATGAAGTTGGTG GTGAGGCCCTGGGCAGGTTGGTATCAAGGTTA CAAGACAGGTTTAAGGAGACCAATAGAAACTG GGCATGTGGAGACAGAGAAGACTCTTGGGTTT CTGATAGGCACTGACTCTCTCTGCCTATTGGT

  4. Next Generation Sequencer • Recently, the technology for determining DNA sequence has been dramatically improved. • The instrument that determines DNA sequence based on the new technology is called NGS. GGCATGAAA GTCAGGGCA GAGCCATCT ATTGCTTAC ATTTGCTTC TGACACAAC TGTGTTCAC

  5. Genome “Big Data” Sanger sequencer NGS is Human introduced to Genome market. Project ( 1990 ~ 2003 ) High-throughput http://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/ sequencer Length of HG: 3 ・ 10^9

  6. Growth of personal genome data • The huge cost down has encouraged sequencing of individual’s genome. • Large scale cohort studies such as.. • ToMMo will recruit 150K participants from 2013 to 2017, in Japan • Genomics England aims to sequence 100K individuals’ genome, in UK. • Direct-to-consumer genetic testing • 23andMe has sequenced more than 1M customers’ DNA. • openSNP: Web site of collecting DTC results ≒ 2700 genotypes (June, 2016) • It also poses privacy risks.

  7. Variation of Genome • The feature of an individual’s genome is described by a difference between the genome and the reference genome. Ref: GGCATGAAAGTCAGGGCAGAGCCATCTATTGC Individual:GGCATGAAAGTCTGGGCAGAGCCAT TATTGC • Sequence variants are considered to associate with phenotype (observable traits of the individual.) • Num. of. Known SNP is around 3M • SNP: single mutation observed more than 1% of a population. • One of the important topics of Bioinformatics is to find association between phenotypes and genotypes. • Some of such associations are already known. • BRCA: breast cancer, ADH4: alcohol metabolizing, etc..

  8. (P. Claes et al. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 2014)

  9. The privacy problems of personal genome • Genome can be a personal identifier, while it is strongly associated with phenotype. • Lin et al., 2004 • ≒ 80 SNPs can identify an individual. • Gymrek et al., Science, 2013 • Surname can be recovered from personal genomes by profiling Y-STRs and querying genetic genealogy databases. • Homer et al., 2008 • Statistics of GWAS study leak whether or not a participant belongs to case/control. • Legislation is not well prepared • US: Genetic information nondiscrimination act (GINA) • Does not apply to life insurance and the military. • The grand daughter of the cancer patient was rejected for the position in US army after taking genetic test (Lindor, 2012) • Japan: None • Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance Co. is deliberating using people's genetic information to provide targeted services.

  10. The privacy problems of personal genome • The privacy problem hinders access to many data resources potentially useful for a variety of scientific researches. • Global Alliance for Genomics & Health • Consortium aims for sharing genetic information for research purposes. • Established in 2013. 375 institutions has been participated so far. http://genomicsandhealth.org/

  11. Privacy Preserving Data Mining • The term PPDM is firstly introduced by the papers (Agrawal & Srikant, 2000) and (Lindell & Pinkas, 2000) • The goal: To release aggregate information about the data without releasing individual information. • Example: • Aggregate info: Average salary of employees in the University • Individual info: A s pecific employee’s salary

  12. Two main approaches • Perturbation approach • The data or the result of the database search is perturbed so that a database user is not able to obtain “true” database contents. • Cryptographic approach • The data holder is called “party”. Each party uses encryption to protect his/her own data. The data are processed without decryption, and only the result of the data mining is obtained by specific parties. • Those two approaches could be complementary.

  13. Cryptographic approach • Homomorphic Encryption • Enabling add/mul operations on encrypted data. • Additive Homomorphic Encryption (Elgamal, 1984), (Paillier, 1999) • Fully Homomorphic Encryption (Gentry, 2009) • Garbled Circuit (Yao, 1986) • Enabling computation of any function while the input variables are encrypted. • Secret Sharing • A data point is divided into k shares. The data point is recovered only when θ shares are collected. Some operations can be computed on shares.

  14. Outline • Background • Additively homomorphic encryption • Beacon search by Oblivious transfer • Genome sequence search • Overview of the proposed method • Recursive oblivious transfer • Burrows Wheeler Transform • Results • Conclusion

  15. Homomorphic Encryption • Homomorphism: A structure-preserving map between two algebraic structures.       ( ) ( ) ( ) : ( , ) ( , ) f g g f g f g f G H s.t. 1 2 1 2    log : ( , ) ( , ) R R     log( ) ( ) ( ) g g f g f g 1 2 1 2 • Additive homomorphic encryption • Additive op. on the plain text is equivalent to another op. on the cipher text.    ( 1 2 ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Enc m m Enc m Enc m • Lifted ElGamal [Elgamal84], Paillier [Paillier99]

  16. Additively Homomorphic cryptosystem  sk  ( , ) p q   pk  , ( , ) n p q n g   2 m n ( ) : mod Enc m g r n pk   r  2 * 1 mod g kn n Z 2 n      1 2 2 m m n ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 1 2 ) mod Enc m Enc m g r r n pk pk    ( ( 1 ) ( 1 )) 1 2 Dec Enc m Enc m m m sk pk pk

  17. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption Computing m1 + m2 on the server, without leaking m1 to the server. m2 m2 Secret key : For Decryption only server’s data server’s data Public key: For Encryption only m1 ( m 1 ) Enc user’s data

  18. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption m2 m2 Secret key : For Decryption only server’s data server’s data Public key: For Encryption only m1 ( m 1 ) Enc user’s data

  19. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption m2 m2 Secret key : For Decryption only server’s data server’s data Public key: For Encryption only m1 is invisible from Server. m1 user’s data

  20. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption m2 m2 Secret key : For Decryption only server’s data server’s data Public key: For Encryption only ( m 2 ) m2 Enc m1 user’s data    ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 1 2 ) Enc m Enc m Enc m m

  21. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption m2 m2 Secret key : For Decryption only server’s data server’s data Public key: For Encryption only ( m 2 ) m2 Enc m1 user’s data  ( 1 2 ) Enc m m

  22. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption m2 m2 Secret key : For Decryption only server’s data server’s data Public key: For Encryption only m1 user’s data  ( 1 2 ) Enc m m

  23. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption m2 m2 server’s data server’s data m  1 m 2

  24. Secure additive operation based on additive homomorphic encryption Additive operation is performed on the server without leaking client’s value to the server. m2 m2 server’s data server’s data m  1 m 2

  25. Outline • Background • Additively homomorphic encryption • Beacon search by Oblivious transfer • Genome sequence search • Overview of the proposed method • Recursive oblivious transfer • Burrows Wheeler Transform • Results • Conclusion

  26. Can we make secure Public Private Bea Beacon In Index Yes es: : 1 beacon search? No: 0 1, ‘A’ 1 1 1, ‘T’ 2 0 1, 1, ‘G’ 3 0 1, ‘C’ 4 1 2, ‘A’ 5 0 Query: (2 , ‘A’) … … … 3000 30 0000 00000 000, ‘A’ 11999999997 1 Enc(5) Enc(0)

  27. What is necessary? • The user needs to obtain t -th element of the server’s look-up table (vector) v without leaking t to the server. • The problem is conventionally called Oblivious Transfer . The server does not learn t. t   ( 1 , , ) v v v N [ t ] v How do we implement OT?

  28. (1 out of N) Oblivious Transfer by AHE t-th cyphertext [Step 1] Key setup     Enc( 0 ), , Enc( 1 ), , Enc( 0 ) Secret key (for decryption) Public key (for encryption) [Step 2] Query entry     ( ) 1 i t  Enc( 1 ), , Enc( ) q q   q N  i  0 ( ) i t   ( 1 , , ) v v v N

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend