July 2015 Lexington was selected as the replication site for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

july 2015 lexington was selected as the replication site
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

July 2015 Lexington was selected as the replication site for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 2013-CK-WX-K028 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily


slide-1
SLIDE 1

This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 2013-CK-WX-K028 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues.

July 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lexington was selected as the replication site for High Point

Police Department’s Offender Focused Domestic Violence Initiative, which is based on focused deterrence theory

  • Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Office funded UNCG

to evaluate both sites

Lexington had several existing advantages for replication in

place prior to implementing the strategy

  • Ongoing PSN/focused deterrence strategy in place since 2010
  • Understanding of the dynamic of DV in relationships among officers

and command staff; reinforced through training

  • Strategies in place to deal with DV situations and investigations
  • Strong commitment from the Chief and buy-in from other partners

(i.e., District Attorney’s Office, probation, victim service providers)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

A certain number of domestic violence offenders are known to

law enforcement

Focuses on changing offender behavior; a shift from traditional

focus on the victim

  • Law enforcement “owns the problem of domestic violence”

Adaptation of an evidence-based approach to dealing with

criminal behavior

  • Focused deterrence or “pulling levers”
  • Puts offenders on notice that their behavior will no longer be tolerated
  • Strips offenders’ anonymity
  • Provides certain, swift, and severe consequences for continued DV through

any means or levers that exist

  • Offenders make a rational choice as to whether to continue violent behavior

based on the information they receive Takes advantage of all potential contacts with DV offenders even

those at lower levels

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lots of legal exposures or

levers to pull

8 HPPD Assault Arrests Simple to Assault on Female to Felony Drug, Disorderly, Felony Property,

Weapon violations

Gang Affiliations Unsatisfactory termination 3/06,

previous absconder

Currently Not Supervised 2004 and 2006 Assault on Females

dismissed by DA

In prison 10/03 for 4 Felony

B&E/Larceny and one Misdemeanor AISI, Out 2/04

12/06 Assault on Female pending Court

Source: Chief Marty Sumner, High Point Police Department

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Control over her

behavior, activities, & whereabouts

  • Jealousy
  • Victim

blaming/denial of

  • wn

accountability

  • Monitoring and

surveillance

  • Negating her

needs (notice that her “rules” are marked through)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

D List

No previous charges for DV Responding officer can identify an aggressor but no arrest can be made Officer believes the potential exists for violence Validated intimate partner relationship

C List

1st charge for DV related

  • ffense

B List

2nd charge of DV related

  • ffense
  • r

Violation of prohibited behavior for which offender received notice as C list

  • ffender (violating pretrial

conditions, contacting victim, etc.)

A List

3rd or more DV charges Offender has violent record including DV Violation of 50B protective

  • rder

Used weapon in DV Convicted felon D List Receives letter from Police putting him on official notice and their name is added to the watch list Delivered by a trained patrol

  • fficer during a follow up visit

within 48 hours of the call C List Face-to-face deterrent message from Violent Crime Detective Often while offender is still in jail and just before going before judge for bond hearing B List Law enforcement and community message face-to- face Offenders called to a notification perhaps quarterly

  • r more frequent

A List At time of arrest or indictment

(Commit prohibited behavior or new charge moves up a level) Graphic Source: Chief Marty Sumner, High Point Police Department

LPD has not yet started B-list notifications

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Example of an offender arrested for assault on female Monitoring jail calls

  • Contempt of court for every jail call made to victim violating court order of no-

contact; offender has to serve 5 days for every jail call X 15 calls before facing his assault charge

Probation levers

  • Offender on probation for a previous assault so probation arrested him for

violation and offender has to serve 80 days prior to facing his assault charge

Prosecutorial scrutiny

  • After viewing assault on store surveillance footage, district attorney indicted
  • ffender for kidnapping in addition to the assault charge

Certain, predictable consequences through partner buy-in

  • Nearly every guilty defendant gets 18 months of supervised probation which

includes abuser treatment program and conditions not to threaten, harass, or assault the victim + any other conditions such as Alco-Sensor monitoring

slide-11
SLIDE 11

V/O LPD FSOP DSS/CPS DA Probation Magistrate

Courts

Victim/ Offender

System System System System adaptations adaptations adaptations adaptations Innovative Innovative Innovative Innovative solutions solutions solutions solutions Identification of Identification of Identification of Identification of gaps gaps gaps gaps Agency updates/ Agency updates/ Agency updates/ Agency updates/ new information new information new information new information

Action Action Action Action Planning Planning Planning Planning

Report back to team on Report back to team on Report back to team on Report back to team on

  • utcomes of follow through
  • utcomes of follow through
  • utcomes of follow through
  • utcomes of follow through

Information Information Information Information Input Input Input Input Problem Problem Problem Problem Identification Identification Identification Identification

Specific victim/ Specific victim/ Specific victim/ Specific victim/

  • ffender
  • ffender
  • ffender
  • ffender

needs needs needs needs

Follow Follow Follow Follow-

  • Through

Through Through Through

O O O Ongoing and improved ngoing and improved ngoing and improved ngoing and improved communication among communication among communication among communication among partners partners partners partners

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • REMEMBER:

REMEMBER: REMEMBER: REMEMBER: Some of the strategy’s greatest success will not be quantified in the data!!!! Some of the strategy’s greatest success will not be quantified in the data!!!! Some of the strategy’s greatest success will not be quantified in the data!!!! Some of the strategy’s greatest success will not be quantified in the data!!!!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Total Total Total Total # # # # Sex Sex Sex Sex Average Average Average Average Age Age Age Age DV DV DV DV History History History History C C C C List List List List 170 79% male 34 years 79% had only the one DV arrest for which they were C-notified; 21% had at least one DV arrest prior to their C-level arrest with some having as many as 4 prior DV arrests D List D List D List D List 214 77% male 34.8 years 83% had no prior DV arrests; 17% had at least one prior DV arrest

slide-14
SLIDE 14

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% B-List C-List D-List

14% 14% 14% 14% 11% 11% 11% 11% 12% 12% 12% 12% 19% 19% 19% 19% 15% 15% 15% 15% 16% 16% 16% 16% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14%

Percemtage of notified offenders who reoffended after notification Percemtage of notified offenders who reoffended after notification Percemtage of notified offenders who reoffended after notification Percemtage of notified offenders who reoffended after notification

Recidivism Rates for Notified Offenders in High Point & Lexington Recidivism Rates for Notified Offenders in High Point & Lexington Recidivism Rates for Notified Offenders in High Point & Lexington Recidivism Rates for Notified Offenders in High Point & Lexington

HP: 6-months HP: 1 year LPD: Jul 2014-May 2015

slide-15
SLIDE 15

“Typically, the rate of re-

  • ffense by perpetrators
  • f domestic violence is

30 to 40%, irrespective

  • f the type of

intervention used…”

“Studies have suggested that recidivism rates in domestic violence cases are high…estimating 40%-80% or more of repeat violence (Garner, Fagan, & Maxwell, 1995; Shepard, 1992).”

Stover, C. S. (2005), Volume 20

  • “…38.4 percent of abusers were

arrested for a new domestic violence offense within two years…”

  • “Studies…documented

reabuse…ranging from 26 to 41 percent within five to 30 months.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/225722.pdf

“Depending on how reabuse is measured, over what period of time…a hard core of approximately 1/3 of abusers will reabuse in the short run, and more will reabuse in the long run.”

  • ~60% who reoffend, do so

within 6 months.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 May 2015 37.0% 37.0% 37.0% 37.0% 35.7% 35.7% 35.7% 35.7% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 35.7% 35.7% 35.7% 35.7% 31.8% 31.8% 31.8% 31.8% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 44.0% 44.0% 44.0% 44.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 21.1% 21.1% 21.1% 21.1% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%

Percentage of Arrests Resulting in Victim Injury Percentage of Arrests Resulting in Victim Injury Percentage of Arrests Resulting in Victim Injury Percentage of Arrests Resulting in Victim Injury

Nationally, 48.1% of DV incidents result in victim injury (NCVS)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Monthly Tracking of DV Arrests and IP DV CFS Monthly Tracking of DV Arrests and IP DV CFS Monthly Tracking of DV Arrests and IP DV CFS Monthly Tracking of DV Arrests and IP DV CFS

Total DV Offenders Arrested Total IP DV CFS

Reductions in CFS and arrests are expected

  • ver time. When the

strategy is new, we may expect calls and arrests to actually increase before they decrease. HP has seen a 13% decrease in arrests & projected 41% decrease

  • ver next 2 years

HP has seen a 20% decrease in CFS & projected 37% decrease

  • ver next 2 years
slide-18
SLIDE 18

V/O LPD FSOP DSS/CPS DA Probation Magistrate

Courts

Victim/ Offender

System System System System adaptations adaptations adaptations adaptations Innovative Innovative Innovative Innovative solutions solutions solutions solutions Identification of Identification of Identification of Identification of gaps gaps gaps gaps Agency updates/ Agency updates/ Agency updates/ Agency updates/ new information new information new information new information

Action Action Action Action Planning Planning Planning Planning

Report back to team on Report back to team on Report back to team on Report back to team on

  • utcomes of follow through
  • utcomes of follow through
  • utcomes of follow through
  • utcomes of follow through

Information Information Information Information Input Input Input Input Problem Problem Problem Problem Identification Identification Identification Identification

Specific victim/ Specific victim/ Specific victim/ Specific victim/

  • ffender
  • ffender
  • ffender
  • ffender

needs needs needs needs

Follow Follow Follow Follow-

  • Through

Through Through Through

O O O Ongoing and improved ngoing and improved ngoing and improved ngoing and improved communication among communication among communication among communication among partners partners partners partners

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thank you to all of the partners who

Thank you to all of the partners who Thank you to all of the partners who Thank you to all of the partners who have collaborated to make this initiative have collaborated to make this initiative have collaborated to make this initiative have collaborated to make this initiative a success in Lexington!!!! a success in Lexington!!!! a success in Lexington!!!! a success in Lexington!!!!

Next meeting will be August 5 at 2pm at the

Lexington Police Department

We hope to see you all there!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Chief Mark Sink & Capt. Robby Rummage Chief Mark Sink & Capt. Robby Rummage Chief Mark Sink & Capt. Robby Rummage Chief Mark Sink & Capt. Robby Rummage

mjsink@lexingtonnc.gov rdrummage@lexingtonnc.gov

  • Lt. Melissa Carter
  • Lt. Melissa Carter
  • Lt. Melissa Carter
  • Lt. Melissa Carter

mpcarter@lexingtonnc.gov

Lexington Police Department

Dr Dr Dr

  • Dr. Stacy

. Stacy . Stacy . Stacy Sechrist Sechrist Sechrist Sechrist & John & John & John & John Weil Weil Weil Weil

smsechri@uncg.edu jdweil@uncg.edu

North Carolina Network for Safe Communities