Joint Intervention Team AoC West Midlands Governor Induction Event - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

joint intervention team
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Joint Intervention Team AoC West Midlands Governor Induction Event - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Joint Intervention Team AoC West Midlands Governor Induction Event Solihull College & University Centre 21 January 2017 Karen Riley Territorial Director Content Update on the Joint Intervention Team in the West Midlands Risk based


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joint Intervention Team

AoC West Midlands Governor Induction Event Solihull College & University Centre 21 January 2017 Karen Riley Territorial Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Content

Update on the Joint Intervention Team in the West Midlands Risk based intervention – Formal & Prevention Area Reviews & Structural Change Reflections & Challenges

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A changing landscape

3

  • New Government & Ministers
  • One Department
  • One Agency?
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Role of the Intervention Team

  • Identify, manage and mitigate risk to provision and public funding;
  • Intervene early to prevent and address failure minimising the

impact on students and

  • Support the Area Review process and oversee implementation

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Joint Intervention Team in the WM

Deputy Director Intervention Midlands & East Karen Riley Birmingham & Solihull The Marches & Worcestershire Michael Nicol Coventry & Warwickshire Lorna Pursglove The Black Country South East Midlands Stuart Parkes

East Midlands D2N2 & Greater Lincolnshire – Jane Peacock Greater Cambridgeshire, Peterborough, Norfolk & Suffolk – David Churchill Leicestershire, Stoke & Staffordshire – Lisa Hawes

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Risk based intervention - Formal

  • JIT led intervention
  • Oversight of college

recovery plan through regular case conferences

  • Escalation to FEC led

intervention following CRG consideration

  • Recommendations

revisited every 6 months through stocktakes

  • Quality – Ofsted

Inadequate & Minimum Standards

  • Finance – Control &

Health

  • Lender of last resort where

necessary through Funding Committee

  • Support conditional on

strengthening Leadership & Governance and automatically triggers inadequate FH

Exceptional Financial Support Triggers Notices of Concern FE Commissioner Stocktake

  • Approach to Intervention set out November 2015

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa ds/attachment_data/file/475851/SFA- ApproachtoIntervention-Nov2015.pdf

  • Current position across the WM - 8 colleges in receipt
  • f NOCs

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sfa- current-notices-of-concern

  • No new Finance NOC’s expected in the WM based on

initial assessment of 2016-2018 financial plans but Ofsted & MS subject to inspection results and year end success rates

  • 5 cases escalated to the FE Commissioner with 6

colleges currently in receipt of EFS

  • Work underway to align NOC’S & NTIs
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Risk based intervention - Prevention

Triggers/ Intelligence Dialogue Mitigation

  • NAO recommended a more proactive approach resulting

in the risk based policy published in November 2015 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads /attachment_data/file/475853/SFA_Early_Intervention_Str ategy_Nov_2015.pdf

  • A series of trend indicators (financial health, forecasting

& quality) are used as triggers alongside institutionally generated intelligence/feedback to flag potential risks

  • Dialogue with colleges to assess understanding of the

risks and the action being taken/planned to remedy

  • Where assurance secured light touch oversight
  • maintained. Where assurance not secured, the policy

sets out steps to escalate concerns

  • A relatively small number of colleges have been

identified as low risk in the WM. Dialogue is either planned or suggests mitigation is in place to address risks

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Area Reviews

Progress

  • Waves 1-3 completed, all WM reviews in first 3

waves - Birmingham & Solihull, Marches & Worcestershire, Coventry & Warwickshire, Black Country, and Stoke & Staffordshire.

  • All WM reviews now in implementation phase.

Key outcomes:

  • Structural changes - 11
  • Academy conversions - 7
  • Apprenticeship Organisations – up to 3
  • Institute of Technology – 1
  • ATA – 1
  • One extension to secure sustainable solution

Next Phase

Transition Grant Restructuring Facility Guidance for LEPs and local authorities Implementation Guidance & Due Diligence Framework Academisation guidance (inc. TU assessment)

Combined /Local Authority FE/SFC Advisers JIT & Transaction Unit JARDU

College

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Implementation Guidance

9

Developed with wide range of stakeholders – currently consulting widely and aim to publish shortly Takes account of lessons from previous changes and from other parts of UK; builds in views of Turnaround experts; The essential building blocks: Having the right “change” expertise Have a shared vision for the institution Good planning and project management Strong governance and leadership, including clear accountability Excellent communications and stakeholder engagement – with learners; employers; staff; LEPs/local authorities; lenders etc

Phase 4 Legal transition & delivery Phase 3 Approvals Phase 2 Planning Phase 1 The right people with the right skills

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Reflections & Challenges

Learning Lessons

Restructuring Facility Capital & VAT Capacity & Capability Professional Advisers Banks Pensions

10

Insolvency Regime Apprenticeship Reforms Alternative Structures Devolution

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Any Comments or Questions?

11