jeremiason et al 1994
play

(Jeremiason et al., 1994) David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 1 Homologs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Updated: 17 April 2013 Print version Lecture #36 Toxics: PCBs in the Great Lakes (Jeremiason et al., 1994) David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 1 Homologs (11) What are the PCBs Isomers (1-46) Congeners (209) 3 2 2 3 Biphenyl 1 1 4


  1. Updated: 17 April 2013 Print version Lecture #36 Toxics: PCBs in the Great Lakes (Jeremiason et al., 1994) David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 1

  2. Homologs (11) What are the PCBs Isomers (1-46) Congeners (209) 3 2 2 3  Biphenyl 1 1’ 4’ 4 6’ 5’ 5 6 Cl  2,2’ - Dichlorobiphenyl  2,3’ - Dichlorobiphenyl Cl Cl Cl David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 2

  3. History  1930: Monsanto is major US producer  1970: Monsanto decides to sell PCBs only for closed use  1975: NY State warns public about salmon and bass in Hudson  1979: PCB manufacture banned in US  1982: NY State begins dredging “hot spots”  1990: all PCB-containing equipment must be removed from US public buildings David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 3

  4. Arochlor Mixtures  Arochlor 12xx (xx=% chlorine)  1221: 50% Cl 1 , 35% Cl 2  1232: 26% Cl 1 , 29% Cl 2 , 24% Cl 3  1242: 13% Cl 2 , 45% Cl 3 , 31% Cl 4  1248: 49% Cl 4 , 27% Cl 5  1254: 15% Cl 4 , 53% Cl 5 , 26% Cl 6  1260: 12% Cl 5 , 42% Cl 6 , 38% Cl 7  1262: no data  1268: no data David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 4

  5. PCBs in the Lake Superior  Reference: “PCBs in Lake Superior, 1978-1992: Decrease in Water Concentrations Reflect Loss by Volatilization,” by Jeremiason, Hornbuckle and Eisenreich, Environmental Science and Technology, 28:903 (1994) St. Mary’s River David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 5

  6. Empirical Models ( ) = ∑ ∑ − 0 20 . t PCB PCB e 25 25 o ( ) = ∑ ∑ − 0 22 . t PCB PCB e 82 82 o  Data tell us that about 26,500 kg has been lost from the water column between 1980 and 1992 David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 6

  7. Loss rate and K ow ’s Log Kow -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 k (/yr) k (yr-1) -0.3 k-regr. -0.2 -0.1 0 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 7

  8. Areal Sediment Burden (mass)  Estimated at 4900 kg in 1986  using data from sediment cores  relatively small compared to total lost from water column (26,500 kg from ‘80 to ‘92) ∑ ∑ = 1 φ ρ − PCB PCB ( ) z areal i i s i Thickness of depth PCB conc. (ng/g-dry increment “i” sediment) in depth increment “i” Porosity of increment “i” David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 8

  9. Inputs = W Qc ( )  Riverine = 13 54 10 . x L yr / 2 ng L / =  Known Q 110 kg yr /  Estimate c from analysis of pristine rain  Other  estimates from industrial, municipal, (urban) runoff and storm sewer flows gives a combined total of about 40 kg/yr David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 9

  10. Inputs (cont.)  Direct Atmospheric deposition Surface  wet deposition precipitation Area ∑ = F PCB P SA ( ) wet T rain , = 10 2 2 ng L / ( 76 cm )8. 21 10 x m =  dry deposition 125 kg yr /  calculated for 4 seasons, then averaged Dry particle deposition velocity (0.2 cm/s) ∑ Fraction of year when it = φ F PCB V ( SA f ) dry T air , d d is not precipitating (0.9) = 32 kg yr / Fraction of PCBs associated with particles David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 10

  11. Outputs  Outflow  St. Mary’s River outflow = = 13 71 10 . / ( . 084 / ) 60 / W x L yr ng L kg yr  Burial (net loss to sedimentation)  estimated at 110 kg/yr from sediment cores collected in 1986 and 1990  Net Volatilization  true volatilization minus gas absorption  assumed to account for missing flux David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 11

  12. Reactions  NONE!  “evidence does not exist to support PCB degradation in Lake Superior or any other oligotrophic, aerobic system exhibiting low ambient concentrations” David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 12

  13. PCB Mass Balance in Lake Superior, 1986 Atmosphere Net Volatilization Atmospheric Deposition ~200 kg ~1900 kg/yr Wet 125 kg/yr Dry 32 kg/yr Other discharges ~40 kg/yr Particle Rivers Outflow Settling ~110 kg/yr ~60 kg/yr ~3000 kg/yr Water Column ~10,100 kg Recycling ~2890 kg/yr Sediment ~4900 kg Burial ~110 kg/yr David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 13

  14. Congener-specific sedimentation  Calculation of first-order net sedimentation rate Mass sedimentation rate (mg/cm 2 /yr) Inventory (or areal TSS)   W sed f   Fraction particulate   INV p = w k sed RR Recycling ratio = downward flux (from sed trap) divided by the accumulation in the sediment David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 14

  15. Sedimentation vs overall loss rate Log Kow -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 k (yr-1) k (/yr) -0.3 ksed (yr-1) k-regr. -0.2 -0.1 0 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 15

  16. Two Film Volatilization Model K  Jeremiason’s equation = ol k f vol w h v  Same as Chapra’s = v k H f v d 1 1  Where: 1 RT 1 = + K k H k ol a w David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 16

  17. Estimating 2-film parameters  The gas film coefficient = + k 0 2 . u 0 3 . a H O , 10 2 0 61 .   D   = PCB air ,   k k a PCB , a H O ,   D 2  The liquid film coefficient H O air , 2 = 1 64 . k 0 45 10 . u − w CO , 0 5 .   2 Sc   = PCB   k k w PCB , w CO ,   Sc 2 CO 2 Kinetic viscosity: molecular diffusivity Schmidt Number David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 17

  18. Volatilization vs overall loss rate Log Kow -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 k (yr-1) k (/yr) -0.4 kvol (yr-1) k-regr. -0.3 kvol-regr. -0.2 -0.1 0 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 18

  19.  To next lecture David Reckhow CEE 577 #36 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend