Jennifer Gihring January 25, 2016 Water Resource Assessment: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

jennifer gihring january 25 2016 water resource assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Jennifer Gihring January 25, 2016 Water Resource Assessment: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jennifer Gihring January 25, 2016 Water Resource Assessment: Status March 2014: SAC briefed on water resource assessment methods Feb. 2015: SAC briefed on results of saltwater intrusion/upwelling assessment April 2015: SAC approved


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jennifer Gihring January 25, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Water Resource Assessment: Status

  • March 2014: SAC briefed on water resource

assessment methods

  • Feb. 2015: SAC briefed on results of saltwater

intrusion/upwelling assessment

  • April 2015: SAC approved saltwater

intrusion/upwelling assessment

  • Dec. 2015: SAC briefed on revised water

resource assessment methods

  • Today: Potential SAC recommendation
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Water Supply Plan

Projected Demand Conservation & Irrigation Efficiency Net Demand Net Demand Water Available From Traditional Sources Alternative Water Supplies & Project Options

=

  • =
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose of Water Resource Assessment

Informs magnitude of projects and management actions needed to meet future demands and avoid unacceptable water resource impacts.

  • SAC to consider recommendation on water

resource assessment methods

  • Not requesting SAC recommendation on

findings or methods to determine available groundwater

  • Assume necessary components of the NFSEG

are available for use

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Water Resource Assessment Components

Quantitative Water Resource Constraint Indicators of Water Resource Constraint

Waterbodies with Adopted MFLs Saltwater Intrusion Water Reservations Wetland Vegetation Other Priority Waterbodies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Saltwater Intrusion/Upwelling

  • Statistical analysis of observed data
  • Groundwater quality is projected to impact

the availability of fresh groundwater in the NFRWSP in 2035 in a limited geographic area.

  • SAC recomm.

In Feb 2015; no changes

Chloride Trend Wells projected to exceed 250 mg/L by 2035

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Water R ter Rese eserva vations tions

  • Water reservations are based on the needs
  • f fish and wildlife or for public health and

safety (373.223(4), F.S.)

  • One water reservation in the NFRWSP

(Prairie Creek/Camps Canal)

  • May constrain local surface water

permitting, but does not represent regional constraint for RWSP

  • Approach: Qualitative discussion in plan
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Wetland Vegetation

  • Input data:
  • 2009-2011 land cover maps
  • Soil maps
  • 2010 & 2035 surficial aquifer levels
  • GIS analysis combining vegetation type,

soils, and change in the surficial aquifer

  • Field QA/QC
  • Output: Map of wetland vegetation w/

sensitive vegetation classified as high, moderate, or low potential for impact

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MFLs: Lakes

  • Calculate 2010 Freeboard: Difference

between UFA elevation under 2010 conditions vs. minimum needed to meet MFLs

  • Calculate UFA drawdown at 5-year

increments through 2035

2010 Freeboard Incremental Drawdown Remaining Freeboard

  • =
slide-10
SLIDE 10

MFLs: 2010 Freeboard Values

Lake County 2010 Freeboard (ft) Banana Putnam 0.5 Bell Putnam 1.5 Broward Putnam 1.8 Como Putnam 0.5 Dream Pond Putnam 1.5 Georges Putnam 2.0 Gore Flagler 2.9 Grandin Putnam 1.6 Little Como Putnam 1.3 Orio Putnam 0.6 Silver Putnam 0.6 Stella Putnam 1.4 Swan Putnam 2.7 Trone Putnam 1.6 Tuscawilla Alachua 1.0

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MFLs: Brooklyn, Geneva, & Cowpen

  • Qualitative discussion in the plan:
  • Analyses indicate that adopted MFLs are

not met under existing conditions.

  • Adopted MFLs were developed with

methods that are no longer considered applicable to lakes with extremely high range of stage fluctuation.

  • Re-evaluation of these MFLs is in

progress.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MFLs: Lower Santa Fe/Ichetucknee

  • Lower Santa Fe & Ichetucknee Rivers and

Springs

  • Utilize assessments conducted during

development of the MFLs and P/R Strategy (“Recovery” status)

  • No reassessment for the NFRWSP
  • Metric: 17 cfs recovery from 2010

conditions at Ft. White gage

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Metho Method: Othe d: Other r Priority Priority Waterbodies terbodies

  • SRWMD MFLs Development Planning List

& Green Cove Spring

  • Method:
  • Calculate flow relative to no-pumping

conditions

  • Calculate flow relative to projected

2035 water use

  • Metric: 10% decrease in flow
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Method: Other Priority Method: Other Priority Waterbodies terbodies

River/Spring County/ Basin Planning List Year

Alapaha River Alapaha 2017 PL Upper Suwannee River Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Alapaha River Rise Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Alapaha Rise Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Anderson Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Falmouth Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Green Cove Clay N Holton Creek Rise Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Lime Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Lime Run Sink Upper Suwannee 2016 PL SUW923973 (Stevenson) Upper Suwannee 2016 PL SUW101972 (Unnamed) Upper Suwannee 2016 PL Suwannee Upper Suwannee 2016 PL White Upper Suwannee 2016 PL

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Potential SAC Recommendation

  • Components:
  • Method for addressing water reservation
  • Method for sensitive vegetation assessment
  • Method for assessing status of MFL

waterbodies

  • Method for assessing priority waterbodies