item 7
play

ITEM 7: US 181 HARBOR BRIDGE PROJECT Texas Transportation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ITEM 7: US 181 HARBOR BRIDGE PROJECT Texas Transportation Commission April 30, 2015 Project scope Develop, design, construct, maintain and finance a total project length of 6.44 miles. Base scope New six-lane Harbor Bridge.


  1. ITEM 7: US 181 HARBOR BRIDGE PROJECT Texas Transportation Commission April 30, 2015

  2. Project scope � Develop, design, construct, maintain and finance a total project length of 6.44 miles. � Base scope – New six-lane Harbor Bridge. – Six-lane sections of US Highway 181 (US 181). – Reconstruction of approximately 1.6 miles of Interstate Highway 37 (I-37). – Reconstruction of approximately 1 mile of Crosstown Expressway (SH 286). – Demolition of the existing Harbor Bridge. � Option work – #1 - Broadway Boulevard from Harbor Drive to I-37 (Requested by the City of Corpus Christi). – #2 -Transition of I-37 to a low-speed arterial street from the SH 286/US 181 Interchange to Mesquite Street. 25-year Operation and maintenance life-cycle contract. � � $984M identified in the Funding Plan. US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 2

  3. Public outreach � 4 public/agency scoping meetings from 2005 to 2011. � 6 meetings of the Citizen Advisory Committee from 2011 to 2014. � 5 meetings of the Technical Advisory Committee from 2011 to 2014. � 8 neighborhood meetings prior to the DEIS in 2012. � 8 additional neighborhood meetings prior to the public hearing in 2014. � 2 public meetings with the City of Corpus Christi for park mitigation in 2013. � 1 public meeting in 2012. � Public hearing held February 18, 2014, extended formal comment period. � In response to requests, the public comment period was extended 30 days. Corpus Christi public hearing, February 18, 2014 US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 3

  4. Public outreach � 20 days of neighborhood storefront meetings during DEIS public review period: – La Retama Central Public Library. – Oveal Williams Senior Center. � Early coordination on environmental justice mitigation to include: – Livability summit hosted by FHWA and CC MPO in October 2014. – Currently Developing a livability plan for the Northside neighborhood working with FHWA. – Two livability workshops were conducted early 2015, with additional workshops before 2016. Public outreach and livability workshops – “The History Project” involved testimonials from residents, historical photos documenting the history of the neighborhoods. US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 4

  5. Public outreach Multiple stakeholder meetings throughout the project � EPA Summit EJ Interagency Workgroup � North Beach HOA � Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee � Rotary, Kiwanis Club Black Chamber of Commerce � Hispanic Chamber of Commerce � Northside Neighborhood Association � � Corpus Christi MPO � Port of Corpus Christi � Westside Business Association Public outreach and livability workshops � Kelsey Memorial Methodist Church � United Way of the Coastal Bend � Spohn Health Care System US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 5

  6. US 181 Harbor Bridge aesthetics — Blue Ribbon Panel � “Blue Ribbon Panel” meetings to develop aesthetics requirements – February 19 and April 16, 2014 � Blue Ribbon Panel Members – Nelda Martinez, Corpus Christi Mayor – Judy Hawley, Port of Corpus Christi Commission Chair – Terry Simpson, San Patricio County Judge – Loyd Neal, Nueces County Judge � Aesthetics requirements of the panel were provided to proposers. � Aesthetics Subcommittee evaluated proposals based upon requirements in the RFP. � Sustainability Plan – FHWA “INVEST” program Aesthetics Subcommittee Meeting platinum rating. April 14, 2015 US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 6

  7. Submitted proposals — Flatiron/Dragados USA, JV* Equity members � Flatiron Constructors, Inc. (50%) � Dragados USA, Inc. (50%) Major non-equity members and other team members � AIA Engineers, Ltd. � Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. � Figg Bridge Engineers, Inc. � KCI Technologies, Inc. � Iridium Concesiones de Infraestructuras, � M2L Associates Inc. S.A. (acting through ACS Infrastructure � PaveTex Engineering and Testing, Inc. Development, Inc.) � Pinnacle Consulting Management Group, Inc. � DBI Services, LLC � Professional Service Industries, Inc. � Austin Bridge & Road, LP � Randy Burkett Lighting Design, Inc. � AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc. � RJ Rivera Associates, Inc. Beton Consulting Engineers, LLC � The Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory � � Blanton & Associates, Inc. (as represented by The University of Western � D.H. Griffin of Texas, Inc. Ontario) � IEA, Inc. � Ware & Associates, Inc. *alphabetical order US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 7

  8. Submitted proposals — Harbor Bridge Constructors* Equity members Walsh Investors, LLC (sole member of Walsh Infrastructure, LLC) � � Walsh Infrastructure, LLC (100%) Major non-equity members and other team members Maldonado ‐ Burkett Intelligent Transportation Systems, LLP � Archer Western/Granite JV � � Archer Western Construction, LLC � Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Granite Construction Company Olivarri & Associates, Inc. � � � HDR Engineering, Inc. � Rodriguez Transportation Group, Inc. � Infrastructure Corporation of America � RODS Surveying, Inc. � Applied Research Associates, Inc. � RVE, Inc. � B2Z Engineering � Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Bridgescape, LLC Solaray Engineering, Inc. � � � Genesis Structures, Inc. � Stateside Right of Way Services, LLC � Hinman Consulting Engineers, Inc. � STL Engineers � Illumination Arts, LLC � Structural Engineering Associates, Inc. � International Bridge Technologies, Inc. � West Wind Laboratory, Inc. INTERA Incorporated Wiss, Janey, Elstner � � � KTA ‐ Tator, Inc. *alphabetical order US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 8

  9. Submitted proposals — Harbor Bridge Partners* Equity member � Kiewit Development Company Major non-equity members and other team members � Buckland & Taylor � IDCUS dba IDC Inc. � J.D. Abrams, L.P. � Lymon C. Reese & Associates Lamb ‐ Star Engineering, L.P. Olivarri & Associates Inc. � � � Miller Paving Limited � Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. � Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc. � Tolunay ‐ Wong Engineers, Inc. � AIA Engineers, Ltd. � Touchstone Architecture & Consulting, P.A. � Alta Vista Solutions � The Transtec Group, Inc. CSJ Utility Coordinators, LLC Universal Field Services, Inc. � � Gunda Corporation, LLC � *alphabetical order US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 9

  10. Submitted proposals — Traylor ‐ Zachry ‐ Fluor Crosstown Builders* Equity members Major non-equity members � Fugro Consultants, Inc. Illumination Arts, LLC. � TYLI ‐ PTG, JV � TZF Crosstown Constructors, LLC. � Infrastructure Corporation � ― Traylor Bros., Inc. (35%) � T.Y. Lin International of America ― Zachry Construction � Parsons Transportation � Karagozian & Case, Inc. Corporation (35%) Group, Inc. � Martinez, Guy & Maybik, Inc. ― Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (30%) � Morehead Dotts Rybak Other team members � TZF Crosstown Maintenance, Norton Corrosion Limited � LLC. � Arias & Associates, Inc. � Rowan Williams Davies & ― Traylor Bros., Inc. (10%) � Bridgefarmer & Associates, Inc. Irwin, Inc. ― Zachry Construction � Cobb, Fendley & Associates, Inc. � RVi Planning Corporation (10%) � Corsair Consulting LLC � Volkert, Inc. ― Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (80%) Cox McLain Environmental � Ximenes & Associates, Inc. � Consulting, Inc. � CTLGroup � Dan Brown and Associates, PC *alphabetical order US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 10

  11. Evaluation of proposals Evaluation process � Implemented a pre-established and rigorous procedure to evaluate and select the proposal that offers the best value. � Separate pass/fail, technical/aesthetic, and price subcommittees. � Subcommittees were separate and unaware of other committees’ scores. � Evaluations were compiled and tallied by each subcommittee and recommendations made to TxDOT administration regarding a final score and then to Commission for consideration. US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 11

  12. Apparent best value determination � Price includes design, construction and maintenance. Best Value Scoring: � Technical and aesthetics score is based upon: – Aesthetic requirements. Price 80 points + Technical – Technical solutions. including aesthetics 20 points – Project management plan. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- – Quality management plan. Maximum 100 points – Maintenance management plan. – Sustainability plan. Apparent best value = Highest total proposal score US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 12

  13. Evaluation results summary Detailed e valuations resulting in… US 181 Harbor Bridge Project 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend