it s all in the hidden states a hedging method with an
play

Its All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Its All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis Risk Yanxin Liu and Johnny Siu-Hang Li Presenter: Yanxin Liu September 9, 2015 Presenter: Yanxin Liu Its All in the Hidden States: A Hedging


  1. It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis Risk Yanxin Liu and Johnny Siu-Hang Li Presenter: Yanxin Liu September 9, 2015 Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 1 / 44

  2. Outline Introduction 1 The Applicable Mortality Models 2 The Generalized State Space Hedging Method 3 Analyzing Population Basis Risk 4 A Numerical Illustration 5 Conclusion 6 Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 2 / 44

  3. Introduction Population Basis Risk ⇒ A risk associated with the difference in mortality experience between the population of the hedging instruments and the population of the liability being hedged Multi-Population Mortality Model ◮ Augmented Common Factor Model (Li and Lee, 2005) ◮ Co-integrated Lee-Carter Model (Li and Hardy, 2011) ◮ Gravity Model (Dowd et al., 2011) ◮ Two-population CBD Model (Cairns et al., 2011) ◮ M-CBD Model (Zhou and Li, 2015) Managing Basis Risk ◮ Coughlan et al.(2011) develop a framework for analysing longevity basis risk; ◮ Cairns et al.(2013) use stochastic simulation to analyse several key risk factors, including the population basis risk, that influences the hedge effectiveness of a longevity hedge. Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 3 / 44

  4. Why An Explicit Measure of Population Basis Risk is Needed? As the market in longevity and mortality-related risk becomes more liquid, the reference population of a standardized longevity contract can be linked to a larger range of populations, ◮ e.g., the Life and Longevity Markets Association provides longevity indices for four different populations: ⋆ United States; ⋆ England and Wales; ⋆ Netherlands; ⋆ Germany. ◮ Those four populations could further be used as the reference population of longevity contracts such as q-forwards. Without an explicit measure of basis risk, ◮ the hedgers are not able to evaluate the basis risk profile for their hedge portfolios; ◮ no guideline for hedgers to select the most appropriate standardized contracts in a longevity hedge. Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 4 / 44

  5. Research Objectives 1 To introduce a new hedging method called the generalized state space hedging method; ◮ allows us to decompose the underlying longevity risk into a component arising solely from the hidden states that are shared by all populations and components stemming exclusively from the hidden states that are population-specific. ◮ can be used as long as the mortality model can be written in state space form; 2 To develop a quantity called standardized basis risk profile, which is an efficient measure for hedgers to select the most appropriate population among all candidate populations. Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 5 / 44

  6. Outline Introduction 1 The Applicable Mortality Models 2 The Generalized State Space Hedging Method 3 Analyzing Population Basis Risk 4 A Numerical Illustration 5 Conclusion 6 Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 6 / 44

  7. State Space Model: A General State Space Structure Observation Equation y t = � � D + B � α t + � ǫ t Transition Equation α t = � � U + A � α t − 1 + � η t where � y t is the vector of observations at time t ; � α t is the vector of hidden states at time t ; D and � � U are the vectors of constants; B is the design matrix (linear transformation between � y t and � α t ); A is a squared matrix (first-order Markov relation of � α t ); i.i.d. i.i.d. � ǫ t ∼ MVN(0 , R ) and � η t ∼ MVN(0 , Q ). Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 7 / 44

  8. State Space Model and Multi-Population Mortality Model Suppose that we consider n p populations. α (1) α ( n p ) α c t ) ′ , ( � t ) ′ , . . . , ( � ) ′ ) ′ , where We partition � α t into � α t = (( � t ◮ � α c t represents the states that are shared by all populations being modeled; α ( p ) ◮ � represents the states that are exclusive to population p . t η (1) η ( n p ) ◮ accordingly, � t ) ′ , ( � t ) ′ , . . . , ( � ) ′ ) ′ ; η c η t = (( � t ◮ Q would be a block diagonal matrix with blocks Q c , Q (1) , . . . , Q ( n p ) η (1) η ( n p ) η c being the covariance matrix of � , respectively. t , � t , . . . , � t Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 8 / 44

  9. Reformulating the current mortality models into state space form: Illustration I: ACF Model (Li and Lee, 2005) Illustration II: M-CBD Model (Zhou and Li, 2015) Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 9 / 44

  10. Augmented Common Factor Model (ACF Model, Li and Lee, 2005) The ACF model assumes that ln( m ( p ) a ( p ) t + b ( p ) x k ( p ) + ǫ ( p ) + b c x k c x , t ) = x , t , x t µ c + k c k c t − 1 + η c = t , t µ ( p ) + φ ( p ) k ( p ) k ( p ) + η ( p ) = , p = 1 , . . . , n p , t t t where ◮ m ( p ) x , t is population p ’s central death rate at age x and in year t ; ◮ a ( p ) x , b ( p ) x , µ c , µ ( p ) and φ ( p ) are constants; x , b c x b ( p ) x b c = 1 and | φ ( p ) | < 1; ◮ � x = 1, � x i.i.d. i.i.d. i.i.d. ◮ ǫ ( p ) ∼ N(0 , Q c ) and η ( p ) ∼ N(0 , σ 2 ∼ N(0 , Q ( p ) ). ǫ ), η c x , t t t Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 10 / 44

  11. ACF Model in State Space Form In ACF model, the observation equation and transition equation can be specified as y t = � � D + B � α t + � ǫ t and α t = � � U + A � κ t − 1 + � η t , where � ′ � ln( m (1) x a , t ) , . . . , ln( m (1) x b , t ) , . . . , ln( m ( n p ) x a , t ) , . . . , ln( m ( n p ) � y t = x b , t ) , � ′ � a (1) x a , . . . , a (1) x b , . . . , a ( n p ) x a , . . . , a ( n p ) � D = , x b � ′ � t , k (1) , . . . , k ( n p ) k c α t � = , t t � ′ � ǫ (1) x a , t , . . . , ǫ (1) x b , t , . . . , ǫ ( n p ) x a , t , . . . , ǫ ( n p ) � ǫ t = , x b , t µ c , µ (1) , . . . , µ ( n p ) � ′ , � � U = Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 11 / 44

  12. ACF Model in State Space Form and  1 0 0 · · · 0  � b (1) � b c  0 · · · 0  φ (1) 0 0 · · · 0   � � b (2) b c 0 · · · 0  φ (2)    0 0 · · · 0 A = , B =     . . . . ... . . . .  . . . .    ... . . . . . . . .     . . . .   � � b c b ( n p ) 0 0 · · · φ ( n p ) 0 0 0 · · · with b c = ( b c � x a , . . . , b c x b ) ′ and b ( p ) = ( b ( p ) x a , . . . , b ( p ) � x b ) ′ , p = 1 , . . . , n p . α c In ACF model, the common states vector � t reduces to a scalar and α c t = k c we have � t . Similarly for the population-specific states vector, α ( p ) = k ( p ) we have � , for p = 1 , . . . , n p . t t Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 12 / 44

  13. M-CBD Model (Zhou and Li, 2015) The M-CBD model assumes that logit ( q ( p ) x ) + κ ( p ) 1 , t + κ ( p ) x ) + ǫ ( p ) κ c 1 , t + κ c x , t ) = 2 , t ( x − ¯ 2 , t ( x − ¯ x , t , κ c µ c i + κ c i , t − 1 + η c = i , t , i , t κ ( p ) µ ( p ) + φ ( p ) κ ( p ) i , t − 1 + η ( p ) = i , t , i , t i i for i = 1 , 2 and p = 1 , . . . , n p , where ◮ q ( p ) x , t is population p ’s death probability at age x and in year t ;; i , µ ( p ) and φ ( p ) ◮ µ c are constants; i i ◮ ¯ x is the average of the sample age range; ◮ | φ ( p ) | < 1; i 2 ( t )) ′ and � η ( p ) = ( η ( p ) 1 ( t ) , η ( p ) ◮ let � 2 ( t )) ′ ; η c t = ( η c 1 ( t ) , η c t ◮ ǫ ( p ) i.i.d. i.i.d. η ( p ) i.i.d. ∼ N(0 , σ 2 η c ∼ MVN(0 , Q c ) and � ∼ MVN(0 , Q ( p ) ). ǫ ), � x , t t t Presenter: Yanxin Liu It’s All in the Hidden States: A Hedging Method with an Explicit Measure of Population Basis September 9, 2015 13 / 44

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend