ISS: THE GLOBAL LEADER IN GOVERNANCE Santa Barbara County Employees - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

iss the global leader in governance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ISS: THE GLOBAL LEADER IN GOVERNANCE Santa Barbara County Employees - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ISS: THE GLOBAL LEADER IN GOVERNANCE Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System January 24, 2018 Now more than ever, Governance Matters www.issgovernance.com AGENDA Corporate Governance Evolution Proxy Voting Policy Options at


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Now more than ever, Governance Matters

www.issgovernance.com

ISS: THE GLOBAL LEADER IN GOVERNANCE

Santa Barbara County Employees’ Retirement System January 24, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA

› Corporate Governance Evolution › Proxy Voting Policy Options at ISS › Trends in Governance

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. 3

2003 SEC adopts Proxy Voting Rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 2011 SEC adopts rules for “Say on Pay” and golden parachutes (Dodd-Frank) 1985 Council of Institutional Investors formed; Delaware court cases lay foundation for corporate governance 2004 Launched Governance Analytics 2008 Launched Governance Exchange 2010 Launched ISS ProxyExchange 2011 Launched ExecComp Analytics Suite 2013 Launched Governance QuickScore 2013 Launched PolicyEngine 2005 UN develops the Principles of Responsible Investment 2010 U.K. Stewardship Code is published \ 1997 ICS founded as separate business entity from ISS 2002 First to market: Corporate Governance Ratings and Securities Class Action Services 2003 First to market: Vote Disclosure Services 1992 First to market: Agency Voting Services 1988 DOL issues Avon Letter 1992 Cadbury Code (U.K.) 1994 General Motors Corporate Governance Guidelines 1999 OECD releases Principles of Corporate Governance 2001 Collapse of Enron 2013 “Say on Pay” initiatives in Switzerland & Israel

1985 1988 1992 1994 1997 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2008 2010 2011 2013 2014 2015 2016

Industry Developments ISS Innovations

2000 ISS launches Global Proxy Distribution Service (GPD) 2014 Japan launches Stewardship / Governance Codes\ 2014 Launched Equity Plan Scorecard \ 2014 Acquired Incentive Lab 2015 U.S. Sees Market-Wide Push To Facilitate Private Ordering On Proxy Access \ \ 2015 Launch of Governance Risk Report 2015 QuickScore coverage expansion 2015 Acquired Ethix SRI Advisors to expand ESG Solutions \ 2016 Launch ISS Analytics, Powered by DataDesk 2016 CalPERS’ Global Governance Principles Call for Comply-Or- Explain Approach

  • n Long-

Tenured Directors

ISS at the Forefront of Corporate Governance Evolution

THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INDUSTRY HAS EVOLVED SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE LAST 30 YEARS

2016 ISS acquires iiWisdom’s Interactive Governance Portal

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. 4

Rigorous & Inclusive Policy Formulation Process

Balancing global principles and local market specificity, ISS brings a transparent and inclusive approach that includes ongoing market feedback, surveys, roundtables and an open industry comment period.

ISS EVOLVES ITS PROCESS

Global In-person Discussion Forums and roundtables frame the policy process.

Annual Policy Survey brings in perspectives from institutional investors, corporate issuers and governance experts. Offers all market constituents the ability to actively participate in ISS’ policy development process.

Numerous Viewpoints are considered to develop guidelines that strike the right balance between shareholder interests and economic practicality.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. 5

ISS Provides More Governance Research & Policy Options

ISS covers a spectrum of shareholder interests, to align with client philosophies as they serve their underlying clients.

  • Global coverage and

principles, ISS market specific policies and expertise

  • Cover 39,000 company

meetings annually, across 115+ markets

  • Viewed as the industry

standard and market best practice

  • 5 thematic policies,

including Sustainability, SRI, Faith-based, Taft- Hartley, Public Fund

  • Designed to fill specific

investor needs and mandates (e.g. meet PRI requirements)

  • Bespoke implementation of

client philosophy

  • High-touch approach where

custom analyst partners with client

  • Fastest growing area of

research, as governance matters globally

  • Comprehensive,

independent research on high-profile economic proposals, including M&A and contests for corporate control

ISS Benchmark Research Specialty Research Custom Research Special Situations Research

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.

ISS’ Multiple Policy Perspectives

6

ISS Policy Sustainability Policy SRI Policy Catholic Policy Public Fund Policy Taft-Hartley Policy

Policy Focus Investment firms and large institutional investors UN PRI Signatories or similarly aligned investment managers & asset owners SRI investment firms, religious groups, charitable foundations & university endowments Catholic faith-based investors, including dioceses & Catholic healthcare systems Public pension fund managers & public plan sponsors/trustees Taft-Hartley pension funds & investment managers (ERISA) Orientation “Best practice” standards that promote total shareholder value & risk mitigation United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) The "triple bottom line" value creation Economic gain, social justice, environmental stewardship, ethical conduct & teachings of the Catholic Church (USCCB) Long-term best interests

  • f public plan participants

& beneficiaries Worker-owner view of long-term corporate value based on the AFL-CIO proxy voting guidelines Key Policy Highlights:

  • 1. Board

Board competence, performance, and independence (50%) Board competence, performance - including

  • n ESG topics, and

independence (50%) Board competence, performance - including

  • n ESG topics, diversity,

and independence (50%) Board competence, performance - including

  • n ESG topics, diversity

and independence (50%) Board competence, performance, & independence (50%) Board competence, performance, & independence (67%)

  • 2. Compensation

Alignment of pay and performance, presence of problematic compensation practices, shareholder value transfer (SVT) Alignment of pay and performance, presence of problematic compensation practices, shareholder value transfer (SVT) Alignment of pay and performance including on ESG topics, presence of problematic compensation practices, shareholder value transfer (SVT) Alignment of pay and performance - including

  • n ESG topics, presence
  • f problematic

compensation practices, shareholder value transfer (SVT) Alignment of pay & performance, presence of problematic compensation practices, voting power dilution (15%) Alignment of pay & performance, presence of problematic compensation practices, voting power dilution (10%)

  • 3. Social & Environmental

Consider shareholder proposals on social, environmental and labor/human rights issues

  • n a case-by-case basis

Generally support shareholder proposals advocating ESG disclosure

  • r universal norms/codes
  • f conduct

Generally support shareholder proposals on social, environmental and labor/human rights issues Generally support shareholder proposals on social, environmental and labor/human rights issues Generally support shareholder proposals on social, environmental & labor/human rights issues Generally support shareholder proposals on social, environmental & labor/human rights issues Board Opposition 3% 3% 4% 4% 32% 39% Auditor Ratification Opposition 0% 0% 9% 9% 87% 87% Equity Pay Plans 6% 6% 6% 6% 69% 75% Say on Pay Opposition 9% 9% 11% 11% 18% 18%

  • Gov. Shareholder Proposal Support

78% 79% 90% 90% 91% 91% E&S Shareholder Proposal Support 69% 81% 96% 96% 91% 91%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TRENDS IN GOVERNANCE

› Director Elections › Executive Compensation › “ESG” Considerations › One Share, One Vote

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.

Director Support Remains High – “Failed” Elections Down

8 88.8% 6.0% 3.0% 1.2% 0.8% 0.2%

90%+ 80-90% 70-80% 60-70% 50-60% <50%

85 43 45 52 38 40 45 33 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Majority Withhold/Against Director Votes

Elections held January-June of each year

Concerns Raised by ISS Number of Directors Receiving <50% Support Board Responsiveness 13 Poor Attendance 10 Unilateral Board Action 6 Overboarded 4 Non-Independent Member of Key Committee 4 Shareholder Inability to Amend Bylaws 4 Poison Pill Concerns 4 Compensation Concerns 3 Risk Oversight Issue 1

  • Approx. 9 out of 10

directors receive 90% support or greater

2017 Average Support for R3k Nominees: 95.8% (Votes Cast)

*All statistics on slide for Russell 3000

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.

Non-Binding Vote on CEO Pay – Support Generally Up

9

90.7% 91.4% 91.3% 91.7% 91.5% 92.1% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Average Say-on-Pay Support Level - Russell 3000

2.6% 2.2% 2.4% 2.2% 1.5% 1.3% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Say-on-Pay Failure Rate - Russell 3000

Average shareholder support at an all-time high Failed say-on-pay votes at an all-time low

79.3% 14.2% 5.2% 1.3%

Vote Results for 2017 Season

>90% 70-90% 50-70% <50%

*All statistics on slide for Russell 3000

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.

ESG – Peak in Resolutions Filed

10

408 375 384 356 367 400 460 479 434 485

100 200 300 400 500 600

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Total E&S Resolutions Filed

225 170 73 12 5

Status of E&S Resolutions in 2017

Voted Withdrawn Omitted Pending Other

7.6% 8.7% 9.4% 12.0% 12.1% 9.8% 12.5% 15.0% 14.0% 16.3% 18.1% 20.6% 18.6% 23.1% 21.9% 20.1% 20.5% 21.0%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Average Vote Results for E&S Proposals

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.

One-Share, One-Vote – Who regulates?

Trend in Dual or Multi-Class Capital Structures

  • Facebook, Under Armour
  • Snap – Parent Company of the SnapChat app

11

7.36% 7.72% 7.88% 8.30% 8.48% 8.82% 8.75% 3.72% 4.12% 4.10% 4.27% 4.62% 4.79% 4.53%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 50 100 150 200 250 300 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Different Vote Rights Different Vote Rights and Controlled Percentage of Russell 3000 Percentage of Russell 3000

DIFFERENT VOTING RIGHTS AND CONTROLLED COMPANIES

Who will address the gap?

  • Regulators
  • Index Providers: S&P Composite 1500, FTSE Russell, MSCI (?)
  • Shareholders
slide-12
SLIDE 12

THANK YOU

Andrew Linberg, Associate Director Head of Custom Research – Americas andrew.linberg@issgovernance.com Joshua Russell, Vice President Account Executive joshua.russell@issgovernance.com