IPv6 Deployment Survey (Residential/Household Services) How IPv6 is being deployed? Jordi Palet (jordi.palet@consulintel.es) Consulintel, CEO/CTO - 1
Survey Contents • Basic ISP data (name, country, RIR) • Technology of the customer link • Is it a commercial service or a “pilot” • IPv6 WAN link • IPv6 customer addressing • IPv4 service • Transitioning and provisioning • IPv6 DNS services • Other data (optional contact details) - 2
IP version of Survey Responder IPv6 305 37% IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 514 63% - 3
RIR AfriNIC 16 2% APNIC 154 19% AfriNIC RIPE NCC 343 APNIC 42% ARIN LACNIC ARIN RIPE NCC 181 22% LACNIC 125 15% - 4
100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 Afghanistan 2 Albania 2 Algeria 2 Andorra 1 Argentina 10 Armenia 1 Australia 36 Austria 1 Bahamas 1 Bangladesh 3 Belgium 6 Bhutan 2 Brazil 40 Cameroon 1 Canada 12 Chile 2 China 1 Colombia 7 Costa Rica 3 Czech Republic 2 Denmark 3 Dominican Republic 1 Ecuador 1 El Salvador 1 Estonia 1 Finland 3 France 17 Germany 24 Greece 5 Grenada 1 Guatemala 2 Hong Kong 1 Hungary 3 Iran 1 Iraq 1 Ireland 3 Italy 2 Japan 2 Jordan 2 Kuwait 1 Lithuania 1 Luxembourg 2 Malaysia 7 Mexico 4 Mozambique 2 Netherlands 13 New Caledonia 1 New Zealand 33 Nicaragua 2 North Korea 1 Norway 8 Oman 3 Pakistan 1 Panama 1 Paraguay 2 Peru 5 Philippines 2 Poland 1 Portugal 1 Romania 4 Russian Federation 11 Saudi Arabia 2 Serbia 2 Singapore 1 Slovenia 4 South Africa 2 Spain 14 Sudan 1 Sweden 7 Switzerland 6 Taiwan 2 Thailand 2 Tunisia 2 Turkey 1 Ukraine 2 United Arab Emirates 2 United Kingdom 26 United States 93 Uruguay 2 - 5 Venezuela 5 Wallis and Futuna 1 Yemen 3
Technology 2G/3G/4G with CPE 4 1% xDSL 118 Cable/DOCSIS 25% 102 22% 2G/3G/4G with CPE Cable/DOCSIS FTTH Other Wireless (WiFi, LMDS, WiMax, ...) Wireless (WiFi, LMDS, WiMax, ...) 44 xDSL 10% FTTH Other 145 50 31% 11% - 6
Is IPv6 already a commercial service? Yes 298 36% N/A 374 N/A 46% No Yes No 147 18% - 7
WAN Prefix Size WAN Prefix Stable /112 /126 6 unnumbered 9 /127 2% 39 3% 21 Yes 12% 183 7% 23% Other N/A 47 /112 14% /126 No /127 /64 Yes No Other 101 12% unnumbered N/A 535 65% /64 203 62% WAN Addressing Type WAN from same pool as customer prefixes Yes WAN /64 from customer prefix ULA 63 8% 37 No 12% Yes 93 39 No Other 11% 5% 20 9 2% 3% N/A GUA No link-local N/A Yes No Other link-local 65 Yes N/A 21% 663 ULA 81% GUA 194 64% N/A 759 93% - 8
LAN Prefix Size LAN Prefix Stable Other 30 Yes 9% 179 22% /48 71 23% /48 N/A /64 90 /56 29% No /64 No 104 Yes Other 13% N/A 536 65% /56 121 39% Can the customer opt to have it "stable"? Extra cost (on top of stable IPv4)? Yes Yes No 15 42 25 No 2% 5% 3% 49 6% N/A N/A No No Yes Yes N/A N/A 728 779 89% 95% - 9
IPv4 service provided? Public IPv4 address at CPE WAN? Yes Yes 260 312 32% 38% N/A N/A No No Yes Yes N/A N/A 525 498 64% No 61% 34 4% No 9 1% IPv4 address is "stable"? Can the customer opt to have IPv4 "stable"? Yes Extra cost for stable IPv4? 88 11% No Yes Yes 36 155 74 4% No 9% 19% 12 1% N/A No N/A N/A Yes No No Yes No Yes 132 16% N/A 532 N/A 65% 694 85% N/A 732 90% - 10
Tunnel Broker What transition mechanism? 3 464XLAT 6RD 1% 3 6to4 7 1% 5 Other CGN (dual-stack with 3% NAT64 2% 13 private IPv4 + GUA) 3 5% 25 464XLAT 1% 9% MAP-T lw4o6 6RD 1 1 DS-LITE 0% 9 0% 6to4 3% CGN (dual-stack with private IPv4 + GUA) DS-LITE Dual-stack (public IPv4 + GUA) Dual-stack (public IPv4 + GUA) lw4o6 214 75% MAP-T NAT64 Other Tunnel Broker - 11
IPv6 reverse DNS? NS Delegation for stable IPv6 prefix? Yes Yes 99 109 12% 13% No 80 No N/A 10% N/A 130 16% No No Yes Yes N/A 590 N/A 72% 630 77% DNAME for non-stable IPv6 prefix for PTRs? Yes 17 No 2% 98 12% N/A No Yes N/A 704 86% - 12
Conclusions • In general “correct” deployment – Some exceptions • Misunderstandings on IPv6 technology/marketing/other reason: – IPv6 prefix size – Stability of prefix • More “advanced” countries seem to do it smartly, less ”misunderstandings” - 13
Thanks !! Survey link: http://survey.consulintel.es/index.php/175122 Contact: – Jordi Palet (Consulintel): jordi.palet@consulintel.es - 14
Recommend
More recommend
