ipod usage study
play

iPod Usage Study Quantitative Research Report Prepared for Apple - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

iPod Usage Study Quantitative Research Report Prepared for Apple iPod Team December 4, 2015 Alexander Katherine Valerie Kevin Maya Dfouni Hayes Laufer Ng Porter Background: History of the iPod 1997: iPod development started


  1. iPod Usage Study Quantitative Research Report Prepared for Apple iPod Team December 4, 2015 Alexander Katherine Valerie Kevin Maya Dfouni Hayes Laufer Ng Porter

  2. Background: History of the iPod ● 1997: iPod development started ● Creators of iPod: Jon Rubinstein, Tony Fadell, Michael Dhuey and Jonathan Ive iPod product line: iPod Classic, iPod Shuffle, iPod Nano, iPod Touch ● Problem recognition by Apple CEO, Tim Cook ● 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_iOS_devices

  3. Background: iPod vs. iPhone Sales 3 http://riaa.com/media/D1F4E3E8-D3E0-FCEE-BB55-FD8B35BC8785.pdf

  4. Background: Album Sales vs. Music Streams 4 http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/public%20factsheets/Soundscan/nielsen-2014-year-end-music-report-us.pdf

  5. Background: Streaming and Revenue 5 http://riaa.com/media/D1F4E3E8-D3E0-FCEE-BB55-FD8B35BC8785.pdf

  6. Background: Revenue 6 http://riaa.com/media/D1F4E3E8-D3E0-FCEE-BB55-FD8B35BC8785.pdf

  7. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective One: How many Smartphone owners also own the iPod? Hypothesis One: H ₒ : Smartphone users do not own the iPod H ₐ : Smartphone users do own the iPod 7

  8. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective Two: How are Apple products acquired by users? Hypothesis Two: H ₒ : Apple products are commonly purchased by the users themselves H ₐ : Apple products are commonly gifted to the end users 8

  9. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective Three: Determine the relationship between the frequency of iPod usage for listening to music and the frequency of Smartphone usage. Hypothesis Three: H ₒ : iPods are used more often than Smartphones for listening to music H ₐ : Smartphones are used more often than iPods for listening to music 9

  10. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective Four: Identify the situational circumstances for usage of the iPods and Smartphones for the purpose of listening to music Hypothesis Four: H ₒ : iPods and Smartphones are utilized more when listening to music during inactive situations (sleeping, commuting, etc) H ₐ : iPods and Smartphones are utilized more when listening to music during active situations (gym, running, etc) 10

  11. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective Five A: Which existing features are important in the decision between iPod vs. Smartphone while listening to music? Hypothesis Five A: H ₒ : The all-inclusiveness of the device has no impact on the influence of inactive and active iPod users H ₐ : The all-inclusiveness of the device (phone calls, data usage) is the most important feature in the decision of choosing which device to listen music on 11

  12. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective Five B: Which features are desired by users in the market that do not already exist today? Hypothesis Five B: H ₒ : Users are satisfied with their music listening devices and there is no strong desire for any new features H ₐ : Noise-cancelling technology is the most desired feature in the market that does not already exist 12

  13. Research Objectives & Hypotheses Objective Six: What are the crucial purchasing criteria when purchasing an iPod or a Smartphone? Hypothesis Six: H ₒ : All criteria are equally weighed when considering whether or not to purchase an iPod or not H ₐ : The most crucial purchasing criterion when considering whether or not to purchase an iPod or not, is the cost 13

  14. Study Design Population of interest : People that listen to music on portable devices Data collection method : Self-administered questionnaire (Qualtrics) Sample design error : To minimize population specification error, we have spent extensive time studying people that listen to music on portable devices before sampling Measurement error : To minimize surrogate information error, we will pay more careful attention to specification of the types of information required to fulfill the objectives of our research 14

  15. Study Design Sampling frame: D’Amore McKim student email list in combination with EnGauge Team’s Facebook friend lists Sampling Method: Snowball sampling 15

  16. Study Design Response rate: 20% We plan to reach out to 500 NU students. We expect to receive responses from at least 100 students. How we can increase our response rate: ● Advanced notification about survey to 500 students Send reminder notifications to solicit participation ● 16

  17. Study Design Ideal type of survey: A traditional face-to-face data collection (focus group) encompassing all people who listen to music on a portable device worldwide. Type of survey we will use: Due to limited time and funds, we will conduct a targeted online Qualtrics quantitative self administered survey. 17

  18. Study Design Length of questionnaire: 5-10 minutes Expected incidence rate: 85%; 11,484 students (11,484 is 85% of the total number of enrolled Northeastern undergraduates, 13,510. 85% of college students own Smartphones according to Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2015.) Structured: Structured Expected data collection time needed: 2 weeks (10 business days) 18

  19. Areas of Questioning EnGauge worked collaboratively with the Apple iPod Division in developing the questionnaire. Survey topics included: Use Product Appeal of Cases Ownership Existing and History Impact Desired (benefits vs. Features barriers) of using iPod over Smartphone and vice versa Purchase Frequency Patterns of Use 19

  20. Areas of Questioning 1. Product ownership history Q1 of 2011: Apple sold almost 20 million iPods. a. Do you own a Smartphone? Q4 of 2012: Apple sold just over 5 million. i. Yes/No “That’s despite a huge revamp of the line and a range of new colours for the 2012 iPod nano.” b. What brand of Smartphone do you own? i. Apple, Samsung, Android, HTC, Motorola, Nokia, Blackberry, LG, Other c. Do you own an iPod i. Yes/No 2. Product purchase patterns a. If you no longer had an iPod, how unlikely or likely is it you would buy another? i. On a scale of 1-7; 1= Very Unlikely, 7= Very Likely b. Have you purchased an iPod in the past 5 years? i. Yes/No 20 https://www.thesnugg.com/news/2012/12/is-the-smartphone-killing-the-ipod/#.VjN_366rRsN

  21. Areas of Questioning 3. Frequency of use a. In the past 3 months, indicate how frequently or infrequently you have used your Smartphone to listen to music. i. 1-5; 1= Never (0 times), 5= All the time (every day) b. In the past 3 months, indicate how frequently you have used your iPod to listen to music. i. 1-5; 1= Never (0 times), 5= All the time (every day) 4. Use cases a. Please indicate the device you would choose to use for listening to music in the given situations (Smartphone, iPod, Other, or “I would not listen to music”). ii. Going for a run, at the gym, doing homework/studying, walking somewhere, during commute (car, bus or train), traveling on a plane, trying to fall asleep, entertaining guests 21

  22. Areas of Questioning 5. Appeal of existing and desired features a. How important or unimportant are the following features in influencing your decision on whether or not to use a Smartphone to listen to music? (1= least important; 5= most important) i. Battery life, cost, data plan, size, screen resolution, ability to call and text, camera, ability to use music streaming services b. How important or unimportant are the following features in influencing your decision on whether or not to use a Smartphone to listen to music? (1= least important; 5= most important) i. Battery life, cost, size, weight, storage capacity c. What features would you like to have on your music listening device that do not currently exist? (1= least desirable; 5= most desirable) i. Built-in radio, cable access, walkie-talkie, music editing software, and more 22

  23. Areas of Questioning 6. Impact (benefits vs. barriers) of using iPod over Smartphone and vice versa a. Which device is better for listening to music? i. iPod, Smartphone, Other b. iPods are better than Smartphones because of the... i. Check the reasons most important to you. c. Smartphones are better than iPods because of the... i. Check the reasons most important to you. 23

  24. Description of Data Collection Process To obtain respondents, we reached 196 surveys started out to the D’Amore McKim student email list in combination with 148 surveys completed EnGauge employees’ Facebook (76%) communities. 129 final Response IDs after cleaning 24

  25. Analysis and Results: Objectives Answered How many Smartphone users are also iPod users? 25

  26. Analysis and Results: Objectives Answered How are Apple products acquired? 26

  27. Analysis and Results: Objectives Answered Which nonexistent features are desired by users in the market? 27

  28. Analysis and Results: Objectives Answered Identify the situational circumstances for usage of the iPods and Smartphones 28

  29. ANOVA: Gender Preference for SoundCloud Identifying the gender preference for listening to music on a particular platform Conclusion: With a statistical significance of 0.018, males listen to music on SoundCloud more than females do. See Page 54 for SPSS Output 29

  30. ANOVA: Gender Preference for Features Identifying the gender preference of important features in the decision to purchase a Smartphone Conclusion: When buying a Smartphone, males hold screen resolution quality to a higher importance than females do. See Page 50 for SPSS Output 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend