IPIN competition 2016 - Track 4 Sponsored by Indoor Mobile Robot - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ipin competition 2016 track 4
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IPIN competition 2016 - Track 4 Sponsored by Indoor Mobile Robot - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IPIN competition 2016 - Track 4 Sponsored by Indoor Mobile Robot Positioning http://asti.es/en/ Chairs: M Carmen Prez Cristina Losada Co-Chairs: Felipe Espinosa Javier Macias-Guarasa International Conference on Indoor Positioning and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Indoor Mobile Robot Positioning

Chairs: Mª Carmen Pérez Cristina Losada Co-Chairs: Felipe Espinosa Javier Macias-Guarasa

]

International Conference

  • n Indoor Positioning

and Indoor Navigation

  • rganised by EvAAL

IPIN competition 2016 - Track 4

Sponsored by http://asti.es/en/

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TRACK 4 PRES ENTATION

GOAL: est imate the traj ectory followed by a mobile robot along a predetermined track inside an indoor area.

COMPETITION S ET-UP:

Robot: EAS YBOT of AS TI

1.64m 0.52m 0.34m

  • Magnetic guidance system.
  • The robot speed does not exceed

0.5m/ s, but it is not uniform during the traj ectory.

  • Reference point t o be localized

in the middle of the robot.

  • No possibility of interaction with

the mobile robot.

  • The traj ectory (ground truth) is

not able to be seen for competitors.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

TRACK 4 PRES ENTATION

COMPETITION S ET-UP:

Navigation area:

Strut profiles

  • Area 12m x 6m.
  • 4 strut profiles where participants can place

their equipment. Adj ustable height up to 315cm.

  • No limitation in the number of sensors to be

located in the strut profiles.

  • 3

positions provided in advance for calibrating purposes, including the (0,0) of the robot starting point.

  • 30 minutes set-up (45min in practice).
  • Test duration: 3-4 minutes. Two loops.
  • Order of participation by drawing lots.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TRACK 4 PRES ENTATION

Ground truth:

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 X coordinate (m) Y coordinate (m) Participants have to report the traj ectory:

  • X coordinate (mm)
  • Y coordinate (mm)
  • Timestamp (ms)
  • Minimum frame-rate: 0.1s
slide-5
SLIDE 5

TRACK 4 PRES ENTATION

Evaluation method:

Euclidian distance between the estimated positions and the ground truth.

The

  • rder
  • f

the measurements is considered.

Final scores are computed considering the third quartile (CDF at 75% ).

200 400 600 800 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Error (mm) % of measurements

172 mm

75%

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 X coordinate (m) Y coordinate (m) Robot path Estimated path Euclidean distance

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Competitors of Track 4

Janis Tiemann, Fabian Eckermann and Christian Wietfeld, “ ATLAS - An Open-Source TDOA-based Ultra-Wideband Localization System” , TU Dortmund University, Communication Networks Institute (CNI), Germany.

Maxim Katkov and S ergey Huba, “ TOPOrtls TPM UWB wireless system”, R&D Dept, TopoR TLS , Belarus/ S andwich, MA, US A.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Competitors of Track 4- Out of Competition

J. Ureña, J. M. Villadangos, D. Gualda, M. C. Pérez, A. Hernández, J. J. García, A. Jiménez, J. C. García, J. F . Arango, E. Díaz, “ Locate-US: an Ultrasonic Local Positioning System based

  • n

Encoded Beacons” , Electronics Department, University of Alcalá.

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 X coordinate (m) Y coordinate (m) 200 400 600 800 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Error (mm) % of measurements

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Competitors of Track 4- Out of Competition

  • R. Nieto, E. S

antiso, P . López, M. Martínez, F . Espinosa. “ Laser scanner network for indoor positioning and tracking” , Electronics Department, University

  • f Alcalá.
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 X coordinate (m) Y coordinate (m)

200 400 600 800 1000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Error (mm) % of measurements

slide-9
SLIDE 9

RANKING

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 X coordinate (m) Y coordinate (m)

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 X coordinate (m) Y coordinate (m)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RANKING

Cumulative Distribution Function of the Euclidian error

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Error (mm)

106 mm 311 mm

X2 X1

Participant CDF 75% Average Error X1 106mm 80.12mm X2 311mm 220.46mm

slide-11
SLIDE 11

THE WINNER

1500€ cash prize

Janis Tiemann, Fabian Eckermann, and Christian Wietfled CDF(75%)=106mm