io session i combination failures futures much ado about
play

IO Session I: Combination Failures & Futures Much Ado About - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IO Session I: Combination Failures & Futures Much Ado About What? Moderator: Jeffrey M. Bockman , PhD, EVP, Oncology Practice Head, Cello Health BioConsulting, previously Defined Health Panelists: Kapil Dhingra , MD, Managing Member,


  1. IO Session I: Combination Failures & Futures— Much Ado About What? Moderator: Jeffrey M. Bockman , PhD, EVP, Oncology Practice Head, Cello Health BioConsulting, previously Defined Health Panelists: Kapil Dhingra , MD, Managing Member, KAPital Consulting LLC Axel Hoos , MD, PhD, SVP Therapeutic Area Head R&D, Head Immuno-Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline Ramy Ibrahim , MD, Chief Medical Officer, Parker Institute For Cancer Immunotherapy Vanessa Lucey , PhD, MBA, Director, Cancer Research Institute Robert Stein , MD, PhD, Senior R&D Advisor, Agenus Mai-Britt Zocca , PhD, Chief Executive Officer, IO Biotech Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  2. Immuno-Oncology Dominates Growth, But Does Not Dominate Sales – At Least Not Yet Source: Evaluate Pharma , Cello Health BioConsulting Analysis Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  3. Checkpoint Inhibitor Sales (Anti-PD-1/PD-L1): The Taxanes of the IO World - Foundational KEYTRUDA OPDIVO Cowen, Sept 4 2018: Investors' Guide To Immuno-Oncology Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  4. The Clinical Pipeline Reflects a Diverse Set of MOAs & Therapeutic Modalities: Reflecting a Richness of Targets But Perhaps Insufficient Translational Insights US IO Pipeline by Highest WW Phase and Mechanism 350 300 250 Viral vaccine and/or oncolytic Other IO (ADC) Number of Agents Other Cell Therapy 200 Innate Immunity (antagonist) Innate Immunity (agonist) Immuno-metabolism 150 Cytokine Costim 100 Checkpoint CAR-T cells Cancer vaccine 50 Bispecific (IO Redirecting) 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase of Development Phase 3 Pre-registered Registered Marketed Source: Adis R&D Insight; Clarivate Analytics Cortellis; company websites; clinicaltrials.gov; Cello Health BioConsulting Analysis Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  5. CRI’s Analysis Shows the IO Pipeline Growth: Mostly Spaces That Are Well-Trodden Source: CRI Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  6. Advances with CPIs, While Dramatic in Selected Settings, Remain Incremental and/or Limited in Many Others Aggregated PD1/L1 Efficacy per Tumor Type and Setting: mOS RCC, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=410, 1 trial) NSCLC, PDL1+, 1L (n=49, 1 trial) NSCLC, PDL1+, 3L (n=146, 1 trial) HOTTER TUMORS NSCLC, PDL1+, 2L (n=1242, 5 trials) Bladder, PDL1+/-, 1L (n=119, 1 trial) HCC, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=39, 1 trial) Mesothelioma, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=89, 2 trials) NSCLC, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=996, 4 trials) Ovarian, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=124, 1 trial) Bladder, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=1337, 6 trials) Bladder, PDL1+/-, neo/adjuvant (n=56, 1 trial) HNC, PDL1+, 2L (n=260, 2 trials) NSCLC, PDL1-, 3L (n=93, 1 trial) SCLC, PDL1+/-, maintenance (n=45, 1 trial) Breast TNBC, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=170, 1 trial) Sarcoma, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=38, 1 trial) HNC, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=279, 2 trials) GC/GEJ, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=124, 2 trials) Bladder, PDL1+, 2L (n=74, 1 trial) NSCLC, PDL1-, 2L (n=108, 1 trial) COLDER TUMORS Bladder, PDL1+/-, 4L (n=41, 1 trial) GC/GEJ, PDL1-, 3L (n=115, 1 trial) Bladder, PDL1+/-, 3L (n=66, 1 trial) GC/GEJ, PDL1+/-, 3L (n=589, 2 trials) SCLC, PDL1+/-, 2L (n=98, 1 trial) 0 10 20 30 Months N Engl J Med 2017; 377:2500-2501 Source: Cello Health BioConsulting (Defined Health) Analysis: ESMO, ASCO, AACR, ASH abstracts; prescribing information; company press releases; *efficacy data is weighted by the number of patients per trial, total number of patients across all trials and number of trials represented are in y-axis label Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  7. Hence the Rapid Increase in Combination Studies of Anti-PDx Agents With a Diverse Range of IO and Non-IO Approaches The clinical trial landscape for PD1/PDL1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. a | There are 2,250 active trials testing anti-PD1/ PDL1 agents as of September 2018, compared with 1,502 trials in September 2017. b | The 1,332 trials evaluating anti- PD1/PDL1 agents in combination with the top 38 targets (among the 1,716 combination trials testing a total of 240 targets) are shown here. We have selected those targets being evaluated in at least 6 trials. The number of active clinical trials that are testing drugs against the target are indicated in each bubble. Source: CRI Analysis - Nature Reviews Drug Discovery volume 17 , pages 854–855 (Dec 2018) Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  8. CRI April 2019 Update (Courtesy of Jun Tang et al) Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  9. What Is Clear Is That the Competitive Landscape Is Increasingly Intense, & Not Simply Intra-Class/Modality But Inter-Class/Modality Cancer metastases Esophageal cancer RCC/Renal cancer Pancreatic cancer Colorectal cancer HCC/Liver cancer Gastrointestinal Prostate cancer Head and neck Ovarian cancer Thyroid cancer Bladder cancer Small cell lung Gastric cancer Breast cancer GBM/Glioma Solid tumor Lung cancer Melanoma Carcinoma Count of Agents in Sarcoma Development per Cancer cancer cancer cancer NSCLC Mechanism by Indication P1->MRKT Bispecific (IO 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Redirecting) 25 19 22 7 1 42 24 29 8 6 12 18 3 7 34 8 4 4 3 3 2 Cancer vaccine 9 3 9 1 3 2 1 3 3 1 CAR-T cells 9 36 7 9 3 6 7 6 9 4 8 10 8 2 9 6 7 6 8 1 2 4 Checkpoint 4 18 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 Costim 8 12 2 2 7 2 5 3 4 4 3 15 5 1 1 Cytokine 3 8 3 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 Immuno-metabolism Innate Immunity 3 7 1 3 3 3 2 5 2 1 5 3 1 1 (agonist) Innate Immunity 5 14 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 (antagonist) 4 10 4 8 1 2 2 1 2 1 8 2 2 1 1 3 Other cell therapy 2 1 1 Other IO (ADC) Viral vaccine and/or 7 14 10 10 1 6 11 9 2 3 10 5 1 3 10 6 6 2 3 2 2 oncolytic Highest Count Key 1 20 50 *Bispecific (IO Redirecting) includes IO/IO Targeting Bispecifics Source: Adis R&D Insight, Thomson Reuters Cortellis; Cello Health BioConsulting (Defined Health) Analysis Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

  10. What Is Clear Is That the Competitive Landscape Is Increasingly Intense, & Not Simply Intra-Class/Modality But Inter-Class/Modality CEA/CEACA Number of Agents in P-cadherin CEACAM6 CEACAM1 CLEC12A Development per Target, by EpCAM CD123 BCMA PSMA Modality ROR1 GPC3 HER2 CD19 CD20 CD33 B7H3 A33 5T4 M5 PC  MRKT CAR-T cells 6 55 6 5 12 2 6 7 1 3 6 1 2 1 Antibody-drug conjugate 45 10 7 12 2 2 9 4 8 2 1 2 4 3 2 Bispecific/trispecific antibody 20 15 12 7 13 5 5 6 7 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 Naked monoclonal antibody 23 9 18 3 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 3 Small molecule 33 8 1 3 Cancer vaccine 32 4 1 1 1 Fusion protein 12 4 6 3 1 2 1 1 Other cell therapy 3 6 1 1 4 1 1 Peptide 4 Oncolytic virus 3 1 Undefined 1 1 1 Recombinant product 1 Other 1 Source: Adis R&D Insight; Key (# of agents) Clarivate Analytics Cortellis, Cello Health BioConsulting 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 >20 Cancer Progress New York, NY | May 7 - 8, 2019

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend