N Y S E A M E X: G H M
Executing our Strategy ● Driving Sustainable Growth
Diversifying Improving Expanding
N Y S E A M E X : G H M
Investor Presentation December 2011 Jeffrey F. Glajch Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
N Y S E A M E X : G H M Investor Presentation December 2011 Jeffrey F. Glajch Chief Financial Officer Executing our Strategy Driving Sustainable Growth Diversifying Improving Expanding N Y S E A M E X : G H M Safe
Executing our Strategy ● Driving Sustainable Growth
Diversifying Improving Expanding
N Y S E A M E X : G H M
2
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are identified by words such as “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” and other similar words. All statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments that Graham Corporation expects
the timing of conversion of backlog to sales, profit margins, foreign sales operations, its strategy to build its global sales representative channel, the effectiveness of automation in expanding its engineering capacity, its ability to improve cost competitiveness, customer preferences, changes in market conditions in the industries in which it operates, changes in general economic conditions and customer behavior and its acquisition strategy are forward-looking statements. Because they are forward-looking, they should be evaluated in light of important risk factors and uncertainties. These risk factors and uncertainties are more fully described in Graham Corporation's most recent Annual and Quarterly Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including under the heading entitled “Risk Factors.” Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of Graham Corporation's underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those currently anticipated. In addition, undue reliance should not be placed on Graham Corporation's forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, Graham Corporation disclaims any obligation to update or publicly announce any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation.
Recent Price $23.38 Common shares outstanding 9.9 million Market capitalization $231.5 million 52-week price range $26.30 – $14.36
56,998 Ownership: ►Institutional 67.9% ►Insider 4.0% ►ESOP 3.2% ►Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) 40% Participation ►Annual dividend $0.08
Note: Market data as of November 30, 2011; ownership as of most recent filing
3
Executing our Strategy ● Driving Sustainable Growth
Diversifying Improving Expanding
4
5
Condensers 17% Ejectors 32% Aftermarket 12%
Heat Exchangers
6% Pumps 14%
Other 19% Refining 41% Chemical Processing 12% Power 28%
Nuclear 19%
($ in millions) International Revenue Domestic Revenue FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY 2012 $74.2 $62.2 $101.1 $86.4 $65.8 $55.2
55% 55% 37% 46% 50% 49% * Midpoint of guidance provided on October 28, 2011 ($104-$110 million)
$107.0*
FY 2006 – FY 2009 22.4% CAGR Driven by oil refining and petrochemical markets FY 2010 – FY 2012E 31.2% CAGR Oil refining, petrochemicals, Navy and power markets will drive growth
demand in emerging markets
infrastructure in developed markets
changes
addressable
Chemical and Hydrocarbon Processing
expansion in emerging markets
population
addressable
chemicals
power infrastructure
plants
nuclear power expansion
energy
propulsion program
fleet
carriers
7
8
Chemical / Petrochemical Processing 12% Oil Refining 41% Other 19% Power 28%
Asia (China)
coal-to-liquid, fertilizer
Middle East
South America
United States
energy and refining
9
Past: Primarily Oil Refining & Petrochem Now: Four Distinct Markets
Asia 16% Middle East 20% Other 14% U.S. 50%
10
Year 1 Year 2
Graham establishes competitive advantage during first 24 months… Understanding pipeline, developing design options, identifying decision makers, understanding timing, creating strong relationships to…
$150 million pipeline consistent with past few years
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
* World Nuclear Association 2009 Report
11
Use disciplined product pricing and order selection process Apply continuous improvement and targeted capex to gain capacity and reduce lead time Employ flexible cost model to accommodate cyclical demand Align manager and employee compensation with profit and cash management objectives Focus on cash management and operating working capital
Dramatic improvement in financial results, both at top and bottom of cycle Strong, debt free balance sheet A business poised for
inorganic long term growth
12
DIVERSIF Y IN G IMP ROVING E X P A N D I N G
Executing our Strategy ● Driving Sustainable Growth
13
$40.3 $41 $46.4 $46.8*$51.8 $48.9 $34.9 $40.7 $41.1 $44.5 $37.5 $41.3 $55.2 $65.8 $86.4 $101.1 $62.2 $74.2 $107**
EBITDA Margin
($ in millions)
14
* 1997 was a three-month transition year and is excluded from this comparison; 1996 reflects a 12-month period ** Midpoint of guidance provided on October 28, 2011 ($104-$110 million) Note: See supplemental slides for EBITDA reconciliation and other important disclaimers regarding EBITDA.
3.6% 4.5% 7.7% 10.1% 11.1% 7.0% 3.3% 1.6% (1.3)% (0.7)% (3.3)% 1.4% 11.3% 10.5% 25.4% 27.0% 17.9% 14.0%
15
*Excludes $0.5 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, in acquisition costs ** Includes R&D tax credit of $0.16 Note: All earnings per share amounts adjusted for stock splits
$5.8 $15.0 $17.5 $6.4 $6.4
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
$1.71 $1.49 $0.58** $0.64 $0.64*
Earnings per Share
$3.0 $5.5 FY2012 Q2 Q1
$8.5
$15.7 $19.2 $25.9 $25.0 $33.6
Q2 FY11 Q3 FY11 Q4 FY11 Q1 FY12 Q2 FY12
17.1% 8.6% 17.1% 20.0% 26.3%
Q2 FY11 Q3 FY11 Q4 FY11 Q1 FY12 Q2 FY12
$0.16 $0.08 $0.27 $0.30 $0.55
Q2 FY11 Q3 FY11* Q4 FY11 Q1 FY12 Q2 FY12
($ in millions)
16
($ in millions)
Cash available for acquisitions and organic growth
3/31/08 3/31/09 3/31/10 3/31/11 9/30/11 Energy Steel: all cash $18 million acquisition
No bank debt at 9/30/11
* Excludes $16 million in unusually high upfront and near-term customer advances utilized to lock in raw material costs
17
$54.2 $75.7 $48.3
$44.3 $50.1 $48.8 $50 $41 $26.3
3/31/07 03/31/08 3/31/09 3/31/10 3/31/11 09/30/11
($ in millions)
18
$91.1 $75.1 $94.3
Reflect major multi-year projects, including U.S. Navy and major Middle East refineries
19
Guidance provided as of October 28, 2011
DIVERSIF Y IN G IMP ROVING E X P A N D I N G
Executing our Strategy ● Driving Sustainable Growth
20
21
22
23
24
Expected long-term energy demand growth resulting in capacity expansion Record, high-quality backlog Worldwide brand recognition Sales model based on early engineering involvement Expanding addressable market opportunities Strong balance sheet Acquisition opportunities Results-oriented management team
25
DIVERSIF Y IN G IMP ROVING E X P A N D I N G
Executing our Strategy ● Driving Sustainable Growth
26
27
* Data from FY1993 though FY2005 excludes discontinued operations and is unaudited; 1997 was a three-month transition year and is excluded from this comparison; 1996 reflects a 12-month period. ** Graham believes that when used in conjunction with GAAP measures, EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure, assists in the understanding of Graham’s operating performance.
Fiscal Years Ended March 31 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 GAAP operating profit $8,775 10,042 $ 26,328 $ 21,088 $ 6,013 $ 5,454 $ Interest income 55 $ 55 $ 416 $ 1,026 $ 516 $ 316 $ Depreciation & amortization 1,648 1,119 1,005 885 887 793 EBITDA** 10,478 $ 11,216 $ 27,749 $ 22,999 $ 7,416 $ 6,563 $ 2005* 2004* 2003* 2002* 2001* 2000* GAAP operating profit (206) $ (1,969) $ (1,028) $ (1,296) $ (124) $ 332 $ Interest income 55 $ 54 $ 125 $ 98 $ 342 $ 346 $ Depreciation & amortization 780 745 704 774 776 827 EBITDA** 629 $ (1,170) $ (199) $ (424) $ 994 $ 1,505 $ 1999* 1998* 1996* 1995* 1994* 1993* GAAP operating profit 2,591 $ 4,932 $ 3,995 $ 2,818 $ 1,075 $ 662 $ Interest income 296 $ 215 $ 64 $
820 804 706 732 771 807 EBITDA** 3,707 $ 5,951 $ 4,765 $ 3,550 $ 1,846 $ 1,469 $ ($ in millions)
28
29
EXPANDED CUSTOMER BASE
End Users (Exxon Mobil, Chevron etc.)
(Dresser Rand, GE etc.)
Nuclear Power Plants in U.S.
OIL REFINING
CHEMICAL PROCESSING
OTHER APPLICATIONS
Ethanol Biodiesel
POWER GENERATION
30
Refining vacuum distillation Gardner Denver Chemicals/Petrochemicals Croll Reynolds; Schutte Koerting; Gardner Denver Turbomachinery OEM – refining, petrochemical Ambassador; SPX (Yuba); Krueger Turbomachinery OEM – power and power producer Holtec; Babcock Thermal Engineering; SPX (Yuba); Krueger HVAC Alfa Laval; APV; ITT; Ambassador Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Joseph Oats; DCFAB Nuclear Dubose; Consolidated; Tioga; Nova; Maxim
31
Refining vacuum distillation Gardner Denver; GEA Jet Pump; Korting Hannover; Edwards Chemicals/Petrochemicals Croll Reynolds; Schutte Koerting; Gardner Denver; GEA Jet Pump; Korting Hannover; Edwards Turbomachinery OEM – refining, petrochemical Donghwa-Entec; Bumwoo; Oiltechnik; Krueger; various local fabricators Turbomachinery OEM – power and power producer Holtec; Babcock Thermal Engineering; SPX (Yuba); Krueger
disciplined approach
executive
investing in the future
32
An 11 MW turbine-generator set at a geothermal power producing plant in Papua New Guinea.
33
Supports a steam turbine and enables the conversion of maximum energy in high pressure steam into power. 34
An ejector system lowers the pressure in the distillation column to allow crude oil to boil at a lower
efficient and cost-effective separation of crude oil into valuable products, such as diesel, gas oils, kerosene, and other fuels. A condenser supports a steam turbine and enables the conversion
high pressure steam into power.
REFINERY EJECTOR SYSTEM CNOOC HUIZHOU REFINERY–CHINA 240,000 BBL/DAY REFINERY
Growth Options 1. Increase ability to serve existing U.S. nuclear power plants 2. Capitalize on planned U.S. new nuclear power plant construction 3. Expand company to access and service international nuclear power plants Products 1. Heat exchangers 2. Vessels 3. Piping 4. Systems 5. Raw materials 6. Vacuum products
36
37
Operating = Connected to grid Under Construction = First concrete for reactor poured, or major refurbishment under way Planned = Approvals, funding or major commitment in place, mostly expected in operation within 8-10 years Proposed = Specific program or site proposals, expected operation mostly within 15 years
Source: World Nuclear Association, as of October 8, 2011
Future Expansion: This data represents a more than 50% increase in planned and proposed reactors since the 2007 WNA report
Country Operating Under Construction Planned Proposed USA 104 1 7 27 France 58 1 1 1 Japan 51 2 10 5 Other 61 8 39 80 China 14 27 51 120 Russia 32 10 14 30 South Korea 21 5 6 Germany 9 UK 18 4 9 Ukraine 15 2 20 Canada 17 3 3 3 Sweden 10 India 20 6 17 40 South Africa 2 6 Total 432 63 154 341