Investor and Analyst Luncheon New York 30 October 2018 1 Forward - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor and analyst luncheon
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investor and Analyst Luncheon New York 30 October 2018 1 Forward - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hegh LNG Partners LP The Floating LNG Infrastructure MLP Investor and Analyst Luncheon New York 30 October 2018 1 Forward looking statements This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements concerning future events and our


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Höegh LNG Partners LP – The Floating LNG Infrastructure MLP

1

Investor and Analyst Luncheon

New York 30 October 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward looking statements

2

This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements concerning future events and our operations, performance and financial condition. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “future”, “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “plan,” “intend” or words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: market trends for FSRUs and LNG carriers, including hire rates and factors affecting supply and demand; the Partnership's distribution policy and ability to make cash distributions on the Partnership's units or any increases in the quarterly distributions on the Partnership's common units; restrictions in the Partnership's debt agreements and pursuant to local laws on the Partnership’s joint ventures' and subsidiaries' ability to make distributions; the Partnership's ability to settle or resolve the boil-off claim for the joint ventures, including the estimated amount thereof; the ability of Höegh LNG to satisfy its indemnification obligations to the Partnership, including in relation to the boil-off claim; the Partnership's ability to purchase additional vessels from Höegh LNG in the future; the Partnership's ability to integrate and realize the anticipated benefits from acquisitions; the Partnership's anticipated growth strategies; including the acquisition of vessels; the Partnership's anticipated receipt of dividends and repayment of indebtedness from subsidiaries and joint ventures; effects of volatility in global prices for crude oil and natural gas; the effect of the worldwide economic environment; turmoil in the global financial markets; fluctuations in currencies and interest rates; general market conditions, including fluctuations in hire rates and vessel values; changes in the Partnership's

  • perating expenses, including drydocking and insurance costs; the Partnership's ability to comply with financing agreements and the expected effect of restrictions and covenants in such agreements; the financial

condition liquidity and creditworthiness of the Partnership's existing or future customers and their ability to satisfy their obligations under the Partnership's contracts; the Partnership's ability to replace existing borrowings, including the Gallant/Grace facility, make additional borrowings and to access public equity and debt capital markets; planned capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund capital expenditures; the exercise of purchase options by the Partnership's customers; the Partnership's ability to perform under the Partnership's contracts and maintain long-term relationships with its customers; the Partnership's ability to leverage Höegh LNG's relationships and reputation in the shipping industry; the Partnership's continued ability to enter into long-term, fixed-rate charters and the hire rate thereof; the

  • perating performance of the Partnership's vessels and any related claims by Total SA or other customers; the Partnership's ability to maximize the use of its vessels, including the redeployment or disposition of

vessels no longer under long-term charters; the Partnership's ability to compete successfully for future chartering and newbuilding opportunities; timely acceptance of the Partnership's vessels by their charterers; termination dates and extensions of charters; the cost of, and the Partnership's ability to comply with, governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards, as well as standard regulations imposed by its charterers applicable to its business; demand in the FSRU sector or the LNG shipping sector in general and the demand for the Partnership's vessels in particular; availability of skilled labor, vessel crews and management; the ability of Höegh LNG to meet its financial obligations to the Partnership, including its indemnity, guarantee and option obligations; the Partnership's incremental general and administrative expenses as a publicly traded limited partnership and the Partnership's fees and expenses payable under the Partnership's ship management agreements, the technical information and services agreement and the administrative services agreements; the anticipated taxation of the Partnership, its subsidiaries and affiliates and distributions to its unitholders; estimated future maintenance and replacement capital expenditures; the Partnership's ability to retain key employees; customers' increasing emphasis on environmental and safety concerns; potential liability from any pending or future litigation; potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events, piracy or acts by terrorists; future sales of the Partnership's common units and Series A preferred units in the public market; the Partnership's business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations; the Partnership's ability to successfully remediate any material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and its disclosure controls and procedures; and other factors listed from time to time in the reports and other documents that we file with the SEC, including the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 6-K. All forward-looking statements included in this presentation are made only as of the date of this presentation. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Partnership to predict all of these factors. Further, the Partnership cannot assess the impact of each such factor on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The Partnership does not intend to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Presenters

3

Steffen Føreid

CEO & CFO Höegh LNG Partners

Sveinung J.S. Støhle

Chairman, Höegh LNG Partners President & CEO, Höegh LNG

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Agenda

4

  • Introduction to Höegh LNG Partners
  • Höegh LNG - FSRU leadership
  • LNG and FSRU markets update
  • Höegh LNG Partners in-depth

Steffen Føreid

CEO & CFO Höegh LNG Partners

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Höegh LNG Partners LP – At a glance

5

Only publicly listed pure-play owner and operator

  • f FSRUs

Modern assets providing critical energy infrastructure Strong distribution coverage supported by growing portfolio of long-term contracts Rapidly growing supply of inexpensive LNG driving FSRU adoption GP support from a clear market leader in Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd.

1.20x

Distribution coverage ratio1

9.5%

Yield

10.7 years

Average remaining charter length

USD 2 bn

Revenue backlog3

Form 1099

For tax purposes

~$580m

HMLP market capitalisation

Board

Majority independent and experienced

$144 / 83 m

Annualized segment EBITDA / net income2

1) Distribution coverage ratio is for the quarter ended June 30, 2018and represents distributable cash flow divided by distributions declared 2) Segment EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measures. See the Appendix for a reconciliation Segment EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Annualized net income and Segment EBITDA is Segment EBITDA for the quarters ended March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018 multiplied by two 3) Revenue backlog is calculated as HMLP’s share of the monthly hire rate for each vessel multiplied by the number of months remaining for each charter

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Drop-down candidates

Höegh LNG Partners

6

Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd.

Listed Oslo Børs

46.1% Fleet ownership and operation Business development

Future business

Leif Höegh & Co Public

53.9%

Public

Long-term contracts – stable cash flows – strong distribution coverage

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Agenda

7

  • Introduction to Höegh LNG Partners
  • Höegh LNG - FSRU leadership
  • LNG and FSRU markets update
  • Höegh LNG Partners in-depth

Sveinung J.S. Støhle

Chairman, Höegh LNG Partners President & CEO, Höegh LNG

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Höegh LNG: Unlocking access to the expanding global LNG market

Regasification/ infrastructure Consumption Transportation Liquefaction Production The natural gas value chain Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Natural Gas Höegh LNG focus

Construction, ownership and operation of FSRUs

  • n long-term contracts

Höegh LNG business model

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

FSRUs: Time and cost-efficient access to global LNG markets

9

  • Installation time reduced to 2 weeks, with jetty in place
  • 20-50% of the installation cost relative to land-based
  • Subject to fewer regulations, depending on location
  • Flexibility to move to new site or trade as LNGC
  • 4-6 years to develop green-field regas plants
  • Cost: USD 1bn plus, depending on capacity

Land-based regasification Floating storage and regasification units

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Höegh LNG FSRU: Market-leading regasification capacity and full trading capabilities

Main Dimensions: Length: 294 m Breadth: 46 m Depth: 26 m Draught: 12 m Storage capacity: 170,000 cbm Regasification capacity: 750,000 mmscfd Deadweight 80,430 tons Gross tonnage 103,800 tons

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Superior operating record highlights overall operational strengths and efficiencies

  • Achieved zero lost-time incidents last 12 months

− Clear policy and communication: Safety First! − Competent, committed, cooperative and safety aware teams − All incidents and near-misses investigated − State-of-the-art risk management systems

11 1 Per million work hours

99.87% 99.70% 99.95% 99.94% 99.79% 100.00% >99.50%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 YTD Target

Technical availability

1.07 0.44 0.73 0.00 0.38 0.00 <1.00

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 YTD Target

Lost time injury frequency1

  • Full technical availability

− Highly qualified teams onboard and onshore − Intense focus on implementing best practices − Robust technical designs of vessels and equipment − Spare part and maintenance systems well adapted

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Höegh LNG’s FSRUs ideal for providing multiple LNG services

12

LNG bunkering LNG truck distribution ISO containers distribution Small-scale LNG distribution Pipe-to-shore regasified LNG from FSRU

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Avenir LNG: Strategic complement for further growth for Höegh LNG

  • Avenir LNG Ltd. – Established to build market leader

position in the small-scale LNG market

− Anchor investors: Höegh LNG (25%), Golar LNG (25%), Stolt-Nielsen (50%)

  • Business model: Delivery of LNG to small-scale

industrial and power demand, development of LNG bunkering services and transportation sector supply

  • Initial asset base, under construction:

− 4x 7,500-cbm +2x 20,000-cbm LNG carriers − Small-scale LNG import terminal in Sardinia

  • Avenir LNG represents an attractive investment
  • pportunity in a fast growing LNG segment
  • Small-scale LNG expected to create additional LNG

demand and strong synergies for HLNG’s FSRUs

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Höegh LNG: Important developments

14

  • Entire fleet fully funded

− Debt financing secured for FSRU #9 − Debt financing secured for FSRU #10

Financing Operational Commercial

  • 100% technical availability across the global fleet
  • Excellent HSEQ statistics - Zero LTIs last 12 months
  • Successfully amended Höegh Gallant charter with Egas
  • 3-year +1 TC for Höegh Esperanza with CNOOC in China
  • Interim employment for FSRU #9 with Naturgy
  • Investment in Avenir LNG for small-scale LNG
  • Progress made on several FSRU tendering processes
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Agenda

15

  • Introduction to Höegh LNG Partners
  • Höegh LNG - FSRU leadership
  • LNG and FSRU markets update
  • Höegh LNG Partners in-depth

Sveinung J.S. Støhle

Chairman, Höegh LNG Partners President & CEO, Höegh LNG

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Global energy outlook: Expanding LNG market to increase gas’ share of global energy mix

16

  • Transition to a lower carbon fuel

mix set to continue

  • Natural gas expected to overtake
  • il and coal as the primary fossil

fuel with an annual average demand growth of 1.6%

  • Coal’s share of the energy mix

expected to decrease sharply

Source: BP Energy Outlook 2018

Primary energy consumption Shares of primary energy

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Global LNG supply expanding with higher Australian and US production

Largest exporters, 2018:

  • 1. Qatar
  • 2. Australia
  • 3. Malaysia
  • 4. Nigeria
  • 5. United States

22 28 28

West Africa

12 13 11

N Africa

3 12 23

USA

14 14 16

S America

4 4 5

Europe

11 11 17

Russia

45 56 65

Australia

59 61 55

SE Asia 2016 2017 2018

Global LNG production, in millions of tonnes

94 91 96

MEG

Sources: GIIGNL, IHS Markit, 2018 based on annualized YTD data 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Liquefaction investment impasse ended with LNG Canada FID

18

  • LNG Canada FID

− Initial capacity 14 mtpa with two trains: possibility to add another two trains − Expected to come on-line by 2025

  • LNG Canada not backed by third-

party offtake

− Developers Shell (40%), Petronas (25%) and Mitsubishi (15%) take on significant price and volume exposure − Fellow developers PetroChina and KOGAS (20% combined) to use LNG for domestic markets

  • Corpus Christi train 3 FID

− 4.5 mtpa capacity − Supported by foundation contracts

Sources: IHS Markit

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LNG: Attractively priced energy for the future

19

  • Current spot prices reflect solid

demand for LNG

  • Delivered cost of North American

LNG highly attractive relative to spot prices in the current oil price environment

  • Long-term contracts rolling off

towards 2025 favouring North American production

7.7 7 9.3 10.7 5 7.5 10 12.5 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 US Gulf Canada NWE Japan USD 40 USD 60 USD 80 USD 100

USD per MMBtu

LNG prices

DES North East Asia Current spot Brent-indexed slope

Sources: IHS Markit, Platts

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Significant momentum in LNG trade, driven by China’s coal-to-gas switch

20

  • Global LNG trade could reach

~320 million tonnes in 2018; up ~7.5% from 2017

  • Chinese imports expected to

increase ~50% from 2017 to around 56 million tonnes, or ~21% of the world market

  • Aggressive coal-to-gas switch

and increased supply of global LNG the main drivers behind the growth in Chinese LNG imports

Source: Waterborne LNG / IHS Markit / Höegh LNG 2018 estimates based on YTD trade and historical seasonal movements in the fourth quarter

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E million tonnes

China's share of global LNG trade

RoW China China share, rhs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Significant potential for a further increase in Chinese LNG imports

21 Sources: IHS Markit

50.7% 13.2% 6.6% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Coal Oil Gas Bn tonnes oil equivalents

Share of global consumption 2017

World total China ex HK China in % of world total, rhs

slide-22
SLIDE 22

More regasification capacity required for Chinese LNG imports to continue to increase

22

  • Imports periodically exceed

available regasification capacity, particularly in northern China

  • During such periods, LNG is being

loaded on trucks and distributed inland

  • One FSRU would add around

USD 0.5 million tonnes of monthly regasification capacity

1 2 3 4 5 6 2016 2017 2018

million tonnes per month

China, imports and regasification capacity

Total imports Total nameplate capacity

Sources: IHS Markit

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The Tianjin LNG terminal

Höegh LNG operates the sole FSRU in the Chinese market

23

  • Höegh LNG has in place a 3-year

FSRU/LNGC contract with CNOOC for the FSRU Höegh Esperanza

− Will serve as regasification terminal in Tianjin − Contract runs to June 2021, CNOOC has the option to extend the contract for one year

  • Höegh LNG’s first-mover advantage

provides benefits as FSRU infrastructure continues to expand across the country

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FSRUs unlocking access to LNG markets for new importers

24

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020E 2025E 2030E 2035E 2040E

mtpa

World LNG supply and demand

JKT Europe China India Other Asia MENA S America RoW LNG Capacity

Source: IHS Markit

FSRU opportunities in Asia

China: 1st FSRU in place India: 1st FSRU to be installed Q4 2018, several contemplated Bangladesh: FSRU in place, contemplating more Thailand: Contemplating FSRU Pakistan: 2x FSRUs installed, contemplating more Indonesia: 2x FSRUs installed Vietnam: Contemplating FSRU Myanmar: Contemplating FSRU Other (Australia, Hong Kong, Sri Lanka, Philippines): All contemplating FSRUs

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Large number of market opportunities backed by diverse drivers of demand

Region Existing Underway Proposed N America

  • 1

2 S America 6 2 3 Europe 4 1 4 MENA 6

  • 5

Sub-Saharan Africa

  • 1

4 South Asia 4 3 5 Asia/Oceania 4 2 7 Sum 24 10 30 +

25

Enabler Security of supply Seasonal demand Back-up for hydro Balance of trade New gas-fired generation Demand drivers Increasing supply of attractively priced LNG Transportation Replacement for coal and oil Existing and potential FSRU contracts

Source: IHS Markit, Höegh LNG

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Robust LNG carrier markets have several positive implications for the FSRU market

  • Fall-back option well in the

money

− FSRUs with full trading capabilities earn the same rates as purpose-built LNGCs − Höegh LNG has fixed its non- FSRU trading capacity at long- term rate levels

  • Attention diverted away from

LNGC-to-FSRU conversions

− Several shipowners have put plans to convert LNGCs to FSRUs on hold

26

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

'000 USD per day

LNGC charter rates

Steam spot DFDE spot Long-term

Data source: IHS Markit

slide-27
SLIDE 27

FSRU supply and demand balance remains favorable

27

  • Recent newbuilding contracting:

− BW LNGC-to-FSRU conversion − Maran Gas: 1x FSRU ordered, 1x FSRU order cancelled (LNGC) − Botas 1x FSRU for own project

  • Single-purpose FSRUs are

intended for a pre-determined project, rather than participation in competitive tenders

8 8 5 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 Höegh LNG Excelerate Golar LNG BW Gas Other Single-purpose Units

FSRU fleet and orderbook by owner/employment

Committed Available Committed NB Uncommitted NB

MOL Exmar Maran Dynagas Dynagas Gazprom Kol/Kal SWAN Java-1 OLT Botas

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Agenda

28

  • Introduction to Höegh LNG Partners
  • Höegh LNG - FSRU leadership
  • LNG and FSRU markets update
  • Höegh LNG Partners in-depth

Steffen Føreid

CEO & CFO Höegh LNG Partners

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Modern fleet with fixed-rate, long-term contracts

29

Unit Type Ownership Built Region Charterer 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 Current HMLP Fleet Neptune FSRU 50% 2009 Turkey Total Cape Ann FSRU 50% 2010 India Total PGN FSRU Lampung FSRU 100% 2014 Indonesia PGN Höegh Gallant FSRU 100% 2014 WW trading EgyptCo/HLNG Höegh Grace FSRU 100% 2016 Colombia SPEC

Contracted Revenue Option

Average 10.7 year contract length provides predictability and stability in cash flows

1 2 2 3 1) Economic interest; ownership interest 49% 2) Subsidiary of Total 3) Includes HMLP option to charter Höegh Gallant to HLNG at end of EgyptCo contract

PGN LNG Total Spec EgyptCo/HLNG

Revenue backlog by counterpart

Asia Europe S America

Revenue backlog by region

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Diversified portfolio of solid counterparties representing critical energy infrastructure

30

Cape Ann

Jaigarh, India Increase energy supply

PGN FSRU Lampung

Lampung, Indonesia Replacing expensive oil liquids in power generation

Neptune

Aliaga, Turkey Meeting peak demand in energy consumption

Höegh Grace

Cartagena, Colombia Providing security of supply in periods of drought

Höegh Gallant

Egypt/worldwide trading Balancing of trade, currently

  • perating as LNGC
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Generating stable and predictable cash flows

Q2 2018 Since IPO Distributable cash flow1 USD 0.53 per unit + 90 % Distributions declared USD 0.44 per unit + 30 % Distribution coverage ratio4 1.20x 1.08x-1.20x IDRs 25% 0-25%

31

1) Segment EBITDA and distributable cash flow are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the Appendix for definitions of Segment EBITDA and distributable cash flow and a reconciliation of the comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure 2) Excludes principal payment on direct financing lease, amortization in revenues for above market contracts and equity in earnings of JVs: amortization for deferred revenue 3) Non-cash accrual related to boil-off-gas claim to be indemnified by HLNG 4) Distribution coverage ratio represents distributable cash flow divided by distributions declared

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1Q152Q153Q154Q151Q162Q163Q164Q161Q172Q173Q174Q171Q182Q18

Segment EBITDA1,2, $m

Indemnity 3

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Balance sheet steady deleveraging

32

UPDATE

June 30, 2018 Cash and cash equivalents USD 21 million Available under RCF USD 40 million Total liquidity USD 61 million Interest bearing debt, reported USD 458 million Interest bearing debt, proportionate share of JVs USD 679 million Equity capitalization4 USD 725 million Debt5 / Total capitalization 48 % Net debt1 / Segment EBITDA2, LQA3 4.5x

1) Proportionate share of net debt, i.e. includes 50% of JV net debt. Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure , please see the Appendix for a definition of net debt and a reconciliation of net debt to the comparable US GAAP financial measure 2) Segment EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please the Appendix for a definition of Segment EBITDA and a reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to net income, the comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure 3) Last Quarter Annualized

0.0x 1.0x 2.0x 3.0x 4.0x 5.0x 6.0x Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2017 Jun 30, 2018

Net debt1/Segment EBITDA2, LQA3

4) As of October 26 2018, reflecting outstanding common, subordinated and preferred units as of June 30, 2018 5) Total proportionate outstanding interesting bearing debt

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Höegh LNG Partners has consistently and significantly outperformed the Alerian MLP index

33

HMLP vs. Alerian MLP index, adj. for distributions

50 100 150 200 250 IPO 2015 2016 2017 2018 USD million

Equity raised by Höegh LNG Partners1

Common equity Preference equity ATM Pre-funding of Höegh Gallant acquisition

  • Acquisition of Höegh Grace
  • Settlement of seller credit from

Höegh Gallant acquisition

Source: InFront

1) Net proceeds to HMLP from IPO to 23 August 2018

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Drop-down potential of modern and attractive assets

34

Unit Type Ownership Built Region Charterer 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 HLNG FSRU Fleet Independence FSRU 100% 2014 Lithuania KN Höegh Giant FSRU 100% 2017 WW trading Naturgy Höegh Esperanza FSRU 100% 2018 China CNOOC FSRU#9 FSRU 100% 2019 WW trading Naturgy FSRU#10 FSRU 100% 2019

Long-term business under development

Contracted Revenue Option

  • The most modern and efficient FSRUs in the market
  • Long-term business under development for four units
  • Assets marketed through open-market tenders, bilateral discussions and partnerships

Future business

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Höegh LNG Partners – Key investment considerations

35

Only publicly listed pure-play owner and operator of FSRUs Modern assets providing critical energy infrastructure Strong distribution coverage supported by growing portfolio of long-term contracts Rapidly growing supply of inexpensive LNG driving FSRU adoption GP support from a clear market leader in Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Agenda

36

  • Appendix
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Glossary

37

  • Höegh LNG Partners LP – “Höegh LNG Partners” or “HMLP”
  • Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. – “HLNG”
  • HMLP and HLNG – “Höegh LNG Group” or “Höegh LNG”
  • “EgyptCo” – LNG owned counterparty to HMLP in Egypt
  • Floating Storage and Regasification Unit – “FSRU”
  • Liquefied Natural Gas Carrier – “LNGC”
  • Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company – “EGAS”
  • Perusahaan Gas Negara – “PGN”
  • Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P. – “SPEC”
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Non-GAAP financial measures: Segment EBITDA

38

Segment EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization and taxes. Segment EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization, taxes and other financial items less non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA. Other financial items consist of gains and losses on derivative instruments and other items, net (including foreign exchange gains and losses and withholding tax on interest expenses). Segment EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and external users of financial statements, such as the Partnership's lenders, to assess its financial and operating performance. The Partnership believes that Segment EBITDA assists its management and investors by increasing the comparability of its performance from period to period and against the performance of other companies in the industry that provide Segment EBITDA information. This increased comparability is achieved by excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods or companies of interest, other financial items, depreciation and amortization and taxes, which items are affected by various and possibly changing financing methods, capital structure and historical cost basis and which items may significantly affect net income between periods. The Partnership believes that including Segment EBITDA as a financial and operating measure benefits investors in (a) selecting between investing in it and other investment alternatives and (b) monitoring its ongoing financial and

  • perational strength in assessing whether to continue to hold common units. Segment EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered an alternative to net income,
  • perating income or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Segment EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income, and these

measures may vary among other companies. Therefore, Segment EBITDA as presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The following tables reconcile Segment EBITDA for each of the segments and the Partnership as a whole to net income (loss), the comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, for the periods presented:

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Non-GAAP financial measures: Segment EBITDA

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Segment reporting

40

Three months ended June 30, 2018 Joint venture Majority FSRUs Total held (proportional Segment Elimin- Consolidated (in thousands of U.S. dollars) FSRUs consolidation) Other reporting ations reporting Time charter revenues $ 35,510 10,576 — 46,086 (10,576) (2) $ 35,510 Other revenue 1,100 — — 1,100 1,100 Total revenues 36,610 10,576 — 47,186 36,610 Operating expenses (6,383) (2,709) (1,180) (10,272) 2,709 (2) (7,563) Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures — — — — 5,111 (2) 5,111 Segment EBITDA (1) 30,227 7,867 (1,180) 36,914 Depreciation and amortization (5,268) (2,399) — (7,667) 2,399 (2) (5,268) Operating income (loss) 24,959 5,468 (1,180) 29,247 28,890 Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 544 2,967 — 3,511 (2,967) (2) 544 Other financial income (expense), net (6,839) (3,324) (785) (10,948) 3,324 (2) (7,624) Income (loss) before tax 18,664 5,111 (1,965) 21,810 — 21,810 Income tax benefit (expense) (1,845) — (21) (1,866) — (1,866) Net income (loss) $ 16,819 5,111 (1,986) 19,944 — $ 19,944 Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income — — — — 3,003 (3) 3,003 Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) $ 16,819 5,111 (1,986) 19,944 (3,003) (3) $ 16,941

(1) Segment EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a definition of Segment EBITDA and reconciliations to net income, the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure, please see the Appendix. (2) Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership's share of the joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (loss) of joint ventures. (3) Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Non-GAAP financial measures: Distributable cash flow

41

Distributable cash flow represents Segment EBITDA adjusted for cash collections on principal payments on the direct financing lease, amortization in revenues for above market contracts less non- controlling interest in amortization in revenues for above market contracts, non-cash revenue: tax paid directly by charterer less non-controlling interest: non-cash revenue, amortization of deferred revenues for the joint ventures, interest income, interest expense less amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed, other items (net), unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains), current income tax expense, net of uncertain tax position less non-cash income tax: tax paid directly by charterer, non-controlling interest in finance and tax items and other adjustments such as indemnification paid or to be paid by Höegh LNG for the non-cash boil-off accrual, non-budgeted expenses, losses and estimated maintenance, indemnified by, or refunded to HLNG, distributions of the Series A preferred units and replacement capital expenditures. Cash collections on the direct financing lease investment with respect to the PGN FSRU Lampung consist of the difference between the payments under time charter and the revenues recognized as a financing lease (representing the payment of the principal recorded as a receivable). Amortization in revenues for above market contracts consist of the non-cash amortization of the intangible for the above market time charter contract related to the acquisitions of the Höegh Gallant and Höegh

  • Grace. Amortization of deferred revenues for the joint ventures accounted for under the equity method consist of non-cash amortization to revenues of charterer payments for modifications and

drydocking to the vessels. Non-cash revenue: tax paid directly by charterer and non-cash income tax: tax paid directly by charterer consists of certain taxes paid by the charterer directly to the Colombian tax authorities on behalf of the Partnership’s subsidiaries which is recorded as a component of time charter revenues and current income tax expenses. Estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, including estimated expenditures for drydocking, represent capital expenditures required to maintain over the long-term the operating capacity of, or the revenue generated by, the Partnership's capital assets. Distributable cash flow is presented starting with Segment EBITDA taken from the total segment reporting using the proportional consolidation method for the Partnership's 50% interests in the joint ventures as shown in this Appendix. Therefore, the adjustments to Segment EBITDA include the Partnership's share of the joint venture's adjustments. The Partnership believes distributable cash flow is an important liquidity measure used by management and investors in publicly traded partnerships to compare cash generating performance of the Partnership’ cash generating assets from period to period by adjusting for cash and non-cash items that could potentially have a disparate effect between periods, and to compare the cash generating performance for specific periods to the cash distributions (if any) that are expected to be paid to unitholders. The Partnership also believes distributable cash flow benefits investors in comparing its cash generating performance to other companies that account for time charters as operating leases rather than financial leases, or that do not have non-cash amortization of intangibles or deferred revenue. Distributable cash flow is a non-GAAP liquidity measure and should not be considered as an alternative to net cash provided by operating activities, or any other measure of the Partnership's liquidity or cash flows calculated in accordance with GAAP. Distributable cash flow excludes some, but not all, items that affect net cash provided by operating activities and the measures may vary among companies. For example, distributable cash flow does not reflect changes in working capital balances. Distributable cash flow also includes some items that do not affect net cash provided by operating activities. Therefore, distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Distributable cash flow is not the same measure as available cash or operating surplus, both of which are defined by the Partnership's partnership agreement. The first table below reconciles distributable cash flow to Segment EBITDA, which is reconciled to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure for Segment EBITDA, in this Appendix. Refer to this Appendix for the definition of Segment EBITDA. The second table below reconciles distributable cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities, the most directly comparable GAAP measures for liquidity.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Non-GAAP financial measures: Distributable cash flow

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Reconciliation of distributable cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Net Debt

44

Net Debt. Net Debt is defined as long-term debt plus revolving credit and seller’s credit due to owners and affiliates net of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition Net Debt is used as a supplemental financial measure used by management and external users of financial statements, such as the Partnership's lenders, to assess leverage. Net Debt is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered an alternative to total debt or any other measure of liquidity presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following tables reconcile Net Debt to total debt from which it is derived for the Partnership’s consolidated balance sheet and the balance sheet of its non-consolidated joint ventures, for the periods presented:

(in thousands of US dollars) Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2017 Jun 30, 2018 Current portion of consolidated long-term debt 32,208 32,208 45,458 45,458 Consolidated long-term debt 330,635 300,440 434,845 412,479 Consolidated revolving credit and seller's credit due to owners and affiliates 47,000 43,005 51,832 45,292 Share of joint ventures' current portion of long-term debt 11,047 11,752 12,502 12,895 Share of joint ventures' long-term debt 238,551 226,979 214,654 208,193 Consolidated cash and cash equivalents - current portion (32,868) (18,915) (22,679) (20,980) Consolidated restricted cash - current portion (10,630) (8,055) (6,962) (5,958) Consolidated restricted cash - long-term portion (15,198) (14,154) (13,640) (13,404) Share of joint ventures' cash and cash equivalents (2,099) (4,753) (4,050) (2,504) Share of joint ventures' restricted cash - current portion (4,222) (4,229) (4,260) (7,685) Share of joint ventures' restricted cash - long-term portion (12,552) (12,554) (12,604) (12,662) Net interest-bearing debt 581,872 551,724 695,095 661,124 Segment EBITDA, LQA 102,796 103,384 134,808 147,656 Net debt/Segment EBITDA, LQA 5.7x 5.3x 5.2x 4.5x

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Contact: www.hoeghlngpartners.com ir@hoeghlngpartners.com