investments and pensions oversight committee
play

INVESTMENTS AND PENSIONS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Education Trust Board - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation to the: INVESTMENTS AND PENSIONS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Education Trust Board Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. December 2012 New Mexico 529 Programs Performance Detail g SUMMARY COMMENTS PCA was asked to provide additional


  1. Presentation to the: INVESTMENTS AND PENSIONS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Education Trust Board Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. December 2012

  2. New Mexico 529 Programs – Performance Detail g SUMMARY COMMENTS  PCA was asked to provide additional detail on 5-year performance of the Education p y p Plan (TEP) and Scholar’s Edge Plan (SE) 18+ Portfolios • Data is sourced from the Morningstar Direct database for Peer Universes • Data for the NM 529 Programs provided by Oppenheimer g p y pp  TEP 18+ 5-year annualized performance* trailed its median peer by 4.44% per year • Underperformance primarily due to results of Core Bond Fund during 2008/2009 p p y g • TEP 18+ 12-month performance ending 9/30/2009 trailed median peer by 17.68% • Portfolio held a 50% allocation to Core Bond Fund for part of that period  SE 18+ 5-year annualized performance* trailed its median peer by 1.02% per year y p p y p y • Underperformance also due to results of Core Bond Fund during 2008/2009 • SE 18+ 12-month performance ending 9/30/2009 trailed peers by 8.59% • Portfolio held a 25% allocation to Core Bond Fund for part of that period p p • Both TEP and SE have improved performance relative to peers in 2011 and 2012 *As of 9/30/2012 2

  3. New Mexico 529 Programs – Performance Detail g THE EDUCATION PLAN Annualized Performance Ending 9/30/2012 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year NM TEP 18+ 4.76 3.83 -1.27 Median Peer 5.04 4.69 3.17 Difference -0.28 -0.86 -4.44  During the 5-year period ending 9/30/2012, TEP 18+ trailed the median peer by 4.44% 12-Month Performance Ending 9/30 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 NM TEP 18+ -3.87 -12.81 4.34 2.39 4.76 Median Peer 0.75 4.87 5.63 1.93 5.04 Difference -4.62 -17.68 -1.29 0.46 -0.28  Performance differences are primarily attributed to the 12-month period ending 9/30/2009  During that period, TEP 18+ trailed its median peer by 17.68% g p , p y Source: Morningstar Direct/Oppenheimer 3

  4. New Mexico 529 Programs – Performance Detail g THE EDUCATION PLAN Capital US Equity, Non-US Appreciation, 6% Value, 2% Equity, 3% 2% Other, Other LC C LC Core Idx, Id 6% 5% Intl Idx, 1% Money Market, 40% Cash, 40% Bonds, 45% Core Bond, 50% TEP 18+ Morningstar 19+ Direct Allocation as of Q4 2008 Allocation as of Q4 2008*  Asset allocation between TEP and median plan were similar  TEP had 5% higher allocation to Bonds (50% vs. 45%)  Oppenheimer Core Bond held a 50% allocation for two of the four quarters ending 9/30/2009 pp q g • Core Bond experienced a return of -33.5% during those two quarters (Q4 2008,Q1 2009) • Underperformance during the period entirely attributable to Core Bond, partially offset by its replacement, Dreyfus Bond Market Fund • Core Bond was removed form the Program as of 3/2/2009 *Using best information available 4

  5. New Mexico 529 Programs – Performance Detail g SCHOLAR’S EDGE PLAN Annualized Performance Ending 9/30/2012 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year NM SE 18+ 6.54 4.76 0.84 Median Peer 5.40 4.46 1.86 Difference 1.14 0.30 -1.02  During the 5-year period ending 9/30/2012, SE 18+ trailed the median peer by -1.02% 12-Month Performance Ending 9/30 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 NM SE 18+ -5.33 -3.93 6.22 1.33 6.54 Median Peer -4.24 4.66 5.78 1.10 5.40 Difference -1.09 -8.59 0.44 0.23 1.14  Performance differences are primarily attributed to the 12-month period ending 9/30/2009  During that period, SE 18+ trailed its median peer by 8.58% g p , p y Source: Morningstar Direct/Oppenheimer 5

  6. New Mexico 529 Programs – Performance Detail g SCHOLAR’S EDGE PLAN US Equity, Capital Non-US Appreciation, 6% Equity, 3% 5% Value, 5% Other, 11% Money Market, 20% High Core Bond, Core Bond Yield, 8% Bonds, 34% 25% Cash, 46% Intl Ltd Term Bond, Bond, 30% 8% Morningstar 19+ Advisor SE 18+ Allocation as of Q4 2008* Allocation as of Q4 2008  SE had a much higher allocation to bonds versus median peer(71% vs. 34%)  Oppenheimer Core Bond held a 25% allocation between April 2008 and February 2009 • Impact of Core Bond underperformance to SE was less than TEP • Bond portfolio was diversified across Core, International, High Yield, Limited Term • Core Bond was removed form the Program as of 2/17/2009 *Using best information available 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend