Introduzione alle fibre ottiche Edoardo Milotti Corso di - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

introduzione alle fibre ottiche
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Introduzione alle fibre ottiche Edoardo Milotti Corso di - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduzione alle fibre ottiche Edoardo Milotti Corso di Fondamenti Fisici di Tecnologia Moderna A. A. 2019-20 1.2 Bit rate basso 1.0 Larghezza di banda piccola 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 1.2 Bit rate alto 1.0 Larghezza


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduzione alle fibre ottiche

Edoardo Milotti Corso di Fondamenti Fisici di Tecnologia Moderna

  • A. A. 2019-20
slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Bit rate basso Larghezza di banda piccola Bit rate alto Larghezza di banda grande

slide-3
SLIDE 3

µ

Figure 7-3 A typical fiber optic communication system: T, transmitter; C, connector; S, splice; R, repeater; D, detector

Le fibre ottiche permettono di stabilire canali di telecomunicazione a larga banda

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Problema: un anello misterioso …

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Riflessione totale: se non tutti gli angoli di rifrazione sono possibili, infatti allora esiste un angolo limite tale che sinθ2 = n1 n2 sinθ1 n1 n2 > 1 n1 n2 sinθ1

(lim) = 1

θ1

(lim) = arcsin n2

n1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

θ1

(lim) = arcsin n2

n1

θ1

(lim) ≈ 48°.75

nel caso dellinterfaccia aria-acqua n1 ≈ 1.33, n2 ≈ 1, allora

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Figure 7-2 Schematic of the photophone invented by Bell. In this system, sunlight was modulated by a vibrating diaphragm and transmitted through a distance of about 200 meters in air to a receiver containing a selenium cell connected to the earphone.

vedi: Ghatak and Thyagarajan, "Optical Waveguides and Fibers", Fundamentals of Photonics, Module 1.7 https://spie.org/publications/fundamentals-of-photonics-modules

slide-9
SLIDE 9

= < = > < ∆ ∆ ≡ ∆

∆ = + ≈ ≈

(a)

n n r a n n r a = < = >

1 2

for for < ∆ ∆ ≡

2

∆ = + ≈ ≈

= < = > < ∆ ∆ ≡ ∆

∆ = + ≈ ≈ ( )( – ) ( – ) ( – ) n n n n n n n n n n n

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2

2

n1 n2 ⌧ 1

<latexit sha1_base64="7zKRgrbI0v BZwZbIbeWkvBl/dk=">A CKHicbVDLTgIxFG3xhfgAdOm kZi4kcygRpdENy4xkUcCk0mnU6Ch0 7ajgkhfIlb3fg17gxbv8TOMAsBT3KTk3PuKyeIOdPGcRawsLW9s7tX3C8dHB4dlyvVk46WiSK0TS XqhdgT kTtG2Y4bQXK4qjgN uMHlM/e4rVZpJ8WKmMfUiPBJsyAg2VvIrZeG76AoJv4EGnCPXr9ScupMBbRI3JzWQo+VXIRyEkiQRFYZwrHXfdWLjzbAyjHA6Lw0STWNMJnhE+5YKHFHtzbLP5+jCKiEaSmVLGJSpfydmONJ6GgW2M8JmrNe9VPzP6ydmeO/NmIgTQwVZHhomHBmJ0h QyBQlhk8twUQx+ysiY6w MTaslSvpbiMl13YJDkOW5oY5SmWU6aWSDc1dj2iTdBp197p+ 3xTaz7k8RXBGTgHl8AFd6AJnkALtAEBCXgD7+ADfsIv+A0Xy9YCzGdOwQrgzy8H/aN </latexit>

(questo è un parametro importante per caratterizzare la fibra )

∆ = n2

1 − n2 2

2n1

<latexit sha1_base64="gETK9S7yHouSkdweMNEtN+Jq7YQ=">A CPHicbZDLbhMxFIbtUmgJhSZ0ycZqhMSm0cxAVTZIVcuCZ DIRcpNZzye1KrH tlnkKJRHoCn6b d9D3Yd4e67RpPkgVJOJKl3/+52V+cK+kwCH7TnWe7z1/s7b+svTp4/eaw3njbda wXHS4Ucb2Y3BCS 06KFGJfm4FZLESvfj6s r3fgr pNE/cJaLUQZTLVPJAb01qTeHX4VCYF/YMLXASz0Jx E7YXoSjaN5Gfn73FcFrWARbFuEK9Ekq2hPGpQOE8OLTGjkCpwbhEGOoxIsSq7EvDYsnMiBX8NUDLzUkAk3Khe/mbP3 klYaqw/GtnC/bejhMy5WRb7ygzwym3mKvN/uUGB6edRKXVeoNB8uSgtFEPDKjQskVZwVDMvgFvp38r4FXgq6AGubalmozHK+SGQJLJiCYpVNlv4tZqHFm4i2hbdqBV+bJ1+/9Q8v1jh2yfvyDH5QEJyRs7JN9ImHcLJL3JDbskdvacP9A9 XJbu0FXPEVkL+vQXGLyraw= </latexit>
slide-10
SLIDE 10

= < = > < ∆ ∆ ≡ ∆

∆ = + ≈ ≈

For a typical (multimode) fiber, a ≈ 25 µm, n2 ≈ 1.45 (pure silica), and ∆ ≈ 0.01, giving a core index of n1 ≈ 1.465. The cladding is usually pure silica while the core is usually silica doped with germanium. Doping by germanium results in a typical increase of refractive index from n2 to n1. Now, for a ray entering the fiber core at its end, if the angle of incidence φ at the internal core- φ

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

= < = > < ∆ ∆ ≡ ∆

∆ = + ≈ ≈

L'apertura numerica

µ θ

sin sin i n n θ =

1

φ

φ θ = > θ θ = θ <

i

<latexit sha1_base64="X6mfwa7wbHMFBz8 B7axbuI/omU=">A CGHicbVA5T8MwGLXLVcrVwshiUSExVQmHYKxgYWwlekhtVDmO01p17Mh2kKqov4AVFn4NG2Jl49/gpBloy5MsPb3 X 5+zJk2jvMDSxubW9s75d3K3v7B4VG1dtzVMlGEdojkUvV9rClngnYM 5z2Y0Vx5HPa86cPmd97pkozKZ7MLKZehMeChYxgY6U2G1XrTsPJgdaJW5A6KNAa1SAcBpIkERWGcKz1wHVi46VYGUY4nVeGiaYxJlM8pgNLBY6o9tL80jk6t0qAQqnsEwbl6t+OFEdazyLfVkbYTPSql4n/eYPEhHdeykScGCrIYlGYcGQkyr6NAqYoMXxmCSaK2VsRmWCFibHhLG3JZhspubZDcBCwLCfMUSajXK9UbGjuakTrpHvZcK8aN+3revO+iK8MTsEZuA u AVN8AhaoAMIoOAFvI 3+A4/4Cf8WpSWYNFzApYAv38BLoWe6g= </latexit>

n0

<latexit sha1_base64="zSZegf vqR6R5KxMxP+u37vtY3g=">A CGnicbVA5T8MwGLXLVcLVwshiUSExVQmHYKxgYSyCHlIbVY7jtFYdO7IdpKrqT2CFhV/DhlhZ+Dc4aQba8iRLT+9 l1+QcKaN6/7A0tr6xuZWedvZ2d3bP6hUD9taporQFpFcqm6ANeVM0JZh tNuoi OA047wfgu8zvPVGkmxZOZJNSP8VCwiBFsrPQoBu6gUnPrbg60SryC1ECB5qAKYT+UJI2pMIRjrXuemxh/ipVh NOZ0 81T AZ4yHtWSpwTLU/zW+doVOrhCiSyj5hUK7+7ZjiWOtJHNjKGJuRXvYy8T+vl5roxp8ykaSGCjJfFKUcGYmyj6OQKUoMn1iCiWL2VkRGWGFibDwLW7LZRkqu7RAchixLCnOUySjXHceG5i1HtEra53Xvon71cFlr3BbxlcExOAFnwAPXoAHuQRO0A FD8AJewRt8hx/wE37NS0uw6DkC 4Dfv3YJn5I=</latexit>

µ θ

θ =

φ

sin ( cos ) φ θ = > n n

2 1

θ θ = θ <

(riflessione totale interna)

µ θ

θ =

φ

φ θ = > θ θ = sin – θ <

F H G I K J L N M M O Q P P

1

2 1 2

12

n n

sin i < n1 n0 " 1 − ✓n2 n1 ◆2#1/2 ≈ q n2

1 − n2 2 = n1

√ 2∆

<latexit sha1_base64="7ZNthg/FkbsE8khO+yqONEA4Qdo=">A CmnicbVFNb9QwEHXCV1kobE qBziMWCGVQ7dJAJUDlarCAcSlSN2 0ia7chxn16pjB3tSsYpy4GfyC/gbOMki0ZaRbD29 2bGek5LKSwGwS/Pv3X7zt17G/cHDx5uPno83HpyanVlGJ8wLbU5T6nlUig+QYGSn5eG0yKV/Cy9+NjqZ5fcWKHVCa5KnhR0oUQuGEVHzYc/YysUCPgAcW4oq9U8bNwVNB LnuMUQtjt4c5fQ9R0rtiIxRJfzyLoUTKrw73I9dGyNPoHxPa7wdbpHLvg2mZOPHAg7JUo/sQl0mY+HAXjoCu4CcI1GJF1Hc+3PC/ONKsKrpBJau0 DEpMampQM mbQVxZXlJ2QRd86qCiBbdJ3WXVwCvHZJBr4 5C6Nh/O2paWLsqUucsKC7tda0l/6dNK8zfJ7VQZYVcsX5RXklADW3wkAnDGcqVA5QZ4d4KbEldpOi+58qWdjZqLa0bQrNMtD9FJbQ0dPxg4EILr0d0E5xG4/DN+N23t6PDo3V8G+Q5eUl2SEj2ySH5TI7JhD y29v0tr1n/gv/yP/if+2tvrfueUqulH/yB2t3yJ0=</latexit>
slide-14
SLIDE 14

sin i < n1 n0 " 1 − ✓n2 n1 ◆2#1/2 ≈ q n2

1 − n2 2 = n1

√ 2∆

<latexit sha1_base64="7ZNthg/FkbsE8khO+yqONEA4Qdo=">A CmnicbVFNb9QwEHXCV1kobE qBziMWCGVQ7dJAJUDlarCAcSlSN2 0ia7chxn16pjB3tSsYpy4GfyC/gbOMki0ZaRbD29 2bGek5LKSwGwS/Pv3X7zt17G/cHDx5uPno83HpyanVlGJ8wLbU5T6nlUig+QYGSn5eG0yKV/Cy9+NjqZ5fcWKHVCa5KnhR0oUQuGEVHzYc/YysUCPgAcW4oq9U8bNwVNB LnuMUQtjt4c5fQ9R0rtiIxRJfzyLoUTKrw73I9dGyNPoHxPa7wdbpHLvg2mZOPHAg7JUo/sQl0mY+HAXjoCu4CcI1GJF1Hc+3PC/ONKsKrpBJau0 DEpMampQM mbQVxZXlJ2QRd86qCiBbdJ3WXVwCvHZJBr4 5C6Nh/O2paWLsqUucsKC7tda0l/6dNK8zfJ7VQZYVcsX5RXklADW3wkAnDGcqVA5QZ4d4KbEldpOi+58qWdjZqLa0bQrNMtD9FJbQ0dPxg4EILr0d0E5xG4/DN+N23t6PDo3V8G+Q5eUl2SEj2ySH5TI7JhD y29v0tr1n/gv/yP/if+2tvrfueUqulH/yB2t3yJ0=</latexit>

NA = arcsin(max sin i) = arcsin n1 √ 2∆

<latexit sha1_base64="9AI53p8x5fI7VjPspLEjybTka+Q=">A CVnicbZDLSgMxFIYz473eqi7dBIugmzLjBd0I3hauRMGq0CnlTCbV0EwyJmfEMvRpfBq3utGXETO14PVA4Oc7t5w/zqSwGARvnj8yOjY+MTlVmZ6ZnZuvLixeWp0bxhtMS2 uY7BcCsUbKFDy68xwSGPJr+LuUZm/u fGCq0usJfxVgo3SnQEA3SoXd2LUsBbkxanB326RyMwzAq15uhD5AQV61+UqnY 2TuDxUZ0zCVCv12tBfVgEPSvCIeiRoZx1l7wvCjRLE+5QibB2mY ZNgqwKBgkvcrUW5 BqwLN7zp IKU21YxuLNPVx1JaEcb9xTSAf3eU BqbS+NXWV5lf2dK+F/uWaOnd1WIVSWI1fsc1EnlxQ1LU2jiTCcoew5AcwI91fKbsEAQ2ftjy3lbNRaWjcEk SULoOkJaYDXqk408LfFv0Vlxv1cLO+fb5V2z8c2jdJlskKWSMh2SH75ISckQZh5JE8kWfy4r167/6YP/FZ6nvDniXyI/zqB2 dtAE=</latexit>

= = ∆ = = = ∆

For a typical step-index (multimode) fiber with n1 ≈ 1.45 and ∆ ≈ 0.01, we get sin . ( . ) . i n

m =

= × = 1 2 1 45 2 0 01 0 205 ∆ so that im ≈ 12°. Thus, all light entering the fiber must be within a cone of half-angle 12°.

α α ≈

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Attenuazione nelle fibre ottiche

λ λ λ

Figure 7-10 Typical wavelength dependence of attenuation for a silica fiber. Notice that the lowest attenuation occurs at 1550 nm [adapted from Miya, Hasaka, and Miyashita].

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Example 7-3

Calculation of losses using the dB scale become easy. For example, if we have a 40-km fiber link (with a loss of 0.4 dB/km) having 3 connectors in its path and if each connector has a loss of 1.8 dB, the total loss will be the sum of all the losses in dB; or 0.4 dB/km × 40 km + 3 × 1.8 dB = 21.4 dB.

Example 7-4

Let us assume that the input power of a 5-mW laser decreases to 30 µW after traversing through 40 km of an optical fiber. Using Equation 7-12, attenuation of the fiber in dB/km is therefore [10 log (166.7)]/40 ≈ 0.56 dB/km.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Dispersione degli impulsi nelle fibre ottiche

µ ≈

  • 1. Different rays take different times to propagate through a given length of the fiber. We

will discuss this for a step-index multimode fiber and for a parabolic-index fiber in this and the following sections. In the language of wave optics, this is known as intermodal dispersion because it arises due to different modes traveling with different speeds.4

  • 2. Any given light source emits over a range of wavelengths, and, because of the intrinsic

property of the material of the fiber, different wavelengths take different amounts of time to propagate along the same path. This is known as material dispersion and will be discussed in Section IX.

  • 3. Apart from intermodal and material dispersions, there is yet another mechanism—referred

to as waveguide dispersion and important only in single-mode fibers. We will briefly discuss this in Section XI. In the fiber shown in Figure 7-7, the rays making larger angles with the axis (those shown as

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Figure 7-11 Pulses separated by 100 ns at the input end would be resolvable at the output end of 1 km

  • f the fiber. The same pulses would not be resolvable at the output end of 2 km of the same fiber.

θ = + = θ = θ = θ θ θ θ θ = θ

slide-20
SLIDE 20

= < = > < ∆ ∆ ≡ ∆

∆ = + ≈ ≈

i

<latexit sha1_base64="X6mfwa7wbHMFBz8 B7axbuI/omU=">A CGHicbVA5T8MwGLXLVcrVwshiUSExVQmHYKxgYWwlekhtVDmO01p17Mh2kKqov4AVFn4NG2Jl49/gpBloy5MsPb3 X 5+zJk2jvMDSxubW9s75d3K3v7B4VG1dtzVMlGEdojkUvV9rClngnYM 5z2Y0Vx5HPa86cPmd97pkozKZ7MLKZehMeChYxgY6U2G1XrTsPJgdaJW5A6KNAa1SAcBpIkERWGcKz1wHVi46VYGUY4nVeGiaYxJlM8pgNLBY6o9tL80jk6t0qAQqnsEwbl6t+OFEdazyLfVkbYTPSql4n/eYPEhHdeykScGCrIYlGYcGQkyr6NAqYoMXxmCSaK2VsRmWCFibHhLG3JZhspubZDcBCwLCfMUSajXK9UbGjuakTrpHvZcK8aN+3revO+iK8MTsEZuA u AVN8AhaoAMIoOAFvI 3+A4/4Cf8WpSWYNFzApYAv38BLoWe6g= </latexit>

n0

<latexit sha1_base64="zSZegf vqR6R5KxMxP+u37vtY3g=">A CGnicbVA5T8MwGLXLVcLVwshiUSExVQmHYKxgYSyCHlIbVY7jtFYdO7IdpKrqT2CFhV/DhlhZ+Dc4aQba8iRLT+9 l1+QcKaN6/7A0tr6xuZWedvZ2d3bP6hUD9taporQFpFcqm6ANeVM0JZh tNuoi OA047wfgu8zvPVGkmxZOZJNSP8VCwiBFsrPQoBu6gUnPrbg60SryC1ECB5qAKYT+UJI2pMIRjrXuemxh/ipVh NOZ0 81T AZ4yHtWSpwTLU/zW+doVOrhCiSyj5hUK7+7ZjiWOtJHNjKGJuRXvYy8T+vl5roxp8ykaSGCjJfFKUcGYmyj6OQKUoMn1iCiWL2VkRGWGFibDwLW7LZRkqu7RAchixLCnOUySjXHceG5i1HtEra53Xvon71cFlr3BbxlcExOAFnwAPXoAHuQRO0A FD8AJewRt8hx/wE37NS0uw6DkC 4Dfv3YJn5I=</latexit>

θ t AC CB c n AB c n

AB =

+ = / / /

1 1

cosθ = θ = θ θ θ θ θ = θ

θ = + = θ = θ t n L c cos

L = 1

θ θ θ θ θ = θ

(tempo richiesto per attraversare una lunghezza L di fibra)

θ = + = θ = θ = θ θ θ θ θ t n L c

min = 1

θ

(tempo minimo richiesto, per raggi assiali)

t n L cn

max = 1 2 2

θ θ τ = = τ ≅ ≈ ∆ ∆ τ τ τ

τ τ τ = +

τ = × × × =

(tempo massimo richiesto, per raggi con )

= ys at θ =θc = cos–1(n2/n1) τ = = τ ≅ ≈ ∆ ∆ τ τ τ

τ τ τ 2 = +

τ = × × × =

slide-21
SLIDE 21

= θ θ τi c = =

L N M O Q P

t t n L n n

max min

– –

1 1 2

1 τ ≅ ≈ ∆ ∆ τ τ τ

τ τ τ 2 = +

τ = × × × =

(intervallo di tempo intermodale)

= θ θ τ = = τi ≅ ≈ n L c L n c NA

1 1

2 ∆ ( )2 ∆ τ τ τ

τ τ τ 2 = +

τ = × × × =

(approssimazione dell'intervallo di tempo intermodale)

= θ θ τ = = τ ≅ ≈ ∆ ∆ τ τ τ

τ τ τ

2 2 1 2 2

= +

i ∆

τ = × × × =

(larghezza totale dell'impulso) larghezza iniziale dell'impulso

slide-22
SLIDE 22

= θ θ τ = = τ ≅ ≈ ∆ ∆ τ τ τ

τ τ τ = +

For a typical (multimoded) step-index fiber, if we assume n1 = 1.5, ∆ = 0.01, L = 1 km, we would get τ1

8

1 5 1000 3 10 0 01 50 = × × × = . . ns/km

(7-20)

That is, a pulse traversing through the fiber of length 1 km will be broadened by 50 ns. Thus, two pulses separated by, say, 500 ns at the input end will be quite resolvable at the end of 1 km of the

  • fiber. However, if consecutive pulses were separated by, say, 10 ns at the input end, they would be

absolutely unresolvable at the output end. Hence, in a 1-Mbit/s fiber optic system, where we have

  • ne pulse every 10–6 s, a 50-ns/km dispersion would require repeaters to be placed every 3 to 4 km.

On the other hand, in a 1-Gbit/s fiber optic communication system, which requires the transmission

  • f one pulse every 10–9s, a dispersion of 50 ns/km would result in intolerable broadening even

within 50 meters or so. This would be highly inefficient and uneconomical from a system point of view.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

n r n r a

2 1 2 2

1 2

( ) – =

F H I K L N M M O Q P P

0 < r < a

n r n n

2 2 2 1 2 1 2

( ) – = = ∆

c h

r > a ∆ ∆ ≈ ≈ ≈ µ ≈ ≈ ≈ µ

Fibre con "indice parabolico"

= ∆

= = ∆

∆ ∆ ≈ ≈ ≈ µ ≈ ≈ ≈ µ

Figure 7-12 Different ray paths in a parabolic-index fiber

τim = ≈ ≈

F H G I K J

n L c n n n n L c L cn NA

2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 4

2 2 8 – ∆

b g

≈ ∆ ≈ τ ≈ °

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

30

OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 5, No. 1 / January 1980

Moving fiber-optic hydrophone

  • W. B. Spillman, Jr., and R. L. Gravel

Sperry Research Center, Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776

Received September 24,1979 A fiber-optic hydrophone based on an intensity-modulation mechanism is described. The device possesses suffi- cient sensitivity to detect typical deep-sea noise levels in the frequency range 100 Hz to 1 kHz and to detect static displacements of 8.3 X 10-3

  • A. It is not susceptible to phase noise and is insensitive to static-pressure

head varia-

  • tions. The hydrophone is passive

in nature and requires no electrical power. Ease of fabrication and potential low

cost make this device an attractive candidate for incorporation into practical fiber-optic accustic sensing-arrays.

Considerable effort has been expended during the past few years to develop fiber-optic acoustic sensors.

In particular, what has been sought is a mechanism that

directly converts acoustic waves into modulation of the light passing through an optical fiber, i.e., a passive

sensor that requires no electrical power. Previous work

has generally been based on some variation of a single-

mode interferometric approach,1- 4 in which acoustic

waves induced phase variations in the light passing through a single-mode fiber. However, this approach

is susceptible to phase noise because of random fluc-

tuations of fiber length caused in large part by tem- perature differences along the fiber. Recent work has

shown that this approach is considerably more sensitive

to temperature variations than to pressure variations.

5

Some attempts have been made to circumvent this problem, with varying degrees of success.

6'7

In this Letter, we report the development of a fiber-

  • ptic hydrophone based on intensity modulation. This

approach thereby circumvents the perceived phase- noise problem. The approach exploits the fact that, if two fiber ends are sufficiently near each other and a

length of one of the fibers is free to move, then acoustic waves in the medium in which the fibers are placed in-

duce fiber motion. Fiber motion varies the amount of light coupled between the two fiber ends, thereby creating light-intensity modulation. Clearly, the sen- sitivity of such a device is inversely proportional to fiber-core diameter such that a fiber displacement of

  • ne core diameter will result in approximately

100%

light-intensity modulation.

The basic device configuration is shown in Fig. 1(a). Two fibers are mounted such that their end surfaces are

parallel, coaxial, and separated by about 2-3 ,m. The fiber on the left was mounted in a ferrule and rigidly

attached to a base plate. The right-hand fiber was held

in a Newport Research Corporation five-axis fiber po-

sitioner, which allowed x-y-z translations and two tilts. This positioner also allowed the length of free fiber to

be varied, thereby allowing the natural mechanical resonance frequency of the fiber to be easily changed. Although the moving fiber in this case was stripped of buffer-coating material, leaving the glass cladding ex- posed to the water, this potential source of strength degradation and reliability could be removed in ad- vanced versions of the device. This could be done ei- ther by rebuffering the fiber or by surrounding it with some inert transparent fluid through which acoustic waves would be directly coupled through diaphragms.

The fiber used was ITT single-mode fiber with a 4.5-,um

  • core. Light from a Hughes He-Ne laser at 0.6328

pm

was coupled into the fiber, using a 20X microscope ob-

  • jective. Two separate types of measurements were
  • performed. In the first, light power coupled through

the device as a function of static fiber displacement was

determined. In the second, the actual device sensitivity

to acoustic waves in water was determined by using the

experimental setup shown in Fig. 1(b).

Figure 2 shows the measured relative optical power coupled through the device as a function of static fiber displacement in air. For a displacement equivalent to 0.5 fiber-core diameter, the quantity R, defined as

ACOUSTIC WAVE FERRULE R OVING FIRER

(a)

SPECTRUMI AIRLYZER OPTICAL PITORCPRO N E D1T1ECTO
  • COusT
C Z10UR E _

(b)

TOE ILt10CCE
  • Fig. 1. Moving-fiber optical hydrophone:

(a) device con-

figuration, (b) experimental setup.

0146-9592/80/010030-02$0.50/0 t 1980, Optical Society of America

TEST TANK

30

OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 5, No. 1 / January 1980

Moving fiber-optic hydrophone

  • W. B. Spillman, Jr., and R. L. Gravel

Sperry Research Center, Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776

Received September 24,1979 A fiber-optic hydrophone based on an intensity-modulation mechanism is described. The device possesses suffi- cient sensitivity to detect typical deep-sea noise levels in the frequency range 100 Hz to 1 kHz and to detect static displacements of 8.3 X 10-3

  • A. It is not susceptible to phase noise and is insensitive to static-pressure

head varia-

  • tions. The hydrophone is passive

in nature and requires no electrical power. Ease of fabrication and potential low

cost make this device an attractive candidate for incorporation into practical fiber-optic accustic sensing-arrays.

Considerable effort has been expended during the past few years to develop fiber-optic acoustic sensors.

In particular, what has been sought is a mechanism that

directly converts acoustic waves into modulation of the light passing through an optical fiber, i.e., a passive

sensor that requires no electrical power. Previous work

has generally been based on some variation of a single-

mode interferometric approach,1- 4 in which acoustic

waves induced phase variations in the light passing through a single-mode fiber. However, this approach

is susceptible to phase noise because of random fluc-

tuations of fiber length caused in large part by tem- perature differences along the fiber. Recent work has

shown that this approach is considerably more sensitive

to temperature variations than to pressure variations.

5

Some attempts have been made to circumvent this problem, with varying degrees of success.

6'7

In this Letter, we report the development of a fiber-

  • ptic hydrophone based on intensity modulation. This

approach thereby circumvents the perceived phase- noise problem. The approach exploits the fact that, if two fiber ends are sufficiently near each other and a

length of one of the fibers is free to move, then acoustic waves in the medium in which the fibers are placed in-

duce fiber motion. Fiber motion varies the amount of light coupled between the two fiber ends, thereby creating light-intensity modulation. Clearly, the sen- sitivity of such a device is inversely proportional to fiber-core diameter such that a fiber displacement of

  • ne core diameter will result in approximately

100%

light-intensity modulation.

The basic device configuration is shown in Fig. 1(a). Two fibers are mounted such that their end surfaces are

parallel, coaxial, and separated by about 2-3 ,m. The fiber on the left was mounted in a ferrule and rigidly

attached to a base plate. The right-hand fiber was held

in a Newport Research Corporation five-axis fiber po-

sitioner, which allowed x-y-z translations and two tilts. This positioner also allowed the length of free fiber to

be varied, thereby allowing the natural mechanical resonance frequency of the fiber to be easily changed. Although the moving fiber in this case was stripped of buffer-coating material, leaving the glass cladding ex- posed to the water, this potential source of strength degradation and reliability could be removed in ad- vanced versions of the device. This could be done ei- ther by rebuffering the fiber or by surrounding it with some inert transparent fluid through which acoustic waves would be directly coupled through diaphragms.

The fiber used was ITT single-mode fiber with a 4.5-,um

  • core. Light from a Hughes He-Ne laser at 0.6328

pm

was coupled into the fiber, using a 20X microscope ob-

  • jective. Two separate types of measurements were
  • performed. In the first, light power coupled through

the device as a function of static fiber displacement was

determined. In the second, the actual device sensitivity

to acoustic waves in water was determined by using the

experimental setup shown in Fig. 1(b).

Figure 2 shows the measured relative optical power coupled through the device as a function of static fiber displacement in air. For a displacement equivalent to 0.5 fiber-core diameter, the quantity R, defined as

ACOUSTIC WAVE FERRULE R OVING FIRER

(a)

SPECTRUMI AIRLYZER OPTICAL PITORCPRO N E D1T1ECTO

  • COusT

C Z10UR E _

(b)

TOE ILt10CCE

  • Fig. 1. Moving-fiber optical hydrophone:

(a) device con-

figuration, (b) experimental setup.

0146-9592/80/010030-02$0.50/0 t 1980, Optical Society of America

TEST TANK

µ µ

Figure 7-18 A change in the transverse alignment between two fibers changes the coupling and hence the power falling on the detector.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Figure 7-19 Light returning to the detector changes as the shape of the reflecting diaphragm changes due to changes in external pressure.

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31