SLIDE 1 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 1 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
Vision 54/ 56, Phase 1 E ast T ask F
c e Pr e se ntation
(We st of US 41 to Br uc e B. Downs Blvd.)
Se pte mbe r 24, 2015
www.Vision54‐56.com
Age nda for T
- day
- Introductions
- Background
- Expectations of Task Force
- Informational presentation
- Initial discussion of alternatives
- Next Task Force meetings
- Public comments
- Adjourn
SLIDE 2 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 2 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
Intr
www.Vision54‐56.com
- Govt. in the Sunshine
- Meetings of Boards open
to public
meetings must be given
must be taken
business outside noticed meetings
SLIDE 3 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 3 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
E tique tte & Rule s
- Role of the Task Force
- Advisory board to MPO
- Review alternatives
- Develop consensus on
recommendations
- Attendance
- Make every effort to attend meetings
- No voting alternates
www.Vision54‐56.com
E tique tte & Rule s
- Meeting Organization
- Select Chair and Vice Chair
- Follow Robert’s Rules of Order
- Use name cards to notify the Chair you
wish to speak (stand on end)
- Listen & consider all opinions
- Listen & consider all public comments
SLIDE 4 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 4 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
Bac kgr
www.Vision54‐56.com
MOBIL IT Y 2040 L RT P
requirements
Plan
year planning horizon
- Update every 5 years
- Implement with 5‐year
program
goals, and policies
SLIDE 5
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 5 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Polic y Constr aint FDOT and Pasco County MPO Policy Road improvements to non‐freeway or non‐ expressway roads shall be limited to a maximum of 6 general purpose through lanes. Exceptions may be made on roads that necessitate special use lanes, such as express lanes, toll lanes, and dedicated transit lanes.
MOBILITY 2040 LRTP, Adopted December 2014
www.Vision54‐56.com
2040 Roadway Cost Affor dable Plan
SLIDE 6
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 6 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
2040 Roadway Cost Affor dable Plan SR 54/56 Corridor Improvements
Alternative improvements within the SR 54/56 corridor will be evaluated as part of future corridor assessment after adoption of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan and will include, but not necessarily be limited to, premium transit improvements, overpasses, and/or elevated lanes. In addition, future corridor assessment will include significant public engagement regarding alternative improvements to the SR 54/56 corridor.
www.Vision54‐56.com
2040 T r ansit Cost Affor dable Plan
SLIDE 7 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 7 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
2040 T r ansit Cost Affor dable Plan Significant Transit Investment Assumes new dedicated transit funding
www.Vision54‐56.com
Vision 54/ 56 Appr
Segment 1 Segment 2 Future Study
3 Segments Defined
Bruce B. Downs Blvd. Gunn Hay
SLIDE 8 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 8 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
2-Phase Appr
Phase 1 Defining the Alternatives Phase 2 Evaluating 5‐6 Alternatives & Selecting Preferred Alternative
www.Vision54‐56.com
2-Phase Appr
- ac h
- Phase 1 – Defining the Alternatives
- Facilitate informational discussion
- Identify, discuss, and reduce the
universe of alternatives to 5 or 6
- Document Phase 1 efforts, present to
MPO Board, and obtain a decision as to whether to move to Phase 2
SLIDE 9 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 9 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
2-Phase Appr
- ac h
- Phase 2 – Evaluating 5‐6 Alternatives &
Selecting Preferred Alternative
- Evaluate the 5 to 6 alternatives
resulting from Phase 1
- Facilitate extensive public engagement
and outreach
- Select and refine a preferred
alternative
- Develop an implementation plan
www.Vision54‐56.com
Pr
SLIDE 10 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 10 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Pr
www.vision54‐56.com
www.Vision54‐56.com
T ask F
c e Me e tings
- West Task Force (US 19 to West of US 41)
- September 29, 2015—Information focus and preliminary
discussion of alternatives
- December 1, 2015—Discussion of alternatives
- February 2, 2016—Agreement on 5‐6 key alternatives,
recommendations to MPO Board
- East Task Force (West of US 41 to Bruce B. Downs Blvd.)
- September 24, 2015—Information focus and preliminary
discussion of alternatives
- December 3, 2015—Discussion of alternatives
- February 4, 2016—Agreement on 5‐6 key alternatives,
recommendations to MPO
SLIDE 11 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 11 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
T ask F
c e E xpe c tations
- Attend all three Phase 1 meetings (continue
with Phase 2 as appropriate)
- Guide achievement of Phase 1 objectives
- Help present recommendations to MPO Board
- Nominate and elect Chair and Vice‐Chair
- Recognize Chair/Vice Chair roles
- Be visionaries and plan for the ultimate
improvements to the SR 54/56 corridor
www.Vision54‐56.com
Chair / Vic e Chair E xpe c tations
- Run efficient meetings
- Facilitate discussion and motions
- Keep discussion on track
- Facilitate public comment
- Help present recommendations
to MPO Board
- Action Needed ‐ Chair/Vice Chair
nominations/elections
SLIDE 12 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 12 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.mobility2040pasco.com
Que stions?
? ? ? ? ?
E ast T ask F
c e Infor mational Pr e se ntation
SLIDE 13 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 13 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Pr e se ntation Summar y Purpose of Presentation: Provide background & information about the SR 54/56 corridor
- Existing and future conditions
- Growth & economic development
- Previous studies & SR 54/56 improvement
alternatives
E xisting and F utur e Conditions and the SR 54/ 56 Cor r idor
SLIDE 14
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 14 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
3 Cor r idor Se gme nts
Segment 1 Segment 2 Future Study
www.Vision54‐56.com
E xisting Hot Spots
Gunn Hwy Suncoast Pkwy Little Road US 41 Collier Pkwy I‐75 BBD Blvd
SLIDE 15 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 15 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Daily T r affic Volume s vs. Capac ity: We st Se gme nt
‐ 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000
Little Road Gunn Hwy Suncoast
West ‐ 2014 East ‐ 2014 West ‐ 2040 East ‐ 2040
6‐Lane General Capacity
www.Vision54‐56.com
Daily T r affic Volume s vs. Capac ity: E ast Se gme nt
‐ 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000
US 41 Collier I‐75 BBD West ‐ 2014 East ‐ 2014 West ‐ 2040 East ‐ 2040
6‐Lane General Capacity
SLIDE 16 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 16 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Cur r e nt F DOT T r anspor tation Pr
- je c ts
- Widening to 6 lanes from east of the
Suncoast Parkway to west of US 41 (underway)
- SR 54/US 41 ‐ New Interchange (Project
Development & Environment (PD&E) study underway)
- SR 56/I‐75 ‐ Diverging Diamond Interchange
(design in 2016‐17)
- SR 54/Collier Parkway ‐ New Interchange
(future PD&E study beyond 2025) Gr
c onomic De ve lopme nt: County & Gate way Cr
Mar ke t Ar e a
SLIDE 17 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 17 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Pasc o County Gr
459,023 515,652 710,431 905,211 125,400 157,222 261,584 374,966 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000
2010 2020 2030 2040 Population Employment
2X 3X
www.Vision54‐56.com
2010-2040 Population Gr
Population Growth = 452,000 Growth in 54/56 study area = 135,000 (30% of County growth)
SLIDE 18 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 18 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
2010-2040 E mployme nt Gr
Employment Growth = 250,000 Growth in 54/56 study area = 78,000 (31% of County growth)
www.Vision54‐56.com
2040 % of Population Gr
ke t Ar e a
North 8% of growth East 10% of growth Gateway Crossings 38% of growth Central 18% of growth Harbors 26% of growth
Gateway Crossings 18% of land area 38% of growth
SLIDE 19 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 19 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Appr
Impac ting SR 54/ 56
www.Vision54‐56.com
Appr
in We st Se gme nt
TOD Overlay
SLIDE 20 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 20 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Appr
in E ast Se gme nt
TOD Overlay
www.Vision54‐56.com
Appr
Impac ting SR 54/ 56
Included in 2040 growth projections
- 50% residential
- 60% non‐residential
SLIDE 21 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 21 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gate way Cr
South Mar ke t Ar e a Pasco County Economic Development Objectives
- Policies to support a major employment hub
- Dense, urban community
- World class amenities and transportation
- ptions
- High‐rise office and technology‐based
entrepreneurship
- Research and training centers
- Business accelerator
Source: Pasco County Economic Development Plan (2013‐2025) www.Vision54‐56.com
E c onomic De ve lopme nt
- Criteria for Class A Office Users
- 30 minute travel time for employees
- Highly visible from major road
- Sidewalk access to surrounding uses
- Walking distance to services (restaurants, dry
cleaners, outdoor recreation, hotel/motel)
- Transit‐friendly in urban areas (wi‐fi, quiet,
clean, well‐lit, limited stops – BRT or light rail preferred)
- <1 hour to nearest international airport for
client visits
SLIDE 22 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 22 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
T r ansit Or ie nte d De ve lopme nt (T OD) 1) Established Five Market Areas 2) Vision for the South Market Area
- Implementing TOD
- Decreasing auto‐dependency
- Increasing economic viability and
livability
3) Mobility Fees and Urban Service Areas Pasco County’s Comprehensive Plan (2010)
www.Vision54‐56.com
T r ansit Or ie nte d De ve lopme nt (T OD)
- Timeline: Mid 2016
- Establishes Standards for
Mobility Fee Reduction
- Neighborhood Context
- Mix of Uses
- Connectivity
- Walkability
- Access to Transit
- Pedestrian + Bicycle Safety
- Dedicated Transit
Capacity/Free Travel
TOD Ordinance
SLIDE 23 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 23 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
T r ansit Or ie nte d De ve lopme nt (T OD) 6 Transit Center Overlays
- 1. Western Hub
- 2. Suncoast Parkway/Gunn Highway
- 3. Sunlake Boulevard
- 4. US 41
- 5. I‐75
- 6. Wiregrass
Pr e vious Study E ffor ts & SR 54/ 56 Impr
Alte r native s
SLIDE 24 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 24 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Pr e vious Study E ffor ts
- FDOT/TBARTA SR 54/56 Project Concept
Development Study
- Urban Land Institute Report for Pasco
County
- 54 Express (unsolicited bid to FDOT)
- Pasco County/FDOT SR 54/56
Transit/Managed Lanes and Toll Feasibility Study
www.Vision54‐56.com
T ime line Pr e vious Study E ffor ts
2015 MOBILITY 2040 2014 54/56 Toll Feasibility Study 2013 54 Express 2013 ULI Report 2011 ‐ 2013 54/56 Concept Study
SLIDE 25 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 25 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Summar y of Alte r native s
- Parallel improvements outside the SR
54/56 corridor (3 alternatives)
- Project Concept Development Study
(18 alternatives)
- Overpasses at key intersections (1
alternative)
- Do nothing alternative
- Other alternatives?
www.Vision54‐56.com
De finitions (handout)
- Express Bus
- Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT)
- BRT “Light”
- Light Rail
- Dedicated Guideway
- At‐Grade
- Grade‐Separated
- Express Lanes
- Frontage Roads
- Queue Jumps
SLIDE 26 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 26 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Par alle l Alte r native s Outside the SR 54/ 56 Cor r idor
- All practical parallel improvements already
included in MOBILITY 2040
- Alternatives outside the SR 54/56 corridor that
would go beyond these include:
- SR 52 – 4‐lane elevated express lanes from US
19 to US 301
- Ridge Road – 4‐lane elevated express lanes
from US 19 to US 301
- Tower Road (from collector to arterial from
Sunlake to US 41)
www.Vision54‐56.com
MOBIL T IY 2040 Roadway Ne e ds Plan
SLIDE 27 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 27 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Par alle l Alte r native – Volume s & Capac ity in SR 54/ 56 Cor r idor
SR 52 (6 lanes plus 4‐lane elevated express from US 19 to US 301)
20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 2040 LRTP Needs Alternative Tested
Little Rd Gunn Hwy Suncoast Pkwy US 41 I‐75
Bruce B Downs Blvd
6‐Lane General Capacity
www.Vision54‐56.com
Par alle l Alte r native – Volume s & Capac ity in SR 54/ 56 Cor r idor
Ridge Road Extension (6 lanes plus 4‐lane elevated express from US 19 to US 301)
20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 2040 LRTP Needs Alternative Tested
Little Rd Gunn Hwy Suncoast Pkwy US 41 I‐75
Bruce B Downs Blvd
6‐Lane General Capacity
SLIDE 28 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 28 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Par alle l Alte r native – Volume s & Capac ity in SR 54/ 56 Cor r idor
Tower Road (from collector to arterial from Sunlake to US 41)
20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 2040 LRTP Needs Alternative Tested
Little Rd Gunn Hwy Suncoast Pkwy US 41 I‐75
Bruce B Downs Blvd
6‐Lane General Capacity
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 Pr
De ve lopme nt Study
SLIDE 29 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 29 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 Pr
De ve lopme nt Study
18 initial alternatives in 4 categories 1) At‐grade alternatives in ROW (express lanes, transit, dedicated guideway) 2) Grade‐separated alternatives in ROW (express lanes, transit, dedicated guideway) 3) Alternatives outside existing ROW (express lanes, transit, dedicated) 4) Modified existing 6‐lane (no separate guideway)
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW
1) Express Bus/Express Lanes in median ‐ 2 lanes (Alt. 3) 2) Express Bus/Express Lanes in median ‐ 4 lanes (Alt. 5) 3) Light Rail/Dedicated Guideway in median (Alt. 7A) 4) Light Rail/Dedicated Guideway with frontage roads (Alt. 7C) 5) BRT/Dedicated Guideway in median (Alt. 8A) 6) BRT/Dedicated Guideway with frontage roads (Alt. 8C) 7) Light Rail/Dedicated Guideway/Express Lanes (Alt. 9) 8) BRT/Dedicated Guideway/Express Lanes (Alt. 10)
SLIDE 30
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 30 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 1) Express Bus/Express Lanes in median ‐ 2 lanes (Alternative 3)
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 2) Express Bus/Express Lanes in median ‐ 4 lanes (Alternative 5)
SLIDE 31
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 31 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 3) Light Rail/Dedicated Guideway in median (Alternative 7A)
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 4) Light Rail/Dedicated Guideway with frontage roads (Alternative 7C)
SLIDE 32
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 32 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 5) BRT/Dedicated Guideway in median (Alternative 8A)
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 6) BRT/Dedicated Guideway with frontage roads (Alternative 8C)
SLIDE 33
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 33 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 7) Light Rail/Dedicated Guideway/Express Lanes (Alternative 9)
www.Vision54‐56.com
At-Gr ade E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit in ROW 8) BRT/Dedicated Guideway/Express Lanes (Alternative 10)
SLIDE 34 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 34 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit
9) Express Bus/Express Lanes ‐ 2 lanes grade‐ separated (Alt. 4) 10) Express Bus/Express Lanes ‐ 4 lanes grade‐ separated (Alt. 6) 11) Light Rail on dedicated guideway ‐ elevated in the median (Alt. 7B) 12) Light Rail on dedicated guideway ‐ elevated
- utside the shoulder (Alt. 7D)
13) BRT on dedicated guideway ‐ grade separated in the median (Alt. 8B) 14) BRT on dedicated guideway ‐ grade separated
- utside the shoulder (Alt. 8D)
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit 9) Express Bus/Express Lanes 2 lanes grade‐separated (Alternative 4)
SLIDE 35
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 35 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit 10) Express Bus/Express Lanes 4 lanes grade‐separated (Alternative 6)
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit 11) Light Rail on Dedicated Guideway elevated in the median (Alternative 7B)
SLIDE 36
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 36 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit 12) Light Rail on Dedicated Guideway elevated outside the shoulder (Alternative 7D)
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit 13) BRT on Dedicated Guideway elevated in the median (Alternative 8B)
SLIDE 37
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 37 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Gr ade -Se par ate d E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit 14) BRT on Dedicated Guideway elevated outside the shoulder (Alternative 8D)
www.Vision54‐56.com
E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit Outside the ROW 15) Light Rail on Dedicated Guideway on New Alignment (Alt. 7E) 16) BRT on Dedicated Guideway on New Alignment (Alt. 8E)
SLIDE 38 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 38 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit Outside the ROW 15) Light Rail on Dedicated Guideway
(Alternative 7E)
www.Vision54‐56.com
E xpr e ss L ane s/ T r ansit Outside the ROW 16) BRT on Dedicated Guideway
(Alternative 8E)
SLIDE 39
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 39 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Modifie d E xisting 6-L ane / No Se par ate Guide way
17) BRT “Light” in existing lanes with queue jumps (Alt. 1) 18) Express Bus in existing lanes with queue jumps (Alt. 2)
www.Vision54‐56.com
Modifie d E xisting 6-L ane / No Se par ate Guide way
17) BRT “Light” in existing lanes with queue jumps (Alternative 1)
SLIDE 40 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 40 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Modifie d E xisting 6-L ane / No Se par ate Guide way
18) Express Bus in existing lanes with queue jumps (Alternative 2)
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 Pr
De ve lopme nt Study
12 alternatives eliminated
- All At‐Grade (8 alternatives – #1 through #8)
- Circuitous travel patterns
- Diminished level of service
- Elevated Light Rail (3 alternatives ‐ #11, #12, #15)
- Insufficient ridership (14,000 per day)
- BRT (1 alternative ‐ #16)
- Cross access is severely restricted – negative
impacts on businesses
- Insufficient ridership (1,190 to 4,000 per day)
SLIDE 41 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 41 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 Pr
De ve lopme nt Study
- 17: BRT “Light” in existing lanes ‐ queue jumps (Alt. 1)
- 18: Express Bus in existing lanes ‐ queue jumps (Alt. 2)
- 9: Express Bus/Express Lanes ‐ 2 lanes grade separated
(Alt. 4)
- 10: Express Bus/Express Lanes ‐ 4 lanes grade
separated (Alt. 6)
- 13: BRT on dedicated Guideway ‐ grade separated in
median (Alt. 8B)
- 14: BRT on dedicated Guideway ‐ grade separated
- utside the shoulder (Alt. 8D)
6 Alternatives Evaluated Further
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 Pr
De ve lopme nt Study
- 1. Potential business & residential impacts
- 2. Environmental effects
- 3. Right‐of‐way cost
- 4. Construction cost
Criteria for Evaluation of 6 Alternatives
SLIDE 42
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 42 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Study Re c omme ndation 10) Express Bus/Express Lanes 4 lanes grade separated (Alternative 6)
www.Vision54‐56.com
On-Ramp L e ngth Estimated On‐Ramp Length for 10) Express Bus/Express Lanes (Alternative 6)
1,000 feet
Source: Pasco County/FDOT, SR 54/56 Transit/Managed Lanes and Toll Feasibility Study
SLIDE 43
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 43 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Ove r passe s at Ke y Inte r se c tions Overpasses at Key Intersections (similar to approach on US 19 in Pinellas County)
www.Vision54‐56.com
Ove r passe s at Ke y Inte r se c tions
Collier Parkway US 301 Little Road Collier Parkway 16 to 18 potential Overpasses
SLIDE 44 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 44 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Ove r passe s at Ke y Inte r se c tions Length of typical overpass
1,785’ Northbound Exit 600’Clear Span 600’Clear Span 2,230’ Northbound Entry 2,225’ Southbound Entry 2,670’ Southbound Exit 1,170’ Concrete Buttress/Vertical Wall 1,270’ Concrete Buttress/Vertical Wall
4,895’+/-
980’ Concrete Buttress/Vertical Wall 1,055’ Concrete Buttress/Vertical Wall
Appr
e ngth Appr
e ngth
Plus restricted access between overpasses
www.Vision54‐56.com
Do Nothing Alte r native Do nothing/no‐build alternative Standard practice is to use a no‐build alternative to compare with various build alternatives
SLIDE 45
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 45 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Othe r Alte r native s
?
Othe r Pr e vious Study E ffor ts
SLIDE 46 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 46 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
F lor ida 54 E xpr e ss
December 2013
- Proposed a privately
- perated and
maintained elevated toll facility on SR 54/56
approved by FDOT
www.Vision54‐56.com
Ur ban L and Institute – Pasc o County
- October 6‐11, 2013
- Advisory Services Panel
- Advice on land use and real
estate
- What they do:
- Review materials
- Receive presentation and
tour
interviews
- Make recommendations
- Give presentation and
submit final report
SLIDE 47 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 47 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Ur ban L and Institute SR 54/ 56 Conte xt
- Proposed double decking
- f SR 54 compromises
placemaking at prime locations
regional issue
be looked at more seriously
the elevated alternative
www.Vision54‐56.com
Distr ibution of 2040 T r ave l Within the SR 54/ 56 Cor r idor
Road Segment
Percent of Trips
Pasco to Pasco Pasco to Outside County Outside County to Outside County
1 – W. of Bruce B. Downs 68% 32% 0% 2 – E. of Livingston Rd. 51% 44% 5% 3 – E. of Suncoast Pkwy. 65% 35% 0% 4 – W. of Gunn Hwy. 51% 47% 2% 5 – E. of Little Rd. 79% 21% 0%
Average 63% 36% 1%
SLIDE 48 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 48 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 T r ansit/ Manage d L ane s & T
e asibility Study
- Feasibility
- Cost
- Demand
- Revenue
- Assumes 5‐stage
implementation plan
US 19 to E. of Bruce B. Downs
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 T r ansit/ Manage d L ane s & T
e asibility Study
Stage 2 2025 ‐ 12 miles Suncoast to I‐75 Stage 3 2030 ‐ 19.6 miles Little Rd. to BBD Stage 4 2035 ‐ 28.4 miles US 19 to Meadow Pointe Blvd Stage 5 2040 ‐ 35 miles US 19 to US 301 Stage 1 2020 ‐ 1 mile SR 54/US 41
SLIDE 49 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 49 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
SR 54/ 56 T r ansit/ Manage d L ane s & T
e asibility Study
$0 $15 $30 $45 $60 $75
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065
Annual Net Revenue Projections from Tolls (in millions of 2014 dollars)
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5
Summar y
SLIDE 50 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 50 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
www.Vision54‐56.com
Summar y of Challe nge s
- Existing conditions worsening
- Significant growth approved
- Future congestion much worse
- Economic development vision for Gateway
Crossings
- Higher density
- More jobs
- Balancing access, mobility, economic
development, & quality of Life
- How to fund improvements to SR 54/56
www.mobility2040pasco.com
Que stions?
? ? ? ? ?
SLIDE 51 Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 51 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
Pr e liminar y T houghts on SR 54/ 56 Impr
native s Ne xt Me e tings
We st T ask F
c e : 12/ 1/ 2015 and 2/ 2/ 2016 E ast T ask F
c e : 12/ 3/ 2015 and 2/ 4/ 2016
SLIDE 52
Tindale Oliver September 24, 2015 52 Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56, Phase 1
Public Comme nts
