hastherighttoseekandtoenjoyinothercountriesasylumfrompersecu- stackedagainstthewallsofthehullofashipthatwasoriginallydesignedto UniversalDeclarationofHumanRights.InArticle14.1,itstates,“Everyone stateless.Theirnecessaryrelocationprecipitatedthecreationin1948ofthe ingtheatrocitiesofthiswarleftmillionsofdisplacedpeoplehomelessand gees(Malkki1995;Nyers2006;ZuckerandZucker1996).Eventssurround- nitionsconcerningrefu- ningmomentinthecreationofdefi hailedasadefi tionshavebecomeincreasinglycontentioussinceWorldWarII,whichis Forcenturiespeoplehavemigratedbyboat.Thelegalitiesofsuchmigra- callycarryingBalticrefugeesfromSwedenareonlyoneexample. specifi ofpeoplemadesimilarjourneysintheyearsfollowingWorldWarII.Those ney,andleftanindeliblemarkontheirmemoriesandidentity. 1 Thousands sleeponlyseventeencrewmembers.Itwasanemotionallytraumaticjour- as“cubbyholes:”aseriesofwoodenboxes,twofootbytwofootbysixfoot, in.Eachpassengersleptforthemonth-longjourneyinwhattheydescribed fuelfortheengine,andverylittlespaceforthepassengerstomovearound twotoiletfacilitiesfor347passengers,verylittlefoodandwater,alackof sickfortheentirejourneyandmanybecameseriouslyill.Therewereonly forcedtoleavetheirhomelands.CrossingtheAtlanticinthewintermonths similartomostmigrationsbyboatundertakenbyindividualswhohavebeen wellasphysically,emotionally,andpsychologicallydebilitating.Itwasvery landedinCanadaonDecember11.Theirvoyagewaslongandarduous,as Unionaspossible.TheyleftGöteborg,Sweden,illegallyonNovember16and safety,freedom,andrefugeinaplacethatwasasfarawayfromtheSoviet nd In1948,fouryearsaftertheendofWorldWarII,347Estonianwomen,men Introduction Lynda Mannik andchildrenboardedtheSS Walnut, aretiredBritishminesweeper,tofi wascoldandstormy.Manyofthe Walnut ’spassengerswereextremelysea-
oftenworkstosupportstateprotectionistpoliciesthatareinnatelydiscrimi- countedfor.Thisnationalismisaccompaniedbyanunspokenideologythat cial”reasonbehindthisdes- ignationisthattheirmovementsareuncontrolledandoftenuncontrollable andthattheirchoicetomigrateillegallyisacriminalactofsorts,whether ornottheyareinvolvedwithsmugglingrings.Althoughthesevoyagesare currentlydescribedas“illegal,”thepassengersontheseboatsstillfallunder UNdefi nitionsallottedtorefugees,andmostaregrantedrefugeestatusfol- lowingtheirarrivalattheirdestination.Modernnationalismisfoundedon ahomogeneoussystemwhereallglobalspaceismarked,named,andac- being“rooted”inaplacecreatesnecessarymoralityandbalance,andcon- Refugeesandotherswhomigratebyboathavesincebeenconsideredthe versely,thatbeing“uprooted”propelsindividualstobecomeamoraland, potentially,criminallyminded(Malkki1995).WithinthisWesternobsession withnationalorder,refugeesandasylumseekersareviewedasanundiffer- entiatedmass,anaberration.Theyareinbetweenhomelandandnation. Theydonotyetbelonganywhere(AllatsonandMcCormack2005).Arriving viathewrongchannelsoroutoftheboundsofstatecontrolcanhavedev- astatingeffects,evenforindividualswhofalllegallyunderUNdefi nitions. Travelingviawaterdisallowssympathyforthemigrants’plightandinfact mostthreateningwithinthisschema.The“offi discrimination. tion.”Thisiswhenrefugeelawbecamean“inseparablepartofthecodeof sualrepresentations,immigrationpolicies,andlawsshiftedtowardthe“myth HumanRights”(NobleasseeninMalkki1995:500).Duringthisperiod, portrayalsofrefugeesweremostoftenpositive.Therewasaconsistentsym- pathy for so-called displaced persons who were generally represented as hard-working,mostlywhite,anticommunistsinneedof,anddeservingof, protection,andwhohadthepotentialtobecomeexcellentandproductive citizenswiththecorrectideologicalandeconomicvalues.Representations paralleledlegalideasaboutrefugeesthatlasteduntiltheendoftheColdWar (roughlybetweenthelate1940stothelate1980s). Beginninginthemidtolate1980s,publicizedtextualrepresentations,vi- ofdifference,”ascoinedbyB.S.Chimni,aninternationallyrenownedlegal scholar.In1998heexplainedhowrefugeesfromtheglobalSouthcaptured theattentionofNorthernpolicymakersashavinganatureandcharacterthat wasfardifferentfromtherefugeeswhohadleftEuropeafterWorldWarII. According to Chimni, refugees and migrants from the South were repre- sentedinthegeopoliticsofknowledgeproductionsandlegalpolicy,interms ofoverwhelming(andpossiblyuncontrollable)massmovementsofpeople whowerelookingforeconomicopportunitiesonly,andthereforewhowere serious threats to national and economic security (Chimni 1998: 351). In mediareportsmetaphoricdescriptionsalignpeoplewhoareforcedtomi- 2 | Lynda Mannik gratewithtermssuchas tides, waves, and, fl oods, exemplifyingmainstream
Recommend
More recommend