SLIDE 1 Introduction
Lynda Mannik
In1948,fouryearsaftertheendofWorldWarII,347Estonianwomen,men andchildrenboardedtheSS Walnut,aretiredBritishminesweeper,tofi nd safety,freedom,andrefugeinaplacethatwasasfarawayfromtheSoviet Unionaspossible.TheyleftGöteborg,Sweden,illegallyonNovember16and landedinCanadaonDecember11.Theirvoyagewaslongandarduous,as wellasphysically,emotionally,andpsychologicallydebilitating.Itwasvery similartomostmigrationsbyboatundertakenbyindividualswhohavebeen forcedtoleavetheirhomelands.CrossingtheAtlanticinthewintermonths wascoldandstormy.ManyoftheWalnut’spassengerswereextremelysea- sickfortheentirejourneyandmanybecameseriouslyill.Therewereonly twotoiletfacilitiesfor347passengers,verylittlefoodandwater,alackof fuelfortheengine,andverylittlespaceforthepassengerstomovearound in.Eachpassengersleptforthemonth-longjourneyinwhattheydescribed as“cubbyholes:”aseriesofwoodenboxes,twofootbytwofootbysixfoot, stackedagainstthewallsofthehullofashipthatwasoriginallydesignedto sleeponlyseventeencrewmembers.Itwasanemotionallytraumaticjour- ney,andleftanindeliblemarkontheirmemoriesandidentity.1Thousands
- fpeoplemadesimilarjourneysintheyearsfollowingWorldWarII.Those
specifi callycarryingBalticrefugeesfromSwedenareonlyoneexample. Forcenturiespeoplehavemigratedbyboat.Thelegalitiesofsuchmigra- tionshavebecomeincreasinglycontentioussinceWorldWarII,whichis hailedasadefi ningmomentinthecreationofdefi nitionsconcerningrefu- gees(Malkki1995;Nyers2006;ZuckerandZucker1996).Eventssurround- ingtheatrocitiesofthiswarleftmillionsofdisplacedpeoplehomelessand stateless.Theirnecessaryrelocationprecipitatedthecreationin1948ofthe UniversalDeclarationofHumanRights.InArticle14.1,itstates,“Everyone hastherighttoseekandtoenjoyinothercountriesasylumfrompersecu-
SLIDE 2 2 | Lynda Mannik
tion.”Thisiswhenrefugeelawbecamean“inseparablepartofthecodeof HumanRights”(NobleasseeninMalkki1995:500).Duringthisperiod, portrayalsofrefugeesweremostoftenpositive.Therewasaconsistentsym- pathy for so-called displaced persons who were generally represented as hard-working,mostlywhite,anticommunistsinneedof,anddeservingof, protection,andwhohadthepotentialtobecomeexcellentandproductive citizenswiththecorrectideologicalandeconomicvalues.Representations paralleledlegalideasaboutrefugeesthatlasteduntiltheendoftheColdWar (roughlybetweenthelate1940stothelate1980s). Beginninginthemidtolate1980s,publicizedtextualrepresentations,vi- sualrepresentations,immigrationpolicies,andlawsshiftedtowardthe“myth
- fdifference,”ascoinedbyB.S.Chimni,aninternationallyrenownedlegal
scholar.In1998heexplainedhowrefugeesfromtheglobalSouthcaptured theattentionofNorthernpolicymakersashavinganatureandcharacterthat wasfardifferentfromtherefugeeswhohadleftEuropeafterWorldWarII. According to Chimni, refugees and migrants from the South were repre- sentedinthegeopoliticsofknowledgeproductionsandlegalpolicy,interms
- foverwhelming(andpossiblyuncontrollable)massmovementsofpeople
whowerelookingforeconomicopportunitiesonly,andthereforewhowere serious threats to national and economic security (Chimni 1998: 351). In mediareportsmetaphoricdescriptionsalignpeoplewhoareforcedtomi- gratewithtermssuchastides,waves,and, fl
- ods,exemplifyingmainstream
discrimination. Refugeesandotherswhomigratebyboathavesincebeenconsideredthe mostthreateningwithinthisschema.The“offi cial”reasonbehindthisdes- ignationisthattheirmovementsareuncontrolledandoftenuncontrollable andthattheirchoicetomigrateillegallyisacriminalactofsorts,whether
- rnottheyareinvolvedwithsmugglingrings.Althoughthesevoyagesare
currentlydescribedas“illegal,”thepassengersontheseboatsstillfallunder UNdefi nitionsallottedtorefugees,andmostaregrantedrefugeestatusfol- lowingtheirarrivalattheirdestination.Modernnationalismisfoundedon ahomogeneoussystemwhereallglobalspaceismarked,named,andac- countedfor.Thisnationalismisaccompaniedbyanunspokenideologythat being“rooted”inaplacecreatesnecessarymoralityandbalance,andcon- versely,thatbeing“uprooted”propelsindividualstobecomeamoraland, potentially,criminallyminded(Malkki1995).WithinthisWesternobsession withnationalorder,refugeesandasylumseekersareviewedasanundiffer- entiatedmass,anaberration.Theyareinbetweenhomelandandnation. Theydonotyetbelonganywhere(AllatsonandMcCormack2005).Arriving viathewrongchannelsoroutoftheboundsofstatecontrolcanhavedev- astatingeffects,evenforindividualswhofalllegallyunderUNdefi nitions. Travelingviawaterdisallowssympathyforthemigrants’plightandinfact
- ftenworkstosupportstateprotectionistpoliciesthatareinnatelydiscrimi-
SLIDE 3 Introduction | 3
natory.Metaphoricallyspeaking,travelviawaterisviewedassuchathreatto thesolidarityofnationalspacesthatithasthepowertowashawayhumani- tariansentiments.MichaelPugh(2004:55)remindsusthatasylumseekers whoarrivebyboatareoftenassociatedwithnaturaldisastersininternational mediadescriptionswheretermssuchasengulfed, swamped, fl
awayareusedtodescribetheeffecttheyhaveonthenationstheyarrivein. Ironically,allwhomigratebyboatincurfargreaterrisks,andtheirsurvival ratesareincreasinglyshrinking. Migrationbyboatisthemostdangerousformofmovementbetweenna- tionsforavarietyofreasons;thescaleofhumantragediesassociatedwith suchmigrationareoftenoverlookedorkepthiddenfromview.Asexplained above in the example of the Walnut’s voyage, most of the vessels are ill equippedforoceancrossingsorforthelargenumberofpassengerstheyare carrying.Passengersarecrammedintosmall,uncomfortablespaces,suchas dark,airlesshullsofdecrepitships,forlongperiods—weeksandevenmonths. Theboatsoftenhaveunreliableengines,andalackoffuelandappropriate navigationalequipment,orequipmentthatbreaksdownduringthevoyage. Basiclivingconditionsareminimalatbest.Runningoutoffoodandwateris common,andtherearefewifanysanitary(toilet)facilities.Therefore,evenif theyaresuccessfulinarrivingattheirintendeddestinations,whichmanyare not,mostpassengerssufferillnessandphysicaldebilitationonthevoyage, andallsufferpsychologicalandemotionaltraumatovaryingdegrees.As Pughexplains,“Securitizationoftheissueindestinationcountriesinvertsthe risks.Foritisactuallytheboatpeoplewhoareatthemercyoftides,waves, shipwrecksanddrowning”(Pugh2004:55).Therearealsocountlessstories
- frefugeeswhohavepaidexorbitantamountsforthesevoyages;iftheydo
arriveattheirdestination,theyareleftindirefi nancialstraits. Historicstatisticsconcerningthenumberofpeoplewhohavedrowned tryingtomigratebyboatarevagueatbest.Thisisduetotheclandestine natureofthesevoyages,thecomplexchannelsofmigration,andthevarying sizesandconditionsoftheboats.Foranexample,asÁlvareznotes(chapter 6),itisimpossibletotrackallthesmallduck-huntingboats(calledpateras)that crosstheStraitofGibraltar,northosewhohavelosttheirlivesattempting tocross,whichwasestimatedtobeinthethousandsbytheendofthetwen- tiethcentury.2Aswell,intheEuropeanUnion(EU),forexample,primary dataconcerningdrowningsiscollectedbyorganizationssuchastheUnited NationsHighCommissionerforRefugees(UNHCR)andUnitedAgainst Racism.Nation–stateshavenotcollectedcomprehensivedatauntilrecently (Robinsetal.2014).Anunoffi cialestimatepostedontheblogsite“Fortress Europe” states that approximately 14,309 people died trying to cross the MediterraneanSeabetween1990and2013(http://fortresseurope.blogspot .ca/2006/02/immigrants-dead-at-frontiers-of-europe_16.html).Otherapprox- imationsareashighas17,000forasimilarperiod(Horsti,chapter4).Itis
SLIDE 4 4 | Lynda Mannik
estimatedthatapproximatelytwothousandpeopledrownedoffthecoastsof Australiabetween2000and2013.Manyofthelargerboatsthatsankaredis- cussedinthisvolume,includingtheSIEVX(2001),whichwascarrying353 passengers(146children,142women,and65men,allIraqiorAfghan);they alldrowned(Hoffman,chapter11;BriskmanandDimasi,chapter13).The numbersofattempted,successful,andunsuccessfulmigrationsbyboathave increasedexponentiallyinthepastfewyears.Europeanstatisticsarethehigh- esttheyhaveeverbeen,withanestimated580,000peopleattemptingtocross theMediterraneanbetweenJanuaryandOctober2015.Forexample,inApril 2015,withinoneweek(April10–17),itwasestimatedthat13,500peopletried tocrosstheMediterraneanfromLibya,mostwereoriginallyfromSyria,Er- itrea,andSomalia.OnApril19anestimatedsevenhundredtoninehun- dredpeople(estimatedbecausetherewereonlytwenty-ninesurvivors)all crammedontooneboat,drownedinfreezingwatersonlyseventeenmiles fromtheLibyancoast.3TheInternationalOrganizationforMigration(IOM) andMissingMigrantsProject(www.missingmigrants.iom.int)estimatedthat
- verthreethousand,sevenhundredpeoplehavedrownedtryingtocross
theMediterraneanin2015.Increasednumbersandincreasingtragediesgar- neredconcernfromtheinternationalcommunity,butadequatemeasures focusedonorganizedrescuemissionsasopposedtobordercontroldidnot surface.Thelargerissuesconcerningthebusinessofinternationalhuman traffi ckingrings,andthereasonswhypeoplerisktheirlivestomigrateby boathaveyettobetackled. Overtheyearsseveralscholarshavediscussedthemyriadwaysimages andstereotypesaboutmigrationbyboatmarginalizesthepeopleinvolved. Theserepresentationscrossawideberthandcanhaveaprofoundinfl uence
- npolicymakingandpublicopinion,settingupaviciouscycleofdiscrim-
ination.Labelsarecrucialtotheattainmentofrightsandfuturecitizenship protections.Whenhumanidentitiesarenaturalizedthroughmetaphors,it becomeseasiertofurthersubjugateindividualslegally.Whatisleftoutof publicrepresentationsisthatasylumseekerswhomigratebyboatoftenhave nootherchoice,andthatthistypeofmigrationistheirlastchanceforsur- vival.Theauthorsinthiscollectionremindusofthepowerofstories,fi lms, performance,andarttoaddresstheseissuesincreativewaysforpubliccon- sumption,butthatalsoallowforshiftsandchangestopublicperspectives,to giveavoicetomarginalizedindividuals,andtochallengedehumanizingpol- icies.Eventhoughtheglobalrealitiesconcerningmigrationcurrentlyseem insurmountable,theneedforfairnesswithafocusonhumanitarianideals isequallyurgent.Thephysicalmovementofrefugeeandasylumseekers throughwaterturnsthemintoscapegoatsfortheimagineddilutionofstate power,wheninrealitytheseindividualsareoftenforciblymanaged,and sometimeskeptinmotionbystatepracticesthatareattemptingtoensurean
ow.
SLIDE 5 Introduction | 5
A Thematic Synopsis
Theessaysthathavebeencollectedforthisvolumeareallpublishedhere forthefi rsttime.Theyexplorevariouscontemporarycasestudies,artistic renditions,andliteraryinterpretationsofmigrationsbyboataseventswhere culturesintersectandidentitiesarereshaped,inbothpainfulandcreative ways.Eachchapterfeaturesaparticularkindofmarginalizationthatexagger- atesaspectsofbelonging,andthefl uidbordersthatdifferentiate“us”from “them.”Contributorsrepresentavarietyofscholarlydisciplinesandnational interests;althoughthebookiscenteredonrefugeeandmigrationstudiesit clearlycontributestodebatesinmediaandcommunicationstudies,cultural studies,anthropology,geography(inparticularborderstudies),andhistory. Sprinkledthroughoutareconversationsaboutpolicydirectivesandhistories, andallcontributorshopetheirworkwillhaveaneffectonfuturedecision- makingprocesses. Theambiguousnatureofmemories(bothsocialandindividual),media representations,andpopularcultureproductionsarehighlightedinorderto addressnegativestereotypesand,conversely,tohumanizetheindividuals involved.Tothisend,itisimportanttorefl ectonthenatureoftermsand labels.Authorsinthisvolumeusethetermsrefugee, asylum seeker, migrant, illegal migrant, and illegal immigrant,andeachauthorclarifi eshisorherindi- vidualchoices.Generallyspeaking,alllabelsortermsareproblematicbecause theysuggestanaturalizedcategoryandneveradequatelydistinguishspecifi c aspectsofidentitiesforsocialgroupssuchasnationality,politicalstatus,legal status,economicstatus,orintentions.Thetermboat peopleiscurrentlyperhaps themostderogatoryterm;itwascoinedinthe1970stoidentifythehundreds
- fthousandsofpeoplewhofl
edIndochina.Thewordillegalandtheoverall emphasison“illegality”isacentralproblembecauseitexemplifi esadisregard forinternationalhumanrightsinfavorofsecuritization.Inaresponsetothe allocationoflabels,KieranO’DohertyandAmandaLeCouteursuggestthe useofthetermunexpected arrivalsto“steerthefocusawayfromclaimsabout thelegalityofthemethodofarrival”(O’DohertyandLeCouteur2007:2). Tobegin,Iwouldliketohighlightfourthemesthatconnectallchaptersin thisvolume.Thesearedifferentfromthesectionbreakdownthatthisbook isorganizedaround,butarecriticaltounderstandingthepowerandrele- vanceofinterdisciplinarityinanalyzesofdominantdiscoursesthatcirculate in regards to nation–state policymaking, and public opinion. Vacillations betweenwell-understoodbinariessuchascitizen/stranger,land/water,and victim/threatcanbeeasilyusedtojustifyvacillationsinpolicyaccording tothecurrentpoliticalwillofthoseinpower.Simplyput,“Electedleaders andbureaucratsincreasinglyhaveturnedtosymbolicpolicyinstrumentsto createanappearanceofcontrol”(Masseyetal.1998:288;emphasisinthe
- riginal),yet,thoseleadersalsomanipulatethatappearance throughrhet-
SLIDE 6 6 | Lynda Mannik
- ricinthemedia.Increasingly,scholarsareattemptingtounderstandhow
“transnationalfl owsofpeople,mediaandcommodities”(Escobar2001)can beviewedoutsideofstandarddualistictermsandawayfromtheclear-cut juxtapositionsofcitizen/stranger,land/water,andvictim/threat.Alltheau- thorsinthisvolumefocusonalternativemodesofrepresentationtofacilitate humanitarianperspectivesthatareoftenleftoutofpolicydecisions,public conversations,andmediareports.
Water as Ambiguous Space
Theonlyspacesconsidered“free”withinthesystemofmodernnationsare thehighseas.4UlfHannerz(1997)attemptstopiecetogetherabriefhistory
- ftheoreticalideasassociatedwiththetermfl
- wsbyquotingavarietyof
scholarsthathaveusedwater-relatedtermsinreferencetoculture.Hesug- geststhatasystematicanalysisoftheuseofsuchtermsneedstotakeplace (Hannerz1997:4).HannerzbeginswithAlfredKroeber,whostatedthat civilizationsshouldbeviewedas“limitedprocessesoffl owsintime”(1952, asseeninHannerz1997:4).HequotesJohannesFabianandhisplayfulsug- gestionthatscholarshavebeen“liquidatingthecultureconcept”(1978,as seeninHannerz1997:5),andRolandBarthes,whoin1984suggestedthat culturalmovementcouldbeviewedas“animageryofstreamsandcurrents withinariver”thathasthepowerto“transportobjects”and“createwhirl- pools”(Hannerz1997:5).Overall,Hannerzsuggeststhatthefundamental importanceofcultural“fl ows”isintheirabilitytohavedirection,reorganize, andmovewithoutdestroyingtheirsource,andthatwordssuchascrisscross, multicentric,andcountercanactasappendagesforfurtheranalyzesthatat- testtonotionsoffreedomassociatedwithbodiesofwater.Heconcludesby statingthatasarootmetaphorforculture,myriadformsofwatersuchas “tinyrivulets,”“mightyrivers,”and“whirlpools”mayworkwellasprimary
- rganizingprinciples(Hannerz1997:6–7).Infact,thewordfl
- wsisused
frequentlyinmanyformsoftextualexpression,rangingfromacademicwrit- ingtomediareports,asaseeminglywell-understoodtermthatexemplifi es refugeemovementingeneral. Oceanicvoyageshavemetaphoricallyrepresentedliminalperiodswhere humanbeingsare“betwixtandbetween”(Turner1964)reallivesandiden- tities.Ithasbeenarguedthattheambiguousnatureofliminality,associated withtheseaandoceantravel,alsofacilitatesmanynegativeassociationsfor refugees.Asmentionedearlier,theseideasarefedbyWesternobsessions withbinarismsanda“categoricalorderofnation–states,”whererefugees cometorepresentanobjectifi ed,undifferentiatedmassthatisinbetween homelandandoutsideofothernations;inessence,theydonotbelongany- where(AllatsonandMcCormack2005:13–16).Onmanylevels,refugees signifyandhavecometorepresent“anemptiness,anincompletenessvis-
SLIDE 7 Introduction | 7
à-visthemeaningfulpositivepresencetopoliticalsubjectivitythatstateciti- zenshipprovides”(Nyers2006:16).5ThisisechoedinJenniferRutherford’s linkstoideasabout“holing”—“castingrefugeesoutintoastateofun-being”— tometaphoricallydescribetheextentofthemarginalityexperiencedbyasy- lumseekers(Rutherfordchapter5).SusanCoutinsaysthatduringtheactual movementofrefugees,whentheyareimaginedtobeareattheirmostliminal, theyareviewedasnon-human,whichoftenleadstoextremelydehumaniz- ingtreatment(Coutin2005:199).ElizabethColsonandThayerScudderlist negativeemotionalresponsesthatareadirectresultofrelocationincluding grief,depression,loss,andanxiety.Here,thestressincurredisviewedasa temporaryvacuum,whichcanbeextremelydiffi culttorecoverfrom(Colson andScudder1982:269–70).EmotionalvoidsexperiencedbytheTunisian familiesofindividualswhohavedisappearedwhilemigratingbyboatare broughtforwardinOliveri(chapter8)whereeventheirgriefisleftunrec-
- gnizedbystateauthorities.Therefore,anemphasisonliminalitycouldbe
consideredoneoftheprevailingproblemsforrefugeeidentitybecauseofits ambiguousimplications.Whilemetaphorically,themovementthatissug- gestedbythisconceptmayaidinunderstandingshiftingculturesandthe creationofnewidentities,theactualexperienceofphysicalmovementoften positionsrefugeesideologically,psychologically,legally,andphysicallyina voidwheremarginality,loss,andfearprevail. Conversely,waterpossessestheabilitytotraverseacrosslandinavari- etyofways;itsmovementshavealwaysbeenrelegatedtopowerfulideas aboutfreedomandborderlessness.Whenfl uidityisepitomizedinthisway, itwashesawayanyremainingtraceofgroundedexistenceandasEscobar remindsus,itisimaginedthat“transnationalfl ows”leadtodeterritorializa- tionandthat“fl uiditiesoftimeandspace”leadtotheerasureof“place”as somethingwecanrelyon(Escobar2001:146).However,oceansandseasare alsosocial(human)spacesbothintermsofsocialconstructionsandinterms
- f geographical borders. Moreover, real life experiences and connections
aremadewhilepeoplemovethroughit(Steinberg2013).AsVinhNguyen explains,waterandmassmigrationviawaterhavetheabilitytosolidifycol- lectiveidentity,tocreate“ties,attachments,andrelationsnotcircumscribed byterrestrialnationalism”(Nguyenchapter3).Thecomplexcirculationsof identitiesandrelationshipslinkedtooceantravelandthepositivedynamics
- fmovementthroughwaterarealsocentraltounderstandingtheambiguous
natureofmetaphorsandmigrants’experiences.Here,liminalexperiences canbeviewedinapositivewaybecausetheyallowforcreativityandthe production of new meanings. Chapter 12, “En Route to Hell: Dreams of AdventureandTraumaticExperiencesamongWestAfricanBoatPeopleto Europe”(Sow,Marmer,andScheffran),highlightsthefl uidandcreativecon- nectionsandhumanrelationshipsthatareforgedbecauseofthedesperate needtomigratebyboat.
SLIDE 8 8 | Lynda Mannik
Trauma vs. Agency
In1951adetaileddefi nitionpertainingspecifi callytorefugeestatuswascre- ated.Article1A(2)oftheUnitedNationsConventionandProtocolRelating totheStatusofRefugeesdeterminesthata“refugee”issomeone,who,“Ow- ingtoawell-foundedfearofbeingpersecutedforreasonofrace,religion, nationality,membershipofaparticularsocialgrouporpoliticalopinion,is
- utsidethecountryofhisnationalityandisunableor,owingtosuchfear,
isunwillingtoavailhimselfoftheprotectionofthatcountry;orwho,not havinganationalitybutbeingoutsideofthecountryofhisformerhabitual residenceasaresultofsuchevents,isunableor,owingtosuchfear,isun- willingtoreturntoit”(UNHCR2014).Thisdefi nitionisbasedontwocore indicators—fearandprotection—thatresonateinstereotypesappliedtoille- galmigrationwhereindividualsarepositionedasthreateningorvictimized. Ifindividualsdonotexpressa“well-founded”fearthatpropelstheminto homelessness and helplessness, they cannot expect to acquire protection. Thiswouldsuggestthatanyformofagencyontheirpartcouldbeviewed asdetrimentaltotheattainmentofrefugeestatus,andpossiblyputthemin thepositionofanunwantedintruder.However,inreality,fearandagency aremostoftenconjoinedintherefugeeexperience.AsMansouriandLeach state,individualswouldnotrisk“theirlivesin[an]unseaworthyboats[if] they[we]renotindanger”(MansouriandLeach2004:121).Fearalsobe- comesprioritizedwherethetermeconomic refugeeestablishesunsuitabilityand wherethedeclarationofideologicalfeariselevated,asinthecaseofEastern EuropeansandcommunismfollowingWorldWarII(Nyers2006:46).6On theotherhand,ifrefugeesareviewedastooproblematicortoothreatening, statecontrolisincreasedandmuch,ifnotall,humanitarianaidisrefused.In Australianmediaandpolicydiscussions,refugeesarrivingbyboatareoften describedas“queuejumpers,”(Gale2004:330),viewedasundeserving,and considered“illegalmigrants”(BriskmanandDimasichapter13).Forstate policymakers,fearandprotectionbecomekeytermsthataremanipulatedto exclude,tomanufacturecategoriesofdifference,andtostrengthensocial andpoliticalorder.Thefateofmigrantsofallsortsarecoloredbythisjuxta- position.Allindividualsorgroupswhomigrateinaso-called“illegal”way, byboat,areviewedasthemostthreateningtypesofmigrants,andtherefore ashavingthemostagency. Eventhoughmigrationbyboatisundertakenforavarietyofreasons,it isalwaysaclandestineexperience.Oftenfamily,neighbors,andfriendsare nottoldaboutplans,eithertoprotectthemorthoseleaving.“Pushfactors” asdiscussedbyMansouriandLeach(2004:15),arehistoricallylinkedwith politicalconfl ictsthatoriginateinternally,regionally,orinternationally,as wellaswithnaturaldisasters.Personalaccountsprovidegruesomedetailsof torture,imprisonment,deaththreats,andotherformsofpersecutionthatare
SLIDE 9
Introduction | 9
commontotheexperienceofforcedmigration.Lan,aVietnamesewoman inherforties,stated,“YouwanttoknowwhyweleftVietnam?Wesawno futureforthenextgeneration.…WelivedinahousewithDan’sparents,and westayedinthehouseandwaitedforthecommuniststocome.Wethought thatiftheydidnotkillus,theywouldputusinjail”(Gilad1990:35).And inIraqAishaclaimed,“Saddam’speopleusedtocomeandthreatenme,ask aboutmyhusbandandchildren.Iwasn’tstayinginthesameplace,Iwas alwaysmoving.Mydaughterwasfourteenandshecouldn’tgotoschoolbe- causewekeptmovinghouses.IkeptmovingbecauseSaddam’speopleused tothreatenmethatthey’llarrestmeandkillmydaughterifIdidn’ttellthem aboutmyhusbandandotherchildren”(MansouriandLeach2004:20).Im- plicatedinthesecommentsisadeepsenseoflossaccompaniedbybetrayal, pain,humiliation,andfear.Itisverydiffi culttoimaginethattherewouldbe anysortofdebateabout“well-foundedfears”inreferencetorefugeeaidfor theseindividuals.Itisevenmorediffi culttoimaginethat“pushfactors,”such asthosementionedabovearenotspecifi callyrefl ectedinUNdesignations. Asolidargumentcanbemadefortheincompetenceofcritiquesinthemedia and/orarenasofpolicymakingthatfailtoexplicitlyrefl ecttherealitiesthese voicesportray.Thisargument,alongwithpersonalexpressionsoftrauma,is clearlyarticulatedinchapters11,12,and13. PiotrSztompka(2000:457)says,“Traumaoccurswhenthereisabreak, displacement,ordisorganizationintheorderly,taken-for-granteduniverse,” andthatthetraumaofforcedmigration“touchesthecoreofcollectiveorder— thedomainofmainvalues,constituterules,[and]centralexpectations,”and thereforeisdeeplyfelt.Thedepthsofthisformoftraumaiswelldocumented byBriskmanandDimasiinrespecttosurvivorsofthesinkingoftheJanga in2010,whenmorethanfi ftypassengersdrowned(chapter13).Similarly, storiesaboutincidentsofhungerandveryuncomfortablelivingsituations accompaniedbytraumatic,near-deathexperiencesarenarratedbyNorres andMessarinpersonalinterviewswithSueHoffman(chapter11).Colson claimsthataperspectivethatfavorstheideathat“forcedmigrationreleases humanenergywhichcanleadtonewandbetterlivesforthoseuprooted”isa dangerousconclusionbecauseitdoesnottakeseriouslythetraumathatcon- tinuestoplaguerefugeesandthelivesoffuturegenerations(Colson2003: 15).Mostoftenrefugeesandillegalmigrantsarevictimsofhumanrights abuses,andnotofideologicalconcerns.Apoignanthistoricexampleisthe morethanonehundredthousandchildlabormigrants—manyorphanedin Britain—whoweresenttoCanadainthenineteenthandtwentiethcenturies (Rosemanchapter1). Refugeesandasylumseekersdonotconferfeelingsofempoweredupon leavingorwhileintransit.Theyareunderagreatdealofstressandphys- icalsuffering,andtheyareoftenpositionedaspawnsofcomplexpolitical and economic injustices, and of contradictions. Their decision to migrate
SLIDE 10 10 | Lynda Mannik
byboatisoftenspontaneous,orisalastresort.Formost,logicalthoughtsof politicalagency,orofhavinganyagencyduringthisperiodintheirlivesis notlikelybecausetheseareactsofdesperation.Commentrayaboutagency may be heard years later, once they have left detention centers or other placesoftransition,andareactuallyabletoworkandliveinaplacethey cancall“home.”Thistransitionusuallytakesaverylongtime.Thestudies presentedhereillustratethatthetraumasexperiencedduringfl ightremain
- neofthemostenduringaspectsofpersonalmemories.Oneexampleof
the long-term shift from an exclusive focus on trauma toward feelings of newnessandagencycanbefoundinTao’sdescriptionofGinaSinozich’s artworkthatTaosaysrepresentsa“compellingintersection”thatenablesa convergenceofmemory,history,anda“powerfulnewevocationofhome” (Taochapter2).Undertaking,enduring,andsurvivingthistypeofmigration isafeatofdeterminationandstrength.“Strengththroughadversity”wasone
- ftheprevailingthemeswithinacomplexwebofideasconcerningbeinga
refugeethatsurfacedinmyconversationswiththeWalnut’spassengersin 2006(Mannik2012).Thisisnotanuncommonthemeforthosewhohave experiencedforcedmigration(Holt1997:251).ManyoftheWalnut’spas- sengersexplainedtomeonseveraloccasions,therewasa“certaintypeof strength”gainedfromhavingbeenarefugeethatveryfewpeoplecanunder- standunlesstheyhaveexperienceditthemselves.Somefelttheywerebetter peopleforhavinggonethroughit.Afewmadethesamejoke:“Whatdoesn’t killyoumakesyoustronger.”Theseconversationstookplace60yearsafter theirtraumaticvoyage.Similarly,Nguyenemphasizesmigrationbyboatas apowerfulindicatorofcommunityandsolidarityforanowdiverseViet- namesediaspora(Nguyenchapter3).Overall,individualswhomigrateby boatincurfargreaterrisks,leaveinmore-desperatesituationsandgenerally arriveinamoredilapidatedcondition,yetarepubliclydiscriminatedagainst inamoredehumanizingmanner.Ittakesaverystrongindividualtosurvive allofthat. Originaltothisvolumeareexamplesofhumanagency,bothinhuman- itarianactsandinselfi shactsthatcanbeseenintheactionsandcomments
- fhostcommunities.KarinaHorstiexplainshowthefundsfortheconstruc-
tionofthePortad’Europa(GatewaytoEurope)memorialontheislandof LampedusaweredonatedbypeopleandorganizationsinItalywhowanted todrawattentiontothethousandsofdrowningsthathadoccurredinthe pasttwodecades(Horstichapter4).Mannikexplainshowtheresidentsof Charlesville,NovaScotia,welcomedthe174Sikhrefugeesthatarrivedun- announcedintheirtinyvillageinthemiddleofthenightwithwater,tea, andsandwiches,and,conversely,howmanycapitalizedonthiseventby promotingtourisminthearea(Mannikchapter9).BriskmanandDimasi explainhowmanyislandersrantoassistJanga’s passengerswhentheyheard screamsfromtheshorelineandhowtheirvalianteffortsdidnotcoincide
SLIDE 11 Introduction | 11
withastate-directedrescueplan(BriskmanandDimasichapter13).Allof thechaptersmentionedaboveprovideexamplesofhumanitarianactivities thatarehappeningoutsideof,andoftenincontrastto,politicaldiscourses andstate-fundedpractices.
Control and Protectionism
AsnotedbyPeterNyers,“Toinventthecitizenistoinventitsopposite,the refugee”(Nyers2006:9).Thisideaisdiscussedbyallauthorsinthisvolume eitherinovertorinindirectways.Oneoftheprimaryproblemsinherentin defi nitionsandrepresentationssurroundingrefugeesingeneralisthateven thoughUNdesignationsdictatethatcertainpeopleareentitledtorefugee status,therearenostateobligationsattachedtothesedesignations.Thissets upaparadoxwherebyinternationallawconfi rmsthatnationsareobligedto protectrefugees,butthattheirobligationsareonlyvoluntary.Consequently, stateleadershavetotalcontroloverthemanagementofrefugeerightsto asylumandtheirownresponsibilitiestowardaid(AdelmanasseeninAgar 1999:93–94).Coutinreferstothisasa“legallimbo”(Coutin2005:201).In reality,stateresponsibilityismostoftenpredicatedonatensionbetween immigrationpoliciesandasylumpolicies(MansouriandLeach2004:115), whichdolittletosupportthespecifi cneedsofrefugees.InCanada,foran example,refugeescanberejectediftheysufferfromhealthproblemsor cannotfi nanciallysupportthemselves(Gilad1990:126).7Historically,state- supportedracialprejudiceaffectstheoutcomeof“who”getsin.Legalreali- tiesplacerefugeesinan“ambiguous‘inter’zone,wherebytheyareparadoxi- callyincludedwithintherealmofhumanitybyvirtueoftheirexclusionfrom it”(Nyers2006:46).Thisexclusionislegallymalleableandisfashionedand refashionedinmyriadwaysatthestatelevel. Inparticular,politicalargumentsfavoringprotectionismandstate-centered securitization prevail when it comes to refugees who arrive by boat be- causewaterbordersareoftenmorediffi culttopoliceandsurvey.Aswell, mediarepresentationssensationalizethemasadirethreatorcrisistothese- curityofcitizensonavarietyoflevelsincludingeconomic,health,andbasic safetythatistranslatedindirectquotesfrompoliticiansTheframingoftheir identitiesinthemedia,oftensuggestingcriminality,hasanimpactonpublic
- pinionandgovernmentpoliciesconcerningimmigration,andviceversa.
Generallyspeaking,refugeesarepositionedasvoiceless,helplessvictims,
- r,conversely,“masses”or“waves”thatthreatentodestroyintacthomeland
security.Ashasbeenalreadystated,individualswhomigratebyboatare usuallyequatedwiththethreateningsideofthisdichotomy.TamaraVukov (2003)explainsthat“affectiveprocesses”thatfocusonillegalrefugeesasin- trudersandasathreattonationalsecuritycirculatethroughthemedia,other formsofpublicculture,andgovernmentlogic.Thereisa“governmentaliza-
SLIDE 12 12 | Lynda Mannik
tionofaffectitself,”wheremediaculturebecomes“akeysitethroughwhich theaffectivedimensionsofgovernmentpoliciesandpracticescanbetraced” (Vukov2003:339).Arrivalbyboathasaprofoundeffectprecipitatedby heightenedmediacoverage,whichfurthertranslatesintojustifi cationforpol- iciesthatattempttoshoreupnationalborders. Securitizationandimpromptucontrolsatthelevelofstatepolicyhave rootsinsensationalizedmediarepresentations,butthepowerofthemedia alsoliesininterpretationofthefacts.AsDanieleSalernoexplains(chapter7) medianarrativescanhidejustasmuchastheyseemtoreveal.HereSalerno isreferringtothelackofinclusionofthefactthatin1997theItaliangovern- mentchosenottorescuetheKaterIRades, andconsequentlyeighty-oneAl- banianrefugeesdrowned.Mannikprovidesanotherexamplethatexplains howmediarepresentationsinspirepublicopinionsthatarethenmanifested indiscriminatorypublicperformances.Sheexplainshowforweekslarge groupsprotestedthearrivalofthe174refugeeswithslanderousplacards, saying,“DeportANDProsecute”outsideadetentioncenterinHalifaxwhere theAmelie’spassengerswerebeingheldandinvestigated(Mannikchapter9). MannikthushighlightsAhmed’scommentsaboutthewayseventsthatare promotedinthemediaascrisesofsecurityinvitecitizenstopolicenational boundaries—tomonitorsuspiciousothers(Ahmed2004:76). Inthisvolume,Rutherford(chapter5),Hoffman(chapter11),andBrisk- man and Dimasi (chapter 13) provide detailed accounts of the history of policyformationintheAustraliancontextconcerningarrivalsbyboat.These authorsexplainhow,overtime,offshorecampsorholdingplaceshavebe- come increasingly decrepit and volatile situations—as Rutherford puts it, “grimrealities.”Theyexplainhowrefugees’rightsarestrippedfromthem forlongperiodsoftimewhiletheywaittobereleased.Inparticular,harsh andpunitivepoliciesareresponsibleforlockingupmorethanathousand childrenindefi nitelyinAustralian-runimmigrationdetentioncenters(Hoff- manchapter11),andthecallousgovernmentattitudetowardhumanitarian aidforshipsindistress.Allofthesemeasuresarejustifi edbyrhetoricthatlays claimtotheneedfortighterstatesecuritization.Álvarez(chapter6),Oliveri (chapter8),andSow,Marmer,andScheffran(chapter12)focusontherein- forcementofEurope’sexternalfrontiershistorically,andinparticularsince theearly1990s,ineffortstodetractso-calledillegalmigrantsfromarriving atvariouspointsbyboat.Arrivalsmostcommonlycomefromcountriesin NorthAfrica,providingtheperfectexampleofthecontemporary“waron refugees,”thetermcoinedbyHintjens(chapter10)thatsupports“themyth
- finvasion”(deHaas2008).Also,asSow,Marmer,andScheffran(chapter
12)explain,dominatediscoursesthatdefi nemigrationtoEuropebyboatas asecurityproblemworktoobscureunderlyingstructuresthatdemandcheap migrantlaborfromplaceslikeAfrica.
SLIDE 13 Introduction | 13
Memory: Personal and Public
Languageoftenfallsshortofenablingamemoryofatraumaticexperience duetosevereconfusionovertheactualeventsthatcannotbeunderstoodin alogicallyway;emotionstakeover.ErnestVanAlphen(1999:32)usesthe metaphorof“killingtheself”toemphasizethedynamicwaythattrauma cankillmemoryandmeaning.Nevertheless,itisonlythroughmemoryand rememberingthepastthattraumacanbeunderstoodandnegotiated;itis
- nlywhentraumaticexperiencesaregivenavoicethroughnarrativesthat
painfulmemoriesandlossescanbeintegratedintothepresent.Therela- tionbetweentraumaandmemoryiscomplex.Forexample,symptomsof posttraumaticstressdissipateovertime,yetacutememoriesandextreme emotionscanliedormantforalifetime.Ingeneral,wecomposememories andretellmemoriesthathelpusfeelateasewithourlives,ourpasts,and
- uridentities;memoriesaidinthecreationofappropriatecontemporary
meanings.However,traumaticexperiencesaresopowerfulandunusualthat meaningcannotalwaysbeallottedtothembecausethereisnoappropriate context.Theoristshavesuggestedthattraumacanbeexperiencedonlyina belatedform,“whenitreturnsintheformofdreamsorfl ashbacks”(Edkins 2003:40),forexample. Thedetailsofpersonalmemories,suchasthoseexpressedbyyoungSen- egalesemenindangerouscrossingsinsmalldinghies(Sow,Maramer,and Scheffran,chapter12),aptlyexpresstheimpacttraumacanhave.Similarly, forthoseleavingVietnambyboatinthelate1970sandearly1980s,the 1percentsurvivalratewasobviouslydeemedlessriskythanstaying.Gilad relatesthestoryofLyFang,whowastakenbybusinthemiddleofthenight toasmalltownandwhothenspentthirty-twohoursinacanoetogettothe sea.Onceonboardthecanoeheencounteredalitanyoflife-threatening experiences,includinghavingnofoodforfourdaysandbeingbeatenby pirates.Fangwasforcedtowatchtherapeofayounggirlandfi nallyfound refugeonanoldoilrigwith112otherpeoplefortwenty-sixdays.Fangde- scribeshisexperienceontheoilrig:“Itwasveryhot,notenoughwater.The Thaisdonottreatpeoplewellsothatyouwillnotwriterelativestocome andjoinyou.TheThaisalsoencouragethepiratestodiscouragepeople fromcoming.Weeventuallyranoutofwatereventhoughwehadrice.We woulddieifwecookedwithsaltwater.Itlooksridiculoustodieonanoil rig.Wewereveryhungry”(Gilad1990:64).Thesedetailedaccounts,al- thoughoftendiffi culttoread,givevoicetoactualexperienceandenlighten readerstotherealitiesofforcedmigration,whichinturn,hopefully,engen- dersempathy.Thesestoriesremindusthat“therearestorieslying‘behind’ thestoriesthataretold,andtheemotionstheyarousemayneverbefully known”(DonnanandSimpson2007:24).Itcouldalsobearguedthatmi-
SLIDE 14
14 | Lynda Mannik
grationstoriesprovidethefuelforfuturecreativeexpressionasexplained byNguyen(chapter3). Maurice Halbwachs was the fi rst theorist to analyze the importance of socialmemory.In1951hewroteThe Collective Memory,inwhichheinitiateda discussionconcerningthepubicandsharablenatureofmemoryasitdiffered fromdreams(Halbwachs[1951]1980:9–13).8Heismostwellcitedforhis commentariesontheimportanceofsocialframeworksasguidingfactorsin theproductionofindividualmemories,madeobviousinhisrenownedquote, “Thememoryofasocietyextendsasfarasthememoryofthegroupscompos- ingit”(Halbwachs[1951]1980:82).Roseman’schapteratteststotheimport- antsocialrolememoryactivismcanplayconcerningtraumaticmigrations thattookplaceaslongasacenturyago,theirrelationshiptonationalisms,and howindividuallyauthoredliterarygenres,suchaschildren’shistoricalfi ction, canperpetuatethesocialmemoryofmassmigrationsbyboat(chapter1). Thisrolealsoextendstothecreationofcounter-narrativesandtheabilityto initiatesocialandpoliticalagency(Bell2003;Confi no1997).FedericoOliveri discussesthepowerfulrolethoseoutsideofthenation,inthiscaseTunisian mothersandsisters,canplayindepoliticizingnationalmemoriesinItalywith theintentionofshiftingpublicopinionthroughprotest(chapter8). Theproductionsofsocialmemorythatoccurinmuseums,memorialsites, andinvariousformsofmediaareallclearexamplesofthemultipleways nationalismsareproduced.Oftentheseproductionsprovideanalternative voiceforpublicandpoliticaldebatessurroundingmigrationbyboat.Inthis volume,Mannikprovidesadetailedanalysisofwhatwasdescribedasamedia frenzythattookplacewhentheAmeliearrivedonCanadianshoresin1987, andhowitwasresponsibleformuchcontroversialpoliticaldebateaboutthe natureofCanadiannationalideologiesandinnatetensionsbetweenhatred, fear,andtolerance.ThiseventhashadalastingeffectonthewaystheCana- dianpublicviewsandreactstosubsequentarrivalsbyboat(chapter9).Tao explainshowtheAustralianNationalMaritimeMuseumconsistentlypro- videsanarenaforpublicdebatesandthememorializationofAustralia’slong andcontinuinghistoryofarrivalsofrefugeesandasylumseekersbyboat (chapter2).Horsticomparestwooutdoorpublicartinstallationstodemon- stratethepivotalroleartplaysincriticalquestionsabouthumanitarianism versusnationalsecurityforItalianseabordersandislandssuchasLampe- dusa.GreekartistCostasVarotsos’sworktitled,“L’approdo.Operaall’uma- nitàmigrante”[Thelanding.Artworkforthemigranthumanity]isbuilton thewreckageofashipcarryingeighty-oneAlbaniansthatneedlesslysankoff Italy’scoast(chapter4).Salernoexplainsthatthisartwork/memorialsiteen- genderedsomedebateaboutissuesrelatedtohumanitarianaidforrefugees migratingbyboat,butfailedtoaddressaprimaryissue—theall-too-common lackofgovernmentwilltofi nancerescuemissions—sotherefore,inessence, itcreatedanincorrectpublicmemory(chapter7).
SLIDE 15 Introduction | 15
Fictionandfi lmarealsovaluableoutletsforexploringthedepthsofre- membering.HelenHintjens(chapter10)comparesmediareportingandfi lm tolookatthewaysislandsnearEurope’sSouthernMediterraneanshoresare symbolicallydepictedasbothplacesofrefugeandplacesofhorror.Mediated imagescirculateandinfusepublicmemorieswithideasaboutislandsashet- erotopicplacesandislandersasconfl ictedanddivided.Booksandnovelsare alsoplaceswherethistypeofmigrationisimaginedandreimagined.Ashas beenmentioned,RosemanprovidesanoriginalexaminationofCanadian children’sliterature,asaneglectedmediumthataptlyinscribessharedsocial memoriesaboutmigrationbyboat(chapter1).DavidÁlvarezcomparesa Moroccannovel,Cannibales,withaperformancepiecebyanartistfromBel- giumtohighlightthesymbolicfunctionofsmallboatsthattravelfrequently acrosstheStraitofGibraltar(chapter6).Inchapter3,“Nước/Water:Oce- anicSpatialityandtheVietnameseDiaspora,”VinhNguyencomparestwo contemporaryshortstoriestoexplorehowliterarynarrativesrefl ecton,and regenerate,theparadoxicalrolethatideasaboutwaterhaveplayedinterms
- flossandbelonging.Whentheseexperiencesaregivenavoicethrough
narratives,itisoftenwiththeintentionofmakingsenseofpainfulmemories (chapter3).Overall,theauthorsinthisvolumedemonstratehowpainand traumacanbeintimatelylinkedtocreativityandagency.
Conclusions
Allofthechaptersinthiscollectionare original,andallexploreoceantravel undertakenbyrefugees,asylumseekers,labormigrants,andso-calledillegal migrantstoshowhowmigrationbyboatissymbolicallyalignedwithnotions
- fdeterritorializationthatoftensupportfearsofinvasion,yetinrealitythese
voyages represent the most physically and emotionally devastating form
- fforcedmigration.Thecontradictionsinrepresentationandlivedexperi-
encearebroughtforwardthroughstories,memorials,literature,media,and art.Contributionsareinterdisciplinary,andsometimesmultidisciplinaryin scope, to empathize the myriad ways migration by boat is imagined and reimagined,livedandexperienced,andhowtheindividualsinvolvedare representedinambiguousways,whichbothchallengeandreinforcecultural andlegalstructures.Itdrawsattentiontothefactthat,symbolically,boats andwaterareviewedasspacesandplaceswherehopesandfearsalongwith “poeticsandpoliticsaremobilized”(Perera2013:78). The“boat”asanob- ject,becomesavehicleforfi ndingrefuge,andanexperiencethatcanquickly turnintoanightmare,andsometimesendindeath.Bodiesofwater,theonly viablespacesbetweennations,becomebattlefi elds;placesthatprimarily fosterideasabouthumanagencyintermsofinvasion,andonlysometimes, fosterhumanitarianideals;placeswherenationalsecurityiscontestedand whereinnocentvictimsareoftenhiddenandforgotten.
SLIDE 16 16 | Lynda Mannik
Organization of Chapters
Thechapterswithineachofthefoursectionsarestructuredtoshowacom- parisonbetweentopicsandplaceswiththeintentionofmovingconversa- tionsaboutmigrationbyboatfromhistoriesandmemoriestoliteratureand mediarepresentations,fromartisticrenditionstopersonalaccounts,andfrom politicstopopularculture.Thereisanintentionalbalancebetweentheory andempiricalresearch.Everychapterisacasestudyofeithermigrationby boatovertimebetweencertaingeographicalareas,oracertainevent(s)within aspecifi ctimeperiodandsetoflocales.Allarebasedonchallengingste- reotypical representations of individuals who migrate by boat and some, particularlyinSectionIVtitled,“StoriesofSmuggling,Trauma,andRes- cue,”includequalitativeinterviews.Migrationroutesarevariedandcover theglobe:fromBritaintoCanada,TunisiatoItaly,IraqtoAustralia,and MoroccotoSpain.Inthiscontext,boatscarryingasylumseekers,refugees, andso-calledillegalmigrantsnotonlymovepeopleandculturalcapitalbe- tweenplaces,butalsofuelculturalfantasies,dreamsofadventureandhope, alongwithfearsofinvasionandterrorism. Section I, “Embedded Memories for Public Consumption,” consists of threechaptersthatfocusonhistoriesofmigrationbyboatrangingfromthe nineteenth to the twentieth century. Sharon Roseman analyzes Canadian children’sfi ctiontoexplorecontemporarymemoryactivismconcerningthe
- veronehundredthousandBritish“homechildren”whowereforcedtomi-
gratetoCanadabetweenthe1860sandthe1930s.Philanthropistsimagined atthetimethattheywereinvolvedinrescuingthesechildren,whereasCana- dianauthoritiesagreedtothismigrationprogramonlybecauseofadireneed forfarmlaborers.Thechildrenwereeitherorphansorhadparentswhowere unabletotakecareofthem.Theyoungestwereonlythreetofouryearsold andlaborcontractsoftenlasteduntiltheywereeighteenyearsold.Roseman highlightsthreeliterarymotifsthatinspirethiscategoryofhistoricalfi ction, toemphasizethepowerofchildren’sbookstoaffectsocialmemoryover time. In“RepresentingMigrationbyBoatattheAustralianNationalMaritime Museum,”KimTao(chapter2)exploresthecentralityofmigrationbyboatin Australia’shistoryandattheAustralianNationalMaritimeMuseum(ANMM). ThischapterexaminesthreedifferentANMMexhibitionstodemonstrate howarrivalsofrefugeesbyboatarerememberedintheAustraliancontext
- vertime.Variouscreativeinterpretativeprocessesarediscussedintermsof
meaningandpractice,allofthemaimedatdetailingthepainandtraumas
- fforcedmigrationanditscentralroleinAustralianhistory.Theindividu-
alizedcasestudiescoverarrivalsfromVietnaminthelate1970s,thebroad historyofarrivalsfromBritishconvicts,freesettlers,andIndochineseboat people,toseaborneasylumseekersfromIraqandAfghanistaninanexhibi-
SLIDE 17 Introduction | 17
tiontitled“WavesofMigration,”andfi nally,theindividualizedexperiences
- foneCroatianfamilyin1957.Collectively,thesecasestudiesareintended
tochallengemainstreamdiscoursesaboutidentitythatarelinkedtoforced migration. In“Nước/Water:OceanicSpatialityandtheVietnameseDiaspora,”Vinh Nguyenemphasizesthesymbolicassociationofwaterwithcommunityand belongingforhundredsofthousandsofVietnamesesurvivorswhofl edanew communistgovernmentinthelate1970s.“Thismassmigrationcapturedthe world’sattentionandgaverisetoanewculturallexicon:the‘boatpeople’” (chapter3).Afteryearsofrefl ection,memorieshavesurfacedinculturaland literaryrepresentations.Nguyenexaminestwoshortstoriesthatdescribethe uniqueexperiencesofthisgroupandhow,overtime,theculturalsignifi - canceofwaterasametaphorandasaparticularkindofspacehasbecome centraltotheconstructionofdiasporamemoriestoproduceacontemporary senseofcollectiveidentitythatwasforgedthroughlossandtrauma,yetthat emphasizesagency,connection,andmobility. SectionII,“TheArtistandtheIllegalMigrant,”examineslinksbetween variousformsofartisticproductionsthatexploremigrationbyboatinat- temptstoenlightenthepublicaboutthepoliticsandproblemsforrefugees whochosethistypeofmovement.Itlooksatmigrationbyboat,bothhis- toricallyandsymbolically,throughfi ctionandpublicvisualarts.Italsojux- taposesEuropeanandAustralianexperienceandperspective.Inchapter4, “ImaginingEurope’sBorders:CommemorativeArtonMigrantTragedies,” KarinaHorstidrawsontheoriesaboutbordersandthepracticeofborder- inginthecontextofsouthernEuropeanseabordersthroughacomparison
- ftwopublicartworks.Oneisaninstallationofdamagedmigrantboats
thatwerecollectedontheshoresofaGreekislandnamedChoisandthen displayedinBerlinin2009,attheBrandenburgGate.Thesecondisamon- umentthatwaserectedontheislandofLampedusaintheformofagate. Bothexemplifythegateasametaphorforborders,liminality,humanitari- anism,andstatesecuritization.Heranalysisiscriticaltounderstandinghow artworkscaneffectivelycommemoratethetraumaandsufferingassociated withmigrationbyboat,yetthatnevertheless,becomeineffectiveineliciting policyshiftsandempathyintermsofpublicopinion. Inchapter5,“WashedClean”:TheForgottenJourneysof“IrregularMar- itimeArrivals”inJ.M.Coetzee’s Estralia,”JenniferRutherfordexamines J. M. Coetzee’s novel, The Childhood of Jesus (2013). In this fi ctional work Coetzeecreatesashadow-landcalledNovilla,“acosmosofbeingin absentia” where“thereisaroombutnokey,aplacetosleepbutnoshelter,foodbutno fl avor,”aplacefi lledwithholes(chapter5).ShelinksCoetzee’scomplexuse
- fmetaphortotheexperiencesofirregularmaritimearrivalstoAustralian
shores.Accordingly,shedemonstrateshowholing(theactofpropellingan
- bjectintoahole)becomesonewaytothinkaboutstringentlegalpolicies
SLIDE 18 18 | Lynda Mannik
that have become more severe over time, policies that create disparaged subjectsandexpressthewilltohole.AlthoughThe Childhood of Jesusisneither justaboutrefugeepolicynoraboutAustralia,Coetzee’smythicalNovillais aplacewhereasylumseekersdwellinlimbo,“strippedofallbutthebarest necessitiesoflife”(Rutherford,chapter5thisvolume),andthereforeisa spacethatallowsustoimaginethelogicofinhumanepractices,ideologies, andpolicies. TheStraitofGibraltaristhenarrowestwaterwaybetweenEuropeand Africa.DavidÁlvarezlooksatmigrationbyboatthattakesplaceinthisstrait whereillegalmigrantscrosseitherinduck-huntingboatscalledpateras,orin variouskindsofinfl atablecraftscalledbytheirbrandname,Zodiac.These smallboatsfrequentlycapsizeandmanypeoplehavedrownedintheirat- temptstofi ndrefugeinEurope.Álvarezexplainsthehistoricsignifi cance
- ftheStraitofGibraltarasageopoliticalsitethatlinkstheglobalNorth
andSouththroughacomparisonofMahiBinebine’snovel,Cannibales,and aperformancepiecebyartistFrancisAlÿs,called“Don’tCrosstheBridge beforeYouGettotheRiver.”Afterprovidingahistoryofoneofthebusiest maritimechannelsintheworld,heexplainshowthesetwoworksfunction tocritiqueincreasinglystringentimmigrationpoliciesthatstripmigrantsof theirrightsandendangertheirlives.Álvarezalsobringstolightcounterdis- coursesaboutclandestinemigrationandtheimportantrolethatboats,as
- bjects,playinfragilecircumstancesandexperiences.
InsectionIII“Media,Politics,andRepresentation,”thereisshifttoward comparing art and performance with media representations. While mak- ingavarietyofconnectionsbetweenimaginedandrealevents,sectionIII providesavenuesforunderstatinghowpublicopinionisformedbymyriad mediarepresentationsandpopularculturevenues.Aswell,resistancetodis- criminatorystatepolicyisexploredalongsideexplicitracismandindigna- tiontowardrefugees.DanieleSalernobeginsthissectionbylookingatnews media,monuments,andartinstallationsthatrevolvearoundtheKater I Rades tragedywheneighty-onepeoplediedintheStraitofOtranto.Theseindivid- ualswereattemptingtoescapeacivilandeconomiccrisisintheirhomeland
- fAlbania.Themeaningsassociatedwiththiseventwere“shaped,readapted
andrewritteninordertomeettheshiftingnarrativesonwhichOtrantoand itscommunitybasetheircollectiveidentity”(Salerno,chapter7,thisvol- ume).EventhoughtheopeningofCostasVarotsos’swork,“L’approdo.Op- eraall’umanitàmigrante”[Thelanding.Artworkforthemigranthumanity], wasframedbynarrativesofhospitalityandhumanitarianism,interpretations inthemediasurroundingitfunctiontoerasethespecifi citiesoftheevent,in particularthefactthateighty-onepeoplediedbecauseoftheItaliangovern- ment’srefusaltorescuetheirsinkingvessel.InthiswaySalernoremindsus thatrepresentationalpracticesandmediareportscanoftenhidemore,orjust asmuch,astheyclaimtomemorialize.
SLIDE 19 Introduction | 19
Inchapter8,“‘WhereAreOurSons?’”: TunisianMothersandtheRe- politicizationofDeadlyMigrationacrosstheMediterraneanSea,”Federico OliverilooksatthesouthernEuropeanseaborderswhereitisestimated that13,000peoplehavelosttheirlivessince2000,althoughthepoliticalre- sponsibilityandwillforsearchingandmourningforthemisrarelyapparent. HefocusesonthecaseofmissingTunisianswholeftaftertheRevolutionof 2010andreconstructsproteststhattookplaceinavarietyofwaysovertime, fromtheperceptiveofthelostTunisians’mothersandsisters.Inthischapter Olivericombinestheanalysisofmultiplesources,includingpublicpetitions, newspapers,pressreleases,videos,andWebsitestodemonstratehowthese familymembersarerepoliticizingissuesofinjusticebasedonrace,class,and genderthroughdemandsofrespect,whicharegroundedinparentalfeelings
- floveandprotection.HearguesthateventhoughshiftsandchangestoEu-
ro-Mediterraneanimmigrationpolicieswillbeextremelydiffi culttoachieve, itwillbeimpossiblewithouttheactiveinvolvementofthemigrantsandtheir families. Someeventsseemtomonopolizetheinternational“mediascape”(Appa- durai1990)forperiodsoftime.Arrivalsofrefugeesbyboatareonesuch event.Often,forweeksfollowing,socialdramasarecreatedinrepresenta- tionsthatrelyonsystemsofsharedvaluesandmeanings,whicharepoliti- callychargedandhighlyemotional.In“MysteriousRefugees:SocialDrama Ensues”(chapter9,thisvolume),LyndaMannikadoptsVictorTurner’sthe-
- riesaboutsocialdramastoexplorehowmassmediaaffectsandaltersev-
eryday discourses, solidifi es public opinion about migration by boat, and inspirespublic,politicalperformances.In1987thearrivaloftheAmelie,a freightercarrying174refugees(mostlyyoung,Sikhmen)thatlandedina small,isolatedfi shingvillage(populationseventy-seven)ontheshoresof NovaScotia,createdamediafrenzy,andasubsequentsocialdrama.Within thefi rstweek,nationalCanadiannewspapersalonehadpublishedover150 articles.Thischapterexplainshowtheeventbroughttolighttensionsinna- tionalideologiesbetweenhospitalityandhumanitarianismthatsubsequently highlightedracismandpublicfearsconcerningthosewhoarriveillegallyin Canadabyboat.Italsohighlightsthefl uiditybetweenmediaandperforma- tivityindescriptionsofindividualandcollectiveresponses. HelenHintjensshiftsthisconversationspecifi callytoislandsandfocuses
- nunderstandinghowmediaandfi
lmworktorepresentislands,suchas LampedusaandLinosa(bothoffthecoastofItaly),ascontradictoryplacesof refugeandhorrorin“IslandsandImagesofFlightaroundEurope’sSouthern Rim:TroubleinHeterotopia”(chapter10).Severaltinyislandsonsouthern Mediterranean shores have become clearinghouses for the detainment of asylumseekers.Hintjensfocusesontheheterotopicnatureoftheseplaces thataresurroundedbywater,alongsidetheconfl ictingrelationshipsbetween tourists,islandinhabitants,andrefugees.Ingeneral,islandsareimaginedas
SLIDE 20 20 | Lynda Mannik
paradisesandsafehavens,placeswhereitbecomeseasiertoimagineutopian lives.Inrecentyears,hundredshavediedtryingtogettoLampedusaand Linosa,tryingtosurviveandtoescapepoliticaloppressionfromlocations suchasLibya,Syria,andTunisia.Subsequently,theseislandshavebecome placesofincreasedmilitarysecuritizationwhererefugeesareconfi ned,re- jected,andburied. Finally, the last section, “Stories of Smuggling, Trauma, and Rescue,” givesanintimateviewofthecomplexsetsofhumanrelationshipsthatare inculcated in traumatic experiences of people who are forced to migrate byboat.Thestoriesofsurvivors,smugglers,andmembersofhostnations aretoldinthehopesthatdiscriminatory,stereotypicalattitudeswillbeal- teredinfavorofbalancedandempatheticviewpoints.Inchapter11,“‘If WeDie,WeDieTogether’:RiskingDeathatSeainSearchofSafety,”Sue HoffmanfocusesontheAustraliancontextandrelationshipsbetweenso- calledpeople-smugglersandtheso-calledillegalmigrants,whoaretypically fromAfghanistan,SriLanka,Iran,andIraq.Throughpersonalinterviews shefocusesonthemesthatarecentraltotheexperienceofmigrationby boat,includingfear,insecurity,andrisk.Peoplesmugglersaremostoften depictedascallousopportunistsandtheirpassengersaremostoftenviewed asvictimswhoarepreyedupon.Realrelationships,however,arevaried;and sometimessmugglersconcernthemselveswiththesafetyoftheircustomers, particularlyiftheyareworkingwithcitizensfromtheirowncountry.Refu- gees’accountsdemonstratethatasmallnumberbelievethatthesmugglers theywereinvolvedwithdidhelpthemfi ndasafeplacetoliveanddidtreat themwithhumanity.Hoffmanremindsusofthedireneedforinternational aidandprotectionforrefugees,sothatultimatelytheydonothavetoresort totryingtofi ndsafetyinunsafeboats. MigrationfromWestAfricatoEuropehasescalatedinrecentyears.In chapter 12, “En Route to Hell: Dreams of Adventure and Traumatic Ex- periencesamongWestAfricanBoatPeopletoEurope,”PapaSow,Elena Marmer,andJürgenScheffranexploretheplightofyoungSenegalesemen whoundertakeclandestinejourneyswiththeaidofcomplexorganizations, includingtravelagents,shipcaptains,touts,andborom gaals.Afterproviding athoroughanalysisofsophisticatedandpriceypassportcontrols,theyana- lyzequalitativeinterviewstohighlighttheindividuatedcomplexitiesofrela- tionshipsthatareforgedthroughtheriskyexperienceofmigrationbyboat. Theyuncoversymbolicandemotionalelementsthatexplaintheassociated
- trauma. Dominatediscoursesthatpositionmigrantswhotravelbyboatasa
threataccompaniedbyrestrictiveimmigrationpoliciesfailtodetermenwho areinsearchofanincometosupportfamilieswhoarelivingindirepoverty duetotheincreasingdestructionofmarineecosystems.Dominatediscourses focusedonsecuritizationobscurethefactthatthesemigrationsarefuelledby
SLIDE 21 Introduction | 21
“thestructuraljobdemandforcheapmigrantlabourininformalsectorsin Europe”(chapter12). In 2010 the Janga crashed on the rocks at Christmas Island, killing fi fty people.Itisoneofmanysucheventslinkedtowhathasrecentlybeendescribed asaglobalcrisis.Inthefi nalchapter,chapter13“Re-livingJanga:Survivor Narratives,”LindaBriskmanandMichelleDimasinarratethiseventthrough survivors’storiesandthevoicesofthecitizensofChristmasIsland.Islanders talkedabouttheircourageouseffortstosavelivesandthetraumaofwitnessing. Survivorsrecalledthehorrorsofalmostdrowningatseawhilewatchingfriends andfamilymembersdie.Dimasiwasconductingresearchontheislandatthe timeofthecrashandtheconversationssheengagedincontrasteddramatically withsuccessivepoliticaldiscoursesthatpromotedincreasinglystringentde- terrenceandinterceptionpoliciesaslife-savingrequirements.Bothauthors arguethatthefailureoftheAustraliangovernmenttofocusonhumanse- curity,empathy,andcompassionwasafactorinthedeathsoftheJanga’s passengers,andthatlessonscanbelearnedaboutcompassionandhumanity fromthestoriesthatislandersandsurvivorstold.
Notes
1. IhavediscussedthisvoyageinmoredepthinPhotography, Memory and Refugee Identity: The Voyage of the Walnut, 1948 (Vancouver:UBCPress,2012). 2.L’Associationdesamisetdesfamiliesdesvictimsdel’immigrationclandestine (AFVIC)claimedthat3,286bodieswererecoveredfromtheStraitofGibraltar beachesfrom1997to2001. 3.Themassdrowningofhundredsononeboatmadeinternationalheadlinesand drewattentiontowhatwasdescribedasaninternationalcrisisinneedofUN intervention.ThetragedythatoccurredonApril19happenedwhenmostofthe passengerstriedtogettoonesideoftheshipinordertoberescuedbyamerchant ship.FormoredetailsBBC2015. 4.In1982theUNadoptedaninternationalagreementcalledtheLawoftheSea.It defi nesanationalboundaryoftwelvemilesfromanyshorelineasterritory,and twohundredmileswherestateauthorityhaspoweroverresources.Areasoutside thisrangeareconsideredhighseas,wherethereisnonationalownership.The highseasareconsideredmutuallyownedbyallpeoples.Havingsaidthat,even
- nthehighseaspiratesanddrugrunners(forexample)canbedetained.
5.Here,Nyers(2006:46)alsoremindsusthat,asaliminalcategory,refugees“un- hinge”humanitarianideasassociatedwithcitizenship. 6.BythisIamreferringtothemarkedhatredofcommunismfollowingWorldWar IIasdiscussedbyJacobson1998;Troper2000;Whitaker2014. 7. In response to Canada’s policy restrictions, Gilad quotes a Polish immigrant: “Now,Swedenisreallyhumanitarianbecauseittakesdeafpeopleandpeople withdiseases”(Gilad1990:129).