Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

intrabeam stripping loss estimate intrabeam stripping
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate for the ProjectX IC2 Linac for the ProjectX IC2 Linac J.-F. Ostiguy APC/Fermilab ostiguy@fnal.gov JFO - 20100430 Preliminaries Preliminaries V Lebedev suggested that


slide-1
SLIDE 1

JFO - 20100430

Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate Intrabeam Stripping Loss Estimate for the ProjectX IC2 Linac for the ProjectX IC2 Linac

J.-F. Ostiguy

APC/Fermilab

  • stiguy@fnal.gov
slide-2
SLIDE 2

JFO - 20100430

Preliminaries Preliminaries

  • V Lebedev suggested that intra-beam stripping might

account for the unexplained losses at SNS.

  • He performed an estimate for both SNS and PrX
  • His results suggest that we need to pay attention.
  • I wrote a simple program to produce an intrabeam

stripping estimate from TraceWin (can easily be adapted to TRACK).

  • Agreement with Valeri's estimates is very good.
  • We will request that an intrabeam stripping loss

estimate be integrated in TraceWin.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

JFO - 20100430

H- Stripping Cross -Section (V. Lebedev) H- Stripping Cross -Section (V. Lebedev)

Stripping cross-section is essentially constant in the range 2.0x10-4 < β < 3 x 10-3 Velocities are expected to be in that range for SNS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

JFO - 20100430

From Valeri Lebedev's Talk From Valeri Lebedev's Talk

Transverse and long rms beam sizes in the lab frame Transverse and long rms velocities normalized w/r c, in the lab frame. Fractional particle losses per unit of distance: Assumes: Gaussian distribution and σstripping = constant

¾stri

pp i ng

Stripping cross-section

slide-5
SLIDE 5

JFO - 20100430

How this calculation was performed How this calculation was performed

  • IC2 CW lattice (2.5 MeV – 3 GeV) : as of Apr 17
  • Estimate requires only knowledge of 2nd order moments &

synchronous energy

  • Tracking done using TraceWin/Partran

(200k particles with SC – not necessary … just experimenting with Partran)

  • We could/should also be able to use the TraceWin envelope
  • calculation. This was not done because TraceWin does not

currently provide all the necessary moments (Twiss functions) in a convenient form (this will be fixed).

  • Wrote a short program (python) which uses a partran *.out file

(similar to TRACK beam.out) as input.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

JFO - 20100430

PrX- Relative Velocities in the Beam Frame PrX- Relative Velocities in the Beam Frame

slide-7
SLIDE 7

JFO - 20100430

PrX- Beam Sizes In the Laboratory Frame PrX- Beam Sizes In the Laboratory Frame

slide-8
SLIDE 8

JFO - 20100430

PrX - Fractional Particle Loss Along the Linac PrX - Fractional Particle Loss Along the Linac

slide-9
SLIDE 9

JFO - 20100430

PrX - Power Loss/unit length Along the Linac PrX - Power Loss/unit length Along the Linac

slide-10
SLIDE 10

JFO - 20100430

Comparison with Lebedev's Results Comparison with Lebedev's Results

Local loss rate

slide-11
SLIDE 11

JFO - 20100430

Conclusions Conclusions

  • Assuming the IBS model is adequate, the predicted

power loss caused by H- stripping due is marginally manageable in the current lattice.

  • Further studies and experimental results from SNS will

be helpful to gain more confidence about the validity of the model.

  • We need to explore loss reduction by a factor
  • f 2x – 3x.
  • Reducing focusing may be difficult without changing

distance between elements due to constraints on phase advances … etc.