Intertemporal and Inter-Industry Effects of Population Ageing: A General Equilibrium Assessment for Canada
Nabil Annabi, Maxime Fougère and Simon Harvey
November, 2008 Policy Research Directorate, Labour Market Research and Forecasting
Intertemporal and Inter-Industry Effects of Population Ageing: A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Intertemporal and Inter-Industry Effects of Population Ageing: A General Equilibrium Assessment for Canada Nabil Annabi, Maxime Fougre and Simon Harvey November, 2008 Policy Research Directorate, Labour Market Research and Forecasting The
November, 2008 Policy Research Directorate, Labour Market Research and Forecasting
2
2
3
Note: OADR = Population aged 65+ relative to the working-age population
4
4
5
6
7
8
CES : constant elasticity of substitution L : low elasticity of substitution M : medium elasticity of substitution H : high elasticity of substitution B,C,D: qualification levels in the NOC matrix Production Value Added Intermediate Consumption
Cobb-Douglas
Prod.14 …
CES
Capital Labour
Cobb-Douglas CES-L
… … … … … … Type 3
CES-M
B C D B C D B D C
CES-H CES-H CES-H
…
9
10
Labour Capital Primary 3.3 34.4 34.4 65.3
20.8 32.0 53.2 46.6 Construction 14.8 66.8 77.3 22.6
2.2 24.4 65.0 34.8 Communication 1.8 42.5 48.6 51.2 Wholesaling & ret. 9.2 59.0 74.0 25.9 Fin., ins., & RS serv. 10.8 55.7 29.6 70.1
4.8 75.7 70.2 29.6
3.2 77.4 70.2 29.6
11.0 69.4 85.6 14.4 Education 3.4 63.4 84.1 15.9 Health 6.6 64.8 70.3 29.6
1.5 16.5 75.0 24.9 Other serv. 6.7 73.4 79.4 20.6 Share in sectoral GDP at factor cost
Share of sectoral GDP at factor cost Share of sectoral GDP at factor cost in gross output Source: Input-Output tables, Statistics Canada
11 Source: Labour force survey, Statistics Canada
12
Source: Labour force survey, Statistics Canada
13
Source: Annabi, Harvey and Lan (2007), HRSDC.
14
Source: Survey of Household Spending, Statistics Canada
15 Source: Census 2001, Statistics Canada
16
17
18
19
Simulation results.
20
Simulation results.
21
Simulation results.
22
Simulation results.
Note: The exogenous labour productivity growth is set equal to the 1996-2006 historical average of 1.9% per year.
23
24
Simulation results.
25
Simulation results.
26
Simulation results.
Note: Data sorted by increasing change in production.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Production (detrended) Labour demand Capital demand (detrended)
27
28
Simulation results.
Management & skill level A Skill level B
29
Simulation results.
Skill level D Skill level C
30
Simulation results.
Management
17
Bus., fin. & adm.
A 1.7
16 B 3.0
16 C 4.2
15
A 1.7
13 B 3.7
12
Health occupations
A 0.2
12 B 1.2
15 C 1.8
14
A 2.6
13 B 2.8
16
Art, culture, rec. & sports
A 2.9
16 B 6.0
10
Skill level Base run unemployment rate (2006) Unemployment rate (% change from 2006) Wage rate
31
Simulation results.
Sales and services
B 3.6
12 C 5.5
11 D 6.3
9
Trades, tra.& equip.oper.
B 5.2
10 C 5.5
10 D 9.9
7
B 5.8
15 C 5.8
13 D 22.0
6
Processing, man. and ut.
B 3.0
11 C 7.5
8 D 11.1
7
Skill level Base run unemployment rate (2006) Unemployment rate (% change from 2006) Wage rate
32
33
– The unemployment rate decreases by 2.7 percentage points in the long run, leading to an increased pressure on wages (+12% on average). – In the long run, GDP and GDP per capital growth rates would fall by nearly 1.5 and 1 percentage point, respectively.
– Production would expand more in sectors with lower labour share in value-added (GDP at factor cost) Primary Industries, and Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. – Demand effect would mitigate some of the long-run negative effects on labour- intensive service industries Health, Accomodation and Leisure, Other services and Transport and Storage industries.
34
– Wage pressures in Management occupations, Business, Finance and administration, health, social science, and education as well as in Occupations in Primary industries would be well above average. – Wage pressures in Processing, Manufacturing, Sales and Trades could be below average.
35
15 1 1 , 1 , 1 15 15 , 1
t t
g t g t g g g t g g g TC Rbeq g
θ θ θ
− − + − + − ≠ = =
1, 1 , , , , , , , ,
k g t g t t t g t w w t t gj t t g t g t g t c t g t g t
+ + −
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
qual sup gj t itype iprof iqual t itype iprof iqual t itype iprof iqual gj gj itype iprof iqual gj t itype iprof iqual
36
Calibration data.