Interstate Steering Committee Update December 5, 2018 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interstate steering committee update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interstate Steering Committee Update December 5, 2018 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interstate Steering Committee Update December 5, 2018 2 Interstate Update Interstate Steering Committee Background Purpose Workgroup Current Conditions Pavement Bridges 2019 Interstate TYP Interstate Rides


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Interstate Steering Committee Update

December 5, 2018

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Interstate Update

  • Interstate Steering Committee Background
  • Purpose
  • Workgroup
  • Current Conditions
  • Pavement
  • Bridges
  • 2019 Interstate TYP
  • Interstate Rides & Presentations
  • Priorities, Challenges, Best Practices

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interstate Steering Committee

Interstate Steering Committee (ISC)

  • DE’s, ADE’s, BOPD, BOMO, Planning
  • Evaluate the Interstate System as a single asset,

not 11 separate Districts

  • Monthly Pre-PMC meetings
  • Quarterly ISC meetings to review Interstates

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pennsylvania Interstate System

  • 21 interstates = 2,740 segment miles.
  • 2,201 PennDOT bridges.
  • Our interstate makes up 6% of the total state owned

miles, and holds 24% of the traffic volumes.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lehigh Valley Interstate Data

  • Lehigh Valley’s total segment miles is 63 miles.

– Making up 2% of the entire interstates segment miles.

  • Lehigh Valley consists of 60 bridges.

– Making up 3% of the entire interstates bridges.

  • The average combined age of Lehigh Valley’s interstates

highway is 34 years old.

  • The average combined age of Lehigh Valley’s interstates

bridges is 31 years old.

  • The oldest underlying sections of roadway reside on I-78 in

Lehigh County, District 5. About 13.5 miles, of both east and west bound lanes, of I-78 was built in 1958.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Statewide 2017 IRI Pavement Condition

7

Excellent, 1 3 7 3 Good, 8 1 4 Fair, 4 2 7 Poor, 1 0 2

I RI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lehigh Valley Interstates-2017 IRI Pavement Conditions

8

Excellent, 8 Good, 1 7 Fair, 2 6 Poor, 1 3

I RI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Statewide 2017 OPI Pavement Condition

9

Excellent, 6 0 4 Good, 1 6 3 0 Fair, 3 5 6 Poor, 3 5

OPI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lehigh Valley Interstate–2017 OPI Pavement Conditions

10

Excellent, 9 Good, 3 4 Fair, 1 3 Poor, 4

OPI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Statewide Miles Constructed/ Reconstructed

11

1 5 3 0 3 9 3 1 3 3 4 2 4 6 5 7 9 2 5 3 7 3

1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 9 4 0 1 9 5 0 1 9 6 0 1 9 7 0 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Statewide 2017 Bridge Condition Ratings

12

1 5 5 6 5 6 5 8 0 Good (NBI 6 or greater) Fair ( NBI 5 ) Poor (NBI 4 or lower (SD))

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Lehigh Valley Interstates-2017 Bridge Condition Ratings

5 5 5 Good (NBI 6 or greater) Fair (NBI 5)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Statewide 2017 Poor Bridge Deck Area

14

2 9 ,4 0 7 ,1 5 2 1 ,5 5 3 ,8 4 0 Deck Area Poor Deck Area

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Statewide Bridges Constructed/ Reconstructed

15

2 8 2 9 7 1 1 1 3 3 3 7 1 6 9 9 3 1 2 4 5 8

2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 9 2 0 1 9 4 0 1 9 5 0 1 9 6 0 1 9 7 0 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Maximum AADT and Freight by Corridor

16

5 6 ,3 5 6 2 1 4 ,5 8 1 9 5 ,1 2 6 9 8 ,0 7 2 6 8 ,9 8 2 1 0 1 ,2 8 0 1 1 9 ,1 9 2 4 9 ,7 1 3 9 ,7 6 3 4 8 ,3 6 8 1 9 8 ,7 3 8 3 9 ,7 4 5 2 6 ,1 3 6 4 6 ,8 7 5 6 9 ,5 5 6 6 1 ,2 2 5 9 6 ,8 7 5 3 0 ,0 9 2 1 4 9 ,9 4 4 4 4 ,6 5 2 1 4 8 ,5 6 9 1 3 ,4 9 3 1 0 ,3 1 2 2 2 ,1 8 1 1 3 ,5 9 8 1 5 ,8 4 6 2 3 ,9 7 5 1 2 ,7 6 0 1 0 ,7 8 7 2 ,1 2 1 1 0 ,8 5 5 1 3 ,8 0 0 6 ,7 5 7 4 ,4 4 4 7 ,7 6 3 4 ,8 6 4 9 ,1 7 7 8 ,3 5 1 9 ,1 8 0 1 2 ,1 4 3 3 ,7 9 2 1 0 ,4 6 7 VEHICLE COUNT CORRIDOR

Max AADT Max ADTT

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pennsylvania’s Interstate System

17

“Pennsylvania’s Interstate Highway System is a mature system and, as such, is posing an increasingly severe financial burden on the Commonwealth.”

  • March 1982
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Asset Management – Funding Needs

  • Based on Interstate Cycle Needs, $1.1 Billion per

year is required to maintain Interstate mainline and ramps.

  • The calculations do not include capacity

expansion needs or Year of Expenditure (YOE).

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Interstate Update

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Interstate Update

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Interstate Update

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Interstate Update

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Interstate Update

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Interstate Update

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Interstate Update

Statewide Concerns

  • Some Interstates have $0 on 12 Yr TYP
  • SD bridges unfunded
  • Critical Preservation is not funded
  • Preservation is not lasting as long
  • Reconstruction is what’s needed
  • Capacity/ Freight issues unfunded
  • Rest Areas

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • $13.8 Billion of Priority Projects (286 Projects)

– $7.3 Billion Programmed (98 Projects) – $6.5 Billion Unfunded (188 Projects)

  • 2019 IM TYP Financial Guidance $5.5 Billion

(approximately $458 Million per year)

  • The priority needs list address most of the needs but

not all, especially the extensive capacity needs

  • Lehigh Valley - $259 Million of Priority Projects (7

Projects)

– $7.9 Million Programmed (1 Project) – $251 Million Unfunded (6 projects)

26

Interstate Priority Needs (12 Years)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Interstate Priority Needs By Interstate Corridor

27

$764M $151M $636M $1,269M $2,670M $2,043M $1,277M $699M $79M $380M $2,376M $156M $28M $119M $894M $209M $46M $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0

70 76 78 79 80 81 83 84 86 90 95 99 176 180 279 283 376 380 476 579 676

Estimates in Billions Interstate

Hwy Preservation Hwy Rehab Hwy Reconstruction Bridge Preservation Bridge Rehab Bridge Recon/Replace Safety Need Capacity Operational Other

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs By Interstate Corridor

28

Hwy Preservation, $27M Hwy Rehab, $15M

Hwy Reconstruction, $210M

Bridge Preservation, $5M Bridge Recon/Replace, $3M

Total Costs, $259M

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 78

Estimates in Millions

Interstate Hwy Preservation Hwy Rehab Hwy Reconstruction Bridge Preservation Bridge Rehab Bridge Recon/Replace Safety Need Capacity Operational Other

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Interstate Priority Needs By Project Type

29

Hwy Preservation 15% Hwy Rehab 4% Hwy Reconstruction 50% Bridge Preservation 1% Bridge Rehab 1% Bridge Recon/Replace 12% Safety Need 3% Capacity 10% Operational 2% Other 2%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs By Project Type

30

Hwy Preservation 10% Hwy Rehab 6% Hwy Reconstruction 81% Bridge Preservation 2% Bridge Recon/Replace 1%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Corridor

$387M $151M $330M $68M $1,159M $685M $1,245M $396M $232M $2,376M $12M $243M $6M $377M $306M $1,201M $1,511M $1,358M $32M $303M $79M $148M $156M $16M $119M $652M $203M $46M $0 $1 $1 $2 $2 $3 $3

70 76 78 79 80 81 83 84 86 90 95 99 176 180 279 283 376 380 476 579 676 Billions Cost of Project Programmed Cost of Unfunded Projects

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Corridor

32 $8M $251M

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300

78

Millions

Cost of Project Programmed Cost of Unfunded Projects

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Project Type

33

$243M $24M $4,048M $64M $51M $1,056M $92M $1,235M $222M $253M $1,876M $519M $2,838M $72M $133M $603M $360M $90M $17M $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000

Millions

Programmed Unfunded

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Project Type

34

$8M

$20M $15M $210M $5M $3M

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 Hwy Preservation Hwy Rehab Hwy Reconstruction Bridge Preservation Bridge Recon/Replace Millions

Programmed Unfunded

slide-35
SLIDE 35

ISC Next Steps

  • Review Interstate needs

– Priorities – Policies – Funding options – Develop Best Practices

  • Review and Prioritize Interstate Preservation projects for

SPIKE Funding

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Questions

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

PennDOT by the Numbers

37

Melissa Batula. P.E. Highway Delivery Division Chief PA Department of Transportation Bureau of Project Delivery mbatula@pa.gov