Interstate 64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interstate 64 high rise bridge corridor study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interstate 64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agenda Item 8 Interstate 64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study Environmental Assessment Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Study Update November 20, 2014 Scott Smizik Environmental Division Agenda Item 8 Study Area 2 The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Interstate 64/High Rise Bridge Corridor Study Environmental Assessment Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Study Update

November 20, 2014 Scott Smizik Environmental Division

Agenda Item 8

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Study Area

2

The study area is a buffer around the road corridor that includes all natural and physical resources that must be analyzed in the NEPA document. It does not imply right-of-way take or construction impact. Agenda Item 8

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PURPOSE AND NEED

3

To improve capacity, congestion, lane continuity, and intermodal connections must be addressed

3

Improve Capacity Enhance Corridor Safety Improve Emergency Evacuation Address High Rise Bridge Improvements

To enhance corridor safety, roadway design and congestion must be addressed. To improve emergency evacuation, capacity, lane continuity, and roadway design must be addressed To address High Rise Bridge improvements, capacity and design deficiencies must be addressed. Agenda Item 8

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Existing Conditions

4

Agenda Item 8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Projected 2040 Traffic Conditions

5

Agenda Item 8

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Alternatives Retained: No-Build

6

Agenda Item 8

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Alternatives Retained: Eight Lane Build Alternative

7

2 lanes + 2 lanes in each direction

Agenda Item 8

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Alternatives Retained: Eight Lane Build Alternative

8

Agenda Item 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Alternatives Retained: Eight Lane Managed Build Alternative

9

  • No specific operational scenarios identified at this

stage

  • To establish a sample range of travel demand

conditions, the study considers:

  • High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV Lanes)
  • High Occupancy Toll (HOT Lanes)
  • All tolled
  • HOV and All Tolled fit within the footprint of the Eight

Lane Build Alternative

  • If a specific tolling scenario is identified, additional

environmental analysis may be required

Agenda Item 8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Alternatives Retained: Eight Lane Managed Build Alternative

10

Agenda Item 8

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Retained Alternatives

11

Agenda Item 8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Retained Alternatives

12

Agenda Item 8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Retained Alternatives

13

Agenda Item 8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Retained Alternatives

14

Agenda Item 8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Alternatives Retained: Bridge Options

15

Agenda Item 8

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Planning Level Cost Estimates

16

Bridge Costs (millions) Alternative 95-foot Bridge 135-foot Bridge Eight Lane Build Alternative $405 $635 Eight Lane Build – Managed Alternative $425 $670 Total Construction Cost (billions) Alternative 95-foot Bridge 135-foot Bridge Eight Lane Build Alternative $1.86 $2.22 Eight Lane Build – Managed Alternative $1.92 $2.30

Notes: 1) Planning Level Cost Estimates in 2013 dollars 2) Increased cost for managed lanes associated with additional pavement necessary to provide four-foot divider between managed lanes in each direction

Agenda Item 8

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What We Have Heard from the Public

17

  • Concern over construction time/cost
  • Anticipation of property impacts
  • Desire for sound walls
  • Concern over tolls
  • Support

Agenda Item 8

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Next Steps

18

1. Conclude public review 2. Review public input 3. Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing 4. Commonwealth Transportation Board Decision

The EA, associated technical documents, and public hearing materials are available

  • n the study web site: www.64highrise.org.

Agenda Item 8

slide-19
SLIDE 19

QUESTIONS?

19

Agenda Item 8