Internet Governance is political! Questions and Forums Questions: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

internet governance is political questions and forums
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Internet Governance is political! Questions and Forums Questions: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Internet Governance is political! Questions and Forums Questions: Who is governing, who is governed, who owns the property and who pays the rent? [Follow the money] What are the economic implications of the human rights agenda? Who


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Internet Governance is political!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Questions:

Who is governing, who is governed, who owns the property and who pays the rent? [Follow the money]

What are the economic implications of the human rights agenda?

Who is attending the party? Short list of Forum:

International law [UN-GA, UN-HRC, WIPO and ITU]

Plurilateral and bilateral treaties [TPP, RCEP, FTAs etc]

National and state law

ICANN, WSIS Process and IGF

Questions and Forums

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Governance

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Source: “How to fix the IGF” by Sunil Abraham

Stakeholders in internet governance

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Not a simple dichotomy:

What even the most rabid supporter of the multistakeholder model will not ask for.

What you will never fjnd in the multistakeholder model.

What is wrong with the multistakeholder model: consensus and diversity.

Multistakeholderism as 1. forbearance 2. self-regulation 3. regulatory capture 4. coopting dissent.

A new conception of the multistakeholder model from TDMA to FDMA.

Multistakeholder vs. Multilateral

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

ICANN: Property and rent regime vs. governance

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Source: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/governance-06feb13-en.pdf

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

DIDP exclusions are extensive:

RTI allows records of internal deliberation to be made public after the decision is taken. DIDP does not.

DIDP excludes drafts of all correspondence, reports, documents, agreements, contracts, e-mails and all forms of communication.

Exclusion on the basis of request being “not reasonable,” “overly burdensome: loosely worded, vague & can be used to defmect any request to which ICANN does not wish to respond.

Proceedings of internal appeals excluded from DIDP . In RTI, exclusions

  • nly if prohibited by the courts.

DIDP vs. RTI

slide-14
SLIDE 14

IANA T ransition Diversity Analysis

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CCWG Diversity Analysis

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Source: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/chart-2012-02-11-en

Fragmented civil society participation

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

UN Human Rights Council

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank you for your patience!

sunil@cis-india.org 91 9611100817 @sunil_abraham