Updates 1 24/08/2015 The Future of Sector Forums The Future of - - PDF document

updates
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Updates 1 24/08/2015 The Future of Sector Forums The Future of - - PDF document

24/08/2015 Regional Property Sector Forum 26 August 2015 - Christchurch Updates 1 24/08/2015 The Future of Sector Forums The Future of Sector Forums Feedback from workshops How often and where should have sector forums Significant


slide-1
SLIDE 1

24/08/2015 1

Regional Property Sector Forum

26 August 2015 - Christchurch

Updates

slide-2
SLIDE 2

24/08/2015 2

The Future of Sector Forums The Future of Sector Forums

Feedback from workshops

How often and where should have sector forums

  • Significant majority favour current format: two per year in an

il ibl l ti easily accessible location:

  • Northern: North Harbour Stadium
  • Central North: Taupo
  • Central South: Palmerston North and Whanganui
  • Southern: Christchurch and alternate between Nelson/Dunedin
slide-3
SLIDE 3

24/08/2015 3

Who should attend the forums

  • Representative of some form of sector grouping eg:
  • Primary Principals Association
  • Association of Schools (BoT chairs)

( )

  • Associations / grouping decides their representative: does

not need to be their Chair / President / Head

  • Regional member NZPF Executive
  • Regional member PPTA SPC
  • Regional Director NZSTA

What is the role of the attendee?

  • To represent their groupings views on issues covered in the

forum

  • To feedback forum discussion to their group
  • To ensure agenda topics are circulated and discussed by their

group prior to the meeting (in future agenda must be out one month prior to meetings)

  • To suggest topics / issues to be raised at future forums

(requires RealMe access)

  • Points can be articulated or explained by referencing their

p y g school

slide-4
SLIDE 4

24/08/2015 4

What is the purpose of the sector forum?

  • Information transfer
  • Exchange of views and ideas
  • Update the sector on changes, or proposed changes, to

Ministry policies and initiatives

  • Collaboration: discuss and provide feedback on proposed

changes to and/or direction change (or on changes that have

  • ccurred)
  • Network with other sector representatives and Ministry

Network with other sector representatives and Ministry personnel

  • Opportunity to raise issues in regions and/or nationally

Co-construction of Agenda

  • Set up a shared workspace so that people can access draft

d id t t (R lM ) agendas, provide comments etc (RealMe)

  • Send out draft agendas 4 to 6 weeks prior to sector forum so

that it can be circulated with local representatives.

  • Publish agendas ahead of time

 Sh d k h b t  Shared workspace has been set up  Sector representatives notified and collection of details and agenda items begun

slide-5
SLIDE 5

24/08/2015 5

Agenda items received

Topics Ministry Group Five Year Agreement (8) (swimming pools, housing, process, earthquake resilience, condition assessments, asbestos management Education Infrastructure Service H&S d * (4) Ed i I f S i H&S update* (4) Education Infrastructure Service Vulnerable Children’s Act* (2) Sector Enablement & Support Helios* (3) Education Infrastructure Service Procurement, including panels* (3) Education Infrastructure Service Weathertightness (1) Education Infrastructure Service Property Toolbox* (3) Education Infrastructure Service Modern Learning Environments*(4) Education Infrastructure Service Modern Learning Environments (4) Education Infrastructure Service Demographics (2) Education Infrastructure Service Rationalisation (1) Education Infrastructure Service Operational funding* (4) (heating, cleaning, vandalism, staffing) Resourcing RTLBs (1) Education Infrastructure Service *Will be covered in this forum

School Property Service Satisfaction Survey Results

slide-6
SLIDE 6

24/08/2015 6

Survey Response Rate

  • 648 responses:
  • 9 answered only the first question and someone else at

the school answered all questions

  • 5 did not answer any questions
  • 4 were State Integrated schools
  • 1 was an Activity Centre
  • 5 did not provide a School ID
  • 1 was a new contributing school
  • This left 623 usable responses covering 592 schools (or

29%) that were used to compare the response rate compared 29%) that were used to compare the response rate compared to all State Schools.

  • 2014 had a total of 400 responses.
  • 56% increase in total responses

Survey Response Rate

Overall response rate increased from 18% of schools in 2014 to 29% of schools in 2015 Increases came from Central North and Central South Schools in Christchurch Rebuild accounted for only 0.7% of the Southern responses

slide-7
SLIDE 7

24/08/2015 7

Who at each school responded to the survey

Similar response pattern to last year Principals’ are the predominant respondent to the survey (80%)

Prompt Response

The Ministry of Education's property team responds to your enquiries promptly.

X Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree

  • r disagree

Agree

45% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% s

2014 result = 3.12 out of 5 2015 result = 3.48 out of 5

6% 17% 15% 17% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree or disagree Agree Strongly Agree Schools

slide-8
SLIDE 8

24/08/2015 8

Insists on a high standard of documentation

The Ministry of Education's property team maintains quality property information on your school.

X Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree

  • r disagree

Agree

29% 44% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

  • ols

2014 result = 3.57 2015 result = 3.43*

4% 12% 10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree or disagree Agree Strongly Agree Scho

Trust in Ministry’s Property Team

You have a high level of trust in your Ministry of Education property team

2014 result = 3.53 2015 result = 3.72

X Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree

  • r disagree

Agree

30% 36% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% hools

2014 result = not asked 2015 result = 3.49

5% 11% 17% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree or disagree Agree Strongly Agree Sch

slide-9
SLIDE 9

24/08/2015 9

Quality of Service

Overall, you receive quality service from the Ministry of Education's property team.

X Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree

  • r disagree

Agree

29% 37% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% s

2014 result = 3.21 2015 result = 3.47

4% 13% 16% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree or disagree Agree Strongly Agree School

Shared Workspace

slide-10
SLIDE 10

24/08/2015 10

Shared Workspace - Sector Forums

  • A collaborative work space
  • Ministry cannot use Google docs – is not sufficiently secure to

meet Govt Information Security standards

  • Email EIS.Engagement@education.govt.nz to receive your invite

g g @ g y from the workspace.

  • In your email to EIS Engagement, please note the following

details:

  • Name
  • Email Address
  • School
  • Which Sector Forum (e.g. Northern, Central North, Central South, Southern)
  • Contact Number
  • Group/Organisation Role

p g

  • Secondary Contact
  • Once this information is received by EIS Engagement, an

automated email with a link to the workspace will be sent.

  • The email will have specific instructions you must follow for the

first time you log on to the workspace

Shared Workspace - RealMe Login

  • The collaborative workspace requires the use of a RealMe login

to access it.

  • RealMe is a security feature of the Shared Workspace.
  • You can find out more about RealMe at:

https://www.realme.govt.nz/.

  • You will need to create a RealMe login or if you have one already,

use this to login into the workspace.

  • EIS cannot assist in creating the RealMe login. If you have

queries on how to create a RealMe login please check the queries on how to create a RealMe login, please check the https://www.realme.govt.nz/ website for details.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

24/08/2015 11

Shared Workspace – What it looks like

  • Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) hosts the Shared Workspace for many

government departments.

  • The Shared Workspace is based on Microsoft SharePoint.
  • Best option to view Workspace is on Internet Explorer
  • Best option to view Workspace is on Internet Explorer.

Login Page

Shared Workspace – What it looks like

slide-12
SLIDE 12

24/08/2015 12

Shared Workspace – What it looks like Shared Workspace – What it looks like

slide-13
SLIDE 13

24/08/2015 13

Education.govt.nz website

New Ministry website

  • The Ministry has launched its new website –

education.govt.nz

  • The website has a fresh, new look with
  • consistent styling
  • much improved search function
slide-14
SLIDE 14

24/08/2015 14

Refreshed Property pages

  • Our Property pages (no longer called the ‘Toolbox’) are in their
  • wn section:
  • Look under ‘5-19 Years Schools tab/School/Property’

Look under 5 19 Years Schools tab/School/Property

Similar structure to old Toolbox

Most of the information is grouped by task. We have the following main sections for state schools: – Property occupancy document – Day to day management – School facilities – Fixing issues – Design standards – Planning – Project management Project management – Funding Also sections for integrated schools, private schools.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

24/08/2015 15

Navigating around the new web pages

  • use the much improved search function (no A-Z)
  • use the navigation on the right hand side
  • use the URL path to remember where you are and go

use the URL path to remember where you are and go back Don’t forget to update your favourites and bookmarks

Our new pages

  • All pages have been reviewed, refreshed and updated

h where necessary

  • Focus in on user: BoT (which includes Principal) is our

main target

  • Our Planning section is what we call a ‘long and complex

document’ and has a different format - you can download the entire planning section as a PDF

  • Concertina pages are used for pages with long content
slide-16
SLIDE 16

24/08/2015 16

Feedback

  • We welcome your feedback
  • If you notice something that doesn’t sound right, from a typo

to a contradictory piece of policy, email: eis.policy@education.govt.nz

Project Updates

slide-17
SLIDE 17

24/08/2015 17

Helios Project Update

Implementation Timeline Indicative Timing Indicative Timing March 2016 Training – Webinar (45 minutes) April 2016 Release 1 Ministry Go Live Mid / Late 2016 Release 2 Sector Training and Go Live We will not “go live” until Helios is proven to be working effectively or Helios feedback please e‐mail Helios.Support@education.govt.nz

slide-18
SLIDE 18

24/08/2015 18

Professional Services Panel Professional Services Panel

10YPP Consultants Project Managers for Minor and Major construction projects

35

Professional Services Panels

  • EIS is in the process of establishing regional panels for schools

to use:

  • 10YPP Consultants

10YPP Consultants

  • Project Management Minor (projects with a capital value less

than $500K)

  • Project Management Major (projects with a capital value

greater than $500K)

  • The panels will:
  • Provide schools with a choice of suppliers in their region

pp g

  • Allow schools to choose a different supplier to produce their

10YPP than the supplier who provides project management services (the skill sets and experience may be different)

  • Improve quality and performance of these services
slide-19
SLIDE 19

24/08/2015 19

Professional Services Panels

  • The Panels are due to be operational by October 2015
  • The use of the 10YPP Consultant panel is mandatory – schools

must select a supplier from the regional panel list

  • The use of Project Managers from the panel is currently optional
  • Schools who are already in contract with a supplier (for 10YPP or

Project Management) continue to use those suppliers until the contract expires.

Health and Safety

Everyone’s responsibility

slide-20
SLIDE 20

24/08/2015 20

New Zealand’s health and safety story

  • 75 people die on the job every year

600 900 di f k l d di

  • 600-900 die from work-related diseases
  • 1 in 10 is harmed
  • 200,000 ACC claims for work-related harm
  • $3.5 billion in costs (2-4 percent of GDP)

Key changes from Select committee

  • For PCBU with <20 workers in low-risk sectors it will not be mandatory:
  • To have health and safety representatives
  • To have a health and safety committee
  • PCBUs must discharge their overlapping duties to the extent they have

the ability to influence and control the matter

  • Duty holder’s obligations to manage risk are limited to doing what is in

th i bilit t t l d l ith h t i bl their ability to control and manage, along with what is reasonably practicable for them to do to manage the risk

slide-21
SLIDE 21

24/08/2015 21

Key changes from Select committee

  • Officer duty will apply only to other persons who have a very senior

governance role in the organisation that allows them to exercise governance role in the organisation that allows them to exercise significant influence over the management of the business or undertaking

  • Officers do not include a person who merely advises or makes

recommendation to an officer of an organisation

  • Coverage of volunteers remains as it is under the current law
  • Clarification to the definition of workplace
  • PCBUs who manage or control the workplace do not owe a duty to
  • PCBUs who manage or control the workplace do not owe a duty to

people who are there for an unlawful purpose

Roles and Responsibilities

School-run infrastructure projects School-run infrastructure projects “…Effective health and safety means focusing on the high risk areas, not the obscure and inconceivable…”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

24/08/2015 22

School Senior Management

  • Responsible and accountable for health and safety management

and performance in school construction projects and performance in school construction projects

  • Demonstrate leadership in health and safety management and

active engagement in health and safety performance

  • Involved in providing the support and resources required to

ensure health and safety is appropriately managed

  • Able to demonstrate that health and safety is actively reviewed

and has been taken into consideration in business decisions

  • Hold themselves and others accountable for health and safety

Project Manager

  • Responsible and accountable that health and safety expectations

are being addressed by the main site contractor consultants and are being addressed by the main site contractor, consultants and sub-contractors

  • Actively engages and communicates with the contractor,

consultants and school on health and safety management

  • School’s representation for construction projects
  • Holds the main site contractor responsible for health and safety
  • n the site
  • Ensures safety is actively and collaboratively addressed

throughout the lifecycle of the project and with all parties (i.e. Ministry, schools, boards of trustees, consultants, main site contractor, sub-contractors and any other providers)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

24/08/2015 23

Main Site Contractor

  • Responsible and accountable for the safety of the site and

adjacent areas that form egress/ingress to the site adjacent areas that form egress/ingress to the site

  • Responsible and accountable for management of sub-

contractors

  • Ensures site is maintained in a clean and safe way
  • Ensures there is appropriate site security, demarcation and

signage of works currently being undertaken

  • Works with the school to ensure risks and hazards are

appropriately identified and managed

Main Site Contractor

  • Responsible for the traffic management of the construction site

(incl site egress/ingress and adjacent roads) and ensures all (incl. site egress/ingress and adjacent roads), and ensures all individuals entering and working on the site are following safety and security requirements and procedures

  • Manages incident reporting and holds all individuals accountable

for safety management

  • Responsible and holds sub-contractors accountable for their

management and performance of health and safety

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24/08/2015 24

Sub-contractor

  • Responsible and accountable to carry out their work safely and

to follow all safety procedures and requirements of the main site to follow all safety procedures and requirements of the main site contractor and the school for the project

  • Actively manage health and safety in the work they do, and

report incidents and hazards as they occur to the main site contractor

  • Responsible to follow all site safety rules and ensure all

individuals undergo site inductions

Further guidance

  • Health and Safety information to help your school meet the

requirements of the current Health and Safety in Employment Act requirements of the current Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992: http://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of- education/specific-initiatives/health-and-safety/

  • The Health and Safety regulator:

http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe

  • Administrator of Health and Safety legislation:

http://www.mbie.govt.nz/

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24/08/2015 25

National Transportables Programme National Transportables Programme

National Transportables Programme Underway

  • Interlink was successful in winning the tender to deliver

modular transportable classrooms (MTBs) under a long term national programme.

  • Interlink is a consortium comprised of Portacom

Building Solutions, Opus and Brewer Davidson

  • There are factories in Auckland and Christchurch
  • They will provide a minimum of 50 modular, multi-

purpose, transportable classrooms each year.

  • Numbers above 50 MTBs are subject to demand and

receiving early forecasting information receiving early forecasting information.

  • These buildings exceed the Ministry’s requirements for

permanent structures.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

24/08/2015 26

Key Benefits of MTBs

  • Faster delivery of high quality, safe, innovative and flexible spaces that

support the latest teaching and learning methods

  • Supply cost effective, standardised, low maintenance facilities which

Supply cost effective, standardised, low maintenance facilities which meet improved standards for earthquake resilience and weathertightness, and are built to exceed the Ministry standards as permanent school buildings in line with the New Zealand Building Code

  • Have the durability to withstand a range of extreme weather and site

conditions

  • Offer greater versatility than permanent structures (these buildings can

be reconfigured and relocated multiple times throughout their lifespan which creates cost efficiencies and increases opportunities for schools pp and communities to share infrastructure resources)

  • Reduce risk, administration and contract management for regional staff

and schools

  • Increase flexibility in how the Ministry responds to rapid growth and
  • ther events impacting school accommodation

Design Features

  • Each studio or suite is made up of the base module options numbered 1 to 9

below to allow for easier transportability and access to difficult sites.

  • Each studio comprises of two short (7.7m) modules and one long (10.7m)

modules.

  • Different configurations of these base modules are possible to suit particular

sites and requirements.

  • The system can potentially be expanded upon in the future to create even

greater flexibility

slide-27
SLIDE 27

24/08/2015 27

Supporting Innovative Learning Environments

The MTB design creates flexible, well- connected spaces for a wider range of learning styles and practices, including: g y p , g

  • Open studios, encouraging

collaborative learning

  • ICT, allowing participation in global

learning communities

  • Breakout spaces to facilitate and

encourage independent learning

  • Covered outdoor learning areas
  • Resource space, for secure and

tidy storage

How to Order an MTB

  • NTP provides a solution for new classrooms. New process applies

which is the same for any project.

  • Planning your project can be an iterative process, the NTP team will

assist with funding planning but will require information from you, including timeframes, number of classrooms approved by network and the general project scope and the general project scope.

  • NTP team will assist with funding planning. Please Note: funding

must be approved, and available, before a contract order is issued.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

24/08/2015 28

Conditions of Use Document

  • Upon confirmation in the pipeline the

Host School will be required to sign a Conditions of Use Document which

  • utlines the roles of the Board, School,

Ministry and the supplier Ministry and the supplier.

  • The document also provides a

maintenance plan for the MTBs

Questions

Who can I talk to about MTBs? Project Planning: Nicola Barrett – Nicola.Barrett@education.govt.nz or Nicola Barrett Nicola.Barrett@education.govt.nz or Spyros Vatselias – Spyros.Vatselias@education.govt.nz National Transportables Programme: Greg Eunson – Greg.Eunson@education.govt.nz

slide-29
SLIDE 29

24/08/2015 29

Operational Funding Operational Funding

Property Related Expenditure

Provision of Operational Funding

  • Operational funding is a bulk payment to schools
  • Operational funding is the money provided to boards of

trustees from the government to implement the goals of the school charter and for the running of the school

  • Boards of trustees are responsible for setting priorities and

managing the schools funding. In doing so the board must comply with legislative and contractual requirements

  • The overall quantum is driven by school type and school

i size

  • The Ministry uses a range of components and inputs to

calculate the total provision that is made eg PMG

slide-30
SLIDE 30

24/08/2015 30

Why is this approach taken?

  • To provide schools the flexibility to decide where, when and

h i t how money is spent

  • To encourage schools to look for efficiencies
  • To allow schools to find operational efficiencies that work

for their school

  • To allow schools to be innovative and think long term

Funding of caretakers, cleaners, ground staff and canteen workers

  • Boards decide on the number of caretakers, cleaners,

d t ff d t k th t th l ground staff and canteen workers that they employ.

  • The salary cost of these employees is met by boards from

their operational funding.

  • The Government provided boards with additional funding in

recognition of increased salary costs related to contract negotiations for caretakers, cleaners, ground staff and canteen workers. A ifi li i d h b d h h

  • A specific line item was created to show boards how much

additional funding they were provided for this reason.

  • This is not the ‘the’ funding Boards receive to pay for these

staff.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

24/08/2015 31

Heat, Light and Water (HL&W)

  • In 2009 HL&W allocations were fixed at current levels
  • Prior to that ‘actual costs’ were reimbursed
  • Experience across multiple industries demonstrates that

when ‘actual’ costs are paid there is no incentive to manage consumption

  • Budget adjustments of:
  • 4.0% in 2011
  • 6.9% in 2012
  • 1.9% in 2014
  • 2.0% in 2015
  • There are provisions for increasing HL&W eg new

classrooms

  • Boards must apply in writing for case by case consideration

Vandalism

  • Schools are rated 1(Low) to 5 (Extreme)
  • The vandalism rating is based on the schools vandalism

risk profile.

  • It is provided to assist boards to take steps to reduce

vandalism.

  • It is not intended to cover the clean up costs post an act of

vandalism

  • Schools have adopted a wide range of strategies to reduce

Schools have adopted a wide range of strategies to reduce vandalism

slide-32
SLIDE 32

24/08/2015 32

Feedback to the Ministry

  • Are there specific issues you would like to raise and for me

t t k b k t N ti l Offi ? to take back to National Office?

Lunch Break

64

slide-33
SLIDE 33

24/08/2015 33

Innovative Learning Environments and Flexible Learning Spaces

Talking terminology

The terms “innovative learning environments” and “flexible learning spaces” are now preferred instead of “modern learning environments”. Today we’ll cover:

  • Reason for the change
  • Define key terms
  • Updated on work we’re doing on design guidance and standard

block upgrades

slide-34
SLIDE 34

24/08/2015 34

The problem with “MLE”

  • Implications of “modern” – not just about chasing the latest fads
  • Easy to mistake MLE for just a property term

but learning

  • Easy to mistake MLE for just a property term – but learning

environments are made up of so much more than bricks and mortar (and WiFi).

The Learning Environment

slide-35
SLIDE 35

24/08/2015 35

Innovative Learning Environment

  • A learning environment is the complete physical, social

and pedagogical context in which learning is intended to

  • ccur
  • ccur.
  • An innovative learning environment (ILE) is one that is

capable of evolving and adapting as educational practices evolve and change – thus remaining future focused.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

24/08/2015 36

Flexible learning spaces

  • A flexible learning space supports high quality teaching and

learning by:

  • having appropriate heating lighting ventilation and acoustics;
  • having appropriate heating, lighting, ventilation and acoustics;
  • being flexible enough to support a range of teaching and

learning approaches on any given day, and also being able to adapt to broader changes as education practices evolve over time.

  • An FLS is the physical, inanimate component of an ILE. It takes

people and practices to bring it to life. p p p g

Innovative Learning Environment

slide-37
SLIDE 37

24/08/2015 37

Key messages

  • Change in terminology, not in direction
  • The Ministry is still committed to working with schools to

ensure school property is fit for purpose and supports high quality teaching and learning.

  • Flexible learning spaces can support or foster an innovative

learning environment.

  • You can build a flexible learning space, but you can’t build an

ILE

Education Infrastructure Service Education Infrastructure Service – Engineering and Design Update

  • Design Guidance Document Suite
  • Reference Designs for Standard Blocks
slide-38
SLIDE 38

24/08/2015 38

The Continuum of Technical Standards, Design and Practice

Setting Technical and Design Standards

Assessment of existing, D i f Design of new

Identifying design and practice improvements Conveying expectations to MoE teams, schools & practitioners

MOE ESG ESG MOE Policy

Reviewing assessments and designs

DRP ESG Policy ESG ESG DRP

What needs to change?

Improving the understanding of

  • The Ministry’s business and asset management drivers.
  • What good design in schools looks like.

Increased consideration of

  • Whole-of-life costing of building systems.
  • Design features that add unnecessary cost .

Better packaged project documentation

  • What is known (and not known) about sites.
  • The overall design philosophy and performance expectations.
slide-39
SLIDE 39

24/08/2015 39

Current Focus

  • Design Guidance Document Suite
  • Implementing the Structural and Geotechnical Guidelines
  • incl Settlement Tolerant Foundations
  • incl. Settlement Tolerant Foundations
  • Reference designs
  • Troubleshooting live cases on specific school buildings (many)

Design Guidance Document Suite

1. Make the project design requirements clear before work is started

  • Designing Schools in New Zealand – Principles,

Requirements and Guidelines 2. Define the project requirements and process before Request for Proposal

  • Project Brief document

3. Check that the project design requirements are being met

  • Design Compliance Checklist, and Design Review Panel

Design Compliance Checklist, and Design Review Panel 4. Feed back lessons learned into the initial requirements

  • Design Review Panel, and Post Occupancy Reviews
slide-40
SLIDE 40

24/08/2015 40

Design Guidance – What does it aim to achieve?

  • Provide clarity to design teams
  • What we expect to be included in the quote
  • What we expect to be included in the quote
  • What outcomes we want, what is mandatory and what is

guidance

  • Provide clarity to EIS staff
  • What to look for when evaluating tenders
  • What to look for when signing off design stage completion
  • Know when a contract variation is reasonable

Design Guidance – What does it aim to achieve?

  • Provide guidance to schools
  • What does good look like?
  • Get better design outcomes
  • Learn from past errors
  • Fewer delays and reworks by

being clear about what we want

  • Consistent standard of design

g

slide-41
SLIDE 41

24/08/2015 41

Standard Block Modernisation Designs Standard Block Modernisation Designs

Preparing preliminary and detailed design plans for existing standard block types

81

Standard Block Modernisation Designs

  • Designed and peer reviewed by architects. Reviewed by

educationalist for functionality. Structurally reviewed by i C t ti t d b QS

  • engineers. Costs estimated by QS.
  • Current focus: Avalon, Formula, and Canterbury. (Nelson Two

Storey to follow).

  • Preliminary Design package to be released by end of September

2015.

  • Detailed Design package (including fire and accessibility reports)

to be released by end of 2015.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

24/08/2015 42

Using the designs

  • Upgrade existing buildings to make Flexible Learning Spaces

(FLS) for a range of budgets.

  • Pre-designed options or selection from a menu of priced

modifications.

  • Site specific calculations by an engineer will still be required to

account for:

  • Variation in the geometry, material and construction within

each block type.

  • Moderations that have been made to classrooms since their
  • riginal construction.
  • Consider DQLS on top of these designs – acoustics, heating and

ventilation, and lighting.

Benefits of using the designs

  • Avoid reinventing the wheel for design, and reduce the time and

money cost to schools for upgrading standard classroom blocks. Ensure that schools with standard classroom blocks have spaces

  • Ensure that schools with standard classroom blocks have spaces

that are flexible enough to support many different ways of teaching, and to support future changes in pedagogy.

  • Achieve teaching spaces that are well designed, structurally

sound, and will be valuable assets in the school property portfolio for many years to come.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

24/08/2015 43

Avalon Block

Existing Footprint

Avalon Block

Option 1 - $340,000

slide-44
SLIDE 44

24/08/2015 44

Avalon Block

Option 2 - $410,000

Formula Block

Existing Footprint

slide-45
SLIDE 45

24/08/2015 45

Formula Block

Option 1 - $273,000

Formula Block

Option 2 - $273,000

slide-46
SLIDE 46

24/08/2015 46

Formula Block

Option 3 - $334,000

Canterbury Block

Existing Footprint

slide-47
SLIDE 47

24/08/2015 47

Canterbury Block

Option 1 - $327,000

Canterbury Block

Option 2 - $341,000

slide-48
SLIDE 48

24/08/2015 48

Canterbury Block

Option 3 - $414,000

Implementation: Next Steps

  • Complete briefing documents
  • Technical briefing for engineers/PMs

G l b i fi f M E d h l

  • General briefing for MoE and schools.
  • Finalise communications approach and begin implementation
  • Property pages
  • Socialise with property team.
  • Complete detailed design for Avalon, Formula and Canterbury

blocks.

  • Finalise Nelson Two Storey plans.

Finalise Nelson Two Storey plans.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

24/08/2015 49

Reference Designs for Toilets

  • Toilet reference designs nearly complete.
  • Recommends layouts, standards of performance and

technical specifications for toilets in new schools and those in technical specifications for toilets in new schools and those in existing schools which are being remodelled.

  • Layouts may need modification to suit the needs of individual
  • projects. Also consider structure, building services and

interior fit out.

  • Design teams are obligated to ensure that toilet areas are

code compliant and appropriately designed for each individual school project. j

Key changes – toilet style

Unisex – ‘Self-Contained Cubicles’

  • Rename ‘Unisex’ to ‘Self Contained Cubicles’
  • Rename Unisex to Self-Contained Cubicles .
  • Toilets must be fully self-contained with basin and hand-drying

facilities within each cubicle.

  • Partitions must be full height (floor to ceiling).
  • An additional basin may be provided in the lobby area for those

students just wishing to wash their hands.

  • Self-contained cubicles may open onto an interior circulation, or

y p , covered exterior space.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

24/08/2015 50

Key changes – toilet style (1)

Single Sex / Self-contained cubicles

  • When a new suite of toilets is being constructed, Boards of

Trustees have the choice of designing them as Single Sex or as Trustees have the choice of designing them as Single Sex or as Self-contained cubicles.

  • It is not practical to convert existing Single Sex toilets to Self-

contained cubicles.

  • The Board’s preferred option must be agreed with the Ministry.

Key changes – toilet style (2)

Single Sex

  • Toilet cubicles may be constructed using proprietary partitions

Toilet cubicles may be constructed using proprietary partitions

  • min. 2.2m high partitions and not more than 100mm gap above

floor, for privacy and to prevent phone camera intrusion.

  • Basins and hand-drying facilities shall be located directly
  • utside the cubicles in the Lobby area.
slide-51
SLIDE 51

24/08/2015 51

Student Self-contained WC & Cleaner Accessible WC

slide-52
SLIDE 52

24/08/2015 52

Accessible WC & Shower High Dependency Unit

slide-53
SLIDE 53

24/08/2015 53

Staff Self-contained WC & Accessible WC/Shower Implementation: Next Steps

  • Final round of review and editing underway.
  • Release the final package in September along with the

reference designs for standard block upgrades (preliminary reference designs for standard block upgrades (preliminary designs).

slide-54
SLIDE 54

24/08/2015 54 Maximising Capital Purchasing

Aligning 5YA for Small Geographic Groupings Maximising Capital Purchasing - Goals

  • Hard Target

g

  • Purchase15% more for the same money
  • Standardised contracts in place across all schools involved
  • Quality progress reporting
  • Soft Target
  • Reduce BoT / Principal time spent on capital projects by 50%
  • 90% of the BoTs involved will continue the approach for their next 5YA

cycle

  • Process Target
  • Process and supporting tools that allow any grouping of schools to

replicate the approach and the benefits achieved

slide-55
SLIDE 55

24/08/2015 55

5YA Alignment Conceptually: Lose no money, Gain no money

Assume value of 5YA is the same over two 5YA Cycles Nominal Profile yr1 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr5 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Total Available 5YA Realignment occurs in 4th year of cycle 0% 5YA Expended 60% + 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 160% 35% 5YA Expended 25% + 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 124% 60% 5YA Expended 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 100% 75% 5YA Expended 5% 20% 20% 20% 20% 85% 75% 5YA Expended 5% 20% 20% 20% 20% 85% 100% 5YA Expended 0% 0% 20% 20% 20% 60%

Proof of Concept – Getting Involved

  • Four Trials
  • One in each property region
  • Initial weighting toward ‘regional’ schools
  • Will be advertised in the ‘Bulletin to Schools’ after last sector forum on

9 September

  • Purely voluntary
  • Application to be a trial grouping must include signature of all BoT

chairs

slide-56
SLIDE 56

24/08/2015 56

Proof of Concept – High Level Approach

  • 10YPPs
  • Depending on where a school is in their cycle current plans they will get

a high level review through to a new 10YPP

  • In particular details of specific projects and costs already assessed will

be looked at

  • By aligning across schools we will look for complexity of project

synergies, timing alignment, duplication of design etc

  • A single 10YPP planner will undertake this to get consistency and
  • bjectivity

Proof of Concept – High Level Approach

  • Procurement approach will depend on 10YPPs and number of

schools but may involve: y

  • Limited number of professional services providers: eg PMs, Architects,

Quantity Surveyors, Engineers etc

  • Procurement criteria for these providers established with schools and the

procurement process run by the Ministry

  • Construction providers
  • Ministry, in conjunction with the schools, will develop a procurement strategy
  • Will be based on nature of projects in the 10YPP
  • Will be sensitive to the issue of local providers
slide-57
SLIDE 57

24/08/2015 57

Proof of Concept - School Groupings

  • Must make sense
  • Not cherry picking certain schools
  • Geographic connection (distances could be quite large in some areas

because of location of schools)

  • Size
  • 5 – 12 (3 is probably too small and 15 probably too big for the proof of

concept)

  • Would be good to include a secondary school but not mandatory

Proof of Concept – Why Schools will say No

  • My project manager, my 10YPP planner, knows our school
  • We will lose control of our 5YA
  • The service won’t be as good
  • Local providers will be squeezed out

But:

  • Application is voluntary

pp y

slide-58
SLIDE 58

24/08/2015 58

Proof of Concept - Questions

Southern Regional Updates

slide-59
SLIDE 59

24/08/2015 59

Funding and Timing of Capital Works at Schools

Funding Capital Upgrades

  • Increased Capacity (New Schools / Roll Growth)
  • Funded by Capital Injection
  • Biggest cost driver is demographic movement
  • Maintaining and Improving existing buildings
  • Funded by depreciation
slide-60
SLIDE 60

24/08/2015 60

Ten Year Capital Forecast – (slide from 2014 forum)

Understanding our Estate

  • EIS is moving rapidly along the path toward being an advanced

asset manager

  • Our estate knowledge has grown at an enormous rate over the last

five years:

  • The nationwide condition survey of all schools has been

completed

  • We have assessed approx 1800 leaky buildings (approximately

950 are at various stages of resolution)

  • We have approximately 4,500 building in the CSR or EQR

programme (approximately 1100 schools) programme (approximately 1100 schools)

  • We are underway with 90% of the building that exhibit the

highest potential risk

slide-61
SLIDE 61

24/08/2015 61

Funding our Estate Improvements (excluding Capital Injection

  • Over time we have enough money (5YA is still the major funding

programme)

  • We cannot fund all of the upgrades in three years (it exceeds our

income)

  • We have to manage within our budgets and appropriations we

receive

  • Our approach is to spend our money as quickly as it is prudent to do
  • We are developing and refining a prioritisation approach
  • We are developing and refining a prioritisation approach

Capital Funding By Stage

700,000,000

Balance sheet funded by stage

200,000,000 300,000,000 400,000,000 500,000,000 600,000,000 Planned ‐ Low Planned ‐ Medium Planned ‐ High Committed Under Construction ‐ 100,000,000 Under Construction Baseline Funding

slide-62
SLIDE 62

24/08/2015 62

Regional Update – August 2015

  • Portfolio Changes & Case Managers Areas of

R ibilit Responsibility

  • Relationship Management
  • New schools/kura/major redevelopments
  • Priorities for next 6 months

Proposed dates for 2016

Series 1: Northern – 11 May 2016 Central South – 18 May 2016 Central South 18 May 2016 Southern – 25 May 2016 Central North – 1 June 2016 Shared Workspace will open 9 March 2016 for Agenda items Series 2: Northern – 24 August 2016

124

Central South – 31 August 2016 Southern – 7 September 2016 Central North – 14 September 2016 Shared Workspace will open 29 June 2016 for Agenda items

slide-63
SLIDE 63

24/08/2015 63