interactions between cattle and forestry on montane and
play

Interactions Between Cattle and Forestry on Montane and Foothill - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interactions Between Cattle and Forestry on Montane and Foothill Landscapes of Alberta Jillian Kaufmann , MSc, PAg 2018 CIF-IFC Conference Outline Background Research Objectives Study Design Results and Discussion Management


  1. Interactions Between Cattle and Forestry on Montane and Foothill Landscapes of Alberta Jillian Kaufmann , MSc, PAg 2018 CIF-IFC Conference

  2. Outline ´ Background ´ Research Objectives ´ Study Design ´ Results and Discussion ´ Management Implications

  3. Background ´ Alberta forested public lands simultaneously support livestock grazing and forestry operations ´ Potential integration challenges: ´ Damage to young trees ´ Regeneration failure ´ Altered forage composition, production and accessibility ´ Grazing system interruption ´ Loss in profits

  4. Background – Study Purpose ´ Facilitate successful integration of grazing and forestry on public lands ´ Contribute to development of best management practices ´ Partners ´ Rocky Mountain Forest Range Association ´ Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (now AEP) ´ University of Alberta ´ Alberta Beef Producers ´ Weyerhaeuser ´ Spray Lakes Sawmill ´ West Central Forage Association ´ Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta

  5. Research Objectives ´ Observe cattle use of landscapes containing recently harvested cut blocks ´ Habitat preference ´ Foraging behavior ´ Influence of cattle stocking rate ´ Quantify cattle induced damage to young trees

  6. Lower Foothills Study Site ´ Grazing lease near Logdepole, Alberta ´ Primarily deciduous – aspen, balsam poplar, paper birch ´ Timber harvested by Weyerhaeuser in January 2006 ´ Primarily natural regeneration with white spruce planting on haul roads ´ Four paddocks (each 2.5 – 3 ha) constructed containing areas of clear cut, partial harvest, haul road, uncut forest and brush piles ´ Grazing exclosures (0.2 ha) established within paddocks ´ Cattle grazed at low (0.3 AUM/ha) and high (0.6 AUM/ha) stocking rates

  7. Montane Study Site ´ Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve grazing allotment near Maycroft ´ Three large pastures ranging 365 to 1035 ha ´ Six major habitat types: ´ Coniferous forest ´ Deciduous forest ´ Mixed wood forest ´ Native upland grassland ´ Modified lowland grasslands ´ Coniferous cut blocks harvested in winter 2005/2006 by Spray Lakes Sawmill ´ Cut blocks planted to lodgepole pine or white spruce ´ Herd of 320 cattle grazed pastures July through September 2008 & 2009 ´ Cattle stocking rate ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 AUM/ha ´ Cattle exclusion cages (1.5 x 1.5 m) set up in each habitat type

  8. Data Collection ´ Cattle fitted with GPS collars to track location every 5 to 10 minutes ´ Network of circular 10 m 2 plots established throughout pastures ´ Foothills site - total of 233 permanent plots 10 to 30 m apart throughout all habitat types ´ Montane site – total of 210 plots distributed throughout habitat types ´ Plot data collected following grazing ´ Data parameters: ´ Cattle occupancy ´ Forage biomass, utilization and quality ´ Slope, aspect, elevation, canopy cover ´ Distance to roads and water ´ Slash cover, maximum height and distance to nearest grazing patch ´ Tree regeneration counts, maximum height and diameter, tree impedance rating and record of cattle induced damage ´ Plots established within grazing exclosures at the Foothills site to compare tree regeneration and growth

  9. Data Analysis ´ GPS collar data cleaned and overlain on spatial maps of habitat types ´ Cattle locations used to calculate habitat preference using an electivity index ´ Plot data used to link evidence of cattle presence to environmental characteristics ´ Assessment of tree regeneration success and cattle induced impacts

  10. Results – Cattle Habitat Preference Foothills Site

  11. Results – Cattle Habitat Use Foothills Site

  12. Results – Drivers of Forage Use Foothills Site ´ Cattle foraging behavior was influenced primarily by forage biomass and distance to water ´ Forage protein, slash cover and sapling density had a relatively small influence on cattle foraging behavior ´ Forage use was positively associated with greater forage biomass and better quality, and negatively associated with greater distance to water, slash cover and sapling density

  13. Results – Tree Regeneration and Damage Foothills Site

  14. Results – Sapling Damage Foothills Site

  15. Results – Cattle Habitat Preference Montane Site

  16. Results – Cattle Habitat Use Montane Site

  17. Results – Drivers of Habitat Use Montane Site ´ At the local patch scale: ´ Cattle foraging behavior was influenced primarily by forage biomass ´ Distance to water and roads, forage quality, slope and aspect had a relatively small influence on cattle foraging behavior ´ Forage use was positively associated with greater forage biomass and quality and distance to roads ´ Forage use was negatively associated with greater distance to water, slope and aspect (representing less forage use on north-facing slopes) ´ At the larger landscape scale: ´ Slope, distance to water and distance to roads were the main parameters influencing cattle selection ´ Specifically within cut blocks, topography (primarily elevation) had the greatest influence on cattle presence ´ Forage quality played a greater role in regulating cattle presence within cut blocks than forage biomass ´ Distance to water was also a key factor explaining cattle use of cut blocks

  18. Results – Cattle Use of Cut Blocks Montane Site

  19. Results – Tree Regeneration and Damage Montane Site

  20. Conclusions and Management Implications ´ Application of cattle stocking rates mandated by AEP promote successful integration of grazing and forestry ´ Cattle are unlikely to spend much time in recently harvested cut blocks provided they have access to more preferred habitats ´ Understanding cattle foraging behavior is imperative to preventing negative impacts ´ Timing of grazing needs to be considered – a single mid summer grazing allows time for stem lignification and improved strength ´ Forestry and cattle grazing were found to be compatible land uses in this study based on sustainable management ´ Provincial regeneration standards were met or surpassed for the most part. Regeneration inadequacies were not associated with cattle activity

  21. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend