Interactions Between Cattle and Forestry on Montane and Foothill Landscapes
- f Alberta
Jillian Kaufmann, MSc, PAg 2018 CIF-IFC Conference
Interactions Between Cattle and Forestry on Montane and Foothill - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Interactions Between Cattle and Forestry on Montane and Foothill Landscapes of Alberta Jillian Kaufmann , MSc, PAg 2018 CIF-IFC Conference Outline Background Research Objectives Study Design Results and Discussion Management
Jillian Kaufmann, MSc, PAg 2018 CIF-IFC Conference
´ Damage to young trees ´ Regeneration failure ´ Altered forage composition, production and accessibility ´ Grazing system interruption ´ Loss in profits
´ Rocky Mountain Forest Range Association ´ Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (now AEP) ´ University of Alberta ´ Alberta Beef Producers ´ Weyerhaeuser ´ Spray Lakes Sawmill ´ West Central Forage Association ´ Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta
´ Habitat preference ´ Foraging behavior ´ Influence of cattle stocking rate
´ Grazing lease near Logdepole, Alberta ´ Primarily deciduous – aspen, balsam poplar, paper birch ´ Timber harvested by Weyerhaeuser in January 2006 ´ Primarily natural regeneration with white spruce planting on haul roads ´ Four paddocks (each 2.5 – 3 ha) constructed containing areas of clear cut, partial harvest, haul road, uncut forest and brush piles ´ Grazing exclosures (0.2 ha) established within paddocks ´ Cattle grazed at low (0.3 AUM/ha) and high (0.6 AUM/ha) stocking rates
´ Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve grazing allotment near Maycroft ´ Three large pastures ranging 365 to 1035 ha ´ Six major habitat types:
´ Coniferous forest ´ Deciduous forest ´ Mixed wood forest ´ Native upland grassland ´ Modified lowland grasslands ´ Coniferous cut blocks harvested in winter 2005/2006 by Spray Lakes Sawmill
´ Cut blocks planted to lodgepole pine or white spruce ´ Herd of 320 cattle grazed pastures July through September 2008 & 2009 ´ Cattle stocking rate ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 AUM/ha ´ Cattle exclusion cages (1.5 x 1.5 m) set up in each habitat type
´ Cattle fitted with GPS collars to track location every 5 to 10 minutes ´ Network of circular 10 m2 plots established throughout pastures
´ Foothills site - total of 233 permanent plots 10 to 30 m apart throughout all habitat types ´ Montane site – total of 210 plots distributed throughout habitat types
´ Plot data collected following grazing ´ Data parameters:
´ Cattle occupancy ´ Forage biomass, utilization and quality ´ Slope, aspect, elevation, canopy cover ´ Distance to roads and water ´ Slash cover, maximum height and distance to nearest grazing patch ´ Tree regeneration counts, maximum height and diameter, tree impedance rating and record of cattle induced damage
´ Plots established within grazing exclosures at the Foothills site to compare tree regeneration and growth
´ At the local patch scale:
´ Cattle foraging behavior was influenced primarily by forage biomass ´ Distance to water and roads, forage quality, slope and aspect had a relatively small influence on cattle foraging behavior ´ Forage use was positively associated with greater forage biomass and quality and distance to roads ´ Forage use was negatively associated with greater distance to water, slope and aspect (representing less forage use on north-facing slopes)
´ At the larger landscape scale:
´ Slope, distance to water and distance to roads were the main parameters influencing cattle selection
´ Specifically within cut blocks, topography (primarily elevation) had the greatest influence on cattle presence ´ Forage quality played a greater role in regulating cattle presence within cut blocks than forage biomass ´ Distance to water was also a key factor explaining cattle use of cut blocks