Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

institutionalize a scaled up stem talent expansion
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in Engineering Cohort Program Workshop Objective : You will leave Workshop with A Plan of the Actions to Launch and Institutionalize Large- Scale Cohort Program at your


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Workshop Objective: You will leave Workshop with

  • A Plan of the Actions to Launch and Institutionalize Large-

Scale Cohort Program at your Institution.

  • A Collection of Action Plans by Institutional Types to Launch

and institutionalize a Large-Scale Cohort Program.

Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in Engineering Cohort Program

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in Engineering Cohort Program

wmich.edu/step Anetra Grice

STEP Program Manager

Edmund Tsang, Ph.D.

Emeritus Associate Dean

College of Engineering and Applied Sciences Western Michigan University NSF-STEP Awards (#0336581 and #0969287)

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) of University of Indiana

(http://nsse.indiana.edu/) identifies cohort or learning community as one of six “high impact” practices to enhance student success and retention.

  • Research found placing first-year students in cohort or learning community provides a

structure to promote connection among students, faculty and staff, and to deliver student success services.

  • “Environment that supports perceptions of social relatedness improve motivation,

thereby positively influencing learning behavior…Participation in cohort programs constitutes such an environment.”

  • Cohorts provide a structure for first-year engineering students to transition to college,

and to develop academically and professionally. Cohorts serves as a channel to direct support programs and activities for student success, retention and graduation.

Gabeinick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., andh, B.L. (1990). Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco: CA. Beachboard, M.R., Beachboard, J.C., Li, W., and Adkison, S.R. (2011). “Cohorts and Relatedness: Self-Determination Theory as an Explanation of How Learning Communities Affect Educational Outcomes,” Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853-874. Doolenm, T.L. and Biddlecombe, E. (2014). “The Impact of a Cohort Model Learning Community on First-Year Engineering Student Success,” American Journal of Engineering Education, 5(1), 27-40.

Rationale for Cohorts

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Rationale for Cohorts

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Rationale for Cohorts

Cohorts allowed CEAS to change the narrative during summer orientation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CEAS-STEP Retention/Graduation Rates

  • STEP IB Results (2010–present) – avg. 360 students/year
  • 2nd Year Retention to CEAS above baseline; compares with CSRDE Peers; and 2016

Cohort higher than STEP I (2005-2009)

  • 6-year graduation rate in CEAS trending upward; higher than baseline and CSRDE

Peers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CEAS STEP Retention Rates – Algebra II

  • Admissions criteria to CEAS revised in fall 2012; Algebra II

students must have ≥B to continue in CEAS

  • Created STEP cohorts in fall 2013 for all Algebra II students

Hypothesis: Higher 2nd-year retention rate versus baseline is correlated to Cohort program

  • Hypothesis is valid for 2nd-year retention rate to WMU (a ≤0.05 and DoF = 3;

χ2 =9.250 vs. 7.815) and not valid to CEAS (χ2 =6.251 vs. 7.815)

Year Total # EXEP Return to CEAS Return to WMU 2012 (baseline) 62 25 (40.3%) 40 (64.5%) 2013 Cohort 79 39 (49.4%) 67 (84.8%) 2014 Cohort 90 51 (56.6%) 83 (92.2%) 2015 Cohort 80 42 (52.5%) 57 (71.3%) 2016 Cohort 73 37 (50.7%) 52 (71.2%)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Step 1

INDIVIDUAL

Identify 3-5 courses that students in a cohort at your institution would take together in fall semester, and 2-4 courses to take together in spring semester.

Examples

  • Mechanical Engineering Cohort – Calculus I/Precalculus,

Engineering Graphics/CAD, General Chemistry I & Lab, Technical Communication/English Composition.

  • Computer Science Cohort – Calculus I/Precalculus, Computer Science

I, Technical Communication/English Composition, General Education

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Step 2

GROUP

Report and discuss Step 1 with colleagues at your table

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Step 3

INDIVIDUAL

  • Identify the stakeholders in the academic departments

that provide instructions of courses in fall semester/spring semesters.

  • Think about how you are going to build partnership with

them

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Step 4

GROUP

Report and discuss Step 3 with colleagues at your table

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Step 5

GROUP

Create a communication plan to the stakeholders to gain their support, including a timeline and a process for seat requests and seat “reservations”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Step 6

GROUP

Report Step 5 to Workshop

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Step 7

INDIVIDUAL

Identify the actions to take at your institution for summer

  • rientation with goal of placing students into cohorts

CEAS-STEP

  • Reduce capacity of sections by number of seats reserved for cohorts
  • Add “department restriction” to section requested on web registration
  • Have academic advisors to register students
  • Track usage and report to department; release the reserved seats once summer
  • rientation is complete
slide-15
SLIDE 15

CEAS-STEP Cohort Program

  • Templates are used to facilitate placement of students into STEP cohorts for fall

Request to stakeholder departments are made 2 months before class schedules are published

  • A pool of 30+ CEAS faculty and staff have mentored a cohort
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Step 8

GROUP

Report and discuss Step 7 with colleagues at your table

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Step 9

GROUP

Report summer orientation plan to Workshop

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • An active Advisory Board with participation of key institutional

decision-makers

  • Partner with Office of Institutional Research to create a data

structure and reporting process

  • Align program with institutional strategic plan and priorities
  • Create and use Operations calendar and manuals
  • Gain buy-in from faculty and staff
  • Share resources with other student success programs across

campus

  • Maintain regular communication with campus collaborators
  • Focus on delivering the best customer-service

Factors Supporting Institutionalization

Report out Step 7 to group

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Step 10

GROUP

Identify the critical factors favorable to institutionalization. Identify the stakeholders involved in institutionalizing the cohort practice. Draft an action plan consisting of a list of tasks to carry out and working relations to nurture and build, to institutionalize the cohort practice.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Step 11

GROUP

Report Step 10 to Workshop

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Invitation to Collaborate

  • National Science Foundation - Improving Undergraduate STEM

Education: Education and Human Resources (IUSE: EHR)

  • “[T]his program also encourages replications of research

studies at different types of institutions and with different student bodies to produce deeper knowledge about the effectiveness and transferability of findings.”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Comments, Questions & Answers Contact Information

Edmund Tsang: edmund.tsang@wmich.edu Anetra Grice: anetra.grice@wmich.edu