Institutional Capacity for Natural Disasters: Case Studies in Africa - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

institutional capacity for natural disasters case studies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Institutional Capacity for Natural Disasters: Case Studies in Africa - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Institutional Capacity for Natural Disasters: Case Studies in Africa April 23, 2012 Background CCAPS Program Overview - Research Areas Research Progress - Past Research Institutional Capacity for Disasters - Value Added Definitions A


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Institutional Capacity for Natural Disasters: Case Studies in Africa

April 23, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CCAPS Program Overview

  • Research Areas

Research Progress

  • Past Research

Institutional Capacity for Disasters

  • Value Added

Background

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A natural hazard or shock is a natural phenomenon that may cause human, material, economic or environmental losses and impacts. A natural disaster occurs when these losses and impacts seriously disrupt the functioning of a community or society and exceed the ability of that community or society to cope using its own resources. Capacity is the ability of people, organizations and systems, using available skills and resources, to face and manage adverse conditions, emergencies or disasters.

Definitions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Case Studies

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Zambia and Zimbabwe

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ghana and Togo

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Malawi and Mozambique

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Secondary Research Primary Research

– Fieldwork – Extensive interviews

Methodology

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Moral Hazard Insurance/Perceived Risk Electoral Incentives and Democracy Political Development Civil Society External Actors Economics

Proposed Causal Mechanisms

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Case Studies

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Moral Hazard Insurance/Perceived Risk Electoral Incentives and Democracy Political Development Civil Society External Actors Economics

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-15
SLIDE 15

¡ ¡ ¡

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Priority ¡ Ethiopia ¡ Kenya Political, Institutional Capacity, and Consensus Building ¡ Strong ¡ Moderate ¡ Risk Assessment, Monitoring, and Early Warning ¡ Strong ¡ Strong ¡ Knowledge and Capacity Enhancement ¡ Weak ¡ Moderate ¡ Reduce Underlying Risk Factors ¡ Strong ¡ Moderate ¡ Disaster Preparedness and Response ¡ Moderate ¡ Moderate ¡

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ethiopia and Kenya

Evaluation of Moral Hazard Argument

  • High Donor Reliance
  • Disaster risk management is a political priority for

Ethiopia

  • Different Priority for Agriculture
  • Forums for Coordination are different
  • Donor influence on disaster management

policies is different

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Drought Management Policy Progress

1.41 million affected by Drought World Bank Arid Lands Resource Management (ALRMP) 2+ million affected by Drought European Community Arid Lands Project Begins 3 million affected by Drought 3.8 million affected by drought World Bank ALRMP ends 4 million affected by Drought National Drought Management Authority and Contingency Fund approved by President 1995-1996 1996 1999-2000 2007 2004-2005 2010 2008-2009 2010-2011

  • Nov. 2011

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusion

Prioritize autonomous disaster risk management and capacity building in both countries Formalize a National Disaster Management Policy for both countries

¡

Ethiopia and Kenya

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Moral Hazard Insurance/Perceived Risk Electoral Incentives and Democracy Political Development Civil Society External Actors Economics

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-22
SLIDE 22

GDP/Capita

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Priority ¡ Zimbabwe ¡ Zambia ¡

Political, Institutional Capacity, and Consensus Building ¡

Weak ¡ Strong ¡

Risk Assessment, Monitoring, and Early Warning ¡

Moderate ¡ Moderate ¡

Knowledge and Capacity Enhancement ¡

Strong ¡ Weak ¡

Reduce Underlying Risk Factors ¡

Weak ¡ Weak ¡

Disaster Preparedness and Response ¡

Moderate ¡ Moderate ¡

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Resources

– Financial Capital – Physical Capital – Human Capital

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Resources

– Financial Capital – Physical Capital – Human Capital

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Resources

– Financial Capital – Physical Capital – Human Capital

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Information

– Centralization – Cost – Scale of Hazards

Zimbabwe and Zambia

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Moral Hazard Insurance/Perceived Risk Electoral Incentives and Democracy Political Development Civil Society External Actors Economics

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Institutional Framework for Disaster Risk Management in The Gambia

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The Gambia and Senegal

Visit to Banjul Island, The Gambia

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Visit to Banjul Island

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-33
SLIDE 33

President Jammeh Campaign Advertising

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Visit to Pikine, Senegal

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Visit to Pikine

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Media Reports on Flooding

“I voted for [President Abdoulaye] Wade, I was disappointed. Now we are waiting impatiently for change, we turn to God.” (AFP Media) “There has been much talk but little action. The expectations are

  • enormous. The suburb is aware of the stakes of this election, all eyes are

fixed on that hope.” (AFP Media) “We will make you pay in the next election!” (Interview with Senegalese aid professional)

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Institutional Framework for Disaster Risk Management in Senegal

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Priority ¡ The Gambia ¡ Senegal Political, Institutional Capacity, and Consensus Building ¡ Strong ¡ Moderate ¡ Risk Assessment, Monitoring, and Early Warning ¡ Weak ¡ Moderate ¡ Knowledge and Capacity Enhancement ¡ Moderate ¡ Moderate ¡ Reduce Underlying Risk Factors ¡ Weak ¡ Weak ¡ Disaster Preparedness and Response ¡ Weak ¡ Moderate ¡

The Gambia and Senegal

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Ghana and Togo

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Moral Hazard Insurance/Perceived Risk Electoral Incentives and Democracy Political Development Civil Society External Actors Economics

Ghana and Togo

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Ghana and Togo

Visit to Baguida, Togo

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Ghana and Togo

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Priority ¡ Ghana ¡ Togo Political, Institutional Capacity, and Consensus Building ¡ Moderate ¡ Weak ¡ Risk Assessment, Monitoring, and Early Warning ¡ Moderate ¡ Weak ¡ Knowledge and Capacity Enhancement ¡ Moderate ¡ Weak ¡ Reduce Underlying Risk Factors ¡ Weak ¡ Weak ¡ Disaster Preparedness and Response ¡ Moderate ¡ Weak ¡

Ghana and Togo

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Civil Society

  • Togo: weak civil

society

  • Ghana: vibrant

civil society

Ghana and Togo

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Political Development

Ghana: effective governance, low corruption, and high transparency Togo: less effective bureaucracy, highly corrupt

Ghana and Togo

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Political Development

Ghana: NADMO has no institutional memory Togo: appointments are long-term but based on cronyism Disaster management in Togo: not corrupt?

Ghana and Togo

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Conclusions

Civil society actors are important for DRR, preparedness, and response More developed and higher quality governance leads to increased disaster management activities

Ghana and Togo

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Ethiopia Kenya Gambia Senegal Malawi Mozambique Ghana Togo Zambia Zimbabwe Moral Hazard

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡

  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ Insurance/Perceived Risk + ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡ Electoral Incentives and Democracy

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ Political Development + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ Civil Society ? ¡ + ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡ ? ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

External Actors ? ¡ ? ¡ ? ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡

  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ ? ¡ Economics

  • ­‑ ¡
  • ­‑ ¡

+ ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡ + ¡

Conclusions – Causal Mechanisms

  • ­‑ ¡

Evidence to contradict mechanism

+

Evidence to support mechanism

? ¡

Insufficient/mixed evidence

slide-49
SLIDE 49

¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Moral ¡Hazard ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Economics ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Insurance/Perceived ¡Risk ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Economics ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Democracy ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Poli=cal ¡Development ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Moral ¡Hazard ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡Poli=cal ¡Development ¡ ¡

Linkages Between Hypotheses

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Engage with national governments Emphasize greater economic diversity Increase access to information on disasters Promote bureaucratic reform

Policy Recommendations

slide-51
SLIDE 51