INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS & INTERCHANGES 2019 ACEC-KY/FHWA/KYTC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

innovative intersections interchanges
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS & INTERCHANGES 2019 ACEC-KY/FHWA/KYTC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS & INTERCHANGES 2019 ACEC-KY/FHWA/KYTC Partnering Conference Mark Doctor, PE September 2019 FHWA Resource Center INTERSECTION CHALLENGES Do you have . increasing congestion? severe crashes? mobility


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS & INTERCHANGES

2019 ACEC-KY/FHWA/KYTC Partnering Conference

September 2019

Mark Doctor, PE

FHWA Resource Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Do you have ….

  • increasing congestion?
  • severe crashes?
  • mobility concerns for

pedestrians and bicyclists?

  • limited budgets?
  • inability for more right-of-way?

Source: Mark Doctor, FHWA

INTERSECTION CHALLENGES

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

INTERSECTION CONFLICTS

Right-angle collisions account for over 40% of fatal crashes at intersections Left turn crashes account for over 20% of fatal crashes at intersections Ped/Bike crashes account for 25% of fatal crashes at signalized intersections

Intersections are planned points of conflict in the road system.

People – some in motor vehicles, others walking or biking – cross paths as they travel through or turn from one route to another. Where different paths cross, join or separate - confl flict ct p points ts occur.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INTERSECTION CONFLICT POINTS

If a person commits an error (poor judgement or traffic control violation) Conflict Points may be thought of as “Collision Potential”

“Conventional” Intersection

slide-5
SLIDE 5

REDUCED LEFT TURN CONFLICT INTERSECTIONS

Reducing the number and severity of conflict points

slide-6
SLIDE 6

REDUCED LEFT TURN CONFLICT INTERSECTIONS

Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT)

U-Turn Based Left-Turn Movements (or “Redirected Left-Turn Movements”)

Median U-Turn (MUT)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

At-grade intersections with directional medians so minor road traffic must turn right and make a U-turn to cross or make the left-turn maneuver. (also known as J-turns, Reduced Conflict Intersections, Superstreets and Synchronized Intersections)

Source: Wisconsin DOT

RCUT – RESTRICTED CROSSING U-TURN

Typically all movements from the major road are “normal” (some variations close the median and left-turns are made via U-turn maneuvers).

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Problem: Far-Side Right-Angle Collisions

8

DIVIDED HIGHWAY WITH OPEN MEDIAN

Major Road

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Source: Wisconsin DOT

9

RCUT DISTINGUISHING FEATURES

Minor road traffic turns right, then makes U-turn for a “Left” or “Crossing” movement

slide-10
SLIDE 10

FEWER CONFLICT POINTS

20 20 Conflict ct P Points

10

The RCUT has fewer total conflict points, fewer crossing conflicts and eliminates far side angle collisions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RCUT APPLICABILITY

Is the RCUT only applicable for rural divided highways? NO !!! – They are also very applicable for signalized suburban arterials!!!

US 17 in Brunswick County, NC

slide-12
SLIDE 12

IS ADDING MORE LANES THE ANSWER?

If we have a congested arterial – how do we typically “solve” the problem???

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SIGNAL PHASING

Basic two- phase signal

  • peration

Source: MnDOT Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Manual

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SIGNAL PHASING

Source: MnDOT Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Manual

Adding “protected” left-turn phases is common as volumes increase

slide-15
SLIDE 15

THE “SECRET SAUCE”

BETTER

Fewer phases (intervals) allows more green time for the major through movement and decreases intersection delays

  • Fewer phases also means less “lost time”
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Major Street Minor Street

2

Phase Signal

Major Street Minor Street Minor Street Major Street

4

Phase Signal

Strategically relocating left turn movements can provide more green time to through traffic

SIGNAL PHASING

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SIGNALIZED RCUTS uperstreets

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SR 4 Bypass at Symmes Rd Fairfield, OH

SIGNALIZED RCUT

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SR 4 Bypass at Symmes Rd Fairfield, OH

SIGNALIZED RCUT

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

BETTER SIGNAL OPERATIONS

  • Signalized RCUTs with 2-phases

allow more green time to the major street through

  • Better signal progression
  • Shorter cycle lengths than

comparable conventional intersections may be possible

  • Shorter cycles reduce delay for

most vehicles and for pedestrians RCUTs can even offer an ability to have different cycle lengths in the two directions of the major street

slide-21
SLIDE 21

BI-DIRECTIONAL PROGRESSION

  • Each direction may operate independently
  • Directions can be progressed at different speeds and/or signal spacing
slide-22
SLIDE 22

RCUT FEASIBLE DEMANDS

  • Applicable to a wide range of

Major Street ADTs

  • At minor street demands <5,000

vpd, consider unsignalized RCUTs

  • For minor street demands of

more than 25,000 vpd, consider

  • ther alternative intersections

(such as a MUT or DLT) that would generally serve the minor street more efficiently

Source: FHWA Restricted Crossing U-Turn Informational Guide

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PEDESTRIAN-VEHICLE CONFLICT POINTS

Conventional Intersection 24 conflict points RCUT Intersection 8 conflict points

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pedestrian crosswalk pathways at a signalized RCUT

PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

PEDESTRIAN “Z” CROSSING

slide-26
SLIDE 26

OFFSET APPROACHES OPTION

This variation should be strongly considered in developing areas where the minor street or driveway locations have not yet been established. Wayfinding signs for pedestrians should be used to direct pedestrians to the proper crossing location.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

MID-BLOCK PED CROSSING OPTION

Adding pedestrian signal will not interfere with signal progression!!!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

FHWA WA S Spon

  • nsor
  • red W

d Workshop

  • p

Alte ternati tive I Inte tersecti tions / / Inte terchanges I Informati tional R Report W t Workshop

Accommodating Truck Movements

slide-29
SLIDE 29

RCUT INTERSECTION – LOON

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

LOONS & U-TURN ACCELERATION LANES

30

Could begin right turn lane

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • At-grade intersections with indirect left turns using a U-turn

movement in a wide median and/or loon

  • The MUT eliminates direct left turns on both intersecting streets,

reducing the number of signal phases and conflict points at the main intersection

MUT – Median U-Turn

(aka Michigan Left)

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

MUT – LEFT TURN FROM MAJOR ROAD

Vehicles on the major street (or the street with the median) that want to turn left are directed through the main intersection to a U-turn movement at a downstream directional crossover (usually signalized), and proceed back to the main intersection to then turn right onto the minor street.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Vehicles on the minor street that wish to turn left at the major street are directed to turn right, make a U-turn movement at the same crossover, and then proceed through the main intersection.

MUT – LEFT TURN FROM MINOR ROAD

slide-34
SLIDE 34

SIGNAL OPERATIONS

The MUT removes left-turn phasing, which results in fewer clearance intervals in the intersection cycle and to operate well with a shorter cycle length than a comparable multi-phase cycle

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

PEDESTRIAN WALK PHASES

The two-phase signal at a MUT typically allows a shorter signal cycle length compared to a comparable conventional intersection, but with similar green times for pedestrians and vehicles. This benefits pedestrians by creating more pedestrian phases per hour along with less “don’t walk” time between “walk” times (i.e., less wait time between walk signals).

slide-36
SLIDE 36

MUT APPLICABILITY

Is the MUT only applicable for divided highways with wide medians? NO !!! – The strategy can also be applied on roads without wide medians!!!

ThrU-Turn in Utah

slide-37
SLIDE 37

THRU-TURN INTERSECTION

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a11wVxLIe6s

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Tucson, AZ

EXPRESS LEFT

slide-39
SLIDE 39

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

“The goal of ICE is to better inform the FDOT’s decision-making to identify and select a control strategy meeting the project’s purpose and need, fitting the intersection location’s context classification, providing safe travel facilities for all road users, and reflecting the overall best value.”

https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/TrafficServices/Intersection-Operations.shtm

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Sou

  • urce: Ge

Geor

  • rgia DOT I

ICE Tool

  • ol

ICE promotes the consideration of the wide array of intersection forms and control options including variations

  • n typical forms
slide-41
SLIDE 41

DC FLH PR

Developing ICE Policies Interest in ICE Policies Existing ICE Policies

STATE PROGRESS ON ICE POLICIES

(AS OF JULY 15, 2019)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

RESOURCES

For easy access …

safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/

slide-43
SLIDE 43

THANK YOU !!! QUESTIONS???