INNOVATIONS ON THE HIMATANGI BEACH COMMUNITY SEWERAGE SCHEME Mike - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
INNOVATIONS ON THE HIMATANGI BEACH COMMUNITY SEWERAGE SCHEME Mike - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
INNOVATIONS ON THE HIMATANGI BEACH COMMUNITY SEWERAGE SCHEME Mike Fletcher MDC Project Manager Present the key innovations that were able to deliver an affordable scheme for the Himatangi Beach Community Innovations delivered 15% in
- Present the key innovations that were able to
deliver an affordable scheme for the Himatangi Beach Community
- Innovations delivered 15% in capital savings
Overview
- The Himatangi Beach
Community Sewerage Scheme
- Design Innovations
- Design Approach
The Himatangi Beach Community Sewerage Scheme
- The Himatangi Beach
Community
- Key Drivers
- Procurement Methodology
The Himatangi Beach Community
- Approx. 400 dwellings + Holiday
Park + Community Facilities
- 440 Permanent residents but
Increases to 2500 during peaks
- Deprivation Index 10
- Limited community support so
connection is voluntary
- 294 dwellings signed up plus
Holiday Park & Community Facilities
Key Drivers
- Growth
- Environmental
- Regulatory
- Availability of funding
Procurement Methodology
- Expressions of Interest
- Tender
- Contract award
Design Innovations
- Sharing of pump
stations
- Electrical connections
Type %age of Peak flow
- No. Days/year
%age of year Christmas Holidays 31%-100% 30 8% Other Long Weekends 50% 13 4% Other Typical Weekend 34% 86 24% School Holiday Weekdays 33% 30 8% Normal Weekday 23% 206 56% TOTAL 365 100% Summary of Peak Flow Estimates and Duration for Design
Alarm Level - 160 Litres Run Level - 120 Litres Empty Level - 50 Litres
Parameter Value Pressure limit 60m Duty Flow 1 l/s Tank Capacity 900 litres Pump start level 170 litres Pump stop level 50 litres High level alarm 330 litres Emergency capacity 570 litres Selected Pump Station Unit Characteristics
Public Road
On-lot pumping station Private gravity drainage Private rising main Public rising main
Key
Public Road
Electrical Connections
Design Approach
- Scope and design
development
- Dynamic modelling
Scope and Interfaces
Project Phase
On-lot Works Interface Reticulation Interface WWTP Interface Irrigation
Design
Client - gravity drainage, PSU and pressure laterals locations
Upstream of boundary kits
Contractor (Designer - Beca)
Upstream of screen
Client (MDC) (Process and Treatment Pond)
Wet Well
Contractor (Irrigation Services Ltd) Contractor (Mono - Pump Supplier) - Hydraulic, civil, structural
Construction
Contractor (HIL) Contractor (HIL) Contractor (Civils - HIL) Contractor (Irrigation Services Ltd) M&E (ADG) FTM (Waterclean Technologies)
Commissioning
Contractor (HIL) Contractor (HIL) M&E (ADG) Contractor (Irrigation Services Ltd)
Dynamic Modelling
- Considers pumps performance
- Increased system optimisation
- Modelling of system spatially
- Allows system operation to be assessed
Source: Beca Infrastructure Ltd (20 12) “Himatangi Beach Community Sewerage Scheme: Design Report”
Reticulation Layout
50 63 75 90 110 125 180
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%
50 100 150 200
Relative increase in installed cost (%) PE Pipe Diameter (mmOD)
Relative Increase in Pipe Installed Cost vs Pipe Diameter
System Assessment
- Identify sections in network reticulation over 6
bar
- Identify which PSUs may not empty due to
sustained system pressures
- Pipe velocities
- Retention times
Scheme Costs
- Project value $9.25m (based on 500 HUEs)
- Unsubsidised cost per connection $18,500
c.f. Typical costs for other NZ schemes range between $25,000 to $35,000
- Subsidised cost per connection $8,500
Summaries
- 1. Several key drivers ensured that the project
received support from the community
- 2. The key design innovations produced significant
capital cost savings
- 3. With defined scope and interfaces, the project
team was able to optimise and test the system under future scenarios
Conclusion
By using a collaborative approach with a focus innovation, the project was able to deliver an affordable sewerage scheme for the Himatangi Beach community
The Future post SWSS???
- SWSS ended June 2013
- MoH have no plans to replace scheme
- TLA’s need to lobby MoH for new
central government funding to make these schemes affordable for property
- wners and TLAs